Skip to main content
Log in

Foam-improved oil recovery: Modelling the effect of an increase in injection pressure

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model, called pressure-driven growth, is analysed for propagation of a foam front through an oil reservoir during improved oil recovery using foam. Numerical simulations of the model predict, not only the distance over which the foam front propagates, but also the instantaneous front shape. A particular case is studied here in which the pressure used to drive the foam along is suddenly increased at a certain point in time. This transiently produces a concave front shape (seen from the domain ahead of the front): such concavities are known to be delicate to handle numerically. As time proceeds however, the front evolves back towards a convex shape, and this can be predicted by a long-time asymptotic analysis of the model. The increase in driving pressure is shown to be beneficial to the improved oil recovery process, because it gives a more uniform sweep of the oil reservoir by the foam.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.L. Schramm, J.J. Novosad, Colloids Surf. 46, 21 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Shan, W.R. Rossen, SPE J. 9, 132 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Ashoori, T.L.M. van der Heijden, W.R. Rossen, SPE J. 15, 260 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Afsharpoor, G.S. Lee, S.I. Kam, Chem. Engng. Sci. 65, 3615 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Grassia, E. Mas-Hernández, N. Shokri, S.J. Cox, G. Mishuris, W.R. Rossen, J. Fluid Mech. 751, 346 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.M. de Velde Harsenhorst, A.S. Dharma, A. Andrianov, W.R. Rossen, SPE Reservoir Evaluation Engg. 17, 373 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W.R. Rossen, S.C. Zeilinger, J.X. Shi, M.T. Lim, SPE J. 4, 279 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Mas-Hernández, P. Grassia, N. Shokri, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Engg. Aspects 473, 123 (2015) Special Issue. A collection of papers presented at the 10th EUFOAM Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 7--10 July 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Kern, D. Weaire, A. Martin, S. Hutzler, S.J. Cox, Phys. Rev. E 70, 041411 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. T.E. Green, A. Bramley, L. Lue, P. Grassia, Phys. Rev. E 74, 051403 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Grassia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández, E.M., Grassia, P. & Shokri, N. Foam-improved oil recovery: Modelling the effect of an increase in injection pressure. Eur. Phys. J. E 38, 67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2015-15067-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2015-15067-6

Keywords

Navigation