MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are on average 22 nucleotides long and play a pivotal role in gene regulation. These small RNAs regulate the gene expression post-transcriptionally by suppression of mRNA translation, stimulation of mRNA deadenylation and degradation or induction of target mRNA cleavage, but have also the potential to activate translation [1, 2]. Over half of the mammalian protein coding-genes are regulated by miRNAs and most human mRNAs have binding sites for miRNAs [3]. The interaction of miRNA and target mRNA requires base pairing between the seed sequence (positions 2–8) of the miRNA at the 5 end and a sequence most frequently found in the 3 untranslated region (UTR) of the target mRNA [4]. MiRNAs are involved in neuronal functions like neurite outgrowth and brain development. They were recently described to play a role in human neurodegenerative diseases. Changes in miRNA expression profiles or miRNA target sequences could contribute to the development of Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [5, 6].

Characteristics of AD are insoluble plaques of amyloid β (Aβ) peptides emerging from the cleavage of the amyloid beta precursor protein (APP) and neuro-fibrillary tangles in the brains of AD patients [7, 8]. The alpha-secretase “a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10” (ADAM10) [911] generates soluble secreted amyloid precursor protein-alpha (sAPPα) and avoids formation of plaques, because it cleaves APP inside the Aβ sequence [12].

Numerous available computational methods predict a large number of genes targeted by miRNAs regulating gene expression, but only few have been validated experimentally. Many computational predictions are false positives and therefore have to be filtered out [13]. The requirement of target-site conservation in different species including far related species would be a potential way to reduce the false positive rate [14].

In this study we established an approach to identify miRNAs regulating ADAM10 expression which therefore might influence the progression of AD. The three programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda predicted potential miRNA binding sites to ADAM10. We sought to identify the most interesting miRNAs possibly binding to ADAM10 with additional selection criteria in particular whether they play a role in AD. Additionally, the most interesting miRNAs were experimentally verified by a luciferase assay. Our results show that miR-103, miR-107 and miR-1306 influence the expression of ADAM10 at least in the reporter assay system. These miRNAs could play a role in AD and therefore are interesting candidates to be further analysed concerning their biological function and relation to AD.


miRNA target site prediction databases

MiRNA binding sites to target genes were downloaded from seven different databases: miRBase, 5-Nov-2007,[15]; microRNA, September 2008 Release,[16]; PicTar via UCSC Table Browser, assembly = May 2004 (NCBI35/hg17), group = Regulation, track = PicTar miRNA,[17]; PITA, version 6 (31-Aug-2008),[18]; RNA22, March 2007,[19]; TarBase, June 2008,[20]; TargetScan, Release 5,[3]. We established a workflow considering all miRNA target site predictions downloaded.

miRNA target prediction

We used three prediction programs RNA22, RNAhybrid, miRanda and predicted all binding sites of the miRNA sequences to the 3'UTR sequence of human ADAM10.

RNA22 is a pattern-based method for the identification of miRNA-target sites. The method has high sensitivity, is resilient to noise, can be applied to the analysis of any genome without requiring genome-specific retraining and does not rely upon cross-species conservation. Focusing on novel features of miRNA-mRNA interaction RNA22 first finds putative miRNA binding sites in the sequence of interest then identifies the targeting miRNA and hence allows to identify sites targeted by yet-undiscovered miRNAs. An implementation of RNA22 (19-May-2008) is available online at[19, 21].

The second program RNAhybrid is an extension of the classical RNA secondary structure prediction algorithm from Zuker and Stiegler [22]. It finds the energetically most favorable hybridization sites of a small RNA in a large RNA incorporating ‘seed-match speed-up’, which first searches for seed matches in the candidate targets and only upon finding such matches the complete hybridization around the seed-match is calculated. The user can define the position and length of the seed region with the option to allow for G:U wobble base pairs in the seed pairing. Intramolecular base pairings and branching structures are forbidden and statistical significance of predicted targets is assessed with an extreme value statistics of length normalized minimum free energies, a Poisson approximation of multiple binding sites, and the calculation of effective numbers of orthologous targets in comparative studies of multiple organisms. RNAhybrid, Version 2.1, is available online at[23, 24].

The miRanda algorithm is similar to the Smith-Waterman algorithm, but scores based on the complementarity of nucleotides (A = U or G ≡ C) and one G:U wobble pair is allowed in the seed region but has to be compensated by matches in the 3′ end of miRNA. In order to estimate the thermodynamic properties of a predicted pairing between miRNA and 3′UTR sequence, the algorithm uses folding routines from the Vienna 1.3 RNA secondary structure programming library (RNAlib) [25]. A conservation filter is used and optionally some rudimentary statistics about each target site can be generated. MiRanda, September 2008 Release, is available online at[21, 26].

The parameter setting for RNA22 is: maximum number of “UN-paired” bases within the extent of the seed = 0, extent of seed in nucleotides = 6, minimum number of paired-up bases that you want to see in any reported heteroduplex = 14, maximum value for the folding energy in any reported heteroduplex = −25 kcal/mol. The parameter setting for RNAhybrid is: “-s 3utr_human” (“-s” tells RNAhybrid to quickly estimate statistical parameters from “minimal duplex energies” under the assumption that the target sequences are human 3′UTR sequences). The parameter setting for miRanda is the default parameter setting: gap open penalty = −8, gap extend = −2, score threshold = 50, energy threshold = −20 kcal/mol, scaling parameter = 4.

We retrieved the 3′UTR sequence of ADAM10 (human ADAM10 3′UTR based on transcript NM_001110 (chr15:58888510–58889745)) from NCBI We downloaded 703 mature miRNA sequences for Homo sapiens from miRBase, version 13.0[15].

Extraction of best miRNA predictions

The extraction of miRNAs was applied according to the following selection criteria. We checked for each miRNA how many programs predicted the miRNA to bind to human ADAM10 3′UTR. The regulation of miRNAs in AD was verified by the publication of Cogswell et al. [27], which provides a list of miRNAs expressed in the tissues hippocampus, cerebellum and medial frontal gyrus. Another possibility to check the expression of miRNAs in the brain is the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) database (Mouse Genome Database, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine; [28]. Literature search by PubMed was done as an additional approval, to search for already described target genes of the miRNAs, especially for target genes involved in AD. Mouse ADAM10 3′UTR based on transcript NM_007399 (chr9:70625902–70628036) from NCBI was used for binding site search of mouse miRNAs from miRBase, version 13.0[15]. The parameter setting for RNA22 and miRanda is the same as for human miRNA binding site prediction at the human ADAM10 3′UTR. The parameter setting for RNAhybrid is “-d 1.9,0.28” (1.9 is the location parameter and 0.28 the shape parameter of the assumed extreme value distribution). Additionally, we searched by TargetScan database[3] and microRNA database[16] for miRNAs binding to human ADAM10 3′UTR and compared the TargetScan and microRNA predictions to our list of miRNAs for equal miRNAs. We identified the number of binding sites of a miRNA in the human ADAM10 3′UTR predicted by each program. ADAM10 3′UTR sequences from ten different species were analysed for conserved regions. The following sequences where taken: human ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript NM_001110 (chr15:58888510–58889745), mouse ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript NM_007399 (chr9:70625902–70628036), horse ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript XM_001498169.1 (chr1:132875124–132876868), dog ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript XM_858910 (chr30:26596273–26598436), chimp ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript XM_001172393.1 (chr15:55942343–55944774), chicken ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript ENSGALT00000034458 (chr10:7949768–7951846), rhesus monkey ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript XM_001096908 (chr7:36929437–36932008), zebra fish ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript NM_001159314 (chr7:31745579–31747655), opossum ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript ENSMODT00000011088 (chr1:162230000–162230183), zebra finch ADAM10 3′UTR from transcript XR_054746 (chr10:6638729–6639273). For multiple sequence alignment of the ten ADAM10 3′UTR sequences we applied ClustalW Version 2.1 from the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)[29, 30]. We used default parameters except: DNA Weight Matrix = ‘ClustalW’, Clustering = ‘UPGMA’. After extraction of the conserved regions between at least seven species we looked for miRNA binding sites localized in these conserved regions. Additionally, we determined the conservation (given in percentage) of the miRNA binding site sequence from human to each species.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical software (R 2.8.0, The p-value was computed by the R function fisher.test with default settings. The Fisher’s exact test is used to examine the significance of the association (contingency) between the two kinds of classification. Significantly regulated genes were considered, if the p-value is equal or below 0.05. We generated Venn diagrams to see the overlap between target genes of miR-103 and miR-107 common in 4 out of 6 databases as well as genes in the AlzGene database (; Version: 20.06.2011) [31]. Each set of target genes of miR-103 and miR-107 common in 4 out of 6 databases as well as the set of target genes of miR-1306 in the database PITA was explored for enrichment in Gene Ontology [32] by the software Pathway Studio 8.0 (Ariadne Genomics) based on database ResNet 8.0.

Literature mining and pathway analysis

Literature search by PubMed was done to extract information about the target genes of the miRNAs resulting from Pathway Studio analysis and their relation to AD. To verify the miRNAs searches were performed for miRNA interactions in all PubMed abstracts with the help of the text mining program Pathway Studio 8.0 (Ariadne Genomics) based on the Natural Language Processing (NLP) Technology. Pathway analysis was done with the software Ingenuity Systems IPA 9.0 ( especially with the Path Designer.


Mature miRNAs and the inactive negative control were from Invitrogen (No. PM11012, PM13206, PM10632, PM10056). All RNA species were dissolved to 5 pmol/μl in nuclease-free water upon arrival, aliquoted and stored at −20°C.

Cloning of the ADAM10 3′UTR luciferase reporter construct

The 3′UTR of human ADAM10 was amplified from THP-1 chromosomal DNA using the FailSafe PCR kit (Epicentre) and the following primers:



The obtained DNA fragment was verified by restriction digestion and sequencing. The 3′UTR was subsequently cloned into the NotI site of the pCMV-GLuc vector (NEB), which allows to monitor regulated Gaussia luciferase expression in the cell supernatant.

Cell culture

SH-SY5Y cells were cultivated in phenol red-free DMEM/F12, supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% glutamine at 37°C, 95% air moisture, 5% CO2 and passaged twice a week with a splitting rate of ½ to ¼.

3′UTR luciferase reporter assay

Retro-transfection was performed using 0.005 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) per μl OptiMEM-medium and 0.1 pmol/μl miRNA (Invitrogen) or negative control. For combination of miRNA 1306 together with miRNA 103 or 107 a concentration of 0.05 pmol/μl each was used. 2 ng/μl endotoxin-free plasmid DNA of the 3′UTR-reporter vector were added to 45.000 cells per well in 96 well format. Control cells were mock-treated with nuclease-free water instead of RNA molecules.

5 hrs after transfection, the cell supernatant was exchanged to 200 μl culture medium per well. In a preliminary experiment, 10 μl cell supernatant were collected at various time points over a 72 hour period; 48 hours were determined to be the optimal incubation time (data not shown). Therefore, 10 μl cell supernatant were aspirated 48 hours after transfection and stored at −20°C until samples were measured. Secreted Gaussia luciferase was quantitatively analyzed (Renilla-Luciferase assay, Promega) using the FluostarOptima luminometer (BMG). Cell densities were checked by quantitation of protein content in the cell lysate by NanoQuant assay (Roth).

Results and discussion

MiRNA prediction

We established a workflow (Figure 1) to obtain miRNAs possibly binding to the human ADAM10 3′UTR. Instead of looking up miRNA target sites of ADAM10 in the miRNA target site prediction databases, we predicted the binding sites of human miRNAs to human ADAM10 3′UTR by the three programs, RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda, with the aim to yield a more accurate miRNA target site prediction. Due to the fact that the three prediction programs focus on different aspects for miRNA target site prediction (pattern-based search, seed matching, conservation, energy or structure) various properties of the target sequence are covered (see Methods: “miRNA target prediction”).

Figure 1
figure 1

Computational prediction of miRNAs binding to ADAM10 3'UTR. Three programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda are used for the prediction of miRNAs binding to the human ADAM10 3'UTR. After retrieving a list of 236 miRNAs by RNA22, RNAhybrid or miRanda we extracted the relevant miRNAs according to selection criteria: prediction by at least two programs, differential regulation in AD patients (Cogswell et al. 2008), tissue-specific expression (MGI), binding to AD key genes, corresponding mouse miRNA binding to the mouse ADAM10 3'UTR sequence predicted by at least two of the three programs, additional prediction by TargetScan and microRNA, occurrence of multiple binding sites and evolutionary conservation.

122 miRNAs are predicted by at least two programs to bind to human ADAM10 3′UTR sequence and 52 of them are significant according to expression and selection criteria described in the following. To consider different aspects of the distinct prediction algorithms at least two programs should predict a miRNA binding site. Important is also the expression of the miRNA in brain provided by the MGI database or the regulation of the miRNA in AD as described by Cogswell and colleagues (2008) in the tissues hippocampus, cerebellum and medial frontal gyrus [27]. An additional confirmation of miRNA being involved in AD is a binding site to a target gene, which is involved in AD, described in the literature and thus the miRNA might regulate also other AD key genes such as ADAM10. Furthermore, the miRNA prediction is strengthened by the corresponding mouse miRNA binding to the mouse ADAM10 3′UTR sequence predicted by at least two of the three miRNA prediction programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda. Prediction of the miRNA by other webtools such as TargetScan and microRNA is also a confirmation of the miRNA. Multiple binding sites of a single miRNA in the 3′UTR verify the prediction [33].

The list of 52 miRNAs incorporates not conserved as well as conserved miRNAs or rather miRNA binding sites. Filtering according to conservation helps to reduce the number of miRNAs and improves the selection of candidates for further experimental validations. Consideration of conservation across species, including those not developing AD, was chosen as a filter criterion because a correlation between miRNA conservation and disease susceptibility has in general been suggested by Lu et al. [34]. Our selection procedure therefore excludes non-conserved miRNA binding sites, which also might be relevant for development of the disease but are not lost by being included in the list of 52 miRNAs. In regard to AD being a human disease, future analysis of non-conserved miRNAs might also represent a valuable approach which we did not follow in the context of this manuscript. In our analysis eleven miRNA binding sites are conserved across at least seven species, at which four of these miRNAs are also conserved in the far related species zebra fish. The only miRNA binding site miR-1306 in the human ADAM10 3′UTR predicted by all three programs is also conserved in the far related zebra fish as well as in mouse, horse, dog, chimp, chicken, rhesus monkey and zebra finch (Figure 2A). This binding site is located on chromosome 15 positions 58889309–58889324 and the programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda predicted the binding energy −32.29, -25.7 and −22.55 kcal/mol, respectively. The conservation of the miRNA binding site sequence between human and the species mouse, horse, dog, chimp as well as rhesus monkey is 100%. The conservation of chicken, zebra finch and zebra fish to human in this binding region is 94%, 88% and 75%, respectively. The second most interesting miRNAs possibly binding to human ADAM10 3′UTR are miR-103 as well as miR-107 both having the same binding site located on chromosome 15 positions 58889443–58889468. This site is predicted by the two programs RNAhybrid and miRanda with binding energy −27.9 and −23.66 kcal/mol for miR-103, respectively, as well as −26.2 and −22.28 kcal/mol for miR-107, respectively. The conservation of the miRNA binding site sequence between human and the species mouse, horse, dog and chimp is 96%, while the conservation of chicken, rhesus monkey and finch to human is 65%, 100% and 73%, respectively (Figure 2B–C). Additionally, miR-202 miR-423-5p miR-503 miR-184 and miR-922 bind also to the conserved binding region chromosome 15 positions 58889443–5889473 and miR-330-5p (chr15:58889149–58889178), miR-671-5p (chr15:58889720–58889745) and miR-432 (chr15:58889688–58889718) bind to a region with good conservation also to the far related species zebra fish, but these eight miRNAs have no indication to be involved in AD (Table 1). Table 1 shows a ranked list of the best miRNA binding site predictions according to the specific selection criteria. We chose the three most interesting miRNAs 1306, 107 and 103 and performed analyses with the AlzGene database, further miRNA target site prediction databases, Gene Ontology, literature mining and validation experiments to identify the involvement in AD. MiR-107 and miR-103 are downregulated with age [35] as well as in AD gray matter [36] and repress the translation of cofilin. In brains of a transgenic mouse model of AD the level of miR-103 and miR-107 is decreased while the cofilin protein level is increased which results in the formation of rod-like structures [37]. Furthermore, miR-107 expression is decreased even in the earliest stages of AD. As miR-107 regulates beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) it might be involved in accelerated disease progression [38]. The downregulation of miR-103 and miR-107 with age could concern a protective effect against plaque formation because reduced levels of these miRNAs would lead to an increased level of the predicted target ADAM10 and its neuroprotective product sAPPα in brains of AD patients. Our observations of strong inhibition (> 40%) of ADAM10 expression in the reporter assay upon application of miR-103 and miR-107 would coincide with such a possible protective influence on amyloid pathology (see “Experimental validation of bioinformatically predicted miRNAs”). According to the publication from Cogswell et al. [27]miR-103 is differentially expressed in hippocampus and cerebellum in AD. In addition, the program TargetScan verifies the same binding site of miR-103 and miR-107 to human ADAM10. MiR-1306 is further analysed due to its good conservation to the far related species zebra fish with only one mismatch in the seed region. It is the only miRNA whose binding site to human ADAM10 is predicted by all three programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda, which strengthens the assumption that this binding site is functionally active. Additionally as shown in Figure 3 the hypothesis is verified that miR-1306 is associated to AD: Twelve predicted target genes of miR-1306 are involved in processes and functions playing a role in AD, the nervous system and other neurodegenerative diseases. The predictions rely on TargetScan while the dedicated functions are Ingenuity Expert Findings or from Gene Ontology. MiR-1306 possibly regulates genes like the cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 4 (CHRNA4), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B (TNFRSF1B) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MAP2K4), which are associated to AD by the functions frontotemporal dementia, demyelination of neurons and Huntington’s disease, respectively. MAP2K4 has been found to be involved in AD and is putatively regulated by modules of transcription factor binding sites [39]. Furthermore, miR-1306 is located on chromosome 22 within the second exon of DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGCR8), which is essential for miRNA biogenesis by being a subunit of the microprocessor complex [40]. Evers et al. presents a case of a DiGeorge syndrome patient with the typical deletion in chromosome band 22q11.2, which contains DGCR8, suffering from dementia [41].

Figure 2
figure 2

Conservation of the three miRNA binding sites within the ADAM10 3′UTR. The figure shows the conservation of the miR-1306 (A), miR-103 (B) and miR-107 (C) binding region (light green) between different species. The blue sequence represents the miRNA binding to the DNA of different species as listed on the left side. On the right side the conservation of the miRNA binding region (light green) from different species to human sequence is given. Nucleotide mismatches in the binding region to human binding region are marked in red. The lines and colons below the miRNA sequence show perfect nucleotide matches and G:U/T wobble pairs, respectively.

Table 1 List of predicted miRNAs binding to a conserved region of human ADAM10 3'UTR
Figure 3
figure 3

Target gene predictions for miR-1306. Twelve target genes of miR-1306 were predicted by TargetScan concerning their function in AD, brain, nervous system or other neurodegenerative diseases and graphically interrelated by Path Designer (Ingenuity). The miRNA is located in the nucleus and the predicted target genes indicated by blue arrows and blue framed ellipses are located according to their Gene Ontology either in the nucleus, cytoplasm or membrane. The functions of the target genes are denoted by grey lines and grey framed ellipses and derived from Gene Ontology or Ingenuity Expert Findings, which are substantiated by literature.

Prediction of miRNA target genes and their relation to AD

To confirm the relationship of the three miRNAs to AD we searched for target gene predictions of these miRNAs in the six databases miRBase, microRNA, PicTar, PITA, RNA22, as well as TargetScan (Figure 4). The combination of different miRNA target site prediction databases and the restriction of the output to four out of six databases in the case of miR-103 and miR-107 are important to reduce the amount of false positive miRNA target sites in the end. In the case of miR-1306 there is no restriction of the output, because only the database PITA incorporates predictions for this miRNA. Additionally, Tarbase can be included in the analysis. The database Tarbase has a special position, because in contrast to the other six databases Tarbase contains experimentally supported miRNA targets and not in-silico predicted miRNA binding sites. All miRNA target sites from Tarbase are automatically included in the output of the analysis. In contrast to the other six databases Tarbase doesn’t contain false positive miRNA target sites. In our case Tarbase doesn’t contain target genes for the miRNAs: miR-103, miR-107 and miR-1306. The six miRNA target site prediction databases miRBase, microRNA, PicTar, PITA, RNA22, and TargetScan contain altogether 18915 different (according to EntrezGene) human genes at which PITA alone contains 16819 genes. After the analysis we got 156 and 157 target genes for miR-103 and miR-107, respectively, common in four out of six databases, and 890 target genes for miR-1306 of database PITA. As we focus on miRNAs playing a role in AD, we used the AlzGene database to see which target genes of the miRNAs have a genetic association with AD. AlzGene database is a regularly updated aggregation of all published genetic association studies including GWAS (genome-wide association studies) performed on AD phenotypes. 636 and 591 genes of AlzGene database overlap with 18915 genes of the six miRNA target site prediction databases and 16819 genes of database PITA, respectively. The overlap between AlzGene database genes and the target genes of miR-103, miR-107 as well as miR-1306 are 12, 14 (Figure 5) and 24 genes, respectively (Additional file 1). MiR-103 and miR-107 have 130 target genes in common (Figure 5, Additional file 1). Applying a Fisher’s exact test we got a p-value of 0.0065, 0.0009 and 0.1904 for the overlap of miR-103, miR-107 and miR-1306, respectively, with the AlzGene database, which shows that 12 and 14 are significant high numbers of overlapping genes between the target genes and the AlzGene database. This result suggests that miR-103 and miR-107 might play a role in AD. It is not remarkable that the p-value for the overlap of miR-1306 with the AlzGene database is not significant as the restriction to four out of six databases was not possible, which consequentially leads to the inclusion of a lot of false positive target genes in the 890 target genes of miR-1306.

Figure 4
figure 4

Workflow for miRNA target site prediction. Seven databases miRBase, microRNA, PicTar, PITA, RNA22, TargetScan and Tarbase, which is experimentally supported by miRNA targets, are incorporated in the prediction of miRNA target sites. The input is a miRNA and the output is a set of target genes common to four out of six databases. Tarbase contains experimentally supported miRNA targets and not in-silico predicted miRNA binding sites: all miRNA target genes from Tarbase are automatically included in the output of the analysis.

Figure 5
figure 5

Venn Diagram. The Venn diagram shows the significant overlap of the target genes of miR-103 and miR-107 common in four out of six databases as well as the genes of AlzGene database.

Gene ontology

Additionally, we did a Gene Ontology analysis with the predicted target genes of the three miRNAs to validate the functionality of the miRNAs and their involvement to AD. With the help of the literature mining tool Pathway Studio we searched for molecular functions and biological processes common to the target genes of the three miRNAs. The molecular function calcium ion binding is significant in all three miRNA analyses (miR-103: p-value = 0.0011; miR-107: p-value = 0.0025; miR-1306: p-value = 2.1 × 10−5) and is considered to be involved in AD. Calcium ions are found in an elevated level in tangle-bearing neurons of AD patients compared to healthier neurons [42]. Further, an abnormal increase of intracellular Calcium ion levels in neurites associated with Aβ deposits was demonstrated in a mouse model of AD [43]. An additional evidence is given by the significant biological processes learning (miR-103: p-value = 0.0008; miR-107: p-value = 3.3 × 10−5; miR-1306: p-value = 0.0003), brain development (miR-103: p-value = 0.0023; miR-107: p-value = 0.0004; miR-1306: p-value = 7.1 × 10−6) and nervous system development (miR-103: p-value = 0.0004; miR-107: p-value = 0.0004; miR-1306: p-value = 6.9 × 10−8) that the three miRNAs are involved in AD. Mouse models with an overexpression of ADAM10 showed a positive effect of the α-secretase on learning and memory and mice with a dominant negative mutant form of ADAM10 had learning deficiencies [12]. Environmental influences occurring during brain development predefine the expression and regulation of APP. As a consequence levels of APP and Aβ are increased causing AD later in life [44]. The Aβ fragments forming plaques are of varying length depending on the site of cleavage. The Aβ42 fragment is a ligand for the cellular prion protein, which is important for nervous system development [45]. (See Additional files 2,3 and 4: List of enriched target genes of miR-103/107/1306 in Gene Ontology).

Literature mining

Furthermore, a network (Figure 6) containing already published interactions of miR-103 and miR-107 with genes involved in AD or included in the AlzGene database was established using the literature mining tool Pathway Studio. This network allowed confirming the relation of the two miRNAs to AD by their respective target genes. The genes dicer 1, ribonuclease type III (Dicer) and TAR (HIV-1) RNA binding protein 2 (TARBP2) targeted by miRNA-103 and miRNA-107 are components of the miRNA-processing complex [46]. Besides those two genes, a link between the two miRNAs is provided by linoleic acid [47], which probably affects AD by increasing the expression of Presenilin1 (PSEN1) and Aβ [48]. Another target gene in the network, Granulin (GRN), is regulated by miR-107[49] which regulates BACE1 as well [38]. Therefore both genes might be involved in neurodegenerative diseases especially AD. The tumor suppressors TP53 as well as TP73 appear to regulate the processing of miR-107[46]. MiR-103 increases the expression level of fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) while its expression is reduced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [50]. All six target genes of the miRNAs 103 and 107 GRN BACE1 TP53 TP73 FABP4 and TNF are included in the AlzGene database, hence putatively playing a role in AD. The four remaining target genes cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), nuclear factor I/A (NFIA) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) of the network are mentioned in literature to be involved directly or in processes developing AD. miR-103 directly binds and represses CDK2 and CREB1 through 3′UTR binding [51]. CDK2 is a key regulator in neuronal differentiation with the downregulation of CDK2 as crucial event [52] and neuronal differentiation is regulated by PSEN1, a major key gene of AD [53]. The transcription factor CREB1 is involved in several types of learning and memory. A direct involvement in AD is seen in some mouse models, where its activity is impaired [54]. NFIA is negatively regulated by miR-107[55] and plays an important role in the formation of the corpus callosum in the developing brain. The disruption of NFIA results in agenesis of the corpus callosum [56], whereas the size of the corpus callosum is significantly reduced in AD patients [57]. The expression of the hypoxia-regulated gene VEGFA is decreased by miR-107[58]. Additionally, it is known, that polymorphisms within the VEGFA promoter region are associated with increased risk for AD, by reducing the neuroprotective effect of VEGFA[59]. These findings of the literature and AlzGene database confirm the biological role of the target genes in neurodegenerative processes and hence the involvement of miR-103 and miR-107 in AD.

Figure 6
figure 6

Interaction network of miR-103 and miR-107. The network (established by Pathway Studio) shows already published interactions between miR-103 as well as miR-107 and genes known to be involved in AD or neurodegenerative processes. The different types of proteins or small molecules are indicated by different symbols and the various interactions like regulation, expression and miRNA effect are also displayed by various arrows.

Experimental validation of bioinformatically predicted miRNAs

To demonstrate that the selected miRNAs 1306, 103 and 107 directly regulate ADAM10 expression by interaction with the 3′UTR of the human gene, we performed cotransfection experiments with a Gaussia reporter vector harbouring the 3′UTR of ADAM10 downstream of the luciferase coding sequence together with the respective miRNAs. As a positive control we used miR-122 which has been identified and validated as an important regulator of ADAM10 in hepatocellular carcinoma by an experimental approach [60]. The programs RNA22, RNAhybrid and miRanda predicted a miR-122 binding site to human ADAM10 3′UTR with binding energy −31.2, -25.6 and −21.84 kcal/mol (on average: −26.21 kcal/mol), respectively, comparable to the miR-1306 binding site prediction (see Results and Discussion: “miRNA prediction”). Time resolved measurement revealed that 48 hrs incubation period resulted in maximal effects of the miRNAs in SH-SY5Y cells (data not shown): while the negative control miRNA had no impact on luciferase activity measured in the cell supernatant, miR-122 reduced the luminescent signal to 57% as compared to water treated control cells (Figure 7). This effect is even higher than the one observed in the initial publication from Bai et al. (2009) [60] but might be due to the different reporter enzymes or cell lines used. The three miRNAs identified by bioinformatical approaches and integration of literature mining all showed a significant decreasing effect on the ADAM10 3′UTR-reporter construct: miR-1306 lowered the luminescent signal to 72%, miR-103 to 55% and miR-107 to 48% of control. While miR-103 and miR-107 target the same DNA sequence within the ADAM10 3′UTR (see Figure 2), miR-1306 has a binding site in closer proximity to the Stop codon. We therefore combined miR-1306 and miR-103 or miR-107, respectively, but observed no distinct significant synergistic effect (miR-1306 vs. miR-1306/103 p < 0.001; miR-1306 vs. miR-1306/107 p < 0.001). This might be due to the applied concentration which was reduced to 50% in the combinations (see methods “3′UTR luciferase reporter assay”). These experimental results suggest an influence of miR-103 miR-107 and miR-1306 on ADAM10 expression. Nevertheless, the biological impact of either miRNA has to be elucidated further, e.g. by mRNA and protein measurements. Assessing the effect of the selected miRNAs on pathological features in AD mouse models would also help to understand their distinct role in pathogenesis. However, this study shows that the computational workflow consisting of prediction programs and specific selection criteria is a suitable tool for the identification of miRNAs influencing key genes of diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Figure 7
figure 7

Experimental validation of selected miRNAs. SH-SY5Y cells were transiently cotransfected with the Gaussia reporter vector harbouring the 3'UTR of ADAM10 downstream of the luciferase coding sequence together with the respective miRNAs. MiR-122, which has been described by Bai et al. [60] to target ADAM10, served as a positive control. After 48 hrs of incubation, luminescence was measured in the cell supernatant. Values obtained for control (water) treated cells were set to 100%, data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *** P < 0.001, ns = not significant, RLU = Relative Light Units.


We established a computational approach for the identification of miRNAs putatively influencing the expression of ADAM10. A potential functionality of selected miRNAs 103, 107 and 1306 was confirmed by 3′UTR luciferase reporter assay. These results show that the evolutionary conservation of the target gene binding site facilitates miRNA candidate selection independently from the disease for further experimental validation. Moreover, these experiments underline the reliability of our computational approach, which is a combination of characteristics of the prediction software and specific selection criteria for filtering out false positive predictions: disease relevance, specificity of expression, evolutionary conservation of binding sites and occurrence of multiple binding sites. This workflow can also be applied to key genes of other diseases with adjustment of the selection criteria according to the scientific research interest. Our approach provides a new selection tool for identification and ranking of AD-related miRNAs, but to elucidate a profound pathological role of selected candidates, further experiments have to be done.