Abstract
Many psychometricians and behavioral geneticists believe that high heritability of IQ test scores within racial groups coupled with environmental hypotheses failing to account for the differences between the mean scores for groups lends plausibility to explanations of mean differences in terms of genetic factors. This two-component argument cannot be sustained when viewed in the light of the conceptual and methodological themes introduced in Taylor (2006). These themes concern the difficulties of moving from the statistical analysis of variance (AOV) of observed traits (often summarized in a heritability estimate) to investigation (through regression analysis and experiments) of measurable genetic factors (e.g., the presence or absence of specific alleles at one or more loci) and measurable environmental factors. One such theme is that quantities (“effects”) estimated by an AOV of observed traits cannot be equated with measurable genetic or environmental factors involved in the development of those traits. Once this distinction is clear, the argument that environmental factors have failed to explain the differences lacks weight because it does not consider whether genetic factors have been more successful. This article exposes additional flaws in the lines of thinking associated with the two-component argument, with the distinction between passive, reactive, and active associations between genetic and environmental factors, and with the reciprocal causation models Dickens and Flynn propose in order to reconcile high estimates of heritability and large IQ test score gains between generations. Human heritability estimates are irrelevant in developing explanations of differences across groups or across generations. My critique is directed at opening up more conceptual space for deriving empirically validated models of developmental pathways whose components are heterogeneous and differ among individuals at any one time and over generations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dickens WT, Flynn JR (2001) Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review 108: 346–369.
Dickens WT, Flynn JR (2002) The IQ paradox is still resolved: Reply to Loehlin (2002) and Rowe and Rodgers (2002). Psychological Review 109: 764–771.
Flynn JR (1980) Race, IQ and Jensen. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Flynn JR (1994) IQ gains over time. In: Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence (Sternberg RJ, ed), 617–623. New York: Macmillan.
Flynn JR (2000) How to Defend Humane Ideals: Substitutes for Objectivity. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Flynn JR (2006) Are blacks genetically superior for IQ and GQ? What Germany did that America could not. Unpublished manuscript.
Fryer R, Levitt S (2004) Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 447–164.
Jensen AR (1973) Educability and Group Differences. New York: Harper and Row.
Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA (2002) Towards a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in women. American Journal of Psychiatry 159: 1133–1145.
Lewontin RC (1974) The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.
Lindman HR (1992) Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design. New York: Springer.
Loehlin JC (2002) The IQ paradox: resolved? Still an open question. Psychological Review 109: 754–758.
Medical Research Council (2004) National Survey of Health and Development (The British 1946 birth cohort study). http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/ (viewed 4 March 2005).
Miele F (2002) Intelligence, Race, and Genetics: Conversations with Arthur Jensen. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M (2005) Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry62: 473–481.
Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ, Boykin AW, Brody N, Ceci SJ, Halpern DF, Loehlin JC, Perloff R, Sternberg RJ, Urbina S (1996) Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist 51: 77–101.
Nisbett RE (1998) Race, genetics, and IQ. In: The Black-White Test Score Gap (Jencks C, Phillips M, eds), 86–102. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Ou S-R (2005) Pathways of long-term effects of an early intervention program on educational attainment: Findings from the Chicago longitudinal study. Applied Developmental Psychology 26: 478–611.
Plomin R, DeFries JC, Loehlin JC (1977) Genotype-environment interaction correlation in analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin 84: 309–322.
Rowe DC, Rodgers JL (2002) Expanding variance and the case of historical changes in IQ means: A critique of Dickens and Flynn (2001). Psychological Review 109: 759–763.
Rutter M (2002) Nature, nurture, and development: From evangelism through science toward policy and practice. Child Development 73: 1–21.
Sesardic N (2000) Philosophy of science that ignores science: Race, IQ and heritability. Philosophy of Science 67: 580–602.
Sesardic N (2003) Heritability and indirect causation. Philosophy of Science 70: 1002–1014.
Taylor PJ (2005) Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor PJ (2006) Heritability and heterogeneity: The limited relevance of heritability in investigating genetic and environmental factors. Biological Theory 1: 150–164.
Woodhead M (1988) When psychology informs public policy. American Psychologist 43: 443–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, P. Heritability and Heterogeneity: The Irrelevance of Heritability in Explaining Differences between Means for Different Human Groups or Generations. Biol Theory 1, 392–401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.392
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.392