Abstract
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computing has received great attention due to its advantages of avoiding long-term evolution of the system and maintaining the robustness of holonomic gates to control errors. In this paper, we study a scheme for implementing nonadiabatic holonomic computation using two blockaded Rydberg atoms. With the presence of the Rydberg blockade effect, we realized controlled-phase gates, which play an irreplaceable role in quantum computation and quantum information processing. Therefore, the current scheme may open up new prospects for the design of new types of effective Rydberg quantum gate devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: All data included in this manuscript are available upon request by contacting with the corresponding author.]
References
E.T. Campbell, B.M. Terhal, C. Vuillot, Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation. Nature 549, 172–179 (2007)
T. Albash, D.A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018)
D. Loss, D.P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998)
J. Borregaard, A.S. Sorensen, J.I. Cirac, M.D. Lukin, Efficient quantum computation in a network with probabilistic gates and logical encoding. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042312 (2017)
D.A. Lidar, I.L. Chuang, K.B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998)
R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
E. Sjöqvist, A.K. Pati, A. Ekert, J.S. Anandan, M. Ericsson, D.K.L. Oi, V. Vedral, Geometric phases for mixed states in interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2845 (2000)
G. Falci, R. Fazio, G.M. Palma, J. Siewert, V. Vedral, Detection of geometric phases in superconducting nanocircuits. Nature (London) 407, 355–358 (2000)
S.L. Zhu, Z.D. Wang, Implementation of universal quantum gates based on nonadiabatic geometric phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097902 (2002)
S.L. Zhu, Scaling of geometric phases close to the quantum phase transition in the spin chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077206 (2006)
V.A. Mousolou, E. Sjöqvist, Non-Abelian geometric phases in a system of coupled quantum bits. Phys. Rev. A 89, 022117 (2014)
L.S. Simeonov, N.V. Vitanov, Generation of non-Abelian geometric phases in degenerate atomic transitions. Phys. Rev. A 96, 032102 (2017)
A.A. Abdumalikov Jr., J.M. Fink, K. Juliusson, M. Pechal, S. Berger, A. Wallraff, S. Filipp, Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates. Nature (London) 496, 482–485 (2013)
G.F. Xu, G.L. Long, Universal nonadiabatic geometric gates in two-qubit decoherence-free subspaces. Sci. Rep. 4, 6814 (2014)
Z.T. Liang, X.X. Yue, Q. Lv, Y.X. Du, W. Huang, H. Yan, S.L. Zhu, Proposal for implementing universal superadiabatic geometric quantum gates in nitrogen-vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. A 93, 040305(R) (2016)
E. Sjöqvist, Nonadiabatic holonomic single-qubit gates in off-resonant \(\Lambda \) systems. Phys. Lett. A 380, 65–67 (2016)
X.B. Wang, M. Keiji, Nonadiabatic conditional geometric phase shift with NMR. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097901 (2001)
S.L. Zhu, Z.D. Wang, Unconventional geometric quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187902 (2003)
Z.S. Wang, C.F. Wu, X.L. Feng, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Lai, C.H. Oh, V. Vedral, Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 76, 044303 (2007)
E. Sjöqvist, D.M. Tong, L.M. Andersson, B. Hessmo, M. Johansson, K. Singh, Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation. New J. Phys. 14, 103035 (2012)
J. Zhang, T.H. Kyaw, D.M. Tong, E. Sjöqvist, L.C. Kwek, Fast non-Abelian geometric gates via transitionless quantum driving. Sci. Rep. 5, 18414 (2015)
H. Li, Y. Liu, G.L. Long, Experimental realization of single-shot nonadiabatic holonomic gates in nuclear spins. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 60, 080311 (2017)
C. Zu, W.B. Wang, L. He, W.G. Zhang, C.Y. Dai, F. Wang, L.M. Duan, Experimental realization of universal geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins. Nature 519(7520), 72 (2014)
S. Arroyo-Camejo, A. Lazariev, S.W. Hell, G. Balasubramanian, Room temperature high-fidelity holonomic single-qubit gate on a solid-state spin. Nat. Commun. 5, 4870 (2014)
B.J. Liu, Z.H. Huang, Z.Y. Xue, X.D. Zhang, Superadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 95, 062308 (2017)
Z.Y. Xue, J. Zhou, Y.M. Chu, Y. Hu, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with all-resonant control. Phys. Rev. A 94, 022331 (2016)
M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, K. Molmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010)
E. Urban, T.A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D.D. Yavuz, T.G. Walker, M. Saffman, Observation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms. Nat. Phys. 5, 110–114 (2009)
Y.H. Kang, Y.H. Chen, Z.C. Shi, B.H. Huang, J. Song, Y. Xia, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. A 97, 042336 (2018)
H.Z. Wu, Z.B. Yang, S.B. Zheng, Implementation of a multiqubit quantum phase gate in a neutral atomic ensemble via the asymmetric Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. A 82, 034307 (2010)
D.D. Bhaktavatsala Rao, K. Molmer, Robust Rydberg-interaction gates with adiabatic passage. Phys. Rev. A 89, 030301(R) (2014)
X. Chen, G.W. Lin, H. Xie, X. Shang, M.Y. Ye, X.M. Lin, Fast creation of a three-atom singlet state with a dissipative mechanism and Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042335 (2018)
M.M. Muller, M. Murphy, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, Implementation of an experimentally feasible controlled-phase gate on two blockaded Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A 89, 032334 (2014)
P.Z. Zhao, X.D. Cui, G.F. Xu, E. Sjoqvist, D.M. Tong, Rydberg-atom-based scheme of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 96, 052316 (2017)
P.Z. Zhao, G.F. Xu, D.M. Tong, Nonadiabatic holonomic multiqubit controlled gates. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052309 (2019)
P.Z. Zhao, X. Wu, T.H. Xing, G.F. Xu, D.M. Tong, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with Rydberg superatoms. Phys. Rev. A 98, 032313 (2018)
X.L. Feng, Z.S. Wang, C.F. Wu, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Lai, C.H. Oh, Scheme for unconventional geometric quantum computation in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052312 (2007)
Z.T. Liang, Y.X. Du, W. Huang, Z.Y. Xue, H. Yan, Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 89, 062312 (2014)
M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A 72, 022347 (2005)
D.F.V. James, J. Jerke, Effective Hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum information Can. J. Phys. 85, 625–632 (2007)
D. Møller, L.B. Madsen, K. Mølmer, Quantum gates and multiparticle entanglement by Rydberg excitation blockade and adiabatic passage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 170504 (2008)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11674089 and the Project of Introduction and Cultivation for Young Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Derivation of the effective Hamiltonian
Appendix A: Derivation of the effective Hamiltonian
According to the Hamiltonian shown in Eq. (2), the system evolves in Hilbert space spanned by:\(\vert {\varphi _{1}}\rangle =\vert {BB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{2}}\rangle =\vert {BD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{3}}\rangle =\vert {Br}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{4}}\rangle =\vert {DB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{5}}\rangle =\vert {DD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{6}}\rangle =\vert {Dr}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{7}}\rangle =\vert {rB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{8}}\rangle =\vert {rD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{9}}\rangle =\vert {rr}\rangle _{12}\), Thus, the Hamiltonian shown in Eq. (2) can be rewritten as
By introducing a picture transformation with unitary operator \(U(t)=e^{(-iV\vert {rr}\rangle _{12}\langle {rr}\vert t)}\) [29], one can move to another picture where the Hamiltonian is
Here,
And we assume \(M_{1}=\Delta \) and \(M_{2}=\Delta +V\). According to Ref. [34, 40], we can get the mathematical expression of effective Hamiltonian
Here, \(\frac{1}{M^{'}_{mN}}=\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{1}{M_{m}}+\frac{1}{M_{N}}\right) \). Using the above calculation formula of effective Hamiltonian, we can get the simplified equation of effective Hamiltonian
Because \(\vert {\varphi _{1}}\rangle =\vert {BB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{2}}\rangle =\vert {BD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{3}}\rangle =\vert {Br}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{4}}\rangle =\vert {DB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{5}}\rangle =\vert {DD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{6}}\rangle =\vert {Dr}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{7}}\rangle =\vert {rB}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{8}}\rangle =\vert {rD}\rangle _{12}\), \(\vert {\varphi _{9}}\rangle =\vert {rr}\rangle _{12}\). Therefore, the effective Hamiltonian can also be written as
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, GA., Lu, H. & Liu, Y. Implementation of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation via two blockaded Rydberg atoms. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01222-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01222-4