Abstract
Geodesic equations are solved when at least two of \(\theta \), \(\phi \) and \(\psi \) are constant, or r is constant, on scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type. They can also be solved also on Eguchi–Hanson metrics which are Ricci flat if only \(\phi \) is constant. However, the explicit solution of the geodesic equations is not available yet if only \(\psi \) is constant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Geodesics are the fundamental geometric object in differential geometry. They also reveal nature of gravitational phenomena in curved space-time. In general relativity, null geodesics are interpreted as trajectories of light, time-like geodesics are interpreted as trajectories of massive particles, and they are studied extensively in many exact spacetimes, cf. [2, 3] and references therein. Besides enormous study of geodesics in Riemannian manifolds, Battista and Esposito recently investigated geodesic motion on Euclidean Schwarzschild metrics over \(R^2 \times S^2\) and obtained its explicit form in terms of incomplete elliptic integrals of the first, the second and the third kinds [1]. As Euclidean Schwarzschild metrics belong to gravitational instantons, which play important roles in Euclidean approach of quantum gravity [7], it is interesting to investigate geodesic motion on other gravitational instantons such as Eguchi–Hanson metrics [4, 5]. This is the goal of our paper.
Eguchi–Hanson metrics are complete four-dimensional Ricci flat, anti-self-dual ALE Riemannian metrics on \(R_{\ge 0} \times P^3\). The more general metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type were constructed by LeBurn [11] using the method of algebraic geometry [11] and by the second author solving an ordinary differential equation [10]. They are scalar flat on \(R_{\ge 0} \times S^3 /Z_d\) \((d >2)\) and provide counter-examples of Hawking and Pope’s generalized positive action conjecture [9]. It is important that gravitational instantons always have removable singularity. And it occurs at the largest positive root of potential functions for metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type. The geodesic completeness has not been proved in the literature for these types of metrics, as pointed out in [1]. This motivates us to solve geodesic equations passing through the removable singularity.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we provide a brief introduction to Eguchi–Hanson metrics and scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type. We also give geodesic equations for metrics of Eguchi–Hanson with general radial potential functions. In Sect. 3, we solve geodesic equations on scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type in the following cases: (1) Sect. 3.1, where \(\theta \), \(\phi \), \( \psi \) are constant, geodesics pass through the removable singularity; (2) Sect. 3.2, where \(\phi \), \(\psi \) are constant, geodesics pass through the removable singularity; (3) Sect. 3.3, where \(\theta \), \(\phi \) are constant, geodesics do not pass through the removable singularity. If geodesics pass through the removable singularity, \(\psi \) must be constant and the geodesic equations reduce to Sect. 3.1; (4) Sect. 3.4, where \(\theta \in (0, \pi )\), \(\psi \) are constant. It yields that \(\theta =\frac{\pi }{2}\) if \(\phi \) is not constant; (5) Sect. 3.5, where r is constant, geodesics pass through the removable singularity; (6) Sect. 3.6, where \(\phi \) is constant. It yields that either \(\psi \) or \(\theta \) is constant, and the geodesic equations reduce to either Sect. 3.2 or Sect. 3.3. In Sect. 4, we solve geodesic equations on Eguchi–Hanson metrics, where only \(\theta \in (0, \pi )\) is constant and geodesics do not pass through the removable singularity. If geodesics pass through the removable singularity, then \(\theta =\frac{\pi }{2}\), \(\psi \) is constant and the geodesic equations reduce to Sect. 3.4. In Appendix 5, we provide an brief introduction to incomplete elliptic integrals of the first, the second and the third kinds.
We point out that the explicit solution of geodesic equations is not available yet if only \(\psi \) is constant.
2 Metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type and geodesic equations
In this section, we introduce the metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type and provide their geodesic equations. Let \(\sigma _{1}\), \(\sigma _{2}\), and \(\sigma _{3}\) be the Cartan–Maurer one-forms for \(SU(2)\cong S^3\), defined by
They satisfy
Metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type are given by
where \(f\ge 0\) is a smooth function, which is referred as the potential function.
If
for some \(B>0\), and
the metrics (2.1) are Eguchi–Hanson metrics [4, 5], which are Ricci flat, geodesically complete and asymptotically local Euclidean, and \(\root 4 \of {B}\) is the removable singularity. The underground manifold is, topologically,
Let \(n \ge 2\) be a natural number. If
for some \(B>0\), and
the metrics (2.1) are geodesically complete, asymptotically local Euclidean, and \(\root 4 \of {\frac{B}{n-1}}\) is the removable singularity. The underground manifold is, topologically,
With A given by (2.4), we have
Thus \(\root 4 \of {\frac{B}{n-1}}\) is the largest positive simple root of f. This fact is crucial to solve radial geodesics passing through the removable singularity.
The nonvanishing metric components of (2.1) are
The nonvanishing Christoffel symbols are
Thus geodesic equations of (2.1) for parameter t are
Throughout the paper, we denote \(F(\alpha , k^2)\), \(E(\alpha , k^2)\), and \(\Pi (h,\alpha , k^2)\) the incomplete elliptic integrals of the first, second, and third kind, where \( 0<k<1 \), \( h\in \mathbb {C} \) (cf. Appendix), and
for \(B>0\), \(n\ge 2.\)
3 Geodesics on scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type
In this section, we shall solve the geodesic equations for the following cases when f is given by (2.4).
3.1 Geodesics for constant \(\theta \), \(\phi \), \( \psi \)
The geodesic equations reduce to
Theorem 3.1
The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \(\theta \), \(\phi \) and \( \psi \) and passing through \(r_0\) with conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
The geodesic equation (3.1) implies that
Thus
Changing variable \( u=r^2 \), we obtain
The theorem follows by integrating it from \( r_0^2\) to \( r^2 \). \(\square \)
3.2 Geodesics for constant \(\phi \), \( \psi \)
The geodesic equations reduce to
Theorem 3.2
Let constant \(r_1\), \(\theta _0\) satisfy
The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \(\phi \), \( \psi \) and passing through \(r_0\) with conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
The geodesic equation (3.3) implies that
Thus
Substituting it into (3.2), we obtain
Thus
Therefore
Changing variable \( u=r^2 \), we obtain
with
The theorem follows by integrating them from \( r_0^2\) to \( r^2 \). \(\square \)
3.3 Geodesics for constant \(\theta \), \(\phi \)
The geodesic equations reduce to
Let \(r_1\), \(\psi _0\) be constant and \( r_1\ne 0\). Denote
Lemma 3.1
With the above notations, \( r_+\ge r_0\), and \( r_+=r_0 \) if and only if \( \psi _0=0 \).
Proof
A straightforward computation. \(\square \)
Theorem 3.3
Let \( r \ge r_+> r_0\). The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \( \theta \), \(\phi \) and conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
The geodesic equation (3.5) implies that
Thus
Substituting it into (3.4), we obtain
Thus
Therefore
Changing variable \( u=r^2 \), we obtain
with
where
The theorem follows by integrating (3.7) and (3.8) from \( u_0\) to \( r^2 \). \(\square \)
Theorem 3.4
The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \( \theta \), \(\phi \) and passing through \(r_0\) with conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
Lemma 3.1 implies that \( \psi _0=0 \). Then (3.6) gives that \( \frac{d \psi }{dt} =0\), and it reduces to Theorem 3.1. \(\square \)
3.4 Geodesics for constant \( \theta \in (0, \pi )\), \(\psi \)
The geodesic equations (2.7), (2.9) give that
They imply either \( \dfrac{d\phi }{dt}=0 \) or \( \theta =\dfrac{\pi }{2} \). It reduces to Theorem 3.1 if \(\dfrac{d\phi }{dt}=0\).
Now we focus on the case \( \theta =\dfrac{\pi }{2} \). The geodesic equations reduce to
Theorem 3.5
Let constant \(r_1\), \(\phi _0\) satisfy
The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \(\theta \in (0,\pi )\), \( \psi \), nonconstant \(\phi \) and passing through \(r_0\) with conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
Same as the proof of Theorem 3.2. \(\square \)
3.5 Geodesics for constant r
The geodesic equations reduce to
As \(r=r_0\) is the coordinate origin, we assume \(r>r_0\).
Theorem 3.6
The geodesics for scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type with constant \( r>r_0 \) and conditions
satisfy
Proof
The geodesic equation (3.14) implies that \( \dfrac{d\theta }{dt}=\dfrac{d\phi }{dt}=0 \). Then (3.13) gives \( \dfrac{d^2\psi }{dt^2}=0 \) and the theorem follows. \(\square \)
3.6 Geodesics for constant \( \phi \)
The geodesic equation (2.8) gives
Therefore \( \dfrac{d\psi }{dt}=0 \) or \( \dfrac{d\theta }{dt}=0 \), and it reduces to the theorems in Sect. 3.2 or Sect. 3.3 respectively.
4 Geodesics for constant \(\theta \) on Eguchi–Hanson metrics
In this section, we solve the geodesic equations for constant \(\theta \in \left( 0, \pi \right) \) on Eguchi–Hanson metrics with f given by (2.2). The geodesic equations reduce to
Equation (4.2) implies that either \( \dfrac{d\phi }{dt}=0 \) or
It reduces to the theorems in Sect. 3.3 if \( \dfrac{d\phi }{dt}=0 \).
Now we focus on the case \( \dfrac{d\phi }{dt}\ne 0 \). Then (4.5) holds.
Lemma 4.1
Let function T(x)
for fixed \(\theta \in (0, \pi )\), then it is monotonically decaying and
Proof
It is straightforward that
and
Therefore the lemma follows. \(\square \)
Let \(r_1\), \( \phi _0 \) be constant such that
By Lemma 4.1, we can define
and
Lemma 4.2
Suppose that (4.8) holds, then
Equality holds if and only if
Proof
It is obvious that \( \eta \in [0, \pi ) \). A straightforward calculation shows that
Thus
Equality holds if and only if
Therefore, the lemma follows. \(\square \)
Theorem 4.1
Let \(r \ge \bar{r}_0 >\root 4 \of {B}\). The geodesics for Eguchi–Hanson metrics with only constant \(\theta \in \left( 0, \pi \right) \) and conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
The geodesic equation (4.3) implies that
Thus
Substituting (4.9) and (4.10) into (4.1), we obtain
Thus
Therefore
Changing variable \( u=r^2 \), we obtain
with
The cubic equation \( P(u)=0 \) can be denoted in canonical form [6]
with
Thus the discriminant is
Denote
It is obvious that
Therefore, the algebraic equation \( P(u)=0 \) has three real roots as follows
The theorem follows by integrating (4.11)–(4.13) from \( \bar{r}_0^2\) to \( r^2 \) respectively.
Theorem 4.2
Let constant \(r_1\), \(\phi _0\) satisfy
The geodesics for Eguchi–Hanson metrics constant \(\theta \in (0, \pi )\), nonconstant \(\phi \) and passing through \(\root 4 \of {B}\) with conditions
satisfy
where
Proof
Lemma 4.2 implies that \( \theta =\frac{\pi }{2}\). Then (4.10) gives that \(\frac{d \psi }{dt}=0\), and it reduces to Theorem 3.5. \(\square \)
Data Availability
This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: This is a theoretical study and no experimental data.]
References
E. Battista, G. Esposito, Geodesic motion in Euclidean Schwarzschild geometry. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1088 (2022)
S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983)
A. Cieślik, P. Mach, Revisiting timelike and null geodesics in the Schwarzschild spacetime: general expressions in terms of Weierstrass elliptic functions. Class. Quantum Gravity 39, 225003 (2022)
T. Eguchi, A.J. Hanson, Asymptotically flat self-dual solutions to Euclidean gravity. Phys. Lett. 74B, 249–251 (1978)
T. Eguchi, A.J. Hanson, Self-dual solutions to Euclidean gravity. Ann. Phys. 120, 82–106 (1979)
R. Franci, L.T. Rigatelli, Storia della Teoria delle Equazioni Algebriche (Mursia, Milan, 1979)
G.W. Gibbons, S.W. Hawking, Classification of gravitational instanton symmetries. Commun. Math. Phys. 66, 291–310 (1979)
H. Hancock, Elliptic Integral (Nabe Press, Carolina, 2010)
S.W. Hawking, C.N. Pope, Symmetry breaking by instantons in supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B 146, 381–392 (1978)
C. LeBrun, Counter-examples to the generalized positive action conjecture. Commun. Math. Phys. 118, 591–596 (1988)
X. Zhang, Scalar flat metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type. Commun. Theor. Phys. 42, 235–237 (2004)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the special foundation for Guangxi Ba Gui Scholars and Junwu Scholars of Guangxi University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Elliptic integrals
Appendix: Elliptic integrals
In [8], the incomplete elliptic integrals of the first, the second, and the third kinds are given by
respectively, where \( 0<k<1 \), \( h\in \mathbb {C} \).
The following propositions can be derived straightforwardly.
Proposition 5.1
Let \( a,b,c,x\in \textrm{R} \), \( x>a>b>c \), and denote
then
where
Proposition 5.2
Let \( a,b,c,x\in \textrm{R} \), \( x>a>b>c \), and denote
then
where
Proposition 5.3
Let \( a,b,c,d, x\in \textrm{R} \), \( x>a>b>c \), \( a>d \), and denote
then
where
Proposition 5.4
Let \( a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5, x\in \textrm{R} \), \( x>a_1>a_2>a_3\), \( a_1>a_4 \ge a_5\), and denote
then
where
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Zhang, X. Geodesics on metrics of Eguchi–Hanson type. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 574 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11762-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11762-x