Skip to main content
Log in

Why Evolution Has to Matter to Cognitive Psychology and to Philosophy of Mind

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barsalou LW (2005) Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In: Building Object Categories (Gershokoff-Stowe L, Rakison D, eds), 389–431. Majwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (1999) An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Science 3: 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa R (2000) Learning to be natural. In: Being Humans (Roughley R, ed), 287–307. New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa R (2004). Evolution et rationalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F (1988) Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R (1993) Explanation in biopsychology. In: Mental Causation (Heil J, Mele A, eds), 211–232. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Origgi G, Sperber D (2000) Evolution, communication, and the proper function of language. In: Evolution and the Human Mind: Language, Modularity and Social Cognition (Carruthers P, Chamberlain A, eds), 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papineau D (2003) The Roots of Reason: Philosophical Essays on Rationality, Evolution, and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1987) Ideo-motor action. In: Perspectives on Perception and Action (Heuer H, Sanders AF, eds), 47–76. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Relationships between Perception and Action (Neumann O, Prinz W, eds), 167–201. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (1997) Comment l’esprit vient aux betes. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (2005) Rationality and metacognition in non-human animals. In: Rational Animals? (Hurley S, Nudds M, eds), 247–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust J (in press) What is mental function? In: French Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Springer.

  • Sperber D (2000) Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In: Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (Sperber D, ed), 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2001) The Evolution of Agency and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joëlle Proust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Proust, J. Why Evolution Has to Matter to Cognitive Psychology and to Philosophy of Mind. Biol Theory 1, 346–348 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.346

Keywords

Navigation