Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From its inception Darwinian evolutionary biology has been seen as having a problematic relationship of fact and theory. While the forging of the modern evolutionary synthesis resolved most of these issues for biologists, critics continue to argue that natural selection and common descent are “only theories.” Much of the confusion engendered by the “evolution wars” can be clarified by applying the concept of phenomena, inferred from fact, and explained by theories, thus locating where legitimate dissent may still exist. By setting such analysis in the context of research traditions, it is possible to gain further insight into the complex interplay of facts, phenomena, and theories. Two case studies are explored to assess the value of such approaches, one from within evolutionary biology, the Baldwin effect, and one from outside, intelligent design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronova E (2007) Karl Popper and Lamarckism. Biological Theory 2: 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin JM (1896) A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist 30: 441–451, 536–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe MJ (1996) Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen J, Woodward J (1988) Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review 97: 303–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler PJ (1988) The Non-Darwinian Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bree CR (1872) An Exposition of Fallacies in the Hypothesis of Mr. Darwin. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgham JT, Carroll SM, Thornton JW (2006) Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation. Science 312: 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JH (1985) An organizational interpretation of evolution. In: Evolution at a Crossroads (Depew DJ, Weber BH, eds), 133–167. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SB (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SC (2001) From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris S (2000) Evolution: Bringing Molecules into the Fold. Cell 100: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning P (2005) Holistic Darwinism: Synergy, Cybernetics, and the Bioeconomics of Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1851, 1854, 1858) A Monograph of the Sub-Class Cirripedia. London: The Ray Society [1851 and 1854], and A Monograph of the Fossil Lepadida, London: Paleontological Society [1858].

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1862) On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1868) The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW (2003) Multilevel selection in a complex adaptive system: The problem of language origins. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 81–106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (2003) The Baldwin effect: A crane, not a skyhook. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 69–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ (2003) Baldwin and his many effects. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 3–31. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ (in press) The evolution of Darwinism and the Baldwin effect. In: Atti el Convergno: Epigenetica: Un nuovo modello per la complessita nella scienze e nella filosofia (Stanzione M, ed). Roma: Università di Roma Press.

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (1985) Innovation and tradition in evolutionary theory. In: Evolution at a Crossroads (Depew DH, Weber BH, eds), 227–260. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (1995) Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (1999) Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 202: 2124–2148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (2000) Uprooting the tree of life. Scientific American 282 (2): 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes SM (2003) Baldwin effects and the expansion of the explanatory repertoire in evolutionary biology. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 33–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N (1985) Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary Biology. 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale BG (1982) Evolution without Evidence: Charles Darwin and The Origin of Species. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J (1998) Darwinism’s Struggle for Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ (1998) Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1969) The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert GN, Mulkay M (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF (1997) Developmental Biology. 5th ed. Sunderland MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2003) Between Baldwin skepticism and Baldwin boosterism. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 53–67. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1994) How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1983) Evolution as fact and theory. In: Gould SJ, Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes, 253–262. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2003) Beyond the Baldwin effect: James Mark Baldwin’s “social heredity,” epigenetic inheritance, and niche construction, in Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ (eds), 193–215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE, Gray RD (2001) Darwinism and developmental systems. In: Cycles of Contingency (Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD, eds), 195–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton GE, Nowland SJ (1987) How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems 1: 495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho M-W, Saunders PT, eds (1984) Beyond Neo-Darwinism: An Introduction to the New Evolutionary Paradigm. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann JR, Weber BH (2003) The fact of evolution: Implications for science education. Science and Education 12: 729–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS (1942) Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humes E. (2007) Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for the American Soul. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E (2001) The systems of inheritance. In: Cycles of Contingency (Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD, eds), 99–116. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PE (1993) Darwin on Trial. 2nd ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PE (2000) The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (2000) Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg V (1907) Darwinism Today: A Discussion of Present-Day Scientific Criticism of the Darwinian Selection Theories. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1968) Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1987) Molecular evolutionary clock and the neutral theory. Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Jukes TH (1969) Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164: 788–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds), 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan L (1977) Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1999) Patterns in Evolution: The New Molecular View. New York: Scientific American Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1983) Gene, organism and environment. In: Evolution From Molecules to Men (Bendall DS, ed), 273–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W-H (1997) Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W-H, Gu Z, Wang H, Nekrutenko A (2001) Evolutionary analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 847–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd Morgan C (1896) Of modification and variation. Science 4: 733–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin MAS (1998) The Garden of Ediacara: Discovering the First Complex Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1987) Natural selection: When learning guides evolution. Nature 329: 761–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel GF, Moore CL (1995) Developmental Psychobiology: An Interdisciplinary Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mivart StG (1871) On the Genesis of Species. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (1991) Deconstructing Darwinism: The politics of evolution in the 1860s. Journal of the History of Biology 24: 353–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay M (1985) The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller F (1869) Facts and Arguments for Darwin Dallas WS, trans). London: John Murray. German orig. 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N (1999) Phyogenetic relationships among certariodactyls based upon insertions of short and long interspersed elements: Hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 9707–9712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche Construction: A Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn HF (1896) A mode of evolution requiring neither natural selection nor the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science 15: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama S (1985) The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD, eds (2001) Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RDM, Holmes EC (1998) Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley W (1802) Natural Theology Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: Faulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin H (2004) Evolutionary Thought in Psychology: A Brief History. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebble J, Weber BH (2003) Wandering in the Gardens of the Mind: Peter Mitchell and the Making of Glynn. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes GJ (1893) An Examination of Weismannism. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse M (1982) Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolutionary Controversies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe SN (1993) Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfati J (2002) Refuting Evolution 2. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks N (2004) God, the Devil, and Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S (1997) Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388: 639–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1953) The Baldwin effect. Evolution 7: 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele EJ, Lindley RA, Blanden RV (1998) Lamarck’s Signature: How Retro-genes are Changing Darwin’s Natural Selection Paradigm. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot M (2005) Darwin in the dock: Intelligent design has its day in court. New Yorker (5 December): 66–77.

  • Valentine JW, Jablonski D, Erwin DH (1999) Fossils, molecules and embryos: New perspectives on the Cambrian explosion. Development 126: 851–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang DY-C, Kumar S, Blair Hedges S (1999) Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 226: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH (2003) Emergence of mind and the Baldwin effect. In: Evolution and Learning (Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds), 309–326. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH, Depew DJ (1996) Natural selection and self-organization: Dynamical models as clues to a new evolutionary synthesis. Biology and Philosophy 11: 33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH, Depew DJ (2001) Developmental systems, Darwinian evolution and the unity of science. In: Cycles of Contingency (Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD, eds), 239–253. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH, Depew DJ, eds (2003) Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber BH, Depew DJ (2004) Darwinism, design, and complex systems dynamics. In: Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA (Dembski WA, Ruse R, eds), 173–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich DM, Delaney NF, DePristo MA, Hartl DL (2006) Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann F (1891) Essays on Heredity and Kindred Problems (Poulton E et al., eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann F (1893) The all-sufficiency of natural selection: A reply to Herbert Spencer. Contemporary Review 64: 309–338. 596–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J (2000) Icons of Evolution Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong. Washington DC: Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell W (1837) History of the Inductive Sciences. 3 vols. London: Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken JS (1987) Evolution, Information and Thermodynamics: Extending the Darwinian Program. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJP, Fraústo da Silva JJR (2006) The Chemistry of Evolution: The Development of Our Ecosystem. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AC, Carlson SS, White TJ (1977) Biochemical evolution. Annual Reviews of Biochemistry 46: 573–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese C (1998) The universal ancestor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 6854–6859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese C (2002) On the evolution of cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 8742–8747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1987) On the evolutionary clock. Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8: 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA

    Bruce H. Weber

  2. Robert H. Woodworth Chair in Science and Natural Philosophy, Bennington College, Bennington, VT, USA

    Bruce H. Weber

Authors
  1. Bruce H. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce H. Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, B.H. Fact, Phenomenon, and Theory in the Darwinian Research Tradition. Biol Theory 2, 168–178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.2.168

Keywords

Search

Navigation