Skip to main content
Log in

The Delimitation of Phylogenetic Characters

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Colless DH (1985) On “character” and related terms. Systematic Zoology 34: 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J (1981) Natural kinds and biological taxa. Philosophical Review 90: 66–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M (2007) Foundational issues concerning taxa and taxon names. Systematic Biology 56: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—Phylogeny inference package, Version 3.2. Cladistics 5: 164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh K (2006) The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoologica Scripta 35: 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1975) A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff P, Farris S, Nixon K (2000) TNT (Tree Analysis Using New Technology). (BETA) Published by the authors, Tucumán, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant T, Kluge AG (2004) Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris ESJ, Mishler BD (in preparation) The practice of phylogenetic character delimitation.

  • Hegel GWF (1977) The Phenomenology of Spirit (Miller AV, trans). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1978) A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching IJ, Forey PL, Humphries CJ, Williams DM (1998) Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge AG (2003) The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: Atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics 19: 356–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge AG (2007) Completing the neo-Darwinian synthesis with an event criterion. Cladistics 23: 613–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S (1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (2001) Foreword. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), xvii–xxiii. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler BD (2005) The logic of the data matrix in phylogenetic analysis. In: Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics (Albert VA, ed), 57–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler BD (2009) Three centuries of paradigm changes in biological classification: Is the end in sight? Taxon 58: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff NA (1986) A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Systematic Zoology 35: 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson C (1982) Morphological characters and homology. In: Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction (Joysey KA, Friday AE, eds), 21–74. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997) Complete Works (Cooper JM, Hutchinson DS, eds). Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel F (1995) On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 11: 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullan MR, Armstrong KE, Paterson T, Cannon A, Kennedy JB, Watson MF, McDonald S, Raguenaud C (2005) The Prometheus description model: An examination of the taxonomic description-building process and its representation. Taxon 54: 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards R (2003) Character individuation in phylogenetic inference. Philosophy of Science 70: 264–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth VL (1988) The biological basis of homology. In: Ontogeny and Systematics (Humphries CJ, ed), 1–26. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SP (1977) Introduction. In: Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds (Schwartz SP, ed), 13–41. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2003) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods, Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele K (1993) The holy grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ (1995) Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Biology 44: 482–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO, Siegel-Causey D, Brooks DR, Funk VA (1991) The Compleat Cladist: A Primer of Phylogenetic Procedures. Lawrence: University of Kansas Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins J (1668) An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand and John Martyn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric S. J. Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, E.S.J., Mishler, B.D. The Delimitation of Phylogenetic Characters. Biol Theory 4, 230–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.230

Keywords

Navigation