Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relative Risk and Methodological Rules for Causal Inferences

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amsterdamska O (2005) Demarcating epidemiology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 30(1): 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes D, Bero L (1998) Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Journal of the American Medical Association 279: 1566–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Vaughan MR, Conroy MJ, Quigley H (2003) An analysis of scientific literature related to the Florida panther. Submitted as final report for Project NG01-105. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow N (2003) Are statistical contributions to medicine undervalued? Biometrics 59(1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney L (1955) Smoking and lung cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 171: 1829–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clouser K (1985) Approaching the logic of diagnosis. In: Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine (Schaffner KF, ed), 35–55. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiskey EJ, Eller AC, Perkins DW (2004) Evaluating impacts to Florida panther habitat: How porous is the umbrella? Southeastern Naturalist 3: 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranor C (2006) Toxic Torts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt G (1990) The naturalist conception of methodological standards in science. Philosophy of Science 57: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Science Advisory Board (2000) Comments on the Use of Data from the Testing of Human Subjects, EPA-SAB-EC-00-017. Washington, DC: US EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Bernstein DE, Huber PW (1993) Phantom Risk. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond E (1955) Cause and effect. In: The Biologic Effects of Tobacco (Wynder E, ed), 193–194. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt RA (1990) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer. Medical Oncology Tumor Pharmacotherapy 7: 143–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM) (1998) Exposure of the American People to Iodine-131 from Nevada Nuclear-Bomb Tests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Southwood R, eds (1987) Radiation and Health. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi K (2005) AAAS Report XXIX: R&D Trends and Special Analyses. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky S (2003) Science in the Private Interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L (1987) Progress or rationality. American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little C (1961) Some phases of the problem of smoking and lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 264: 1241–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maehr DS, Deason JP (2002) Wide-ranging carnivores and development permits. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 3: 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhijani A, Hu H, Yih K, eds (1995) Nuclear Wastelands. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews J (1995) Major Greenwood versus Almroth Wright: Contrasting visions of “scientific” medicine in Edwardian Britain. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 69: 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett A, Shackelford N, Sarkar S (2007) Malaria in Africa: Vector species’ niche models and relative-risk maps. PLoS ONE 2(9). www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedic=17786196

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2005) Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parascandola M (1998) Epidemiology: Second-rate science? Public Health Reports 113: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera F (1996) Molecular epidemiology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 88: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ (1998) Should the mission of epidemiology include the eradication of poverty? The Lancet 352: 810–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S (2005) Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health 95: S144–S150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner KF (1993) Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmaus W (1996) The empirical character of methodological rules. Philosophy of Science 63: S98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS (2004) Measurement problems and Florida panther models. Southeastern Naturalist 3: 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS (2007) Taking Action, Saving Lives: Our Duties to Protect Public and Environmental Health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS, McCoy ED (1993) Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DL, Dushoff J, McKenzie FE (2004) The risk of a mosquito-borne infection in a heterogeneous environment. PLoS Biology 2(11). http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020368

  • Snow RW, Peshu N, Forster D, Bomu G, Mitsanze E, Ngumbao E, Chisengwa R, Armstrong Schellenberg JRM, Hayes RJ, Newbold CI, Marsh K (1998) Environmental and entomological risk factors for the development of clinical malaria among children on the Kenyan coast. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92: 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubes G (1995) Epidemiology faces its limits. Science 268: 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weed D (1997) Underdetermination and incommensurability in contemporary epidemiology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7(2): 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynder EL (1961) An appraisal of the smoking-lung-cancer issue. New England Journal of Medicine 264: 1235–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynder EL, Higgins IT, Harris RE (1989) The wish bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43: 619–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Biological Sciences and Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, IN, USA

    Kristin Shrader-Frechette

Authors
  1. Kristin Shrader-Frechette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Shrader-Frechette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrader-Frechette, K. Relative Risk and Methodological Rules for Causal Inferences. Biol Theory 2, 332–336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.4.332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.4.332

Keywords

Search

Navigation