Abstract
The canonical operator \({\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\) (\({\hat{a}}\)) represents the ideal process of adding (subtracting) an exact amount of energy E to (from) a physical system in both elementary quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. This is a “sharp” notion in the sense that no variability around E is possible at the operator level. In this work, we present a class of deformed creation and annihilation operators that originates from a rigorous notion of fuzziness. This leads to deformed, sub-bosonic commutation relations inducing a simple algebraic structure with modified eigenenergies and Fock states. In addition, we investigate possible consequences of the introduced formalism in quantum field theories, as for instance, deviations from linearity in the dispersion relation for free quasibosons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)
M. Peskin, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018)
S.E. Rugh, H. Zinkernagel, Stud. Philos. Hist. Mod. Phys. 33, 663 (2002)
T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rep. 380, 235 (2003)
A. Kempf, G. Mangano, R.B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1108 (1995)
A. Kempf, J. Phys. A 30, 2093 (1997)
A. Kempf, G. Mangano, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7909 (1997)
H.S. Green, Phys. Rev. 90, 270 (1953)
M. Hawton, D. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 57, 4000 (1998)
A.J. Macfarlane, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 22, 4581 (1989)
L.C. Biendenharn, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 22, L873 (1989)
C.-P. Sun, H.-C. Fu, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 22, L983 (1989)
R.N. Costa Filho, M.P. Almeida, G.A. Farias, G.S. Andrade Jr., Phys. Rev A 84, 050102 (2011)
R.N. Costa Filho, G. Alencar, B.S. Skagerstam, G.S. Andrade Jr., EPL 101, 10009 (2013)
F. Parisio, M.A.M. de Aguiar, Phys. Rev. A 68, 062112 (2003)
E.P. Wigner, Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra (Academic Press, New York, 1959)
V. Potocek, S.M. Barnett, Phys. Scr. 90, 065208 (2015)
R. Román-Ancheyta, J. Récamier, Adv. Quant. Chem. 71, 299 (2015)
J.R. Klauder, B. Skagerstam, Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985)
A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1986)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Azadeh Mohammadi, Bruno Cunha, and Carlos Batista for their comments on an early version of this work. This research received financial support from the Brazilian agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico through its program CNPq INCT-IQ (Grant 465469/2014-0). R.X. is also supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under the contract DE-SC0017647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Complex integration
Appendix: Complex integration
In this appendix, we evaluate the functional
With the substitution \(x+1 \rightarrow x\), we get
where \(g_{k}(x)=(x-1)^k f'(x-1)\). We start by considering the following integration in the complex plane
Note that \(\sqrt{z}\) has branch points at zero and at infinity. For the remainder of this appendix, we will work with the branch cut connecting these two branch points through the negative imaginary axis, that is, we restrict ourselves to \(\theta \in [e^{\pi i/2},e^{3 \pi i/2})\). We will assume the following condition on the function \(g_{k}(z)\):
-
Condition (i): \(g_{k}(z)\) is analytic in \(\mathrm{H} \cup {\mathbb {R}}\), except for a finite number of removable singularities (poles) in \(\mathrm{H}\). Here, \(\mathrm{H}\equiv \left\{ z\in {\mathbb {C}} ~|~ \mathfrak {I}{(z)}> 0 \right\} \) is the upper-half of the complex plane.
Given that this condition is satisfied, let us evaluate expression (43) on the path \(\gamma \) defined as
with the following parametrizations:
where we will take the limits \(R \rightarrow \infty \) and \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\). Let us now evaluate each of the integrals
Now, we also need to assume the following condition on g(z):
-
Condition (ii): We associate with \(g_{k}(z)\) the coefficients \(\alpha ,\beta \) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} g_{k}\big (Re^{i\theta }\big ) \underset{R \rightarrow \infty }{\sim } R^\alpha , \quad \text {and} \quad g_{k}\big (\varepsilon e^{i\theta }\big ) \underset{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}{\sim } \varepsilon ^\beta . \end{aligned}$$(49)These coefficients must be such that \(\alpha <-1/2\) and \(\beta >-1/2\).
If condition (ii) is satisfied, we can set
Combining these results, Eq. (43) gives
However, we can also apply the residue theorem to Eq. (43):
Hence, equating Eqs. (51) and (52), we get
which ends the Proof of Proposition 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serafim, J.D., Ximenes, R. & Parisio, F. Sub-bosonic (deformed) ladder operators. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 686 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01670-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01670-y