Skip to main content
Log in

Flow of Information in Molecular Biological Mechanisms

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1958, Francis Crick distinguished the flow of information from the flow of matter and the flow of energy in the mechanism of protein synthesis. Crick’s claims about information flow and coding in molecular biology are viewed from the perspective of a new characterization of mechanisms (Machamer, Darden, and Craver 2000) and from the perspective of information as holding a key to distinguishing work in molecular biology from that of biochemistry in the 1950s–1970s (Darden and Craver 2002). Flow of matter from beginning to end does not occur in the protein synthesis mechanism; flow of information (from Crick’s perspective) does. The flow of information and coding in molecular biological mechanisms are distinguished, on the one hand, from formal information theory, and, on the other, from information as used in cognitive neuroscience, where information and representation are often coupled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bechtel W, Richardson RC (1993) Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon RB (1985) Grene on mechanism and reductionism: More than just a side issue. In: PSA 1984, Vol. 2 (Asquith PD, Kitcher P, eds), 345–353. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian RM (1996) Underappreciated pathways toward molecular genetics as illustrated by Jean Brachet’s cytochemical embryology. In: The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives (Sarkar S, ed), 67–85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, Overbaugh J, Miller S (1988) The origin of mutants. Nature 335: 142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver CF (2001) Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver CF, Darden L (2001) Discovering mechanisms in neurobiology: The case of spatial memory. In: Theory and Method in the Neurosciences (Machamer P, Grush R, McLaughlin P, eds), 112–137. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1958) On protein synthesis. Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology 12: 138–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1970) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227: 561–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1988) What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden L (1991) Theory Change in Science: Strategies From Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden L (1995) Exemplars, abstractions, and anomalies: Representations and theory change in Mendelian and molecular genetics. In: Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences (Lennox JG, Wolters G, eds), 137–158. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden L (1998) Anomaly-driven theory redesign: Computational philosophy of science experiments. In: The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy (Bynum TW, Moor J, eds), 62–78. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden L (2002) Strategies for discovering mechanisms: Schemainstantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward chaining. Philosophy of Science 69: S354–S365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L (2006) Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Mechanisms, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L, Craver C (2002) Strategies in the interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L, Maull N (1977) Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darden L, Tabery J (2005) Molecular biology. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Zalta EN, ed). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/molecular-biology/

  • Ephrussi B, Leopold U, Watson JD, Weigle JJ (1953) Terminology in bacterial genetics. Nature 171: 701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster PL (1999) Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation: A decade of adaptive mutation. Annual Review of Genetics 33: 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan SS (1996) Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grush R (2001) The semantic challenge to computational neuroscience. In: Theory and Method in the Neurosciences (Machamer P, Grush R, McLaughlin P, eds), 155–172. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson NR (1963) The Concept of the Positron: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland MB (1955) An enzymic mechanism for amino acid activation in animal tissues. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 16: 288–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland MB (1996) Biochemistry or molecular biology? The discovery of ‘soluble RNA’. Trends in Biological Sciences Letters (TIBS) 21: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes FL (1991) Hans Krebs: The Formation of a Scientific Life 1900–1933. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes FL (1993) Hans Krebs: Architect of Intermediary Metabolism. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 318–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judson HF (1996) The Eighth Day of Creation: The Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Expanded ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay LE (2000) Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes M (1999a) The prion challenge to the “central dogma” of molecular biology, 1965–1991: I. Prelude to prions. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes M (1999b) The prion challenge to the “central dogma” of molecular biology, 1965–1991. II. The problem with prions. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machamer P, Darden L, Craver C (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morange M (1998) A History of Molecular Biology. Translated from French by Matthew Cobb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby R (1970) Francis Crick, DNA, and the central dogma. In: The Twentieth Century Sciences (Holton G, ed), 227–280. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby R (1994) The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. Revised ed. Mineola, NY: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger H-J (1997) Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (1996) Decoding “coding”—information and DNA. BioScience 46: 857–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger E (1944) What Is Life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper RA (1999) Selection and the extent of explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 66: S196–S209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele EJ, Lindley RA, Blanden RB (1998) Lamarck’s Signature. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (1999) How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor JD (2006). Approaches to information-theoretic analysis of neural activity. Biological Theory 1: 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD (1965) Molecular Biology of the Gene. New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD (1968) The Double Helix. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD (1970) Molecular Biology of the Gene. 2nd ed. New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD (2002) Genes, Girls, and Gamow. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953a) A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171: 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953b) Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171: 964–967. Reprinted in: The Double Helix, A Norton Critical Edition (Stent G, ed), 241–246. New York: Norton, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (1972) Complexity and organization. In: PSA 1972 (Schaffner KF, Cohen RS, eds), 67–86. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamecnik PC (1953) Incorporation of radioactivity from DL-leucine-1-C14 into proteins of rat liver homogenate. Federation Proceedings 12: 295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindley Darden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darden, L. Flow of Information in Molecular Biological Mechanisms. Biol Theory 1, 280–287 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.3.280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2006.1.3.280

Keywords

Navigation