Skip to main content
Log in

Agent-Based Modeling for the Theoretical Biologist

  • Trend
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herein is provided a brief overview of agent-based modeling (ABM), with a particular slant toward its potential as a tool for the theoretical biologist. Of course, its use for experimentalists is obvious; they are, as a group, already using agent-based models (ABMs) to examine contemporary biological questions ranging from molecular processes (e.g., stem cell and totipotency) to evolving ecological landscapes (Grimm and Railsback 2005). For the modeler-theoretician, ABMs offer a new tool for thinking about the structure of biological processes, thus creating a conduit for integrative perspective taking between the experimentalist and the theoretician.

To maintain brevity and because of the various types and range of work being done with ABMs in labs throughout the world, I will generally ignore scale: whether referring to molecular processes or social organization, or events that occur in milliseconds or decades; such features are details specific to the research question. Time, size, and distance are merely parameter values determined by the modeler. Instead I focus on critical features unique to ABMs: agent construction and heterogeneity, rule implementation, and scientific inference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belew RK, Mitchell M (1996) Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations: Models and Algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birgitt S, de Roos A (1999) Synchronous and asynchronous updating in cellular automata. Biosystems 51: 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgelt C, Kruse R (2000) Abductive inference with probabilistic networks. In: Handbook of Defensible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems. Vol 4: Abductive Reasoning and Learning (Gabbay DM, Kruse R, eds), 281–314. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S, Deneubourg J, Franks N, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1997) Would-be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2005) Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematica 36: 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner SP, Guckenheimer J (2006) Dynamic Models in Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N, Troitzsch KG (1999) Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin WA (2005) Using agent based modeling to simulate the influence of family level stress on disease progression. In: Handbook of Families and Health: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Crane DR, Marshall ES, eds), 291–315. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin WA, Schmidt SK, Kornienko O (2005) An agent based model of interaction between intimates: A proposed mechanism for simulating evolving dyads. In: Agent 2004: Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity and Emergence (Sallach DL, Macal CM, North MJ, eds), 327–338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Argonne National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-Based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon B, Ruth M (1997) Modeling Dynamic Biological Systems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1995) Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson D, Holcombe M, Ratnieks F (2004) Coupled computational simulation and empirical research into the foraging system of Pharaoh’s ant (Monomorium pharaonis). Biosystems 76: 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler TA (2000) Putting social sciences together again: An introduction to the volume. In: Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies (Kohler T, Gumerman G, eds), 1–18. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (2000) Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton P (1991) Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parunak V, Savit R, Riolo R (1998) Agent based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users guide. Proceedings of Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent Based Simulation (MABS’98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Vol 1534: 10–25. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogson M, Smallwood R, Qwarnstrom E, Holcombe M (2006) Formal agent-based modelling of intracellular chemical interactions. Biosystems 85: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha LM (1999) From artificial life to semiotic agent models. LANL Technical Report LA-UR-99-5475.

  • Schönfisch B, de Roos A (1999) Synchronous and asynchronous updating in cellular automata. Biosystems 51: 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starfield AM, Smith KA, Bleloch AL (1990) How to Model It: Problem Solving for the Computer Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (1992) Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker DC, Southgate J, Hill G, Holcombe M, Hose DR, Wood SM, MacNeil S, Smallwood RH (2004) The epitheliome: Modeling the social behaviour of cells. Biosystems 76: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffin, W.A. Agent-Based Modeling for the Theoretical Biologist. Biol Theory 1, 404–409 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.404

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.404

Keywords

Navigation