Skip to main content
Download PDF

The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide

Nutrition Journal volume 9, Article number: 3 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A plant-based diet protects against chronic oxidative stress-related diseases. Dietary plants contain variable chemical families and amounts of antioxidants. It has been hypothesized that plant antioxidants may contribute to the beneficial health effects of dietary plants. Our objective was to develop a comprehensive food database consisting of the total antioxidant content of typical foods as well as other dietary items such as traditional medicine plants, herbs and spices and dietary supplements. This database is intended for use in a wide range of nutritional research, from in vitro and cell and animal studies, to clinical trials and nutritional epidemiological studies.

Methods

We procured samples from countries worldwide and assayed the samples for their total antioxidant content using a modified version of the FRAP assay. Results and sample information (such as country of origin, product and/or brand name) were registered for each individual food sample and constitute the Antioxidant Food Table.

Results

The results demonstrate that there are several thousand-fold differences in antioxidant content of foods. Spices, herbs and supplements include the most antioxidant rich products in our study, some exceptionally high. Berries, fruits, nuts, chocolate, vegetables and products thereof constitute common foods and beverages with high antioxidant values.

Conclusions

This database is to our best knowledge the most comprehensive Antioxidant Food Database published and it shows that plant-based foods introduce significantly more antioxidants into human diet than non-plant foods. Because of the large variations observed between otherwise comparable food samples the study emphasizes the importance of using a comprehensive database combined with a detailed system for food registration in clinical and epidemiological studies. The present antioxidant database is therefore an essential research tool to further elucidate the potential health effects of phytochemical antioxidants in diet.

Peer Review reports

Background

It is widely accepted that a plant-based diet with high intake of fruits, vegetables, and other nutrient-rich plant foods may reduce the risk of oxidative stress-related diseases [1–6]. Understanding the complex role of diet in such chronic diseases is challenging since a typical diet provides more than 25,000 bioactive food constituents [6], many of which may modify a multitude of processes that are related to these diseases. Because of the complexity of this relationship, it is likely that a comprehensive understanding of the role of these bioactive food components is needed to assess the role of dietary plants in human health and disease development. We suggest that both their numerous individual functions as well as their combined additive or synergistic effects are crucial to their health beneficial effects, thus a food-based research approach is likely to elucidate more health effects than those derived from each individual nutrient. Most bioactive food constituents are derived from plants; those so derived are collectively called phytochemicals. The large majority of these phytochemicals are redox active molecules and therefore defined as antioxidants. Antioxidants can eliminate free radicals and other reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and these reactive species contribute to most chronic diseases. It is hypothesized that antioxidants originating from foods may work as antioxidants in their own right in vivo, as well as bring about beneficial health effects through other mechanisms, including acting as inducers of mechanisms related to antioxidant defense [7, 8], longevity [9, 10], cell maintenance and DNA repair [11].

Several assays have been used to assess the total antioxidant content of foods, e.g. the 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay [12], the ferric-reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) [13] and the oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay (ORAC) assay [14]. Based on careful considerations (see Blomhoff 2005 and Halvorsen et al 2002 for discussion [15, 16]) we chose to use a modified version of the FRAP assay by Benzie and Strain [13] for total antioxidant analysis [16]. Most importantly, the modified FRAP assay is a simple, fast and inexpensive assay with little selectivity. Assay conditions, such as extraction solvents, were optimized regarding detection of both lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants [16]. The FRAP assay directly measures antioxidants with a reduction potential below the reduction potential of the Fe3+/Fe2+ couple [16, 17]. Thus, the FRAP assay does not measure glutathione. Most other assays have higher reduction potentials and measures glutathione and other thiols [18]. This may be an advantage when using the FRAP assay, because glutathione is found in high concentrations in foods but it is degraded in the intestine and poorly absorbed by humans [19]. A disadvantage of the FRAP assay is its inability to detect other small molecular weight thiols and sulfur containing molecules of e.g. garlic. Most assays for assessing total antioxidant capacity generally result in similar ranking of foods [20–23]. We have now performed a systematic measurement of the total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods. This novel Antioxidant Food Table enables us to calculate total antioxidant content of complex diets, identify and rank potentially good sources of antioxidants, and provide the research community with comparable data on the relative antioxidant capacity of a wide range of foods.

There is not necessarily a direct relationship between the antioxidant content of a food sample consumed and the subsequent antioxidant activity in the target cell. Factors influencing the bioavailability of phytochemical antioxidants, include the food matrix, absorption and metabolism [24–27]. Also, the methods measuring total antioxidant capacity do not identify single antioxidant compounds, and they are therefore of limited use when investigating the mechanisms involved. This is however, not the scope of this article. With the present study, food samples with high antioxidant content are identified, but further investigation into each individual food and phytochemical antioxidant compound is needed to identify those which may have biological relevance and the mechanisms involved.

The aim of the present study was to screen foods to identify total antioxidant capacity of fruits, vegetables, beverages, spices and herbs in addition to common everyday foods. In nutritional epidemiologic and intervention studies, the Antioxidant Food Database may be utilized to identify and rank diets and subjects with regard to antioxidant intake and as a tool in planning dietary antioxidant interventions. The database will be available online at the University of Oslo's web site.

Methods

Reagents

TPTZ (2,4,6-tri-pyridyl-s-triazine) was obtained from Fluka Chemie AG (Deisenhofen, Switzerland), sodium acetate trihydrate and FeSO4 × 7 H2O from Riedel-deHaën AG (Seelze, Germany), acetic acid and hydrochloric acid from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), FeCl3 × 6H2O from BDH Laboratory Supplies (Dorset, England). MilliQ water (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and methanol of HPLC-grade obtained from Merck was used for all extractions. 2-propanol (HPLC-grade) was obtained from Merck.

Sample collection and sample preparation

The antioxidant measurements have been conducted over a period of eight years, from 2000 to 2008. The samples were procured from local stores and markets in Scandinavia, USA and Europe and from the African, Asian and South American continents. Many of the samples of plant material, like berries, mushrooms and herbs, were handpicked. Commercially procured food samples were stored according to the description on the packing and analyzed within four weeks. Handpicked samples were either stored at 4°C and analyzed within three days or frozen at -20°C and analyzed within four weeks. Products that needed preparation such as coffee, tea, processed vegetables etc. were prepared on the day of analysis. Furthermore, all samples were homogenized, dry samples were pulverized and solid samples were chopped in a food processor. After homogenizing, analytical aliquots were weighed. Included in the database are 1113 of the food samples obtained from the US Department of Agriculture National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program. They were collected, homogenized, and stored as previously described [17]. Three replicates were weighed out for each sample. All samples were extracted in water/methanol, except vegetable oils which were extracted in 2-propanol and some fat-rich samples which were extracted in water/2-propanol. The extracts were mixed, sonicated in ice water bath for 15 min, mixed once more and centrifuged in 1.5 mL tubes at 12.402 × g for 2 min at 4°C. The concentration of antioxidants was measured in triplicate of the supernatant of the centrifuged samples.

Measurements of antioxidant content

The FRAP assay of Benzie and Strain [13] was used with minor modifications that allowed quantification of most water- and fat-soluble antioxidants [16, 17]. A Technicon RA 1000 system (Technicon instruments corporation, New York, USA) was used for the measurements of absorption changes that appear when the TPTZ-Fe3+ complex reduces to the TPTZ-Fe2+ form in the presence of antioxidants. An intense blue color with absorption maximum at 593 nm develops. The measurements were performed at 600 nm after 4 min incubation. An aqueous solution of 500 μmol/L FeSO4 × 7 H2O was used for calibration of the instrument. Validation of the assay is described in Halvorsen et al. 2002 [17]. Briefly, the within-day repeatability measured as relative standard deviation (RSD) in standard solutions ranged from 0.4% to 6%. The between-day repeatability was < 3%. The variation in the values for replicate food items obtained from the same source were typically between 3 and 10 RSD%.

Organization of the Antioxidant Food Table

The samples were classified into 24 different categories covering products from the plant kingdom, products from the animal kingdom and mixed food products. Information about sample processing (raw, cooked, dried etc), if any, was included, along with all sample specifications, i.e. product name, brand name, where the product/sample was procured and country of origin. The product information in the database was collected from the packing of the product, from supplier or purchaser. When this information was not available or the samples were handpicked, only country of origin is presented. Each sample is assigned to only one category. The classification was done according to information from the supplier or purchaser, or according to common traditional use of the food. Some foods may therefore be categorized otherwise in other food cultures. For products in the categories "Herbal/traditional plant medicine" and "Vitamin and dietary Supplements" some products may rightfully be classified as both an herbal medicine and a supplement, but are still assigned to only one category. All berries, fruits, and vegetables were fresh samples unless otherwise noted in the database. The Antioxidant Food Table contains 3139 samples. About 1300 of these samples have been published before [16, 17, 28] but for comparison and completeness we have included them in the present publication. All individual samples previously published are identified by a comment in the Antioxidant Food Table. The categories and products in the database are presented in alphabetic order. Information about brand names and product trademarks does not imply endorsement by the authors, and are reported as descriptive information for research applications only. The Antioxidant Food Table will in the future be available online as a searchable database. In addition to the products mentioned in this paper, other foods will in the future be analyzed and incorporated into the online version, which will be posted on the University of Oslo's web site.

Results

Our results show large variations both between as well as within each food category; all of the food categories contain products almost devoid of antioxidants (Table 1). Please refer to Additional file 1, the Antioxidant Food Table, for the FRAP results on all 3139 products analyzed. The categories "Spices and herbs", "Herbal/traditional plant medicine" and "Vitamin and dietary supplements" include the most antioxidant rich products analyzed in the study. The categories "Berries and berry products", "Fruit and fruit juices", "Nuts and seeds", "Breakfast Cereals", "Chocolate and sweets", "Beverages" and "Vegetables and vegetable products" include most of the common foods and beverages which have medium to high antioxidant values (Table 1). We find that plant-based foods are generally higher in antioxidant content than animal-based and mixed food products, with median antioxidant values of 0.88, 0.10 and 0.31 mmol/100 g, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, the 75th percentile of plant-based foods is 4.11 mmol/100 g compared to 0.21 and 0.68 mmol/100 g for animal-based and mixed foods, respectively. The high mean value of plant-based foods is due to a minority of products with very high antioxidant values, found among the plant medicines, spices and herbs. In the following, summarized results from the 24 categories are presented.

Table 1 Statistical descriptives of the Antioxidant Food Table and individual categories.
Full size table

Beverages

In the category "Beverages", 283 products were included, from coffee and tea to beer, wine and lemonades. Dry products like coffee beans and dried tea leaves and powders were also included. The highest antioxidant values in this category were found among the unprocessed tea leaves, tea powders and coffee beans. In Table 2 we present an excerpt of this category and of the analyses of fruit juices. Fifty-four different types of prepared coffee variants procured from 16 different manufacturers showed that the variation in coffees are large, ranging from a minimum of 0.89 mmol/100 g for one type of brewed coffee with milk to 16.33 mmol/100 g for one type of double espresso coffee, the highest antioxidant value of all prepared beverages analyzed in the present study. Other antioxidant rich beverages are red wine, which have a smaller variation of antioxidant content (1.78 to 3.66 mmol/100 g), pomegranate juice, prepared green tea (0.57 to 2.62 mmol/100 g), grape juice, prune juice and black tea (0.75 to 1.21 mmol/100 g) (Table 2). Beer, soft drinks and ginger ale contain the least antioxidants of the beverages in our study, with drinking water completely devoid of antioxidants.

Table 2 Excerpt of the analyses of beverages in the Antioxidant Food Table.
Full size table

Breakfast cereals, grains, legumes, nuts and seeds

Most of the breakfast cereals have antioxidant content in the range of 0.5 to 2.25 mmol/100 g, while 4 single products are above this range. Among grains and grain products, buckwheat, millet and barley flours are the flours with the highest antioxidant values in our study (Table 3), while crisp bread and whole meal bread with fiber are the grain products containing most antioxidants. Beans and lentils have mean antioxidant values ranging from 0.1 to 1.97 mmol/100 g. Different types of rice have antioxidant values between 0.01 and 0.36 mmol/100 g.

Table 3 Excerpt of the analyses of nuts, legumes and grain products in the Antioxidant Food Table.
Full size table

In the nuts and seeds category we analyzed 90 different products, with antioxidant contents varying from 0.03 mmol/100 g in poppy seeds to 33.3 mmol/100 g in walnuts, with pellicle and purchased with nut shell intact. Pecans with pellicle, sunflower seeds and chestnuts with pellicle, have mean antioxidant content in the range of 4.7 to 8.5 mmol/100 g (Table 3). Walnuts, chestnuts, peanuts, hazelnuts and almonds have higher values when analyzed with the pellicle intact compared to without pellicle.

Chocolate

Various types of chocolate were analyzed, from milk chocolate to dark chocolate and baking cocoa. The variation of antioxidant content in chocolate ranged from 0.23 in white chocolate to 14.98 mmol/100 g in one individual dark chocolate sample. Mean antioxidant contents increased with increasing content of cocoa in the chocolate product (Pearson correlation r = 0.927, p < 0.001). Chocolate products with cocoa contents of 24-30%, 40-65% and 70-99% had mean antioxidant contents of 1.8, 7.2 and 10.9 mmol/100 g, respectively.

Dairy products, desserts and cakes, eggs, fats and oils

The dairy category included 86 products and the majority of these products were low in antioxidant content, in the range of 0.0 to 0.8 mmol/100 g. Dairy products with added berries or chocolate and cheeses like Brie, Gorgonzola and Roquefort are the most antioxidant rich products in this category.

One hundred and thirty four products are included in the category "Desserts and cakes". In the upper range of this category we find dog rose soup and chocolate cookies. Eggs are almost devoid of antioxidants with the highest antioxidant values found in egg yolk (0.16 mmol/100 g).

Margarine, butter, canola, corn and soybean oil are the highest ranking products in the "Fats and oils" category. Almost half of the fats and oils have antioxidant content between 0.4 and 1.7 mmol/100 g.

Berries, fruit and vegetables

In Table 4 we present an excerpt of the all the berries, fruits and vegetables analyzed. One hundred and nineteen berries and berry products were analyzed. The average antioxidant content of berries and berry products is relatively high with 25th and 75th percentiles being 1.90 to 6.31 mmol/100 g, respectively. There were 13 samples with especially high antioxidant capacity in this category, including dried amla (Indian gooseberry, 261.5 mmol/100 g), wild dried dog rose (Rosa canina) and products of dried dog rose with antioxidant contents in the range from 20.8 to 78.1 mmol/100 g. Dried wild bilberries (Vaccinum Myrtillus, native to Northern Europe), zereshk (red sour berries) from Iran and fresh dog rose (from Norway and Spain) have mean antioxidant contents of 48.3, 27.3 and 24.3 mmol/100 g, respectively. Other examples of antioxidant rich berries are fresh crowberries, bilberries, black currants, wild strawberries, blackberries, goji berries, sea buckthorn and cranberries. The least antioxidant rich berry products are some of the berry jams with mean values of approximately 0.5 mmol/100 g.

Table 4 Excerpt of the berries, fruit and vegetable analyses in the Antioxidant Food Table.
Full size table

A total of 278 fruits and fruit products and 303 vegetables and vegetable products were included in the database. In the analyzed vegetables, antioxidant content varied from 0.0 mmol/100 g in blanched celery to 48.1 mmol/100 g in dried and crushed leaves of the African baobab tree. In fruits, procured in 8 different countries, the antioxidant content varies from 0.02 mmol/100 g for watermelon to 55.5 mmol/100 g in the yellow pith of Spanish pomegranate. Examples of antioxidant rich fruits and vegetables were dried apples, flour made of okra, artichokes, lemon skin, dried plums, dried apricots, curly kale, red and green chili and prunes (Table 4). Examples of fruit and vegetables in the medium antioxidant range were dried dates, dried mango, black and green olives, red cabbage, red beets, paprika, guava and plums.

Herbal/traditional plant medicine

This is the most antioxidant rich category in the present study and is also the category with largest variation between products. Half of the products have antioxidant values above the 90th percentile of the complete Antioxidant Food Table and the mean and median values are 91.7 and 14.2 mmol/100 g, respectively. The 59 products included originate from India, Japan, Mexico and Peru. Sangre de Grado (Dragon's Blood) from Peru has the highest antioxidant content of all the products in the database (2897.1 mmol/100 g). Other antioxidant rich products are Triphala, Amalaki and Arjuna from India and Goshuyu-tou, a traditional kampo medicine from Japan, with antioxidant values in the range of 132.6 to 706.3 mmol/100 g. Only four products in this category have values less than 2.0 mmol/100 g.

Infant food and beverages

The category includes 52 products, including European, Scandinavian and American products. The variation in antioxidant content in dinner and dessert products for infants varies from 0.02 to 1.25 mmol/100 g. Interestingly, human breast milk (49 samples from Norwegian mothers) has a mean content of 2.0 mmol/100 g. In addition, the category includes two Norwegian dog rose products for infants with antioxidant contents of 6.7 and 18.5 mmol/100 g.

Spices and herbs

An excerpt of the 425 spices and herbs analyzed in our study are presented in Table 5. The study includes spices and herbs from 59 different manufacturers or countries. Twenty seven single products are in the range 100 to 465 mmol/100 g, but the variation is from 0.08 mmol/100 g in raw garlic paste procured in Japan, to 465 mmol/100 g in dried and ground clove purchased in Norway. Sorted by antioxidant content, clove has the highest mean antioxidant value, followed by peppermint, allspice, cinnamon, oregano, thyme, sage, rosemary, saffron and estragon, all dried and ground, with mean values ranging from 44 to 277 mmol/100 g. When analyzed in fresh samples compared to dried, oregano, rosemary and thyme have lower values, in the range of 2.2 to 5.6 mmol/100 g. This is also true for basil, chives, dill and parsley. In addition to common spices and culinary herbs, we have also analyzed other herbs, like birch leaves, wild marjoram and wood cranesbill among others. Details on all herbs can be found in Additional file 1, the Antioxidant Food Table.

Table 5 Excerpt of the spices and herbs analyzed in the Antioxidant Food Table.
Full size table

Soups, sauces, gravies and dressings

In this broad category, we have analyzed 251 products and found that the products with highest antioxidant content are tomato based sauces, basil pesto, mustard paste, sun dried tomatoes and tomato paste/puree, in the range of 1.0 to 4.6 mmol/100 g.

Vitamin and dietary supplements

The category "Vitamin and dietary supplements" includes 131 commercially available vitamin and dietary supplement products from USA, Norway, Mexico and Japan of which many have high antioxidant scores. Among them are supplements containing anthocyanins, vitamin C, green tea powder and multivitamins and multi-antioxidant tablets.

Meat, poultry, fish and miscellaneous ingredients

The majority of the products in these categories were low in antioxidant content. Nevertheless, products like liver, bacon and some prepared chicken and beef products have antioxidant values between 0.5 and 1.0 mmol/100 g.

Discussion

With this study we present a comprehensive survey of the total antioxidant capacity in foods. Earlier small-scale studies from other laboratories have included from a few up to a few hundred samples [20–22, 29–31], and in 2007 the U.S. Department of Agriculture presented the Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) of Selected Foods report including 277 food samples [23]. These studies have been done using different antioxidant assays for measuring antioxidant capacity making it difficult to compare whole lists of foods, products and product categories. Still, a food that has a high total antioxidant capacity using one antioxidant assay will most likely also be high using another assay [20–22]. Consequently, the exact value will be different but the ranking of the products will be mainly the same whichever assay is used. In the present extensive study, the same validated method has been used on all samples, resulting in comparable measures, thus enabling us to present a complete picture of the relative antioxidant potential of the samples.

When classifying the samples into the three main classes the difference in antioxidant content between plant- and animal-based foods become apparent. The results here uncover that the antioxidant content of foods varies several thousand-fold and that antioxidant rich foods originate from the plant kingdom while meat, fish and other foods from the animal kingdom are low in antioxidants. Comparing the mean value of the 'Meat and meat products' category with plant based categories, fruits, nuts, chocolate and berries have from 5 to 33 times higher mean antioxidant content than the mean of meat products. Diets comprised mainly of animal-based foods are thus low in antioxidant content while diets based mainly on a variety of plant-based foods are antioxidant rich, due to the thousands of bioactive antioxidant phytochemicals found in plants which are conserved in many foods and beverages.

Most of the spices and herbs analyzed have particularly high antioxidant contents. Although spices and herbs contribute little weight on the dinner plate, they may still be important contributors to our antioxidant intake, especially in dietary cultures where spices and herbs are used regularly. We interpret the elevated concentration of antioxidants observed in several dried herbs compared to fresh samples, as a normal consequence of the drying process leaving most of the antioxidants intact in the dried end product. This tendency is also seen in some fruits and their dried counterparts. Thus, dried herbs and fruit are potentially excellent sources of antioxidants.

Herbal and traditional plant medicines emerged as many of the highest antioxidant-containing products in our study. We speculate that the high inherent antioxidant property of many plants is an important contributor to the herb's medicinal qualities. In our study we identified Sangre de Grado, the sap from the tree trunk of the species Croton lechleri sampled in Peru to have exceptional high antioxidant content. This sap has a long history of indigenous use in South America for wound healing and as an antifungal, antiseptic, antiviral and antihaemorrhagic medicine. Proanthocyanidins are major constituents of this sap [32] and studies have shown that Sangre de Grado limits the transcription of a wide range of pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators and accelerates the healing of stomach ulcers [33, 34] and promotes apoptosis in cancer cells [35]. Other extreme antioxidant rich herbal medicines are Triphala, an Indian Ayurvedic herbal formulation, shown to have anti-inflammatory activity [36], antibacterial and wound healing properties [37, 38] and cancer chemopreventive potential [39]. Arjuna, another Auyrvedic formula, has been shown to have health beneficial activities [40, 41] while Goshuyu-tou, a traditional Chinese kampo medicine has been shown to significantly reduce the extracellular concentration of NO in the LPS-stimulated Raw 264.7 cells [42].

With their high content of phytochemicals such as flavonoids, tannins, stilbenoids, phenolic acids and lignans [43–45] berries and berry products are potentially excellent antioxidant sources. The phytochemical content of berries varies with geographical growing condition, and between cultivars [46, 47] explaining the variations found in our study. During the processing of berries to jams, total phenol content is reduced [48] resulting in lower antioxidant values in processed berry products than in fresh berries.

Nuts are a rich source of many important nutrients and some are also antioxidant-rich. The observed increase in antioxidant content in nuts with pellicle compared to nuts without pellicle is in good agreement with earlier studies showing the flavonoids of many nuts are found in the nut pellicle [49].

After water, tea and coffee are the two most consumed beverages in the world, although consumption patterns vary between countries. Because of the fairly high content of antioxidants and the frequent use, coffee and tea are important antioxidant sources in many diets. Several different compounds contribute to coffee's antioxidant content, e.g., caffeine, polyphenols, volatile aroma compounds and heterocyclic compounds, [25, 50–52]. Many of these are efficiently absorbed, and plasma antioxidants increase after coffee intake [50, 53]. In green tea, the major flavonoids present are the monomer catechins, epigallocatechin gallate, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate and epicatechin. In black tea the polymerized catechins theaflavin and thearubigen predominate in addition to quercetin and flavonols [54, 55].

Interestingly, the antioxidant content in human breast milk is comparable to that in pomegranate juice, strawberries and coffee and on average higher than the antioxidant content observed in the commercially available infant formulas analyzed in our study. Breakfast cereals are also potential important sources of antioxidants; some of these products have antioxidant contents comparable to berries, which are fairly high, compared to other grain products and may be due to antioxidants added to the products in fortification process.

Chocolate have for several years been studied for its possible beneficial health effects [56]. Our results show a high correlation between the cocoa content and the antioxidant content, which is in agreement with earlier studies [30, 57].

As demonstrated in the present study, the variation in the antioxidant values of otherwise comparable products is large. Like the content of any food component, antioxidant values will differ for a wide array of reasons, such as growing conditions, seasonal changes and genetically different cultivars [46, 58], storage conditions [59–61] and differences in manufacturing procedures and processing [62–64]. Differences in unprocessed and processed plant food samples are also seen in our study where processed berry products like jam and syrup have approximately half the antioxidant capacity of fresh berries. On the other hand, processing may also enhance a foods potential as a good antioxidant source by increasing the amount of antioxidants released from the food matrix which otherwise would be less or not at all available for absorption [65]. Processing of tomato is one such example where lycopene from heat-processed tomato sauce is more bioavailable than unprocessed tomato [66]. The large variations in antioxidant capacity observed in the present study emphasize the importance of using a comprehensive antioxidant database combined with a detailed system for food registration in clinical and epidemiological studies.

Initial studies have been carried out to examine the association between intake of antioxidant rich foods and their health effects [67, 70]. Some of these studies describe a beneficial effect on oxidative stress related chronic diseases, e.g. from intake of nuts [49, 69], pomegranates [71–73], tomatoes [6], coffee [74], tea [54, 75, 76], red wine [77–79] and cocoa [56]. The highly reactive and bioactive phytochemical antioxidants are postulated to in part explain the protective effect of plant foods. An optimal mixture of different antioxidants with complementary mechanisms of action and different redox potentials is postulated to work in synergistic interactions. Still, it is not likely that all antioxidant-rich foods are good sources and that all antioxidants provided in the diet are bioactive. Bioavailability differs greatly from one phytochemical to another [26, 27, 80], so the most antioxidant rich foods in our diet are not necessarily those leading to the highest concentrations of active metabolites in target tissues. The antioxidants obtained from foods include many different molecular compounds and families with different chemical and biological properties that may affect absorption, transport and excretion, cellular uptake and metabolism, and eventually their effects on oxidative stress in various cellular compartments [24]. Biochemically active phytochemicals found in plant-based foods also have many powerful biological properties which are not necessarily correlated with their antioxidant capacity, including acting as inducers of antioxidant defense mechanisms in vivo or as gene expression modulators. Thus a food low in antioxidant content may have beneficial health effects due to other food components or phytochemicals executing bioactivity through other mechanisms.

Conclusions

The Antioxidant Food Table is a valuable research contribution, expanding the research evidence base for plant-based nutritional research and may be utilized in epidemiological studies where reported food intakes can be assigned antioxidant values. It can also be used to test antioxidant effects and synergy in experimental animal and cell studies or in human clinical trials. The ultimate goal of this research is to combine these strategies in order to understand the role of dietary phytochemical antioxidants in the prevention of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other chronic diseases related to oxidative stress.

References

  1. Johnson IT: New approaches to the role of diet in the prevention of cancers of the alimentary tract. Mutat Res. 2004, 551: 9-28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joshipura KJ, Ascherio A, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH, Spiegelman D, Willett WC: Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA. 1999, 282: 1233-1239. 10.1001/jama.282.13.1233.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, Colditz G, Ascherio A, Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC: The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 134: 1106-1114.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riboli E, Norat T: Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 559S-569S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanner SA, Hughes J, Kelly CN, Buttriss J: A review of the epidemiological evidence for the 'antioxidant hypothesis'. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7: 407-422. 10.1079/PHN2003543.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research: Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. 2007, American Institute of Cancer Research, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S: Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007, 47: 89-116. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong WS, Jun M, Kong AN: Nrf2: a potential molecular target for cancer chemoprevention by natural compounds. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006, 8: 99-106. 10.1089/ars.2006.8.99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baur JA, Pearson KJ, Price NL, Jamieson HA, Lerin C, Kalra A, Prabhu VV, Allard JS, Lopez-Lluch G, Lewis K, Pistell PJ, Poosala S, Becker KG, Boss O, Gwinn D, Wang M, Ramaswamy S, Fishbein KW, Spencer RG, Lakatta EG, Le CD, Shaw RJ, Navas P, Puigserver P, Ingram DK, de CR, Sinclair DA: Resveratrol improves health and survival of mice on a high-calorie diet. Nature. 2006, 444: 337-342. 10.1038/nature05354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wood JG, Rogina B, Lavu S, Howitz K, Helfand SL, Tatar M, Sinclair D: Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay ageing in metazoans. Nature. 2004, 430: 686-689. 10.1038/nature02789.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Astley SB, Elliott RM, Archer DB, Southon S: Evidence that dietary supplementation with carotenoids and carotenoid-rich foods modulates the DNA damage: repair balance in human lymphocytes. Br J Nutr. 2004, 91: 63-72. 10.1079/BJN20031001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller NJ, RiceEvans CA: Spectrophotometric determination of antioxidant activity. Redox Report. 1996, 2: 161-171.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benzie IF, Strain JJ: The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996, 239: 70-76. 10.1006/abio.1996.0292.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeLange RJ, Glazer AN: Phycoerythrin fluorescence-based assay for peroxy radicals: a screen for biologically relevant protective agents. Anal Biochem. 1989, 177: 300-306. 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90056-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blomhoff R: Dietary antioxidants and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005, 16: 47-54. 10.1097/00041433-200502000-00009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Halvorsen BL, Holte K, Myhrstad MCW, Barikmo I, Hvattum E, Remberg SF, Wold AB, Haffner K, Baugerod H, Andersen LF, Moskaug JO, Jacobs DR, Blomhoff R: A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J Nutr. 2002, 132: 461-471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Halvorsen BL, Carlsen MH, Phillips KM, Bohn SK, Holte K, Jacobs DR, Blomhoff R: Content of redox-active compounds (ie, antioxidants) in foods consumed in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 95-135.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buettner GR: The pecking order of free radicals and antioxidants: lipid peroxidation, alpha-tocopherol, and ascorbate. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993, 300: 535-543. 10.1006/abbi.1993.1074.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stahl W, van den Berg H, Arthur J, Bast A, Dainty J, Faulks RM, Gartner C, Haenen G, Hollman P, Holst B, Kelly FJ, Polidori MC, Rice-Evans C, Southon S, van Vliet T, Vina-Ribes J, Williamson G, Astley SB: Bioavailability and metabolism. Mol Aspects Med. 2002, 23: 39-100. 10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00016-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller HE, Rigelhof F, Marquart L, Prakash A, Kanter M: Antioxidant content of whole grain breakfast cereals, fruits and vegetables. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000, 19: 312S-319S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Colombi B, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Bianchi M, Brighenti F: Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 2812-2819.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Salvatore S, Del Rio D, Bianchi M, Brighenti F: Total antioxidant capacity of spices, dried fruits, nuts, pulses, cereals and sweets consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006, 50: 1030-1038. 10.1002/mnfr.200600067.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) of Selected Foods - 2007. [http://www.ars.usda.gov/sp2userfiles/place/12354500/data/orac/orac07.pdf]

  24. Astley SB, Lindsay DG: European Research on the Functional Effects of Dietary Antioxidants - EUROFEDA. Mol Aspects Med. 2002, 23: 1-38. 10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00019-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonthier MP, Verny MA, Besson C, Remesy C, Scalbert A: Chlorogenic acid bioavailability largely depends on its metabolism by the gut microflora in rats. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 1853-1859.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Remesy C, Jimenez L: Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 79: 727-747.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Remesy C: Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 230S-242S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dragland S, Senoo H, Wake K, Holte K, Blomhoff R: Several culinary and medicinal herbs are important sources of dietary antioxidants. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 1286-1290.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M: Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 3954-3962. 10.1021/jf990146l.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee KW, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Lee CY: Cocoa has more phenolic phytochemicals and a higher antioxidant capacity than teas and red wine. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 7292-7295. 10.1021/jf0344385.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Richelle M, Tavazzi I, Offord E: Comparison of the antioxidant activity of commonly consumed polyphenolic beverages (coffee, cocoa, and tea) prepared per cup serving. J Agric Food Chem. 2001, 49: 3438-3442. 10.1021/jf0101410.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cai Y, Evans FJ, Roberts MF, Phillipson JD, Zenk MH, Gleba YY: Polyphenolic compounds from Croton Lechleri. Phytochemistry. 1991, 30: 2033-2040. 10.1016/0031-9422(91)85063-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller MJ, MacNaughton WK, Zhang XJ, Thompson JH, Charbonnet RM, Bobrowski P, Lao J, Trentacosti AM, Sandoval M: Treatment of gastric ulcers and diarrhea with the Amazonian herbal medicine sangre de grado. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000, 279: G192-G200.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller MJ, Vergnolle N, McKnight W, Musah RA, Davison CA, Trentacosti AM, Thompson JH, Sandoval M, Wallace JL: Inhibition of neurogenic inflammation by the Amazonian herbal medicine sangre de grado. J Invest Dermatol. 2001, 117: 725-730. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01446.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandoval M, Okuhama NN, Clark M, Angeles FM, Lao J, Bustamante S, Miller MJ: Sangre de grado Croton palanostigma induces apoptosis in human gastrointestinal cancer cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 80: 121-129. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00013-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rasool M, Sabina EP: Antiinflammatory effect of the Indian Ayurvedic herbal formulation Triphala on adjuvant-induced arthritis in mice. Phytother Res. 2007, 21: 889-894. 10.1002/ptr.2183.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar MS, Kirubanandan S, Sripriya R, Sehgal P: Triphala promotes healing of infected full-thickness dermal wound. J Surg Res. 2008, 144: 94-101. 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Srikumar R, Parthasarathy NJ, Shankar EM, Manikandan S, Vijayakumar R, Thangaraj R, Vijayananth K, Sheeladevi R, Rao UA: Evaluation of the growth inhibitory activities of Triphala against common bacterial isolates from HIV infected patients. Phytother Res. 2007, 21: 476-480. 10.1002/ptr.2105.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deep G, Dhiman M, Rao AR, Kale RK: Chemopreventive potential of Triphala (a composite Indian drug) on Benzo(a)pyrene induced forestomach tumorigenesis in murine tumor model system. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 24: 555-563.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Manna P, Sinha M, Sil PC: Phytomedicinal activity of Terminalia arjuna against carbon tetrachloride induced cardiac oxidative stress. Pathophysiology. 2007, 14: 71-78. 10.1016/j.pathophys.2007.05.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Devi RS, Narayan S, Vani G, Shyamala Devi CS: Gastroprotective effect of Terminalia arjuna bark on diclofenac sodium induced gastric ulcer. Chem Biol Interact. 2007, 167: 71-83. 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.01.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Okayasu H, Suzuki F, Satoh K, Shioda S, Dohi K, Ikeda Y, Nakashima H, Komatsu N, Fujimaki M, Hashimoto K, Maki J, Sakagami H: Comparison of cytotoxicity and radical scavenging activity between tea extracts and Chinese medicines. Vivo. 2003, 17: 577-581.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Heinonen M: Berry phenolics and their antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2001, 49: 4076-4082. 10.1021/jf010152t.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Maatta-Riihinen KR, Kamal-Eldin A, Mattila PH, Gonzalez-Paramas AM, Torronen AR: Distribution and contents of phenolic compounds in eighteen Scandinavian berry species. J Agric Food Chem. 2004, 52: 4477-4486. 10.1021/jf049595y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maatta-Riihinen KR, Kamal-Eldin A, Torronen AR: Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in berries of Fragaria and Rubus species (family Rosaceae). J Agric Food Chem. 2004, 52: 6178-6187. 10.1021/jf049450r.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Scalzo J, Politi A, Pellegrini N, Mezzetti B, Battino M: Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition. 2005, 21: 207-213. 10.1016/j.nut.2004.03.025.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang SY, Lin HS: Antioxidant activity in fruits and leaves of blackberry, raspberry, and strawberry varies with cultivar and developmental stage. J Agric Food Chem. 2000, 48: 140-146. 10.1021/jf9908345.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Amakura Y, Umino Y, Tsuji S, Tonogai Y: Influence of jam processing on the radical scavenging activity and phenolic content in berries. J Agric Food Chem. 2000, 48: 6292-6297. 10.1021/jf000849z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen CY, Milbury PE, Lapsley K, Blumberg JB: Flavonoids from almond skins are bioavailable and act synergistically with vitamins C and E to enhance hamster and human LDL resistance to oxidation. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 1366-1373.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Illy E: The complexity of coffee. Sci Am. 2002, 286: 86-91. 10.1038/scientificamerican0602-86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nawrot P, Jordan S, Eastwood J, Rotstein J, Hugenholtz A, Feeley M: Effects of caffeine on human health. Food Addit Contam. 2003, 20: 1-30. 10.1080/0265203021000007840.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yanagimoto K, Lee KG, Ochi H, Shibamoto T: Antioxidative activity of heterocyclic compounds found in coffee volatiles produced by Maillard reaction. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 5480-5484. 10.1021/jf025616h.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Olthof MR, Hollman PC, Katan MB: Chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid are absorbed in humans. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 66-71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McKay DL, Blumberg JB: The role of tea in human health: an update. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002, 21: 1-13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McKay DL, Blumberg JB: Roles of epigallocatechin gallate in cardiovascular disease and obesity: an introduction. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007, 26: 362s-365s.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cooper KA, Donovan JL, Waterhouse AL, Williamson G: Cocoa and health: a decade of research. Br J Nutr. 2008, 99: 1-11. 10.1017/S0007114507795296.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vinson JA, Proch J, Zubik L: Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: cocoa, dark chocolate, and milk chocolate. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 4821-4824. 10.1021/jf990312p.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Imeh U, Khokhar S: Distribution of conjugated and free phenols in fruits: antioxidant activity and cultivar variations. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 6301-6306. 10.1021/jf020342j.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kalt W, Forney CF, Martin A, Prior RL: Antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, phenolics, and anthocyanins after fresh storage of small fruits. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 4638-4644. 10.1021/jf990266t.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mullen W, Stewart AJ, Lean ME, Gardner P, Duthie GG, Crozier A: Effect of freezing and storage on the phenolics, ellagitannins, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity of red raspberries. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 5197-5201. 10.1021/jf020141f.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Xianquan S, Shi J, Kakuda Y, Yueming J: Stability of lycopene during food processing and storage. J Med Food. 2005, 8: 413-422. 10.1089/jmf.2005.8.413.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gil-Izquierdo A, Gil MI, Ferreres F: Effect of processing techniques at industrial scale on orange juice antioxidant and beneficial health compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 5107-5114. 10.1021/jf020162+.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hartmann A, Patz CD, Andlauer W, Dietrich H, Ludwig M: Influence of processing on quality parameters of strawberries. J Agric Food Chem. 2008, 56: 9484-9489. 10.1021/jf801555q.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ismail A, Lee WY: Influence of cooking practice on antioxidant properties and phenolic content of selected vegetables. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004, 13: S162-

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lindsay DG, Astley SB: European research on the functional effects of dietary antioxidants - EUROFEDA. Mol Aspects Med. 2002, 23: 39-100. 10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00005-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Unlu NZ, Bohn T, Francis DM, Nagaraja HN, Clinton SK, Schwartz SJ: Lycopene from heat-induced cis-isomer-rich tomato sauce is more bioavailable than from all-trans-rich tomato sauce in human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2007, 98: 140-146. 10.1017/S0007114507685201.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Gaitini D, Nitecki S, Hoffman A, Dornfeld L, Volkova N, Presser D, Attias J, Liker H, Hayek T: Pomegranate juice consumption for 3 years by patients with carotid artery stenosis reduces common carotid intima-media thickness, blood pressure and LDL oxidation. Clin Nutr. 2004, 23: 423-433. 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mullen W, Marks SC, Crozier A: Evaluation of phenolic compounds in commercial fruit juices and fruit drinks. J Agric Food Chem. 2007, 55: 3148-3157. 10.1021/jf062970x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ros E, Nunez I, Perez-Heras A, Serra M, Gilabert R, Casals E, Deulofeu R: A walnut diet improves endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic subjects: a randomized crossover trial. Circulation. 2004, 109: 1609-1614. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124477.91474.FF.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang Y, Chang CF, Chou J, Chen HL, Deng X, Harvey BK, Cadet JL, Bickford PC: Dietary supplementation with blueberries, spinach, or spirulina reduces ischemic brain damage. Exp Neurol. 2005, 193: 75-84. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.12.014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Adhami VM, Mukhtar H: Anti-oxidants from green tea and pomegranate for chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Mol Biotechnol. 2007, 37: 52-57. 10.1007/s12033-007-0047-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Malik A, Afaq F, Sarfaraz S, Adhami VM, Syed DN, Mukhtar H: Pomegranate fruit juice for chemoprevention and chemotherapy of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 14813-14818. 10.1073/pnas.0505870102.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Malik A, Mukhtar H: Prostate cancer prevention through pomegranate fruit. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5: 371-373.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Andersen LF, Jacobs DR, Carlsen MH, Blomhoff R: Consumption of coffee is associated with reduced risk of death attributed to inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 1039-1046.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Cabrera C, Artacho R, Gimenez R: Beneficial effects of green tea--a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006, 25: 79-99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lee W, Min WK, Chun S, Lee YW, Park H, Lee DH, Lee YK, Son JE: Long-term effects of green tea ingestion on atherosclerotic biological markers in smokers. Clin Biochem. 2005, 38: 84-87. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.09.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cordova AC, Jackson LS, Berke-Schlessel DW, Sumpio BE: The cardiovascular protective effect of red wine. J Am Coll Surg. 2005, 200: 428-439. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.10.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Klinge CM, Wickramasinghe NS, Ivanova MM, Dougherty SM: Resveratrol stimulates nitric oxide production by increasing estrogen receptor alpha-Src-caveolin-1 interaction and phosphorylation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2008, 22: 2185-2197. 10.1096/fj.07-103366.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Sacanella E, Vazquez-Agell M, Mena MP, Antunez E, Fernandez-Sola J, Nicolas JM, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Ros E, Estruch R: Down-regulation of adhesion molecules and other inflammatory biomarkers after moderate wine consumption in healthy women: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 1463-1469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Williamson G, Manach C: Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II. Review of 93 intervention studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 243S-255S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Throne Holst foundation, The Research Council of Norway, and the Norwegian Cancer Society. The authors thank Amrit K. Sakhi, Nasser Bastani, Ingvild Paur and Trude R. Balstad for help procuring samples, the Tsumura Pharmaceutical Company for providing traditional herb medicines and Arcus AS and Norsk Øko-Urt BA for providing samples of beverages and herbs, respectively.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

      Monica H Carlsen, Bente L Halvorsen, Kari Holte, Siv K Bøhn, Nega Berhe, David R Jacobs Jr & Rune Blomhoff

    2. The Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research Bioforsk Øst Apelsvoll, Kapp, Norway

      Steinar Dragland

    3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

      Laura Sampson, Carol Willey & Walter C Willett

    4. Department of Cell Biology and Morphology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita City, Japan

      Haruki Senoo, Yuko Umezono & Chiho Sanada

    5. Faculty of Health, Nutrition and Management, Akershus University College, Lillestrøm, Norway

      Ingrid Barikmo

    6. The Biochemistry Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

      Katherine M Phillips

    7. The Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

      David R Jacobs Jr

    Authors
    1. Monica H Carlsen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Bente L Halvorsen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Kari Holte
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Siv K Bøhn
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Steinar Dragland
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Laura Sampson
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Carol Willey
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Haruki Senoo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Yuko Umezono
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Chiho Sanada
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Ingrid Barikmo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Nega Berhe
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Walter C Willett
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Katherine M Phillips
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. David R Jacobs Jr
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Rune Blomhoff
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Rune Blomhoff.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    R. Blomhoff is a shareholder in Vitas AS, D.R. Jacobs Jr is an unpaid member of the Scientific Advisory Council of the California Walnut Commission. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    MHC took part in planning the study design, contributed to database management, sample procurement, drafting and writing of manuscript. BLH took part in planning the study design and was responsible for assay development and validation, sample analysis, and writing of manuscript, SKB took part in planning the study design and was the database creator and contributed to database management and writing of manuscript, SD, LS, CW, HS, IB, NB, WCW, KMP and DRJ contributed to sample procurement and writing of manuscript, KH, YU and CS contributed to sample procurement and analysis and writing of manuscript, RB was responsible for funding and study design and contributed to sample procurement and writing of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Monica H Carlsen, Bente L Halvorsen contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    12937_2009_259_MOESM1_ESM.PDF

    Additional file 1: The Antioxidant Food Table, Carlsen et al. 2010. the main results of the present study; the table includes all the 3139 products with product descriptions, details and antioxidant analysis results, categorized into 24 categories and arranged alphabetically within each category. (PDF 615 KB)

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Carlsen, M.H., Halvorsen, B.L., Holte, K. et al. The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide. Nutr J 9, 3 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-3

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-3

    Keywords

    • Total Antioxidant Capacity
    • Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity
    • Breakfast Cereal
    • Pomegranate Juice
    • Antioxidant Content