Skip to main content
Log in

Biological Boundaries and the Vertebrate Immune System

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological boundaries are important because of what they reveal about the evolution of a lineage, the relationship between organisms of different lineages, the structure and function of particular subsystems of the organism, the interconnection between an organism and its environment, and a myriad of other important issues related to individuality, development, and evolution. Since there is no single unifying theory for all biological sciences, there are various possible theoretical characterizations of what counts as a biological boundary. Theoretical specificity is crucial for the full characterization of a boundary; to this end, it is useful to begin with general properties (those true of all living system boundaries) and then to compare these to those properties specific to a particular biological boundary. This dual heuristic approach—top-down and bottom-up—can then be repeated to increase the robustness of the boundary characterization. In what follows, I explore both the general structural and functional aspects of biological boundaries and those specific to a biological subsystem, which itself is critical to boundary formation, maintenance, and evolution—the vertebrate immune system. It is a remarkable and sobering regularity of nature that organisms remain whole because their parts are constantly being built up and broken down, and this is no less true of their boundaries. The vertebrate immune system is at the center of this process of biological boundary maintenance and breakdown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buss LW (1987) The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1963) Temporal Organization in Cells: A Dynamic Theory of Cellular Control Processes. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeway CA Jr, Traver P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ (2005) Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease, 6th ed. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod RE (1999) Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Shaw JC, Simon HA (1962) The process of creative thinking. In: Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking (Gruber HE, Terrell G, Wertheimer M, eds), 63–119. New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt J (1969) Theorems on boundaries in hierarchical systems. In: Hierarchical Structures (Whyte LL, Wilson AG, Wilson D, eds), 201–213. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya G (1957) How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein AM (1989) A History of Immunology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber AI (1994) The Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (1972) Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (1987) False models as means to truer theories. In: Neutral Models in Biology (Nitecki M, Hoffman A, eds), 23–55. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (1997) Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science 64: S372–S384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio R. Tuma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuma, J.R. Biological Boundaries and the Vertebrate Immune System. Biol Theory 4, 287–293 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.287

Keywords

Navigation