Abstract
The present paper is a comparative study of transverse momentum spectra of \(K_{s}^{0}\) − mesons, \(\Lambda - \) hyperons, multi-strange baryons \({\Xi }^{ - }\), \({\overline{\Xi }}^{ + } ,\) \(\Omega^{ - }\) and \(\overline{\Omega }^{ + }\) in the most central Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt {s_{NN} }\) = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV for the mid rapidity interval \(\left| y \right|\)< 0.5 by using two different Monte Carlo simulation models, EPOS-1.99 and EPOS-LHC. Particle ratios \(\Lambda /K_{s}^{0} \) are studied at the two center-of-mass energies to understand the enhancement of heavier hadrons over the lighter ones. Nuclear modification factors are also constructed for multi-strange baryons at \(\sqrt {s_{NN} }\) = 2.76 TeV to study particle production and energy loss mechanisms. The validity of these models is tested for Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt {s_{NN} }\) = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV by comparing the simulation data with ALICE experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
This manuscript has associated data available online on data repository. [Authors’ comment: The ALICE experimental data are taken from https://www.hepdata.net/ from the papers https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.61857 and https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.62098].
References
J. Adams et al., (STAR Collaboration) Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005)
K. Adcox et al., (PHENIX Collaboration) Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005)
M. Gyulassy et al., Nucl. Phys. A 750, 30 (2005)
J. Adam et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 064606 (2017)
P. Koch et al., Phys. Rept. 142, 167 (1986)
J. Rafelski, Eur. Phys. ST 155, 139 (2008)
K.A. Bugaev et al., Ukr. J. Phys. 61, 8 (2016)
G. Bocquet et al., (UA1 Collaboration) Phys. Lett. B 366, 441 (1996)
R.E. Ansorge et al., (UA5 Collaboration) Nucl. Phys. B 328, 36 (1989)
R.E. Ansorge et al., (UA5 Collaboration) Phys. Lett. B 199, 311 (1987)
R. Hagedorn, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 6, 1 (1983)
J.D. Bjorken, FERMILAB–Pub–82/59–THY, USA (1982)
D. d’Enterria, R. Stock, 23, 99 (2010)
S. Chatrchyan et al., (CMS Collaboration) Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1945 (2012)
B. Abelev et al., (ALICE Collaboration) Phys. Lett. B 720, 52 (2013)
G. Aad et al., (ATLAS Collaboration) JHEP 09, 050 (2015)
K. Aamodt, et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011).
Z. Yin et al., (ALICE Collaboration) Intl. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Series 29, 1460228 (2014)
V. Khachatryan et al., (CMS Collaboration) JHEP 04, 039 (2017)
J. Rafelski, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 155, 139 (2008)
R.J. Fries et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 044902 (2003)
V. Topor et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 064906 (2004)
S.J. Brodsky et al., Phys. Lett. B 668, 111 (2008)
C. Shen et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 61 (2016)
W. Zhao et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 645 (2017)
S. McDonald et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 064913 (2017)
V. Greco et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202302 (2003)
R.J. Fries et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202303 (2003)
V. Minissale et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 054904 (2015)
A. Arif, Y. Ali, M.Q. Haseeb, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 737 (2021)
A. Arif et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 30, 2150068 (2021)
A. Arif, Y. Ali, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 951 (2021)
M. Šefcík, et al., (ALICE Collaboration) EPJ Web Conf. 171 13007 (2018)
P. Kalinak, (ALICE collaboration) EPS-HEP (2017)
T. Pierog, K. Werner, The EPOS Model, Proceedings of the 31st ICRC, Łodz (2009)
T. Pierog et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015)
K. Werner et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 044902 (2006)
M. Hladik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3506 (2001)
N.N. Kalmykov et al., Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 58, 1966 (1994)
R.J. Fries, J. Phys. G 30, S853 (2004)
K. Werner, Nucl. Phys. B 81, 175 (2008)
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad campus, Pakistan, which provided all possible facilities and a suitable platform to perform the simulations and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arif, A., Ali, Y. & Haseeb, M.Q. Comparison of strange particle production measurements in central Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt {s_{NN} }\) = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV by using Monte Carlo simulation models EPOS-1.99 and EPOS-LHC. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 512 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02739-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02739-y