Abstract
A compilation of the experimental \(p+p\) data of neutral and charged kaon production has revealed a discrepancy between the observed \(K^{0}_{s}\) yield and the the average number of produced charged kaons \(K^{0}_{s}=(K^{+}+K^{-})/2\). This widespread relation holds only for a colliding system that is an uniform population w.r. to the isospin (i.e. that consists of an equal number of all members of a given isospin multiplet). This is not the case for \(p+p\) collisions therefore one should not expect that it will describe the data accurately. A much better agreement is obtained with a model based on the quark structure of the participating hadrons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The relation between the yield of neutral kaons and the charged ones is commonly expected to be in the form (see Refs. [1,2,3]):
where \(K^{0}_{s}\), \(K^+\), \(K^-\) are the mean multiplicities of the corresponding kaon species. This formula comes from the isospin symmetry. However it is not valid for isospin asymmetric initial states.
In Sect. 2, we show a compilation of experimental data on neutral and charged kaon production in \(p+p\) collisions for different \(\sqrt{s}\) range.
In Sect. 3, we present a model based on the parton structure (valence and sea quarks) of different kaons and initial hadrons, the so-called Quark Parton Model (QPM). Such model was used about 30 years ago in the design phase of the CNGS neutrino beam and kaons beams for NA31 experiment [4].
In this paper, we show that this model works much better for \(p+p\) interaction in a large energy range than Eq. (1).
2 Relation between charged and neutral kaon production
The world data compilation of the average number of produced \(K^{0}_{s}\) per event in \(p+p\) collisions is shown in Fig. 1 with red squares, whereas the blue ones correspond to the number of \(K^{0}_{s}\) extracted from \(K^+\) and \(K^-\) production using Eq. (1).
Blue squares are systematically located above the red squares. This shows that Eq. (1) is not adequate for \(p+p\) collisions.
The relation between charged and neutral kaons can be derived using the so called Smushkevich rule: “For all particle involved in isospin-conserving relation all members of isospin multiplets are produced in equal numbers if and only if the initial population is uniform” [7,8,9,10]. It means that it is made up of equal numbers of the members of any multiplets involved. This is obviously not the case for \(p+p\) collisions.
The kaons form two isospin doublets: \(K^+-K^0\)and \(K^--\bar{K^0}\). Therefore e.g. in \({\bar{p}}\)+p collisions, which are obviously uniform we can expect the same number of \(K^+\) and \(K^0\) as well as the same number of \(K^-\) and \(\bar{K^0}\):
therefore,
which leads to Eq. (1). This formula is not valid for the nonuniform isospin initial state \(p+p\) with two members of NN doublet with \(I_{3}=+1/2\), therefore the observation of a discrepancy between Eq. (1) and \(p+p\) data is not surprising.
In this case, when the initial population is nonuniform, a model based on the quark structure of the participating particles was proposed.
3 Derivation of Quark Parton Model formula
The quark structure of K mesons is as follows:
In nucleon–nucleon interaction, u and d valence quarks exist in the initial state. For example, \(K^+\) can be produced with either valence or sea quarks while \(K^-\) with the sea quarks only:
To find a relation between charged and neutral kaons yields we assume the conservation of isospin symmetry. Therefore, there is no difference between up and down quarks (\(u_v = d_v\)). We assume as well that in the first approximation the production of sea quark pairs \(u{\bar{u}}\) and \(d{\bar{d}}\) is equally probable. It is consistent with flavor independence of processes such as \(g\rightarrow q{\bar{q}}\).
but for \(g\rightarrow s{\bar{s}}\) the available phase space is smaller because of significantly larger mass:
we obtain:
We still should multiply \(d_v\) and \(u_v\) by the number of corresponding valence quarks for the proton–proton, proton–neutron or neutron-neutron. After some simple arithmetic:
We would like to compare the validity of the two models represented by Eqs. (1) and (20) using a quantity, \(R_{K}\), corresponding to the normalized (w.r. to \(K^{0}_{s}\) yield) difference between the number of expected \(K^{0}_{s}\) from charged kaons yields and the number of directly measured \(K^{0}_{s}\).
From Eq. (1), we obtain:
while using Eq. (20):
We calculate both ratios for different values of \(\sqrt{s}\). The results are shown in Fig. 2.
Only such data points were shown for which the \(K^+\), \(K^-\) and \(K^{0}_{s}\) multiplicities were measured at the same or close energy. One can see that the QPM formula leads to much better agreement with the line drawn at zero. Points are shown with the associated total uncertainties (statistical and systematical uncertainties) with the exception of the second point at 4.9 GeV where only statistical uncertainty was provided.
One can observe a convergence of the expectations for both models for higher energies. Another issue is the comparison with experimental data – it is problematic to draw any statistically sound conclusion due to large uncertainties for this energy range.
Additionally, there is indication that QPM (Eq. (20)) is describing \(p+p\) data well (and better than Eq. (1)) in different rapidity bins as shown in Fig. 3. The values of \(R_{K}\) related to kaon multiplicities averaged on the whole rapidity region corresponding to \(\sqrt{s}=17.27\) GeV plotted in Fig. 2 show that QPM performs better than the simple average formula (\(R_{K}\) is closer to zero). In Fig. 3, one can observe that this effect is especially pronounced for the mid-rapidity region.
4 Summary
We have noticed that the widespread relation between the average number of produced charged and neutral kaons holds only for a colliding system that is an uniform population w.r. to the isospin (i.e. that consists of an equal number of all members of a given isospin multiplet). This is not the case for \(p+p\) collisions therefore one should not expect that Eq. (1) will describe the data accurately.
We have shown that a better agreement with world data for a wide energy range is obtained if one uses a relation derived from simple considerations about the quark structure of kaons and nucleons Eq. (20).
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: We are using data from different papers that were already published (see bibliography).]
References
A. Wroblewski, On the strange quark suppression factor in high-energy collisions. Acta Phys. Polon. B 16, 379–392 (1985)
M. Gazdzicki, O. Hansen, Hadron production in nucleon–nucleon collisions at 200-GeV/c: a compilation. Nucl. Phys. A 528, 754–770 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(91)90261-4
T. Anticic et al., Inclusive production of charged kaons in p+p collisions at 158 GeV/c beam momentum and a new evaluation of the energy dependence of kaon production up to collider energies. Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 1–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1328-0
M. Bonesini et al., On Particle production for high-energy neutrino beams. Eur. Phys. J. C 20, 13–27 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520100656
A. Acharya et al., \(K^{0}_{S}\) meson production in inelastic p+p interactions at 158 \({\rm GeV} /c\) beam momentum measured by NA61/SHINE at the CERN SPS. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 96 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09976-y
A. Aduszkiewicz et al., Measurements of \(\pi ^\pm \), \(\text{ K}^\pm \), p and \({\bar{p}}\) spectra in proton–proton interactions at 20, 31, 40, 80 and 158 \({\rm GeV}/c\) with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(10), 671 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5260-4
I.M. Shmushkevich, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 103, 235 (1955)
N. Dushin, I.M. Shmushkevich, Sov. Phys.-Dokl. 1, 94 (1956)
A.J. MacFarlane, G. Pinski, G. Sudarshan, Shmushkevich’s method for a charge independent theory. Phys. Rev. 140, B1045 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.B1045
C.G. Wohl, Isospin relations by counting. Am. J. Phys. 50, 8 (1982)
D. Brick et al., Inclusive production of neutral strange particles by 147-GeV/c \(\pi ^+\), \(K^+\), \(p\) interactions in hydrogen. Nucl. Phys. B 164, 1 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(80)90499-X
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Marek Gaździcki for his numerous comments and help during the preparation of this publication. We gratefully acknowledge insightful discussions with Andrzej Rybicki, Ludwik Turko, Wojciech Bryliński, Marjan Cirkovic and other members of the NA61/SHINE collaboration. This work was supported by the National Science Centre Poland - the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014–2021 (Grant 2019/34/H/ST2/00585) and the Polish Minister of Education and Science (contract No. 2021/WK/10).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Stepaniak, J., Pszczel, D. On the relation between \(K^{0}_{s}\) and charged kaon yields in proton–proton collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 928 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12108-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12108-3