Skip to main content
Log in

Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Internet is emerging as a powerful connecting force, allowing firms to serve customers, collaborate with partners and suppliers, and empower employees more effectively than ever before. In the network economy, relationships with key stakeholders are becoming valuable assets of the firm, but few firms manage relationships effectively. The authors propose that firms need to take a more holistic approach to understanding where their relational equity resides and how it should be managed and measured. They also propose that relational equity is not limited to relationships with customers but also includes relationships with partners, suppliers, and employees. Effective management of relational equity requires firms to think in an integrative manner along several dimensions: strategy, process, technology, organization design, and metrics. The authors develop conceptual frameworks for each of these dimensions. Taken together, these frameworks offer a conceptual foundation for research and managerial practice on managing relational equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, Russell L. 1999.Re-Creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David, John Deighton, Werner J. Reinartz, Roland T. Rust, and Gordon Swartz. 2002. “Seven Barriers to Customer Equity Management.”Journal of Service Research 5 (1): 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemberger, J. 1997. “Essence of the Capability Maturity Model.”IEEE Computer, June, 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaou, M. 1999. “Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships.”Sloan Management Review, Summer, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert C., Gary Getz, and Jacquelyn S. Thomas 2001.Customer Equity: Building and Managing Relationships as Valuable Assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, Nick. 2001. “Assessing Knowledge Assets: A Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Equity.”International Journal of Management Reviews, 3 (1): 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, Adam M. and Barry J. Nalebuff. 1997.Co-opetition. 2 vols. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooking, Anne. 1996.Intellectual Equity. London: International Thompson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Patrick, Ted Hall, Alistair Hanna, Lenny Mendonca, Byron Auguste, James Manyika, and Anupam Sahay. 1997. “A Revolution in Interaction.”The McKinsey Quarterly 1: 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, Sunil and Peter Meindl. 2000.Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations. Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.”Economica 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, Anne T., Louis W. Stern, and Erin Anderson. 2001.Marketing Channels. 6th ed. Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, George. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing, October, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Jonathan D. and James C. Wendler. 1998. “The New Economics of Organization.”McKinsey Quarterly 1: 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, Leif and Michael S. Malone. 1997.Intellectual Equity: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay. 2000.Designing the Global Corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Rashi. 1999. “Winning in Smart Markets.”Sloan Management Review 40 (4): 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Jill and Michael W. Lowenstein. 2001.Customer Winback: How to Recapture Lost Customers—and Keep Them Loyal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil, Donald R. Lehmann, and Jennifer A. Stuart. 2001. “Valuing Customers.” Working Paper. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J. and Marc Singer. 2000.Net Worth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gary. 1997. “Bringing Silicon Valley Inside.”Harvard Business Review, September–October, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000.Leading the Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael. 2001.The Agenda. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, James, Earl Sasser, and Leonard A. Schleslinger. 1997.The Service Profit Chain. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, John E. 2001. “Expected Relationship Value.”Industrial Marketing Management 30: 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Katherine N. Lemon, and Roland R. Rust. 2002. “Customer Equity Management: Charting Future Directions for Marketing.”Journal of Service Research 5 (1): 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Dipak and Siddhartha Singh. 2002. “Customer Lifetime Value Research in Marketing: A Review and Future Directions,”Journal of Interactive Marketing 16 (2): 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert S. and David Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance.”Harvard Business Review, January, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996.The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 2000.The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch. 1967.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, Baruch. 2001.Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, James. 1999.The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, Joe Ashbrook. 2002. “Welcome to Harrah’s.”Business 2.0, April.

  • Paulk, Mark C., Charles V. Weber, and Bill Curtis. 1995.The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppers, Don and Martha Rogers. 1999.Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.”Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Kenneth Koput, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interoganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.”Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1): 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Frederick. 2001.Loyalty Rules! Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, Werner J. and V. Kumar. 2000. “On the Profitability of Long-Life Customers in a Noncontractual Setting: An Empirical Investigation and Implications for Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 64 (October): 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Johan, Goran Roos, Leif Edvinsson, and Nicola Dragonetti. 1998.Intellectual Equity: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucci, Anthony J., Steven P. Kim, and Richard T. Quinn. 1998. “The Employee-Customer-Profit Chain at Sears.”Harvard Business Review, January, 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Roland T., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Katherine N. Lemon. 2000.Driving Customer Equity: How Customer Lifetime Value Is Reshaping Corporate Strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, Mohanbir. 2001. “Don’t Homogenize, Synchronize.”Harvard Business Review, July–August, 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Jeff Zabin. 2001.The Seven Steps to Nirvana: Strategic Insights Into eBusiness Transformation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Thomas A. 1997.Intellectual Equity: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001.The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Equity and the Twenty-First Century Organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. H. 1998.Profiting From Intellectual Equity: Extracting Value From Innovation. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, Karl Erik. 1997.The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. New York: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, Don, David Ticoll, and Alex Lowy. 2000.Digital Equity: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, F., and M. Wierserma. 1997.The Wisdom of Market Leaders. New York: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valikangas, Lisa and Gary Hamel. 2001. “Internal Markets: Emerging Governance Structures for Innovation.” Working Paper Strategos Institute, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. “Transaction Cost Economics.” InHandbook of Industrial Organization. Eds. Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willing. Amsterdam: North Holland. 136–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Seurat Company

Mohanbir Sawhney is the McCormick Tribune Professor of Technology and the director of the Center for Research Technology and Innovation at the Kellogg School of Management, North-western University. He is the coauthor (with Jeff Zabin) ofThe Seven Steps to Nirvana: Strategic Insights Into eBusiness Transformation (2001). His research has been published in leading journals such asCalifornia Management Review, Harvard Business Review, Interactive Marketing, Management Science, Marketing Science, and theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science. He also writes for leading trade publications, including theFinancial Times, CIO Magazine, andBusiness 2.0. He has created three new M.B.A. courses at Kellogg, as well as a popular executive course, and has won several awards for teaching. He is a fellow of the World Economic Forum, a fellow at DiamondCluster International, and a charter member if The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE). He advises and speaks to Global 2000 firms worldwide and serves on the advisory boards of several technology startup companies. He holds a Ph.D. in marketing from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Jeff Zabin is a vice president at Seurat Company, a technology firm that specializes in Internet-based marketing resource management services. He is the coauthor (with Mohanbir Sawhney) ofThe Seven Steps to Nirvana: Strategic Insights Into eBusiness Transformation (2001). He has written about marketing in the network economy for several trade magazines, includingComputerworld, and he is a frequent speaker on the topic, with recent audiences including the Strategic Management Association, the Society for Information Management, and the Marketing Science Institute. Prior to joining Seurat, he was a research fellow with DiamondCluster International and a business analyst at a boutique consultancy called Digital Knowledge Assets. A graduate of the University of Wisconsin and a returned Peace Corps volunteer, he began his career in educational publishing at Houghton Mifflin. He has helped launch several Internet ventures and currently serves on the advisory board of PreviewPort, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawhney, M., Zabin, J. Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 30, 313–332 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236908

Keywords

Navigation