Abstract
Instabilities and pattern formation in viscous fluids have been a major topic of non-linear fluid dynamics for several decades. The study of pattern formation in viscoelastic thin films offers the opportunity to find new fascinating structures that cannot be observed in viscous fluids. Rayleigh–Taylor and Faraday instabilities, such as the resulting patterns in thin films of viscoelastic fluids, are investigated. We use the long-wave approximation and a Karman–Pohlhausen approach to simplify the mass and momentum equations. The viscoelastic stress tensor is calculated applying the linear Maxwell model. Conditions for the Faraday instability have been found using Floquet’s theorem. It is shown that viscoelastic films can exhibit harmonic resonance under external vibration. Moreover, a simulation of the non-linear problem in 2D and 3D is conducted with a finite difference method. Unstable oscillating Rayleigh–Taylor modes occur in the 2D numerical solution. Furthermore, we find that the wavenumber changes with the relaxation time of the fluid. Faraday patterns in viscous films emerge as regular structures of the surface, like squares or hexagons. Numerical simulations of the viscoelastic fluid also show regular structures. However, they collapse into a chaotic stripe-like pattern after a certain time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
This paper discusses instabilities in the case of a viscoelastic fluid. A pure viscous (Newtonian) fluid exposed to external stress converts all the stress energy into heat. A viscoelastic fluid on the other hand is able to store a part of the energy. To model this behavior, we choose the linear Maxwell fluid.
One of the instabilities we want to discuss is the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (RTI). RTI appears if a more dense liquid is located above (below) a less dense one and a volume force pointing downward (upward) exists. Such a constellation is unstable and any small disturbance of the flat interface between the two liquids will grow exponentially in time. The instability is named after Taylor [1] and Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh [2]. The Rayleigh–Taylor instability appears quite often, from the structures which are formed by a collapsing star to the patterns in the billows of cigarette smoke. RTI of a Newtonian two-layer system is studied in [3].
RTI of viscoelastic drops is examined in [4] using the Oldroyd-B fluid model. Reference [5] discusses gravity and Rayleigh–Taylor waves with a Jeffrey fluid model. In Ref. [6], the linear stability analysis is applied on a Maxwell fluid. Two Maxwell fluid layers are investigated in Ref. [7] in context of tectonics in the upper mantel, while Ref. [8] assumes a Maxwell fluid over a Newtonian fluid to describe large-scale processes in the lithosphere. RTI of linear viscoelastic fluids is investigated by Ref. [9] through a displacement field which is applied to the stress tensor. Linear and weakly non-linear results are presented.
We shall also consider the Faraday instability, first studied by and named after Faraday [10]. The Faraday instability is caused by an external vertical vibration. The surface of the fluid starts oscillating after some time if a critical amplitude is exceeded. Depending on the vibration amplitude and frequencies, the surface of a vibrating fluid is organized in regular structures like triangles, rectangles, or hexagons. Stability analysis of Faraday waves on viscoelastic fluids is discussed in Ref. [11]. Experimental results of vibrating viscoelastic fluids are shown in Ref. [12, 13]. Numerical investigations of Newtonian Faraday instability using a phase field model one can find in [14]. Reference [15] studies the stability of a viscous fluid layer covered with an elastic polymer film under external vibration by usage of Floquet’s theorem.
A combination of Faraday and Rayleigh–Taylor instability is studied in [16]. The falling of viscoelastic films down an inclined plane is investigated through long-wave approximation, linear stability analysis, and weakly non-linear approaches by [17].
2 Governing equations
Using the linear Maxwell fluid, we have two parameters for the description of the viscoelastic behavior. The relation between the stress tensor \(\bar{\sigma }\) and the shear rate tensor \(\bar{D}\) is given by [18]
where \(\eta\) and \(\Lambda\) are the dynamic viscosity and the relaxation time of the fluid. If \(\Lambda = 0\), Eq. (1) constitutes the inner stress of the Newtonian fluid. The ratio \(\eta /\Lambda\) is equal to Young’s modulus E, so we can find another special case. For \(\eta \rightarrow \infty\) and \(\Lambda \rightarrow \infty\), but \(\eta /\Lambda\) = const., the linear Maxwell fluid is equivalent to the elastic solid. We describe conservation of mass and momentum with the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations
A two-dimensional sketch of our system is shown in Fig. 1. At \(z = 0\), the fluid is in contact with the solid substrate and no fluid movement is possible
On the other hand, the boundary at \(z= h(x,y,t)\) is assumed to be a free surface and the tangential stress must disappear. Thus
The normal stress balance on the free surface reads
Here, \(p_0\) is the pressure of the environment, p the fluid pressure under the surface, \(\gamma\) the surface tension, and K the curvature. The free surface is defined by a function h(x, y, t). This function gives the fluid depth at every location and time and its temporal evolution is ruled by the kinematic condition
In lateral directions, we assume periodic boundaries with \(x\in \left[ 0,L\right]\) and \(y\in \left[ 0,L\right]\).
Equation (1) can be simplified by assuming a viscoelastic force field
which leads with the use of Eq. (3) to
One characteristic time scale of the system is the diffusion time
where \(\nu\) is the kinematic viscosity. We introduce the dimensionless quantities (bearing tildes)
Applying long-wave approximation [19] and the Karman–Pohlhausen method [20], our system (leaving all tildes) simplifies to (see Appendix A)
with \(Q_{ij} = \frac{9}{7} \frac{q_iq_j}{h}\). A similar approximation of a thin film is also applied by Ref. [21].
The system variables are the flow rate \(\vec {q} = \left( q_x,\ q_y\right) ^T\), force \(\vec {F} = \left( F_x,\ F_y\right) ^T\) and the height h(x, y, t). Here, the operator \(\nabla _2 = \left( \partial _x, \partial _y\right) ^T\). Note that all dependent variables are now 2D instead of the original 3D fields. In addition to \(\Lambda\), two new parameters appear, the dimensionless surface tension
and the Galileo number G:
When we apply harmonic oscillations, the Galileo number becomes time-dependent and reads
Oscillations are characterized by their frequency \(\omega\) and amplitude a. Their dimensional counterparts are notated with \(\Omega =\omega /\tau\) and \(A=ga/\Omega ^2\).
3 Linear stability analysis
3.1 Rayleigh–Taylor instability
First, we investigate the instability of Rayleigh–Taylor waves. Due to isotropy in the horizontal plane, it is sufficient to examine the 2D case
After linearizing with respect to the small amplitudes u, f, and \(\eta\), the resulting eigenvalue problem yields the characteristic equation
The most dangerous mode has the growth rate \(\max \left( \Re (\lambda )\right)\). The system is unstable if \(\max \left( \Re (\lambda )\right) >0\). Only with a negative Galileo number, an instability can be observed. The dependency of \(\max \left( \Re (\lambda )\right)\) from k can be understand as dispersion relation. We notice that the growth rate has a maximum in k, which is independent of \(\Lambda\). With increasing \(\Lambda\), the maximum growth rate increases stagnating. A destabilizing effect of relaxation time was also found by Ref. [22, 23].
An increase of the surface tension \(\Gamma\) leads to a decrease of the fastest growing wavenumber in the unstable RTI domain. A decrease of G shifts the unstable domain to the short-wave region of the dispersion spectrum. In Fig. 2, we show dispersion relations for varying values of \(\Lambda\). The scaling parameters are chosen \(\Gamma = -G = 1\), therefore equal forces from surface tension and gravity. They are equivalent to a fluid with \(\rho _0 = 999\ kg/m^3\), \(\gamma = 0.07\ N/m\), \(\nu = 4.4 \cdot 10 ^{-4}\ m^2/s\) and \(d = 2.6\ mm\). These parameters can be achieved, e.g., by a viscous water-based polymer solution. It should be mentioned that viscoelastic solutions have higher viscosities than their solvents; therefore, it is acceptable to assume a viscosity 440 times higher than for water.
3.2 Faraday instability
Under harmonic external excitations, we utilize Floquet’s theorem to estimate the stability condition of the system. We take
The time-dependent components build a vector \(\vec {\xi }(t) = \, \left( \eta (t),\ u(t),\ f(t)\right) ^T\), which fulfils the linear system
Here, \(\bar{A}\) denotes the Jacobian where \(\bar{A}(t) = \bar{A}(t+T)\) with \(T=2\pi /\omega\) due to Eq. (15). A matrix \(\bar{M}\) which transform the system one period ahead is introduced. Therefore
We determine the columns of the monodromy matrix \(\bar{M}\) by integrating
for three linearly independent initial conditions \(i=1,2,3\). The vector \(\vec {\xi }\) can be decomposed into
where \(w_i(t) = w_i(t+T)\). The \(\lambda _i\) are the Floquet exponents. According to Floquet’s theorem, it applies
where \(\sigma _i\) are the eigenvalues of \(\bar{M}\). Due to Eqs. (22, 23), \(\max |\sigma |\) determines the system stability. We compute \(\sigma _i\) by solving Eq. (21) applying a fourth-order Runge–Kutta method. As initial condition, we take an Euclidean base. Figure 3 shows lines of marginal stability (Arnold tongues), \(\max |\sigma |\,= \, 1\). We observe successive subharmonic and harmonic unstable solutions. A change of relaxation time causes also a change of the position of the marginal lines in amplitude and wavenumber.
There is a critical amplitude where the system becomes unstable. This amplitude decreases with increasing frequency. The decrease in frequency is faster for higher relaxation times. The wavenumber of this amplitude is denoted with \(k_{crit}\). In Fig. 4, the critical wavenumber is plotted over the frequency. The \(k_{crit}(\omega )\)—curves show a discontinuity, when an Arnold tongue replaces another one as the most dominant in the system. In the region where \(\Lambda \omega \approx 1\), we observe a harmonic tongue as critical. Also, the size of the appointed frequency window (H2 in (a) and H1 in (b)) increases compared to the Newtonian fluid (c) in Fig. 4. Reference [11] also found a harmonic resonance in that region and a minimum for the critical amplitude.
4 Numerical results
Applying a standard finite difference method [24], solutions in two (2D) and in three dimensions (3D) have been determined. The code has been developed in C++. In Fig. 5, a 2D Rayleigh–Taylor wave is shown for different time steps. There are two resonances, one at \(x\approx 27\) and one at \(x\approx 66\). Two perturbations with nearly the same amplitudes merge at \(t=40\) and form a new bigger RT wave crest at \(t = 50\). After its formation, it begins to shrink as quickly as it has been formed, and at \(t=54\), the drop is not much bigger than the others. This swapping back behavior is a hint to the elastic property of the film. The second resonance, at \(x \approx 66\), grows to such an extent that it finally causes rupture. Figure 6 shows an RTI in 3D. Surface perturbations grow over time. The flow field has sinks where the surface height increases and sources where it decreases. Average flow rates and surface perturbations increase in time.
The 2D Faraday waves of a Newtonian fluid are shown in Fig. 7. There is a \(\pi\)-phase shift after one period; the structures are subharmonic. The wavenumber fits to the results from Floquet analysis, where we expect to be in the \(1\,S\) and \(1\,H\) Arnold tongue region. Therefore, the harmonic solution is not visible in the numerics.
In Fig. 8, the height for a viscoelastic fluid with \(\Lambda =0.5\) is illustrated. We observe a fundamental difference between the patterns of the Newtonian fluid and the linear Maxwell fluid. In the beginning, the Maxwell fluid acts quite similar to the Newtonian fluid. It takes some time before the structures of the surface appear, and then, they look quite similar to their viscous equivalent. After some time, the repeating structures begin to change. The surface oscillates almost chaotically, a full phase repeats only almost the same pattern. The explanation to this can be that the linear Maxwell fluid has a memory of every stress to which it was exposed. This phenomenon is called stress relaxation, it is the major difference between the Newtonian fluid and the linear Maxwell fluid and the best explanation for the appearance of these strange surface patterns. A more detailed presentation of stress relaxation can be found in [18].
The Faraday instability of Newtonian fluids in 3D produces surface patterns like squares or hexagons [21, 25]. In Fig. 9, we can see how the 3D viscoelastic film develops from the random perturbation in the beginning to a subharmonic stripe structure. At \(t=10\), we see a random surface, which becomes a subharmonic square structure at \(t=124\). The squares repeat periodically for some time with small changes. At \(t= 208\), we observe that some of the former squares have developed into diamonds and connect with their neighbors. Then, at \(t= 228\), the regular structure begins to collapse. It follows a kind of transition phase where irregularly changing structures occur, similar to the almost chaotic surface patterns we also observe in the 2D calculation (\(t = 252\)). After the transition phase (\(t= 320\)), the surface ends up in a stripe pattern. This is a similar behavior as the corresponding 2D solution. The applied scaling is \(G=\Gamma = 40\). This can be associated with \(\rho _0=789\ kg/m^3\), \(\gamma = 0.022\ N/m\), \(\nu =3.4\cdot 10^{-5}\ m^2/s\) and \(d =1.67\ mm\) (e.g., ethanol-based polymer solution). Vibrating with \(12\ Hz\) (\(\omega = \pi\)) or \(24\ Hz\) (\(\omega = 2 \pi\)).
Reference [13] studied Faraday waves of viscoelastic fluids experimentally. The authors use a \(1.5\%\) polyacrylamid-co-acid solvent. A similar transition of hexagonal patterns to a stripe-like structure is observed.
5 Conclusions
The Rayleigh–Taylor and the Faraday instability for a viscoelastic Maxwell fluid are examined applying a linear stability analysis as well as direct numerical simulations of a recently derived long-wave model. The results of the numerical solution and the linear analysis confirm each other. The wave numbers and frequencies predicted by the linear model are reproduced by the numerical approach.
The linear stability analysis has shown that the highest growth rate \(\lambda _{max}\) of RTI increases with \(\Lambda\). For high values of \(\Lambda\), the increase stagnates. Here, it should be mentioned that in practice, it is very difficult to increase a fluids’ relaxation time without increasing its viscosity too. The corresponding \(k_{max}\) is not influenced by the relaxation time. Numerical solutions of 2D RTI waves show elastic behavior and resonance.
The Faraday instability in 2D and 3D creates erratic surface patterns. The 3D simulation shows a subharmonic stripe structure which does not occur in Newtonian fluids.
Further research can focus on the implementation of various viscoelastic models and can clarify how pattern formation in these materials distinguish from each other. Also, the Faraday instability of viscoelastics offers many possibilities for further research. For example, the characterization of the patterns which are not observable in Newtonian fluids or a detailed study of the resonance behavior is conceivable. High-frequency regions are not considered by our model due to their short-wave nature.
The long-wave model we developed here can be extended in several directions. One can add horizontal vibrations, resulting in another kind of Faraday instability [27].
Certain combinations of instabilities are possible too. One can combine RTI and Faraday instability or consider the Faraday instability on an inclined surface.
The study of instabilities and pattern formation in viscoelastic fluids is a complex topic which offers many possibilities for future research.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
It should be mentioned that \(v_z = -\int \textrm{d}z \partial _x v_x-\int \textrm{d}z \partial _y v_y\).
References
G.I. Taylor, The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. Proc. Royal Soc. London A201, 192 (1950)
J.W. Strutt, Lord Rayleigh: Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Math. Soc. London 14, 170 (1883)
M. Bestehorn, Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz instability studied in the frame of a dimension-reduced model. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190508 (2020)
D.D. Joseph, G.S. Beavers, T. Funada, Rayleigh-Taylor instability of viscoelastic drops at high Weber numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 109 (2002)
A. Saasen, O. Hassager, Gravity waves and Rayleigh-Taylor instability on a Jeffrey-fluid. Rheol. Acta 30, 301 (1991)
A. Saasen, P.A. Tyvand, Rayleigh-Taylor instability and Rayleigh-type waves on a Maxwell fluid. J. Appl. Math. and Phys. 41, 284 (1990)
B.M. Naimark, A.T. Ismail-Zadeh, Gravitational instability of Maxwell upper mantle. Comput. Seism. Geodyn. 1, 36 (1994)
B.J.P. Klaus, T.W. Becker, Effects of elasticity on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Geophysical J. Int. 168, 843 (2007)
B. Dinesh, R. Narayanan, Branchingbehaviour of the Rayleigh-Taylorinstability in linear viscoelastic fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 915, A63 (2021)
M. Faraday, On the forms and states of fluids on vibrating elastic surfaces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 52, 319 (1831)
H.W. Müller, W. Zimmermann, Faraday instability in a linear viscoelastic fluid. EPL 45, 169 (1999)
C. Cabeza, M. Rosen, G. Ferreyra, G. Bongiovanni, Dynamical behavior of digitations state in Faraday waves with a viscoelastic fluid. Phys. A 371, 54 (2006)
C. Wagner, H.W. Müller, K. Knorr, Faraday Waves on a Viscoelastic Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, (1999)
M. Bestehorn, D. Sharma, R. Borcia, S. Amiroudine, Faraday instability of binary miscible/immiscible fluids with phase field approach. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 064002 (2021)
J. Liu, W. Song, G. Ma, K. Li, Faraday Instability in Viscous Fluids Covered with Elastic Polymer Films. Polymers 14, 2334 (2022)
E. Sterman-Cohen, M. Bestehorn, A. Oron, Rayleigh-Taylor instability in thin liquid films subjected to harmonic vibration. Phys. Fluids 29, 052105 (2017)
S. Chattopadhyay, A.S. Desai, Dynamics and stability of weakly viscoelastic film flowing down a uniformly heated slippery incline. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 064007 (2022)
W.M. Lei, D. Rubin, E. Krempl, Introduction to continuum mechanics, Pergamon Press (1993)
A. Oron, S.H. Davis, S.G. Bankoff, Long-wave evolution of thin liquid films. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 931 (1997)
R.V. Craster, O.K. Matar, Dynamics and stability of thin liquid films. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1131 (2009)
M. Bestehorn, Q. Han, A. Oron, Nonlinear pattern formation in thin liquid films under external vibrations. Phys. Rev. E 88, 023025 (2013)
R.C. Sharma, K.C. Sharma, Rayleigh-taylor instability of two viscoelastic superposed fluids. Acta Physica 45, 3 (1978)
G. Boffetta, A. Mazzino, S. Musacchio, L. Vozella, Rayleigh-Taylor instability in a viscoelastic binary fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 643, (2010)
M. Bestehorn, Computational Physics, de Gruyter Berlin/Boston (2018)
M. Bestehorn, A. Potosky, Faraday instability and nonlinear pattern formation of a two-layer system: A reduced model. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 063905 (2016)
M. Bestehorn, A. Potosky, Faraday instability of a two-layer liquid film with a free upper surface. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 023901 (2016)
S. Richter, M. Bestehorn, Direct numerical simulations of liquid films in two dimensions under horizontal and vertical external vibrations. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 044004 (2019)
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
IMA10 - Interfacial Fluid Dynamics and Processes. Guest editors: Rodica Borcia, Sebastian Popescu, Ion Dan Borcia.
Appendix A: Deviation of Eqs. 12a–12c
Appendix A: Deviation of Eqs. 12a–12c
The derivation of the y-components look analogous to the x-components, so only the x-components are presented in detail. Long-wave approximation is based on the assumption that the considered system is much less prominent in one direction of space (z-direction) than in the others. Rescaling with long-wave approximation leads to \(F_z = O(\delta )\), \(v_z= O(\delta )\), \(\partial _y = O(\delta )\) and \(\partial _x = O(\delta )\), with scaling factor \(\delta = \frac{d}{l}<< 1\). Here, l represents the characteristic length in x- and y-direction. Neglecting all terms of \(O(\delta ^2)\) in Eqs. (2) and (9) leads to
and
Under application of Eq. (3) to the kinematic boundary condition (7), it follows:
The pressure gradient can be found by the boundary condition (6) and Eq. (A2), which yields to
Karman–Pohlhausen method assumes a flow rate
and separates the velocity in x-according to
with
Using this assumption, the z-coordinate can be eliminated in Eqs. (A1, A3) and (A4) by integrating over a weight function
The right-hand side of Eq. (A1) is
The left-hand side isFootnote 1
Integrating Eq. (A3) gives
Equation (A4) is already
The result of this calculation is the system shown in 12a–12c.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schön, FT., Bestehorn, M. Instabilities and pattern formation in viscoelastic fluids. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 232, 375–383 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00792-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00792-x