Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online reverse auctions are increasingly being used in industrial sourcing activities. This phenomenon represents a novel emerging area of inquiry with significant implications for sourcing strategies. However, there is little systematic thinking or empirical evidence on the topic. This article reviews the use of these auctions in sourcing activities and highlights four key aspects: (1) the differences from physical auctions and those of the theoretical literature, (2) the conditions for using online reverse auctions, (3) the methods for structuring the auctions, and (4) the evaluations of auction performance. Some empirical evidence on these issues is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Erin M. and Barton A. Weitz. 1992. “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and James A. Narus. 1991. “Partnering as a Focused Market Strategy.”California Management Review 33 (3): 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, Dan, Axel Ockenfels, and Alvin E. Roth. 2001. “An Experimental Analysis of Late-Bidding in Internet Auctions.” Working Paper. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Itamar Simonson. 2002. “Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions.” Working Paper. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1984.The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajari, Patrick and Ali Hortaçsu. 2000. “Winner’s Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions.” Working Paper. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battalio, R. C., C. A. Kogut, and D. J. Meyer. 1990. “The Effect of Varying Number of Bidders in First-Price Value Auctions: An Application of a Dual Market Bidding Technique.” InAdvances in Behavioral Economics. Vol. 2. Eds. L. Green and J. H. Kagel. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, L. 2000. “B2B: The Hottest Net Bet Yet?”Business Week, January 17, pp. 36–37.

  • Cox, J. C., V. L. Smith, and J. M. Walker. 1988. “Theory and Individual Behavior of First-Price Auctions.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1:61–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, D., John H. Kagel, and D. Levin. 1989. “Resolving Uncertainty About the Number of Bidders in Independent Private-Value Auctions: A Experimental Analysis.”RAND Journal of Economics 20:268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “E-Auction Playbook.” 2001.Purchasing, June 21, pp. S1–S33.

  • Emiliani, M. L. 2000. “Business-to-Business Online Auctions: Key Issues for Purchasing Process Improvement.”Supply Chain Management 5 (4): 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emiliani, M. L. and D. J. Stec. Forthcoming. “Squaring Online Reverse Auctions With the Caux Round TablePrinciples for Business.” Supply Chain Management.

  • Ganesan, Shankar. 1994. “Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 58 (April): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, Susan and John H. Kagel. 1994. “Learning in Common Value Auctions: Some Initial Observations.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25 (3): 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häubl, Gerald and P. T. L. Popkowski Leszczyc. 2001. “The Effect of Minimum Prices on Value Judgments in Auctions.” Working Paper. School of Business, University of Alberta.

  • Jap, Sandy D. 2001. “The Impact of Online Reverse Auctions on Buyer-Supplier Relationships.” Working Paper. Emory University.

  • Kagel, John H. 1995. “Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research.” InThe Handbook of Experimental Economics. Eds. J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Dan Levin. 2001. “Behavior in Multi-Unit Demand Auctions: Experiments With Uniform Price and Dynamic Vickrey Auctions.”Econometrica 69 (2): 413–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Nirmalya, Louis W. Stern, and Ravi Singh Achrol. 1992. “Assessing Reseller Performance From the Perspective of the Supplier.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (May): 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston and John McMillan. 1987. “Auctions and Bidding.”Journal of Economic Literature 25 (2): 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul. 1989. “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert J. Weber. 1982. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.”Econometrica 50:1089–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment—Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Alvin E. and Axel Ockenfels. Forthcoming. “Last-Minute Bidding and the Amazon Auctions on the Internet.”American Economic Review.

  • Ruekert, Robert W. and Gilbert A. Churchill Jr. 1984. “Reliability and Validity of Alternative Measures of Channel Member Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (May): 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Nathan. 2002. “Dynamic Pricing Effects on Strategic Sourcing and Supplier Relations.” Leaders for Manufacturing Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Swinkels, Jeroen M., 2001. “Efficiency of Large Private Value Auctions.”Econometrica 69 (1): 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, S. 2000. “The B2B Tool That Really Is Changing the World.”Fortune, March 20, 132–145.

  • Wang, Ruqu. 2000. “Bidding and Renegotiation in Procurement Auctions.”European Economic Review 44:1577–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Barton A. and Sandy D. Jap. 1995. “Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Ronald T. 2000. “Experts and Amateurs: The Role of Experience in Internet Auctions.”Marketing Letters.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emory University, Atlanta, USA

    Sandy D. Jap

Authors
  1. Sandy D. Jap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Sandy D. Jap (Ph.D., University of Florida) is an associate professor of marketing at the Goizueta Business School, Emory University. Her research focuses on the development and management of interorganizational relationships such as how to create and manage strategic alliances over time, how to balance their risks and rewards, and how to share the payoffs of close collaborations. The results of this work have been published in a variety of journals and books, including theJournal of Marketing Research, Sloan Management Review, and an array of special issue journals related to channel management, sales force management, competition, and e-commerce. She has done extensive work in e-sourcing and business-to-business e-comerce, particularly in the use of online reverse auctions in industrial procurement activities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jap, S.D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 30, 506–525 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236925

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236925

Keywords

Search

Navigation