Abstract
Biological boundaries are important because of what they reveal about the evolution of a lineage, the relationship between organisms of different lineages, the structure and function of particular subsystems of the organism, the interconnection between an organism and its environment, and a myriad of other important issues related to individuality, development, and evolution. Since there is no single unifying theory for all biological sciences, there are various possible theoretical characterizations of what counts as a biological boundary. Theoretical specificity is crucial for the full characterization of a boundary; to this end, it is useful to begin with general properties (those true of all living system boundaries) and then to compare these to those properties specific to a particular biological boundary. This dual heuristic approach—top-down and bottom-up—can then be repeated to increase the robustness of the boundary characterization. In what follows, I explore both the general structural and functional aspects of biological boundaries and those specific to a biological subsystem, which itself is critical to boundary formation, maintenance, and evolution—the vertebrate immune system. It is a remarkable and sobering regularity of nature that organisms remain whole because their parts are constantly being built up and broken down, and this is no less true of their boundaries. The vertebrate immune system is at the center of this process of biological boundary maintenance and breakdown.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buss LW (1987) The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goodwin BC (1963) Temporal Organization in Cells: A Dynamic Theory of Cellular Control Processes. London: Academic Press.
Janeway CA Jr, Traver P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ (2005) Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease, 6th ed. New York: Garland.
Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Michod RE (1999) Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Newell A, Shaw JC, Simon HA (1962) The process of creative thinking. In: Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking (Gruber HE, Terrell G, Wertheimer M, eds), 63–119. New York: Atherton Press.
Platt J (1969) Theorems on boundaries in hierarchical systems. In: Hierarchical Structures (Whyte LL, Wilson AG, Wilson D, eds), 201–213. New York: Elsevier.
Pólya G (1957) How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Silverstein AM (1989) A History of Immunology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–182.
Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tauber AI (1994) The Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wimsatt WC (1972) Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.
Wimsatt WC (1987) False models as means to truer theories. In: Neutral Models in Biology (Nitecki M, Hoffman A, eds), 23–55. London: Oxford University Press.
Wimsatt WC (1997) Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science 64: S372–S384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuma, J.R. Biological Boundaries and the Vertebrate Immune System. Biol Theory 4, 287–293 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.287
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.287