Abstract
It is often said that there is just one “objective” tree of life: a single accurate branching hierarchy of species reflecting order of descent. For any two species there is a single correct answer as to whether one is a “daughter” of the other, whether the two are “sister species” by virtue of their descent from a common parental species, whether they belong to a family line that excludes any given third species, and so on. This position is not right. We may whittle a tree of life, paring troublesome branches, in order to portray an ordering that admits of no legitimate dissent. But the history of life can sustain many legitimate arrangements of the same branches of species. The same can be said about other taxonomically relevant groups besides species, such as “Least Inclusive Taxonomic Units” (LITUs), so the basic claim survives even if we abandon traditional species. Similarly, the claim survives even if we distinguish between synchronic and diachronic groups, even if we consider polytomies, even if we distinguish between models and the world modeled, and even if we recognize an objective world. Nor is the claim merely an epistemic one.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Griffiths PE, Sterelny K (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
LaPorte J (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LaPorte J (2005) Is there a single objective, evolutionary tree of life? Journal of Philosophy 102: 357–374.
Ridley M (1997) Can classification do without evolution? In: Evolution (Ridley M, ed), 196–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ridley M (2004) Evolution. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Simpson GG (1961) Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LaPorte, J. On Systematists’ Single Objective Tree of Ancestors and Descendants. Biol Theory 4, 260–266 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.260
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.260