Abstract
This chapter examines the role of business-to-business electronic reverse auctions (eRAs), one tool in the armoury of e-purchasing used by businesses including retailers. It tracks the development of this particular technology through the hype cycle and presents some propositions to maximise the use of eRAs as an effective e-purchasing tool. It also explains the damaging effect of the early negative perceptions and underlines the difficulty in overcoming them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anonymous (2004) Features: buy better. Int J Prod Performance Manage 53(5/6):560–567
Bartezzaghi E, Ronchi S (2003) Internet supporting the procurement process: lessons from four case studies. Integr Manuf Syst 14(8):632–641
Budden R (2013) UK ad industry attacks government buying process. FT.Com. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1442861680?accountid=17193
Cabinet Office (2013). http://gps.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/about-government-procurement-service/about-us
Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2005) Reconsidering e-business strategy and impact on supply chains. Int J Oper Manage 25(12):1328–1332
Cagno E, Di Giulio A, Trucco P (2004) State of the art and development prospect of e-procurement in the Italian engineering contracting sector. Project Manage J 35(1):24–29
Carter CR, Kaufmann L, Beall S, Carter PL, Hendrick TE, Petersen KJ (2004) Reverse auctions—grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective. Transp Res Part E 40:229–254
Charki MH, Josserand E, Charki NB (2011) Toward an ethical understanding of the controversial technology of online reverse auctions. J Bus Ethics 98:17–37
Croom SR (2005) The impact of e-business on supply chain management: an empirical study of key developments. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(1):55–73
de Boer L, Harink J, Heijboer G (2002) A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage 8:25–33
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13(3):319–340
Devaraj S, Vaidyanathan V, Mishra A (2012) Effect of purchase volume flexibility and purchase mix flexibility on e-procurement performance: an analysis of two perspectives. J Oper Manage 30(7–8):509–520
Emiliani ML (2000) Business-to-business online auctions: key issues for purchasing process improvement. Supply Chain Manage Int J 5(4):176–186
Emiliani ML (2003) The inevitability of conflict between buyers and sellers. Supply Chain Manage Int J 8(2):107–115
Emiliani ML (2004) Sourcing in the global aerospace supply chain using online reverse auctions. Ind Mark Manage 33:65–72
Emiliani ML (2005). Executive decision-making traps and B2B online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Manage Int J 10
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2001) Online reverse auction purchasing contracts. Supply Chain Manage Int J 6(3):101–105
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2002a) Realizing savings from online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Manage Int J 7(1):12–23
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2002b) Squaring online reverse auctions with the round table principles for business. Supply Chain Manage Int J 7(2):92–100
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2004) Aerospace parts suppliers’ reaction to online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Manage Int J 9(2):139–153
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2005a) Commentary on reverse auctions for relationship marketers by Daly and Nath. Ind Mark Manage 34(2):167–171
Emiliani ML, Stec DJ (2005b) Wood pallet suppliers’ reaction to online reverse auctions. Supply Chain Manage Int J 10(4):278–287
European Commission (2006) Legal Study on unfair commercial practices within B2B e-markets. http://www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-h/gdb/06/b2b_2006_ls.pdf
Giunipero L, Ramirez E, Swilley E (2012) The antecedents and consequences of e-purchasing tools usage in supply chain management. J Mark Theor Pract 20(3):279
Hannon D (2003) CAPS research study defines staying power of e-auctions. Purchasing 132(13):48–49
Hartley JL, Lane M, Hong Y (2004) An exploration of the adoption of e-auctions in supply management. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 51(2):153–161
Hatton J, Young B, (2004) Are e-auctions a good way to buy services? Supply Manage 9(12):28–20
Hawkins TG, Gravier MJ, Wittmann CM (2010) Enhancing reverse auction use theory: an exploratory study. Supply Chain Manage 15(1):21–42
Hur D, Hartley JL, Mabert VA (2006) Implementing reverse e-auctions: A learning process. Bus Horiz 49:21–29
IEP (2010) Implementation of reverse e-auctions within the East Midlands improvement and efficiency parternship (East Midlands). http://www.eastmidlandsiep.gov.uk/latest-news/1/451/implementation-of-reverse-e-auctions-within-the-east-midlands/
Jap S (2003) An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J Mark 63(3):96–107
Kauppi K, Brandon-Jones A, Ronchi S, van Raaij EM (2013) Tools without skills. Int J Oper Prod Manage 33(7):828–857
Kisiel R (2002) Supplier group seeks conduct code for auctions. Automot News 67:16F
Knudsen D (2003) Aligning corporate strategy and e-procurement tools. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 33(8):720–734
Kwak M (2002) Potential pitfalls of e-auctions. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43(2):18
Lee PG (2011) Business technology: pricing tactic spooks lawyers—companies’ use of reverse auctions to negotiate legal services is accelerating. Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition) 02 Aug 2011, New York
Li C, Scheller-Wolf A (2011) Push or pull? Auctioning supply contracts. Prod Oper Manage 20:198–213
Mishra AN, Agarwal R (2010) Technological frames, organizational capabilities, and IT use: an empirical investigation of electronic procurement. Inf Syst Res 21(2):249–270
Ogden JA, Petersen KJ, Carter JR, Monczka RM (2005) Supply management strategies for the future: a Delphi study. J Supply Chain Manage 41(3):29–48
Peng L, Calvi R (2012) Why don’t buyers like electronic reverse auctions? Some insights from a French study. Int J Procurement Manage 5(3):352
Prema K (2006) SRM and e-auctions: tools in a toolbox. Purchasing 135(5):46–47
Presutti WD (2003) Supply management and e-procurement: creating value added in the supply chain. Ind Market Manag 32(3):219–226
Ray AK, Jenamani M, Mohapatra PKJ (2013) Relationship preserving multi-attribute reverse auction: a web-based experimental analysis. Comput Ind Eng 66(2):418–430
Rogers D (2013) This race to the bottom is a dangerous game to play. Campaign 2. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1437338221?accountid=17193
Standing C, Stockdale R, Love PED (2010) Managing the transition to global electronic markets in the resource engineering sector. J Enterp Inf Manage 23(1):56–80
Saprikis V, Vlachopoulou M (2012) Determinants of suppliers’ level of use of B2B e-marketplaces. Ind Manage Data Syst 112(4):619–643
Shalev ME, Asbjornsen S (2010) Electronic reverse auctions and the public sector—factors of success. J Public Procurement 10(3):428–452
Soudry O (2004) Promoting economy: electronic reverse actions under the EC directives on public procurement. J Public Procurement 4(3):340–347
Standing S, Standing C, Love P, Gengatharen D (2013) How organizing visions influence the adoption and use of reverse auctions. Electron Commer Res 13:493. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10660-013-9133-0
Tassabehji R, Taylor A, Beach R (2006) Reverse e-auctions and supplier-buyer relationships: an exploratory study. Int J Oper Manage 26(2):166–184
Tassabehji R (2010) Understanding e-auction use by procurement professionals: motivation, attitudes and perceptions. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 15(6):425–437
Tunca T, Wu DJ, Zhong F (2013) An empirical analysis of price, quality, and incumbency in service procurement auctions. Working Paper, University of Maryland and Georgia Institute of Technology. http://scheller.gatech.edu/directory/faculty/wu/pubs/Tunca_Wu_Zhong_Open_Auctions_2013.pdf
Vowler J (2004) Buy smarter. Computer Weekly, 11 May 2004. http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Buy-smarter
Wyld DC (2011) Reverse auctioning: saving money and increasing transparency. IBM Centre for the Business of Government Using Technology Series. http://media.wix.com/ugd//8ea413_a504a2d6ffa68fc9ed9003859013a195.pdf
Yao Y, Zhu KX (2012) Do electronic linkages reduce the bullwhip effect? An empirical analysis of the U.S. manufacturing supply chains. Inf Syst Res 23(3):1042–1055
Yeniyurt S, Watson S, Carter CR, Stevens CK (2011) To bid or not to bid: drivers of bidding behavior in electronic reverse auctions. J Supply Chain Manage 47(1):60–72
Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Info Syst Res 16(1):61–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tassabehji, R. (2014). Electronic Reverse Auctions: Emerging from the Shadows?. In: Lacka, E., Chan, H., Yip, N. (eds) E-commerce Platform Acceptance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06121-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06121-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06120-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06121-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)