Skip to main content
Log in

Manifestly covariant analysis of the QED Compton processin \(ep\rightarrow e \gamma p\) and \(e p \rightarrow e \gamma X \)

  • theoretical physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We calculate the unpolarized QED Compton scattering cross section in a manifestly covariant way. Our approach allows a direct implementation to be made of the specific kinematical cuts imposed in the experiments, e.g. HERA-H1. We compare the "exact" cross section in terms of the structure functions F 1,2 (x B,Q 2), assuming the Callan-Gross relation, with the one obtained using the equivalent photon approximation (EPA) as well as with the experimental results. We find that the agreement with the EPA is better in \(x_{\gamma}\) bins, where \(x_{\gamma}\) is the fraction of the longitudinal momentum of the proton carried by the virtual photon, compared to the bins in the leptonic variable x l .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.F. Weizsäcker, Z. Phys. 88, 612 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Kniehl, Phys. Lett. B 254, 267 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Drees, R.M. Godbole, M. Nowakowski, S. Rindani, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2335 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Ohnemus, T.F. Walsh, P.M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 328, 369 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Glück, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, Phys. Lett. B 343, 399 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. De Rujula, W. Vogelsang, Phys. Lett. B 451, 437 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Glück, C. Pisano, E. Reya, Phys. Lett. B 540, 75 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Glück, C. Pisano, E. Reya, I. Schienbein, Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 427 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Lenderman, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Dortmund, H1 collaboration, DESY-THESIS-2002-004 (2002)

  10. A. Courau, P. Kessler, Phys. Rev. D 46, 117 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Blümlein, G. Levman, H. Spiesberger, J. Phys. G 19, 1695 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.G. Callan, D.J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 156 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Courau, HERA Note H1-187 (unpublished)

  14. X. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Anlauf, Habilitation thesis, Siegen Univ., hep-ph/0211456

  16. H. Abramowicz, A. Levy, hep-ph/9712415

  17. H. Anlauf, H.D. Dahmen, P. Manakos, T. Mannel, T. Ohl, Comput. Phys. Commun. 70, 97 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Glück, E. Reya, A. Vogt, Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 461 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mukherjee.

Additional information

Received: 30 June 2003, Published online: 19 September 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukherjee, A., Pisano, C. Manifestly covariant analysis of the QED Compton processin \(ep\rightarrow e \gamma p\) and \(e p \rightarrow e \gamma X \) . Eur. Phys. J. C 30, 477–486 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2003-01308-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2003-01308-0

Keywords

Navigation