Skip to main content
Log in

Metaphysics and Classification: Update and Overview

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differences between classes and individuals are profound and the fact that biological species are individuals rather than classes provides the basis for organizing knowledge on a causal basis. The class of species is a natural kind and there are laws of nature for this and other classes of natural kinds such as the organism and the molecule. Particular species, like other individuals, function in historical narratives by virtue of laws of nature applying to them. The notion that species can evolve by changing their members is a category mistake. Darwin believed that there is no “essential” difference between species and subspecies in the sense that there is only a quantitative difference between them. The concept of biological species is defined on the basis of a qualitative difference. The rank of taxa can be used to distinguish between important natural kinds. Without such kinds language would become purely referential, and have no “sense” as Frege had put it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson R (2005) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand Y, Härlin M (in preparation) Historicism and Essentialism in Phylogenetic Biology. Preprint in: Bertrand Y (2008) Relationships between nomenclature, phylogenetics and systematics. Doctoral thesis, Göteborg University, Sweden. ISBN 978-91-628-7544-2.

  • Breidbach O, Ghiselin MT (2007) Evolution and development: Past, present and future. Theory in Biosciences 125: 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Querioz K (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds), 57–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Querioz K (1999) The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (Wilson RA ed), 49–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Querioz K (2005a) A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56: 196–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Querioz K (2005b) Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. In: Systematics and the Origin of Species: On Ernst Mayr’s 100th Anniversary (Hey J, Fitch WM, Ayala FJ, eds), 243–263. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74: 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1892) Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische. Kritik (Neue Folge) 100: 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1966) On psychologism in the logic oftaxonomic controversies. Systematic Zoology 15: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1988) The individuality thesis, essences, and laws of nature. Biology and Philosophy 3: 367–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1997) Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2002) Species concepts: The basis for controversy and reconciliation. Fish and Fisheries 3: 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2005a) Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theory in Biosciences 124: 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2005b) Taxonomy as the organization of knowledge. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2007) Is the Pope a Catholic? Biology and Philosophy 22: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte J (2004) Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1872) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 8th ed. London: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1951) The species concept. Evolution 5: 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO (1978) The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Systematic Zoology 27: 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO (1980) Is the evolutionary species fiction? A consideration of classes, individuals, and historical entities. Systematic Zoology 29: 76–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Ghiselin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghiselin, M.T. Metaphysics and Classification: Update and Overview. Biol Theory 4, 253–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.253

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.253

Keywords

Navigation