Abstract
The analytic solution of the average electron velocity vector \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) of an electron swarm in gas under ac electric and dc magnetic fields (\(\mathbf {E}(t)\) and \(\mathbf {B}\), respectively) in a constant-collision-frequency model is extended to cover not only the known case of a right crossing angle (\(\mathbf {E}(t) \perp \mathbf {B}\)) but also the cases of arbitrary crossing angles (\(\mathbf {E}(t) \not \perp \mathbf {B}\)). The x, y, and z components of \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) are obtained as explicit formulae with the following parameters: the amplitude E of \(\mathbf {E}(t)\), the angle \(\theta \) between \(\mathbf {E}(t)\) and \(\mathbf {B}\), the angular frequency \(\omega _E\) of \(\mathbf {E}(t)\), the cyclotron angular frequency \(\omega _B\) (subject to the strength B of \(\mathbf {B}\)), and the electron collision frequency \(\nu \). A basic feature that \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) draws elliptic locus in velocity space is unchanged even under \(\mathbf {E}(t) \not \perp \mathbf {B}\), but the plane including the locus may tilt when \(\omega _E\), \(\omega _B\), or \(\nu \) varies. The derivation of \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) based on the analytic solution of single electron motion is detailed and fundamental behavior of the \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) loci is observed to understand the electron transport under \(\mathbf {E}(t) \times \mathbf {B}\) fields.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: ...].
Notes
At this substitution, the initial phase \(\phi \) in the solution of \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}(t)\) becomes \(\omega _E t' + \phi \). However, the appearance of factors \(\sin (\omega _E t + \phi )\) and \(\cos (\omega _E t + \phi )\) in the components of \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}(t)\) in the integrand are unchanged because t and \(\phi \) in \(\omega _E t + \phi \) are replaced by \((t - t')\) and \((\omega _E t' + \phi )\), respectively, as \(\omega _E (t - t') + (\omega _E t' + \phi )\) and this returns to \(\omega _E t + \phi \).
All terms include a common factor \(\omega _E\), which may cancel with that included in \(v_E\); \(v_E \omega _E\) is the amplitude of the electron acceleration as it has been denoted as a in Ref. [49].
To obtain \(\mathbf {v}(t)\), only one step is necessary for the newborn subset, and \(n_{\varDelta t}\) steps are needed for the oldest subset.
References
O. Tarvainen, S.X. Peng, New J. Phys. 18, 105008 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/10/105008
N. Hayashi, T. Nakashima, H. Fujita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4301 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.38.4301
T.A. Santhosh Kumar, S.K. Mattoo, R. Jha, Phys. Plasmas 11, 1735 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669391
St. Kolev, St. Lishev, A. Shivarova, Kh. Tarnev, R. Wilhelm, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49, 1349 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/9/001
A. Aanesland, J. Bredin, P. Chabert, V. Godyak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 044102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680088
S.K. Singh, P.K. Srivastava, L.M. Awasthi, S.K. Mattoo, A.K. Sanyasi, R. Singh, P.K. Kaw, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 033507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868514
G. Fubiani, J.P. Boeuf, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24, 055001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/24/5/055001
J.Y. Kim, W.-H. Cho, J.-J. Dang, S. Kim, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25, 065019 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/6/065019
J.Y. Kim, W.-H. Cho, J.-J. Dang, K.-J. Chung, Y.S. Hwang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 02B117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933090
O. Fukumasa, Y. Tauchi, S. Sakiyama, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 4593 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.4593
M. Vural, R.P. Brinkmann, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/2/027
T. Uchida, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, L43 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.33.L43
H. Tsuboi, M. Itoh, M. Tanabe, T. Hayashi, T. Uchida, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 2476 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.2476
H. Asakura, K. Takemura, Z. Yoshida, T. Uchida, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 4493 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.4493
T. Uchida, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 1529 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.581182
W. Chen, M. Ito, T. Hayashi, T. Uchida, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 1594 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.581193
H. Sugawara, S. Ogino, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 07LD05 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.07LD05
M. Tadokoro, H. Hirata, N. Nakano, Z.Lj. Petrović, T. Makabe, Phys. Rev. E 57, R43 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.R43
A.V. Vasenkov, M.J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 5522 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1614428
H. Takahashi, H. Sugawara, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 036001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ab71d2
T. Uchida, S. Hamaguchi, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 083001 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/8/083001
Z.Lj. Petrović, S. Dujko, D. Marić, G. Malović, Ž. Nikitović, O. Šašić, J. Jovanović, V. Stojanović, M. Radmilović-Rađenović, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42, 194002 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194002
I. Adamovich et al., J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50, 323001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa76f5
A. Bogaerts, E. Bultinck, I. Kolev, L. Schwaederlé, K. Van Aeken, G. Buyle, D. Depla, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42, 194018 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/19/194018
K. Kamimura, K. Iyanagi, N. Nakano, T. Makabe, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4429 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.38.4429
G.R. Govinda Raju, M.S. Dincer, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, 819 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/27.62348
M.S. Dincer, A. Gokmen, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 25, 942 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/25/6/007
M.S. Dincer, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 26, 1427 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/26/9/013
N. Shimura, T. Makabe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 678 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.108837
K.F. Ness, Phys. Rev. E 47, 327 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.47.327
K.F. Ness, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 27, 1848 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/27/9/007
B. Li, R.D. White, R.E. Robson, K.F. Ness, Ann. Phys. 292, 179 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.2001.6171
R.D. White, K.F. Ness, R.E. Robson, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 32, 1842 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/32/15/312
R.D. White, K.F. Ness, R.E. Robson, B. Li, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2231 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2231
R.D. White, R.E. Robson, K.F. Ness, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 34, 2205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/14/316
R.D. White, R.E. Robson, K.F. Ness, T. Makabe, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 38, 997 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/7/006
S. Dujko, R.D. White, K.F. Ness, Z.Lj. Petrović, R.E. Robson, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 39, 4788 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/39/22/009
S. Dujko, R.D. White, Z.Lj. Petrović, R.E. Robson, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046403 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046403
S. Dujko, R.D. White, Z.Lj. Petrović, R.E. Robson, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 20, 024013 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/20/2/024013
R.D. White, K.F. Ness, R.E. Robson, Appl. Surf. Sci. 192, 26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00019-3
Z.M. Raspopović, S. Dujko, T. Makabe, Z.Lj. Petrović, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 14, 293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/14/2/010
O. Šašić, S. Dujko, Z.Lj. Petrović, T. Makabe, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3560 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.3560
R.D. White, S. Dujko, K.F. Ness, R.E. Robson, Z. Raspopović, Z.Lj. Petrović, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 025206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/2/025206
S. Dujko, D. Bošnjaković, R.D. White, Z.Lj. Petrović, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 24(2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/24/5/054006
S. Dujko, R.D. White, Z.Lj. Petrović, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39, 2560 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2011.2150246
Y. Nakamura, M. Kurachi, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 21, 718 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/21/5/008
T. Sato, H. Sugawara, in Proceedings of XXXIV International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, 10th International Conference on Reactive Plasmas, 37th Symposium on Plasma Processing, and 32nd Symposium on Plasma Science for Materials, Sapporo, Japan, 2019, PO18AM-003
H. Sugawara, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 108002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7567/1347-4065/ab3e5d
H. Sugawara, in Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 72nd Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference, College Station, Texas, USA, 2019, FT1.00064
H. Sugawara, T. Yahata, A. Oda, Y. Sakai, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 33, 1191 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/10/309
Y. Nakata, T. Sato, H. Sugawara, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 49, 83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2020.3010315
M. Hayashi, S. Ushiroda, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2621 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445019
M. Hayashi, T. Nimura, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4879 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.332797
H. Sugawara, Y. Nakata, Book of Abstracts POSMOL 2021 at-present: XXII International Symposium on Electron-Molecule Collisions and Swarms, The University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, 2021, p. 73, No. 41. https://sites.nd.edu/posmol2021conference/
K. Satoh, Y. Ohmori, Y. Sakai, H. Tagashira, Trans. IEE Jpn. A 111, 198 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms1990.111.3_198 [in Japanese]
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by KAKENHI Grant No. JP19K03780 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H. S. organized this work, derived the theoretical formulae, performed computations, and wrote the manuscript. Y. N. participated in verifying the formulae and editing the manuscript. Both authors discussed the results and contributed to the final article.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Work supported by KAKENHI Grant JP19K03780 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Appendices
Appendix A: Coordinate conversion between the \(\mathbf {E}\)-fixed and the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed systems
When vectors \((x^{\mathbf {E}}, y^{\mathbf {E}}, z^{\mathbf {E}})\) in the \(\mathbf {E}\)-fixed system and \((x^{\mathbf {B}}, y^{\mathbf {B}}, z^{\mathbf {B}})\) in the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed system are equivalent to each other with respect to the direction relative to \(\mathbf {E}\) and \(\mathbf {B}\), the components of one can be obtained from those of the other by the following relations representing rotations around the y-axis by angles \(\pm (\pi /2 - \theta )\):
Appendix B: \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}(t)\) in the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed system
Let the initial electron velocity at \(t = 0\) be \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}(0) = \mathbf {v}_0^{\mathbf {B}} = (v_{x0}^{\mathbf {B}}, v_{y0}^{\mathbf {B}}, v_{z0}^{\mathbf {B}})\). In non-ECR condition \(\omega _E \not = \omega _B\), an analytic solution of (5) for \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}(t)\) is
In the ECR condition \(\omega _E = \omega _B \equiv \omega \),
Appendix C: \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {E}}(t)\) in the \(\mathbf {E}\)-fixed system
With \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {E}}(0) = \mathbf {v}_0^{\mathbf {E}} = (v_{x0}^{\mathbf {E}}, v_{y0}^{\mathbf {E}}, v_{z0}^{\mathbf {E}})\), analytic solution of (5) for \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {E}}(t)\) in the non-ECR condition \(\omega _E \not = \omega _B\) is
In the ECR condition \(\omega _E = \omega _B \equiv \omega \),
Both of these ECR and non-ECR solutions are convertible between the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed and the \(\mathbf {E}\)-fixed systems with relations (A.1) and (A.2).
Appendix D: Acceleration acting on electrons in the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed system
In the \(\mathbf {B}\)-fixed system, the equation of motion (5) for an electron becomes
We obtain the following relations:
Equation (D.18), which gives the inner product between two vectors, represents that the instantaneous acceleration acting on an electron having a velocity \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}} = (v_x^{\mathbf {B}}, v_y^{\mathbf {B}}, v_z^{\mathbf {B}})\) is always perpendicular to its position vector relative to a point \((0, - (E/B) \sin \theta \sin (\omega _E t + \phi ), v_z^{\mathbf {B}})\). This point is on a central axis of rotation C represented as \(v_x = 0\) and \(v_y = - (E/B) \sin \theta \sin (\omega _E t + \phi )\). C is parallel to the \(v_z\)-axis, and moves temporally up and down across the origin O of velocity space (see Fig. 5). Equation (D.19) represents that the acceleration is proportional to the distance of \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}\) from C and that the angular frequency \(\omega _B = e B/m\) of the rotation is constant irrespective of \(\mathbf {v}^{\mathbf {B}}\). The acceleration for \(v_z^{\mathbf {B}}\) induces a translational shift along the \(v_z\)-axis (i.e. along C) in velocity space because \(\mathrm{d}v_z^{\mathbf {B}}/\mathrm{d}t\) is equal for all electrons.
In consequence, the infinitesimal motion of the electrons in velocity space by the instantaneous acceleration is helical; i.e. a composition of the rotation around C and the parallel shift along C. The shape of the EVDF of an electron swarm subset remains isotropic around its center in this acceleration.
Appendix E: Details on electron collision cross sections of CCF model gas
The CCF model gas used for the Monte Carlo simulations has the following electron collision cross sections [55], where \(q_\mathrm{el}\) is for elastic collision, \(q_\mathrm{inel,1}\) and \(q_\mathrm{inel,2}\) are for inelastic collisions with loss energies of 10 and 15 eV, respectively, and \(\varepsilon _\mathrm{1eV} = 1\) eV:
The original \(q_\mathrm{inel,2}\) [55] is an ionization cross section, but it is treated as an excitation cross section in this work when the electron-conservative case is examined. In the demonstration of the electron-nonconservative case, \(q_\mathrm{inel,2}\) is restored to be the ionization cross section. The residual energy after the production of a secondary electron by a primary electron is divided into two portions to be assigned to the two electrons at a ratio \(\delta : (1 - \delta )\) with an energy division ratio \(\delta \), and \(\delta \) is assumed to be equiprobable in a range \(0 \le \delta \le 1\).
Appendix F: Semi-major axis and vertices of elliptic vector locus
The calculation of the vector length \(L = |\mathbf {W}(t)|\) can be rearranged into the following form:
where
\(L^2\) can be rewritten as
L becomes its maximum (i.e. the length of the semi-major axis of the elliptic vector locus) when \(\sin (2 \alpha + \beta ) = 1\) twice in a domain \(0 \le \alpha < 2 \pi \), and \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) points the vertices of the ellipse at that time. Such \(\mathbf {W}(t)\) is specified by (14)–(16) with the \(\sin \alpha \) and \(\cos \alpha \) values corresponding to \(\alpha = \pi /4 - \beta /2\) and \(5 \pi /4 - \beta /2\):
X in (25) is \(\cos \beta \) in (F.37) calculated with P, Q, and R in (F.31)–(F.33).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sugawara, H., Nakata, Y. Elliptic vector loci of average electron velocity of electron swarm in constant-collision-frequency model gas under ac electric and dc magnetic fields crossed at arbitrary angles. Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00346-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00346-1