1 Introduction

Neutrinos are massless in Standard Model (SM), but observation of neutrino oscillation data [1, 2] needs neutrinos to be massive but very tiny. Explanation of tiny neutrino mass can be elucidated via Seesaw mechanisms, and one of such existing mechanism is Type-III [3,4,5,6,7], where the new beyond Standard Model (BSM) fermions are in spin one representation of SU(2). There are numerous phenomenological studies at the LHC and other colliders on Type-III seesaw probing different aspects of the BSM scenarios [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] along with the generic displaced decay phenomenology [24]. The Type-III seesaw model has been studied considering electroweak vacuum stability [25], and limits on heavy fermion generation have been drawn for inverse Type-III scenario from the perturbativity of SU(2) gauge coupling [26]. Recent searches of Type-III fermions at the LHC has put a lower limit on the mass of Type-III fermions as \(\sim 740\) GeV [27,28,29] at \(2\sigma \) level, which leaves the possibility of such heavy fermions around TeV along with the indirect bounds [30]. However, such bounds are with the assumption of capturing the prompt leptons only and the lower mass bound can reduce for the displaced lepton as some of them will be missed by the detectors.

The explanation of atmospheric neutrino mass required relatively small neutrino Yukawa couplings \({\mathcal {O}}(10^{-7})\) for \({\mathcal {O}}(100)\) GeV heavy neutrino mass scale. For solar neutrinos mass scale, the couplings will be one order of magnitude less. As we focus on the displaced decay signatures of these Type-III fermions, we consider one generation of Yukawa couplings small, whereas the other two remain relatively large satisfying the light neutrino masses mixing [31, 32]. The tiny neutrino Yukawa coupling can lead to the displaced production of the Higgs boson, which can be reconstructed via its dominant decay mode \(b{\bar{b}}\). The displaced signature is clean from any SM background, and it can be used to constrain the Yukawa couplings. Such a scenario is explored in the context of supersymmetry while considering the decays of the scalar partners of the heavy neutrinos [33].

In this article, at first, we explore the displaced Higgs production at the LHC/FCC with the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV in the detectors CMS, ATLAS [34] and MATHUSLA [35,36,37,38]. MATHUSLA is a proposed detector for studying Long Lived Particles (LLP) produced by the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) from displaced charged tracks, with a modified range of 68–168 m in the longitudinal direction and 60–85 m in the transverse direction from the CMS/ATLAS interaction point (IP) [39], allowing for even smaller effective coupling in constraining or discovering new physics. Earlier the propose detector was with a 100–300 m in the longitudinal and 100–125 m in the transverse direction and in this study we present our results for both proposed lengths. However, the muon collider can open up new frontiers with energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV as we propose similar detectors for long lived particles.

In particular, we devote our analysis to include the boost effect in the transverse and the longitudinal directions. At the LHC, colliding parton momenta are unknown and governed by the parton distribution functions. This causes a boosted system mostly in the longitudinal directions. If the BSM particle decays into a complete visible mode, we can measure the momenta and the exact displaced decay length of such particles. MATHUSLA detector will be only on one side of the LHC detectors, thus asymmetric in the z-axis. While the transverse direction is symmetric, the amount of boost is negligible compared to the longitudinal one. Additionally, if there is only one missing particle in the finalstate the momentum can be reconstructed as the total transverse momentum is zero at any given point. Thus the momentum of the actual BSM particle can be constructed, enabling us to estimate the boosted decay length of that BSM particle. A comparative study for transverse and longitudinal decay lengths are given for CMS, ATLAS and MATHUSLA for the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV at the LHC/FCC and model independent limits on the parameter space based on these collider searches are derived.

Recently muon collider [40,41,42,43,44] is receiving lots of attention for studying various BSM scenarios due to the precision measurements, centre of mass frame, no initial state QCD radiation, etc. [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The long lived particles can also be explored at the muon collider, where we proposed such displaced vertex measurement facility, which can be instrumental in exploring some of these BSM scenarios. As opposed to LHC/FCC, in a muon collider, the total momentum is constant for each collision since it happens in the centre of mass frame. One interesting fact is that the transverse momentum for the Type-III fermion diverges perpendicular to the beam axis, i.e. pseudorapidity goes to zero. This results in slight enhancement of the number of events for higher transverse decay length compared to longitudinal ones. The highest reach of the decay length is constrained by the maximum momentum, which in this case is the net momentum, and thus for both scenarios, maximum decay length will be identical. The analysis has been carried out for centre of mass energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV with 1000, 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and limits on mass and coupling are drawn.

This article is organised as follows. In Sect. 2, we describe the model and the decay modes. The allowed parameter space is discussed in Sect. 3, and we choose our benchmark points for the displaced vertex. Section 4 goes over the collider setups. The simulations at the LHC/FCC, including the kinematics, displaced vertex and results are given in Sect. 5. Similarly, these are detailed in Sect. 6 for the muon collider. In Sect. 7, we summaries the coupling versus mass regions that can be investigated, and in Sect. 8, we present our conclusions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Feynman diagrams of the production and decay of Type-III fermions \(N^0\) and \(N^{\pm }\). a Shows the associate production at the LHC/FCC and b depicts the pair production of \(N^\pm \) at the LHC/FCC and the muon collider. The decay of \(N^0\) and \(N^{\pm }\) to Higgs boson and SM gauge bosons are shown in c, d and e

2 Type III seesaw: the model

The new SU(2) triplet fermions (N) with hypercharge (Y) zero can be added to the SM Lagrangian with the addition of the following terms as given in Sect. 2

(1)

where \(\phi =\begin{pmatrix} G^\pm \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(h + v +i G^0)\end{pmatrix} \) is the Higgs doublet in Standard Model and, \(L=\begin{pmatrix} \nu _{\ell } \\ \ell \end{pmatrix}\) is the left handed lepton doublet. Here \(G^\pm \) and \(G^0\) are charged and neutral Goldstone bosons, h is the physical Higgs boson and v is the vacuum expectation value (vev) which generates the mass for the SM particles. In Sect. 2, we use \({\tilde{\phi }} = i\sigma ^2\phi ^*\) and the \(N_i\) are represented by Eq. (2). \(N_i\) has one pair of charged fermion (\(N^\pm _i\)) and one neutral component (\(N^0_i\)) for each generation i (\(i=1,2,3\)) respectively.

$$\begin{aligned} N_i = \begin{pmatrix} N^0_i &{}&{} \sqrt{2} N^+ _i\\ \sqrt{2}N^-_i &{}&{} -N^0_i \end{pmatrix} \qquad (i = 1,2,3). \end{aligned}$$
(2)

For the simplicity of the collider study, we consider the \(N_i\) in diagonal basis along with the \(Y_{N _i}\). As the Higgs boson gets vev, i.e. \(\langle \phi \rangle = \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}\), the light neutrino mass is generated, which is scaled by the Type-III fermion mass as given below

$$\begin{aligned} m^{\nu }_{ij}= \frac{Y_{N_i} Y_{N_j} v^2}{2M_N}. \end{aligned}$$
(3)

At the LHC, associated \(N^0 N^\pm \) can be produced via \(W^\pm \) boson exchange as well as the pair of \(N^\pm \) via photon and Z boson which can be seen from Fig. 1a, b. Unlike at the LHC, in the muon collider, \(N^0 N^\pm \) cannot be produced.

The hard scattering cross-sections can be calculated as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\sigma }{d{\hat{s}}^2} = \sum _q \int dx \int dy\, f_q(x)f_{{\bar{q}}}(y) \frac{d{\hat{\sigma }}}{d{\hat{s}}^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(4)

where we need to use the parton distribution functions \(f_q(x)\) at the LHC/FCC. For this article, we have used NNPDF23\(\_\)lo\(\_\)as\(\_\)0130\(\_\)qed [59]. The partonic differential distribution of the cross-section can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d{\hat{\sigma }}}{d\cos \theta }= & {} \frac{V_L^2+V_R^2}{64\pi }\,\beta \,N_c\left( 4M_N^2+{\hat{s}}-\beta ^2{\hat{s}}\cos ^2\theta \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(5)

where \(N_c=3\) for quarks (=1 for leptons), \(\beta = \sqrt{1-\frac{4M_N^2}{{\hat{s}}}}\) [60] is the velocity of Type-III fermions (\(0\le \beta \le 1\)) and

$$\begin{aligned} V_A= & {} \frac{Q_fe^2}{{\hat{s}}}+ \frac{g_A^fg_2^2}{{\hat{s}}-M_Z^2} \quad \text {for } q\,{\bar{q}}/\ell ^+\ell ^-\rightarrow N^+N^- \end{aligned}$$
(6)
$$\begin{aligned} V_A= & {} \frac{g_2^2}{{\hat{s}}-M_W^2}\frac{\delta _{AL}}{\sqrt{2}} \quad \text {for } q\,{\bar{q}}'\rightarrow N^0N^{\pm }. \end{aligned}$$
(7)

Here the Z coupling for the fermion f is given by \(g_A^f=T_3-s_W^2\,Q_f\), where \(Q_f\) is the electric charge factor corresponding to quarks or leptons and A corresponds to the chirality \(\{L,R\}\).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Charged \(SU(2)_L\) triplet heavy fermion (\(N^\pm \)) branching ratios to different decay channels as function of the triplet mass. Column wise we depict the branching ratios of \(N_1^{\pm }\), \(N_2^{\pm }\) and \(N_3^{\pm }\), respectively for the different choices of Yukawa couplings satisfying light neutrino masses and UPMNS mixing matrix

Due to the vev of the Higgs bosons, such heavy fermions decays to SM particles like gauge bosons, Higgs boson and fermions. Figure 1 shows the production channels of \(N^\pm \) and \(N^0\), which further decays to SM particles, where we only focus on \(h \rightarrow b{\bar{b}}\) for our study. The two-body decay widths for \(N^\pm \) and \(N^0\) are proportional to \(Y^2_N\) [5] and are given by

$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^0\rightarrow \nu _{\ell } h) = \frac{1}{8}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_h^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2, \end{aligned}$$
(8)
$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^0\rightarrow \nu _{\ell }Z) = \frac{1}{8}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_Z^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2 \left( 1+2\frac{M_Z^2}{M_N^2}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(9)
$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^0\rightarrow W^{\pm } \ell ^{\mp }) = \frac{1}{4}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_W^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2 \left( 1+2\frac{M_W^2}{M_N^2}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(10)

and

$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow \ell ^{\pm }h) = \frac{1}{4}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_h^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2, \end{aligned}$$
(11)
$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow \ell ^{\pm }Z) = \frac{1}{4}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_Z^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2 \left( 1+2\frac{M_Z^2}{M_N^2}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(12)
$$\begin{aligned}&\Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow \nu _{\ell } W^{\pm }) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{Y^2_N M_N}{8\pi }\left( 1-\frac{M_W^2}{M_N^2}\right) ^2 \left( 1+2\frac{M_W^2}{M_N^2}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(13)

respectively, where we drop the generation index i for simplicity.

There are another decay modes possible considering the loop generated mass of \(N^\pm \) and \(N^0\), which gives a mass splitting of \(\Delta M ={\mathcal {O}}(166)\) MeV [60]. It opens up the following decays with the widths given by

$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm })&= \frac{2G_F^2V_{ud}^2\Delta M^3 f_{\pi }^2}{\pi } \sqrt{1-\frac{m_{\pi }^2}{\Delta M^2}} , \end{aligned}$$
(14)
$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 e^{\pm } \nu _e)&= \frac{2G_F^2\Delta M^5}{15\pi ^3} , \end{aligned}$$
(15)
$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \mu ^{\pm } \nu _{\mu })&= 0.12\, \Gamma (N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 e^{\pm } \nu _e) , \end{aligned}$$
(16)

where \(f_{\pi }= 130.5\,\)MeV is the pion form factor, \(G_F\) is the Fermi constant and \(V_{ud}\) is the CKM mixing matrix.

Considering one generation Type-III fermion \(Y_N=Y_{N_{11}} =5\times 10^{-7}\) and \(M_N=1\) TeV, \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm }) \sim 0.1\%\) and has negligible effect on our collider study for this choice of Yukawa. Such behaviour can be visible from Fig. 2a with respect to \(M_N\). However, for even lower choices of \(Y_N\) i.e. for \(10^{-8}\) (Fig. 2d), \( 5\times 10^{-10}\) (Fig. 2g), the decay of \(N^{\pm }=N^{\pm }_1\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm }\) becomes dominant with branching ratios of 47.3% and 97.5%, respectively for \(M_N=1\) TeV. So for these lower \(Y_N\) values, we see a displacement of \(N^\pm \rightarrow \pi ^\pm ,\, N^0\), which is of the order of cm before the \(N^0\) decay gives another recoil. The total displaced decay length will thus depend on both the decays of \(N^\pm \) and \(N^0\) as can be seen from the schematic diagram of Fig. 3.

Considering the general structure of the currents (charged and neutral) both diagonal and off-diagonal Yukawa couplings can play important roles for both one and three generation cases [61]. Nonetheless, if we observe Fig. 3, \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) decay is controlled by the SU(2) gauge coupling \(g_2\), thus there is no generation mixing in the first vertex. However, the second vertex, which causes \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \) decay, is governed by the Yukawa coupling \(Y_N\). For our analysis here, we have considered one generation of the Type-III fermions and the diagonal Yukawa coupling \(Y_N\), which results in the decays of \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu _e\). Even if we consider the off-diagonal Yukawa couplings, which are always lower than the diagonal ones while satisfying the UPMNS mixing matrix [62], the decays of \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu _\mu , h \nu _\tau \) with corresponding branching fractions mediated by \(Y_{N_{12}, N_{13}}\) will contribute in Higgs plus missing energy finalstate. Thus for our analysis the choice of diagonal Yukawa will be sufficient. It can be noted that for TeV scale Type-III fermions, the constraints coming from charged lepton flavour violating processes \(\ell _i \rightarrow \ell _j \gamma \) are less [22] compared to those coming from UPMNS mixing matrix.

One can consider three generations of TeV scale Type-III fermions to see the overall contribution to the desired finalstate. However, while satisfying the light neutrino masses and UPMNS mixing matrix for the benchmark choices of \(Y_{N_{11}}=5\times 10^{-7}, 10^{-8}, 5 \times 10^{-10} \), give rise to \(Y_{N_{22}}= 2.5\times 10^{-7}, 3.1 \times 10^{-7}, 3.1 \times 10^{-7}\) and \(Y_{N_{22}}= 2.5\times 10^{-7}, 8.8 \times 10^{-7}, 8.8 \times 10^{-7}\), respectively. We present the corresponding decay branching fractions of \(N^\pm _{2}\) in Fig. 2b, e, h (second column) and \(N^\pm _{3}\) in Fig. 2c, f, i (third column), respectively. We see that for the second and third generation Type-III fermions, \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) decay is less dominant and thus misses the first displacement. The second recoil, \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \) also tends to have prompt decay due to relatively large Yukawa couplings. It is evident from these set of numbers as well as from the detailed simulation discussed in Sects. 5.3 and 6.3 that the second and third generations fail to contribute for the finalstates in MATHUSLA range, similar to the first generation with \(Y_{N_{11}}=5\times 10^{-7}\). Thus for simplicity, we present our analysis with one generation considering the diagonal Yukawa couplings.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic diagram of \(N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm } \) and \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \) decays

Fig. 4
figure 4

a CMS [29] and b ATLAS [28] bounds on the Type-III fermions when only one generation is light. The black dashed lines are the expected medians whereas the green and yellow bands present the \(1\sigma \) and \(2\sigma \) regions respectively. For both the cases the red line denotes the theoretical prediction for the pair production of Type-III fermions

3 Benchmark points and displaced vertex

The recent collider searches at CMS [27, 29] and ATLAS [28] have put a lower bound of 740 GeV and 680 GeV, respectively Fig. 4 at \(2\sigma \) level, on the Type-III fermion mass with one generation. In this article we consider only one generation of Type-III fermion as light, whereas the other two can be heavy in explaining the neutrino masses and mixing. However, for a conservative choice, we choose \(M_N=1000,\, 1500\) GeV for BP1, BP2 for the collider study as we list them in Table 1. For relatively larger Yukawa coupling i.e., , the branching ratio in \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) is negligible i.e. \(\lesssim 0.1\%\). However, for much lower choices of Yukawa couplings this mode can be dominating as we describe various decay branching ratios in Table 1 for the benchmark points. For the neutral heavy fermions \(N^0\), the dominant decay modes \(W^\pm \ell ^{\mp } , \, Z \nu \) and \(h \nu \) are with the branching ratio 2:1:1. The SM like Higgs boson around 125.5 GeV, mostly decays to \(b{\bar{b}}\).

Table 1 Masses of the Type-III fermions (\(M_N\)) and their branching ratios (in %) for the different decay modes of \(N^{\pm }\). Here \(N^{\pm }\) decay branching fractions are for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7},\,\, 1\times 10^{-8} \,\, {\mathrm{and}} \,\, 5\times 10^{-10}\)
Fig. 5
figure 5

Cross-section (in fb) as a function of centre of mass energy (\(E_{\mathrm{CM}}\)) for the benchmark points at the LHC for the processes \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0N^{\pm }\) (a) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+N^-\) (b)

Table 2 Production cross-sections (in fb) with NLO correction of the processes \(p\,p \rightarrow N^0 N^{\pm }\) and \(p\,p \rightarrow N^+ N^-\), for the benchmark points at the LHC for 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV centre of mass energies

The production cross-sections in both LHC, FCC with next-to-leading order (NLO) correction [63] for the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV are given in Table 2, where NNPDF23\(\_\)lo\(\_\)as\(\_\)0130\(\_\)qed [59] is used as the parton distribution function. It is interesting to see the enhancement of the cross-sections as we increase the centre of mass energy at the LHC/FCC from Fig. 5. Due to the parton distribution function we always find the on-shell production even at higher energies, contrary to the muon collider. Unlike LHC/FCC, in muon collider, we cannot produce \(N^\pm \, N^0\) and we rely only on the pair production of \(N^\pm N^{\mp }\) as we present the cross-sections in Table 12 with the centre of mass energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV for the benchmark points. Due to \(Y=0\) nature, the pair production of \(T_3=0\) component of SU(2), i.e. \(N^0\) is not possible in both of the colliders. However, via \(N^{\pm }\) decay, the pair production of \(N^0\) is possible for lower Yukawa couplings as \(N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm }\) decay mode gets dominant.

Table 3 Rest mass decay length of \(N^0\) for the chosen benchmark points

The chosen benchmark points can give rise to displaced decays with the rest mass decay lengths for \(N^0\) ranging from mm to hundreds of meters for neutrino Yukawa couplings \(Y_N \sim 5\times 10^{-7}- 5\times 10^{-10}\) as shown in Table 3. However, the decay length for \(N^\pm \) can differ from that of the \(N^0\) depending on dominance of additional mode of \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \). For \(Y_N \sim 5\times 10^{-7}\), the decay length is similar to that of \(N^0\). However, for lower \(Y_N\), i.e. \(10^{-8}-10^{-10}\), \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) is the pre-potent and the displaced decay length in this can go up to cm.

Such rest mass decay lengths will be further affected due to the probability distribution of the decay and also owing to the boost of the decaying particle i.e. \(N^{\pm (0)}\) . In particular, we focus on the effect of the latter, where LHC/FCC and muon collider behave differently. For this purpose, we perform a detailed simulation by PYTHIA8 [64], which takes care of the boost effect and the decay distributions, etc. We see in the following sections that in the case of LHC, longitudinal boost plays a major role in enhancing the decay lengths and at the muon collider, the transverse momenta diverges affecting the corresponding decay lengths. The collider setup is described below before presenting the relevant kinematical distributions and analysis.

4 Setup for collider simulation

The model has been implemented in SARAH 4.13.0 [65] to generate the model files for CalcHEP\(\_\)3.8.7 [66]. The cross-sections at tree-level and event generation are performed in CalcHEP with the parton distribution function NNPDF23\(\_\)lo\(\_\)as\(\_\)0130\(\_\)qed [59]. The events are then analysed in PYTHIA8 [64] with initial, final state radiations and subsequent hadronisation. Such hadrons are then fed to Fastjet\(\_\)3.2.3 [65] for jet formation with the following specifications.

  • Calorimeter coverage: \(|\eta | < 2.5\).

  • Jet clustering is done by ANTI-KT algorithm with jet Radius parameter, R = 0.5.

  • Minimum transverse momentum of each jet: \(p_{T,min}^{jet} = 20.0\) GeV; jets are \(p_{T}\)-ordered.

  • No hard leptons are inside the jets.

  • Minimum transverse momentum cut for each detected lepton: \(p_{T,min}^{lep} = 20.0\) GeV.

  • Detected leptons are hadronically clean, which implies hadronic activity within a cone of \(\Delta R < 0.3\) around each lepton is less than \(15\%\) of the leptonic transverse momentum, i.e. \( p_{T}^{\mathrm {had}}< 0.15 p_{T}^{\text {lep}}\) within the cone.

  • Leptons are distinctly registered from the jets produced with an isolation cut \(\Delta R_{lj} > 0.4\).

We reconstruct the Higgs bosons via \(b{\bar{b}}\) mode, where the b-jets are tagged via the secondary vertex reconstruction with b-jet tagging efficiency of maximum 85% [67, 68].

5 Simulations at the LHC/FCC

In this section, we describe all the crucial kinematical distributions leading to displaced Higgs reconstructions. The effect of heavy fermion mass, Yukawa and the centre of mass energy of the collider are explored in detail while projecting the number of events at the LHC/FCC and MATHUSLA.

5.1 Kinematical distributions

We describe the lepton (\(\mu , e\)) multiplicity distributions at the LHC/FCC in Fig. 6 with three different centre of mass energies for the first benchmark point (BP1). In Fig. 6a, b, the multiplicity for the processes \(N^0\,N^{\pm }\) and \(N^+\,N^-\) are depicted, respectively. After imposing the isolation criteria, although the distribution peaks around one, the lepton multiplicity reaches till four.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Multiplicity (\(n_{\mathrm{Lep}}\)) distributions of the charged leptons for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) (a) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) (b) at the three different centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV for \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1) and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

Fig. 7
figure 7

The transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) distributions of charged leptons (1st and 2nd) at the LHC for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) with \(M_N=1~\mathrm{TeV}\), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy 14 TeV. a and b represent the distributions of two leptons for pre and post jet-lepton isolation, respectively for \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm }\rightarrow h\,e^{\pm })=100\%\). c describes the scenario for the isolated leptons obeying the branching ratio of BP1

Fig. 8
figure 8

Jet multiplicity (\(n_{\mathrm{Jet}}\)) distributions for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) (a) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) (b) at \(E_{CM} = 14\) TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1)

Figure 7 demonstrates the lepton \(p_T\) distributions (\(p^{\mathrm{Lep}}_T\)) for BP1. Figure 7a corresponds to the production mode of \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\), where \(N^{\pm }\rightarrow h\,e^{\pm }\) is kept at 100% and jet-lepton isolation is not demanded. Indeed, both the leptons (red and green curves) coming from \(N^\pm \) decays have identical \(p_T\) distributions. The effect of jet-lepton isolation can be observed in Fig. 7b. Though the distributions are identical, the isolation cuts are responsible for the relatively low yield of the second lepton. Finally, we have the distribution in Fig. 7c, where the branching fractions of the decay mode are kept as in BP1 for \(Y_N = 5\times 10^{-7}\). In this case, the second leptons can be from the gauge boson decays, thus lower in \(p_T\) (green curve).

Fig. 9
figure 9

The transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) distributions of the first four \(p_T\) ordered jets at the LHC for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) (a) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) (b) with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy of 14 TeV

Figure 8 illustrates the jet multiplicity distributions for BP1 for the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV. Figure 8a, b represents the process of \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\), respectively. The distributions in blue, olive green and red corresponds to centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV, respectively. In both cases, the multiplicity peak around three and ISR/FSR jets increase as we go for the higher centre of mass energy.

In Fig. 9, we present the jet \(p_T\) distributions (\(p^{\mathrm{Jet}}_T\)) of the first four \(p_T\) ordered jets for BP1 at the centre of mass energy of 14 TeV. The leading jet (in red) peaks around \(\frac{M_N}{2}\) as the two jets coming from the gauge bosons or Higgs boson become collinear due to large boost effect and combine as single jet. The second jet (in blue) either comes from the gauge boson decay or the other BSM fermion and is relatively harder. The third and fourth jets (in green and orange) which come from the decay of gauge bosons are of lower \(p_T\).

Fig. 10
figure 10

b-jet multiplicity (\(n_{\mathrm{bjet}}\)) distributions for the process a \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) and b \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) at \(E_{CM} = \) 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV for \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1) and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

Fig. 11
figure 11

The transverse and longitudinal momenta distributions of the leading jet (a) and the first lepton (b) for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^{-}\), with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energies of 14 TeV and 100 TeV at the LHC

Figure 10a, b describes the multiplicity distributions for the b-jets coming from the Higgs boson decays for the production modes of \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\), respectively at three different centre of mass energies, 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1) and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). The Higgs boson and the Z boson coming from \(N^{\pm (0)}\) are the two sources of such b-jets. The unwanted background b-jet coming from Z decay can be eliminated via the reconstruction of di-b-jet invariant mass distributions. The b-jets coming from the Higgs bosons or Z boson decays can be traced back by reconstructing their invariant mass distributions. The b-jets are tagged via the secondary vertex reconstitution of the b-hadrons associated with the jets. We follow the b-jet tagging efficiency of CMS with a maximum of 85% [67, 68]. The multiplicity of b-jets can go up to four as they come from both the Higgs bosons decays.

Table 4 The percentage of events for \(P_z^{\mathrm{{jet}}}> P_c^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) distribution for the benchmark points at centre of mass of energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV, where \(P_c^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) is the point of cross-over for \(P_z^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) and \(P_T^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) distributions as shown in Fig. 11

At the LHC, we do not know the centre of mass frame of the collision due to unknown longitudinal boost governed by the parton distribution functions which dictates the momentum sharing of the colliding partons. The sharing of the colliding energies of the quarks in this case also varies with centre of mass energies. If we evaluate the heavy fermion decays in complete visible mode i.e. \(N^\pm \rightarrow h \ell ^\pm \), the reconstruction of the heavy fermion momentum is possible and allows us to measure both \(p_T\) and \(p_z\) of \(N^\pm \). This further enables us to determine the longitudinal decay length, in addition to the transverse decay length. On the contrary, it is not possible to reconstruct the total momentum of the neutrino coming from \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \) decay due to the lack of knowledge of the longitudinal boost of the partonic system. However, as the net transverse momentum is zero, for \(pp \rightarrow N^0 N^\pm \rightarrow h\, h\, \ell ^{\pm }\, \nu \), where only a single neutrino contributes towards missing momentum, we can easily calculate the transverse missing momentum as neutrino \(p_T\). Thus, for \(pp \rightarrow N^0 N^\pm \), only transverse momentum and consequently the transverse decay length can be calculated, whereas, for \(pp \rightarrow N^+ N^- \), we can compute the displaced decay length in both transverse and longitudinal direction. Such conclusion is however, bound to change as we move towards lower Yukawa coupling i.e., \(Y_N \le 10^{-8}\) where, \(N^\pm \rightarrow \pi ^\pm N^0\) becomes dominant and multiple neutrinos coming from pion and other decays can smear the invariant mass distributions.

Another intriguing feature that we observe is that the enhanced displaced decay length in the longitudinal direction due to the large longitudinal boost compared to the transverse one. This can be inferred from Fig. 11 which shows the comparison between transverse and longitudinal momentum of the jets and leptons at 14 TeV and 100 TeV for BP1 with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). Figure 11a depicts the comparison between \(p^j_T\) and \(|p^j_z|\) at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV and 100 TeV. In case of 14 TeV, the longitudinal momentum of the jet goes till 3.8 TeV as compared to 2.5 TeV of \(p^j_T\) and the cross-over of the two distributions happen around 1.3 TeV. Similarly, at 100 TeV, \(p^j_T\) reaches up to 7.5 TeV, while \(p^j_z\) reaches till 14 TeV with a cross-over around 1.5 TeV. Certainly, the extra boost in the longitudinal direction can further push the displaced decay compared to the transverse one. In Table 4 we see the number of events in percentage where \(P_z^{\mathrm{{jet}}}> P_c^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) and \(P_c^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) is the cross-over point of \(p_z\) and \(p_T\) as can be seen from Fig. 11a. It is evident that as we increase the centre of mass energy, the longitudinal boost increases more and thus events for which \(P_z^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) is greater than \(P_c^{\mathrm{{jet}}}\) can be around 30% for 100 TeV centre of mass energy. Such effect can be seen in the corresponding displaced decay lengths as we discuss them next.

Similarly Fig. 11b depicts comparison between the charged lepton momentum distributions for BP1 at the centre of mass energies of 14 and 100 TeV. We can see similar effect as the jet momentum distributions in Fig. 11a. The longitudinal momentum is boosted as compared to the transverse one. In the following subsection, we examine both the transverse and the longitudinal displaced decays along with their reaches at CMS, ATLAS and MATHUSLA.

5.2 Displaced decays at the CMS, ATLAS and MATHUSLA

Fig. 12
figure 12

Schematic diagram of the MATHUSLA detector. In transverse direction the range of MATHUSLA is taken as 60–85 m (100–125 m), whereas in the longitudinal direction it is considered as 68–168 m (100–300 m) [37, 39]

In this subsection, we study the distributions of the transverse and longitudinal decay lengths of \(N^\pm \) for three different centre of mass energies 14, 27 and 100 TeV, respectively for BP1 with three different Yukawa couplings. The displaced decays can be detected either in CMS, ATLAS or in a new proposed detector called MATHUSLA. CMS and ATLAS have transverse and longitudinal ranges of 7.5, 12.5 and 22, 44 meter [69, 70] respectively. However, the new proposed detector MATHUSLA is around 100 m from the CMS or ATLAS in the beam axis as well as in the transverse direction [35, 37] as shown in Fig. 12. The length of the detector is 200 m with height of 25 m which give extra reach for the particle with late decay. According to a recent update, the MATHUSLA detector will be placed 68 m away from the CMS/ATLAS interaction point and will have a volume of \(25\times 100\times 100\, \mathrm m^3\) [39]. In the next few paragraphs, we show how different benchmark points pan out in different detectors. The choices of Yukawa here are motivated from the collider searches of the different displaced decays and any further constraint would restrict the parameter points that we are interested in [20, 71].

Fig. 13
figure 13

Displaced total transverse (\(L_\perp \) in purple) and total longitudinal (\(L_{||}\) in green) decay length distributions for the \(N^{\pm }\), coming from the pair productions at the LHC with the centre of mass energies 14 TeV (ac), 27 TeV (df) and 100 TeV (gi) for the benchmark points. Yukawa couplings \(Y_N= 5\times 10^{-7},\,1\times 10^{-8} \), respectively are used for (a, d, g) and (b, e, h) whereas the third column (c, f, i) depicts \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\). The dotted-dashed and dashed line indicates the upper limit of CMS and ATLAS, respectively. The light red band (68–168 m) denotes the MATHUSLA region

Figure 13 depicts a comparative study of total transverse displaced decay and total longitudinal displaced decay, where \(N^\pm \) are pair produced for BP1 (\(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\)). Here, we have used three panels for three different centre of mass energies i.e., 14 TeV (a, b, c), 27 TeV (d, e, f) and 100 TeV (g, h, i), respectively. The transverse \(L_{\perp }\) and the longitudinal \(L_{||}\) decay lengths are described via purple and green lines, respectively. The first column (a, d, g) describes the case for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\), where \(N^\pm \) travels \({\mathcal {O}} (1-10)\) mm before dominantly decay to SM particles i.e. \(h\ell ^\pm ,\, Z \ell ^\pm ,\, W^\pm \nu \), giving the first recoil. If we move further lower in Yukawa coupling i.e., \(Y_N \le 10^{-8}\), the \(N^\pm \rightarrow \pi ^\pm N^0\) decay modes becomes dominant and the first displacement happens in around cm which remains almost unchanged for further lower Yukawa couplings. \(N^0\), thus produced will further give displaced decays depending on the Yukawa couplings, resulting total two recoils. In Fig. 13b, e, h we illustrate the total displaced decay lengths including first and second recoils for i.e., \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\) for \(M_N= {\mathcal {O}}(100)\) GeV. The total decay lengths corresponding to the Yukawa coupling of \(5 \times 10^{-10}\) for the benchmark points are illustrated in (c, f, i), that give rise to decay lengths in the MATHUSLA range. The dotted-dashed and dashed lines indicate the upper limits of CMS and ATLAS, respectively, while the light red band represents the MATHUSLA region (\(68\,\mathrm{m}-168\,\mathrm{m}\)) [39]. It is apparent that, as the centre of mass energy goes from 14 to 100 TeV, the transverse boost effect being negligible fails to enhance the corresponding decay lengths \(L_{\perp }\). Only points with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\) in (c, f, i) can reach MATHUSLA region and rest of other Yukawa couplings correspond to less than a meter range.

The situation however changes drastically as we see the longitudinal displaced decay lengths \(L_{||}\), due to larger boost effects as discussed before. However, such effects are rather small for 14 TeV centre of mass energy compared to 100 TeV. As we approach higher centre of mass energies, the increase in longitudinal decay length \(L_{||}\) becomes more pronounced. For example, if we consider the Yukawa coupling \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\) (c, f, i), the longitudinal decay length\(L_{||}\) is 1.5 times that of the transverse one \(L_{\perp }\) at 14 TeV, 2.5 times at 27 TeV and 7 times at 100 TeV centre of mass energies, respectively . It is worth mentioning that for a centre of mass energy of 100 TeV, we get events m for \(Y_N =10^{-8}, \, 5 \times 10^{-10}\), respectively.

In Table 5, we present the number of events corresponding to transverse and longitudinal decay length inside MATHUSLA for the benchmark points conterminous with \(Y_N =5\times 10^{-10}\) for the centre mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV at an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively. The numbers in brackets refer to an earlier proposed detector dimension \(25 \times 100 \times 200\) [37], while the rest refer to a more recent one, \(25 \times 100 \times 100\) [39]. It is clear that the newly proposed detector dimension is better suited for probing the new physics via the Type-III seesaw model. The longitudinal mode \(L_{||}\) clearly has the advantage in terms of event numbers, producing nearly one order of magnitude more events as compared to the transverse one i.e. \(L_{\perp }\) . We will see that the situation is quite opposite in muon collider as the collision happens in centre of mass energy. In the next subsection, we summarise the event numbers for various finalstates as well as the invariant mass reconstructions of the Higgs boson and the Type III fermions.

Table 5 The observed number of events in MATHUSLA detector in transverse and longitudinal direction for all benchmark points, with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\) at the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV at an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. In transverse direction (\(L_{\perp }\)) the range of MATHUSLA is taken as 60–85 m (100–125 m), whereas in the longitudinal direction (\( L_{\parallel } \)) it is considered as 68–168 m (100–300 m) [39]
Table 6 Number of events for finalstate topologies containing at least two b-jets for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the LHC with integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

5.3 Results

In this section, we focus on the decay channels \(N^\pm \rightarrow h \ell ^\pm \) and \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \), where the Higgs boson further decays to \(b{\bar{b}}\). We consider the possible finalstate with 2b-jets and more, which will later reconstruct the Higgs boson via their invariant mass peak. We also demand one or more charged leptons in the finalstate. The most dominant decay modes of \(N^{\pm (0)} \rightarrow W^\pm \nu (\ell ^{\mp })\) for \(Y_N \sim 10^{-7}\), only contributes to the finalstates with 2b-jets when the other one decays in \(h\ell ^{\pm }(\nu )\). In Table 6, we present the number of events for the finalstate topologies with 4b-jets and 2b-jets at the LHC, at the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV with integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively, for all benchmark points and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). As the cross-section of \(N^\pm N^0\) is almost twice as the pair production of \(N^\pm \), \(N^0 N^\pm \) is the dominant contributor as compared with the pair production of \(N^\pm \) for mono-leptonic finalstates. \(N^+ N^-\) is the major contributor to the finalstates containing two charged leptons. We see that the integrated luminosity can be one order of magnitude lower as we go from 14 to 100 TeV collisions even for larger number of events.

The similar finalstate topologies are also investigated in Table 7 for relatively lower Yukawa coupling i.e. \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\), for the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for the benchmark point. Here, \(N^\pm \) dominantly decays to \( N^0 \pi ^{\pm }\) with \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm })\sim 47.3\%\) for \(M_N = 1\,\mathrm{TeV}\), resulting a first recoil at around a few cm distance as discussed before. \(N^0\) then follows the standard decay branching ratios to the SM modes. The presence of a charged pion instead of a charged lepton reduces the number of charged lepton in the finalstate. Along with that, it contributes to the hadronic jets, and lepton number can further shrink due to jet-lepton isolation criteria. Thus, the multi-lepton finalstates are a rarity as compared to the case of \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). The main source of charged leptons in this case are from \(N^0\rightarrow W^{\pm }\ell ^{\mp }\) and the further decays of the gauge bosons into leptons. This of course decreases the number of b-jets in the finalstate, which can be measured from the \(4b+1\ell , \,4b+2\ell \) finalstates. This effect is even more pronounced for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\), where \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm }\rightarrow N^0 \pi ^{\pm })\sim 97\%\) for both the benchmark points. For example, in case of the most dominant finalstate \(2b+4j+1\ell \), the event number reduced by \(5\%, \, 16.5\%\) for \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}, \, 5\times 10^{-10}\), respectively, compared to \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) for BP1 at 14 TeV centre of mass energy.

Table 7 Number of events for finalstate topologies containing at least two b-jets for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the LHC with integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively for \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\)
Fig. 14
figure 14

Di-b-jet invariant mass (\(M_{bb}\)) distributions for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\) (a) and \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) (b) at the LHC with \(M_N=1~\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy of 14 TeV. The dominant peak around the SM Higgs mass (125.5 GeV) along with a small peak around the Z boson mass (91.1 GeV) are visible

Table 8 The number of events for single Higgs boson and di-Higgs boson mass peaks after the window cuts around the peak of the invariant mass distributions at the LHC/FCC at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for the benchmark points with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)
Fig. 15
figure 15

a Di-bjet-mono-lepton invariant mass (\(M_{bb\ell }\)) distribution for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\), b di-jet-mono-lepton (\(M_{jj\ell }\)) invariant mass distributions for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^+\,N^-\) with \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\) for the benchmark points at the LHC with centre of mass energy 14 TeV

Table 9 The number of events in \(M_{bb\ell }\) distributions for \(N^+ N^-\)after the window cuts around the mass peak at the LHC/FCC for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)
Table 10 The number of events in \(M_{jj\ell }\) distributions after the window cuts around the mass peak at the LHC/FCC for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively with \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\)

Thereafter we attempt to reconstruct the Higgs bosons from the bb invariant mass distribution coming from both \(N^\pm \rightarrow h \ell ^{\pm }\) and \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \), as shown in Fig. 14. We can observe the sharp peaks of Higgs boson around 125 GeV for both cases and a smaller peak around the Z boson mass, which comes from \(N^\pm \rightarrow Z \ell ^{\pm }\) and \(N^0 \rightarrow Z \nu \) decays. The events around the Higgs mass certainly guarantees the finalstate with at least one Higgs boson and two Higgs bosons, which are described in Table 8. A demand of \(|M_{bb}-125.5|\le 10\) GeV is made for single Higgs boson reconstruction. The numbers for the finalstates of 2b- and 4b-jets with the mass windows are shown in Table 8 at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) for benchmark points with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). We see that though the number of events are quite healthy for single Higgs boson reconstruction, the same cannot be said for two Higgs boson reconstructions coming from the two legs of Type-III fermions.

Table 11 The number of events in \(M_{T}\) distributions after the window cuts around the mass peak at the LHC/FCC for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

Finally, we plot the invariant mass distributions of \(bb\ell \) in Fig. 15a in order to reconstruct the mass of Type-III fermion \(N^\pm \). Here we ensure \(|M_{bb}- 125.5|\le 10\) GeV while reconstructing \(M_{bb\ell }\). The two peaks visible at 1000 and 1500 GeV are reconstructed for BP1 and BP2, respectively for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\), where, \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm }\rightarrow h\ell ^{\pm })\sim 25\%\). Similar to the previous case, here also we collect the events with a mass window of \(|M_{bb\ell }-M_N|\le 10\) GeV, to predict the number of events in Table 9. The table describes event numbers for the benchmark points for the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). As we move from BP1 to BP2, keeping the centre of mass energy same we see event number drops as the cross-section decreases simultaneously. Certainly, the analysis predicts LHC/FCC with higher energy and luminosity will have much higher reach, which we discuss in Sect. 7.

In Fig. 15b we present the invariant mass of di-jet-mono-lepton coming from \(N^0\), which is produced from \( N^\pm \rightarrow \pi ^\pm N^0\) decay for lower Yukawa \(Y_N= 10^{-8}\) for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energy of 14 TeV. The \(N^0\) produced from such decays give rise to \(W^\pm \ell ^{\mp }\) dominantly and we reconstruct such \(W^\pm \) bosons from the di-jet invariant mass peak and select the events within \(|M_{jj} -M_{W}| \le 10\) GeV for further reconstruction of \(M_{jj\ell }\). The corresponding events numbers are presented in Table 10 for the centre of mass energies of 14 TeV, 27 TeV and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively. Due to large boost effect the two-jets coming from \(W^\pm \) decay combine as a single Fat-jet and we loose some events while reconstructing di-jet-mono-lepton invariant mass distribution. The more we go for higher Type-III fermion mass the more prominent is such effect as the cross-sections still governs by on-shell productions.

Next, we indulge in measuring the transverse invariant mass distribution, where we have only one neutrino in the finalstate. While we produce \(N^\pm N^0\) at the LHC, \(N^\pm \rightarrow Z \ell \) and \(N^0\rightarrow h \nu \) decays give rise to finalstate with one neutrino, keeping other leg completely visible. The transverse invariant mass [72] of \(N^0\) in such finalstate is constructed via the transverse energy and momenta of Higgs boson reconstituted from the di-b-jet and missing neutrino as

$$\begin{aligned} M^2_T=m^2_h + 2\left( E^{h}_T \not \!\!{E_T}-\mathbf {p^{h}_T}.\mathbf {\not \!\!{p_T}}\right) , \end{aligned}$$
(17)

where \(E^{h}_T ,\, p^{h}_T\) are the transverse energy and momenta, respectively of the Higgs boson reconstructed via di-b-jets. In Fig. 16, we depict the transverse invariant mass of \(bb\nu \) coming from \(N^0\), for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\), where the other leg is tagged via complete visible mode such that, there is only one neutrino in the finalstate. In this case, missing \(p_T\) is equivalent to neutrino \(p_T\). From Fig. 16 we see the edge of the distributions depict the \(N^0\) masses for the two benchmark points at the centre of mass energy of 14 TeV.

Fig. 16
figure 16

The transverse invariant mass (\(M_T\)) distribution for the process \(p\,p\rightarrow N^0\,N^{\pm }\), for the benchmark points at the LHC with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy 14 TeV

The number of events correlated with the transverse invariant mass distribution, i.e. \(|M_{T}-M_N|\le 10\) GeV is presented in Table 11 for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), 1000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). We ensure that the di-bjet invariant mass is peaking at the Higgs mass by selecting the events under \(|M_{bb}-125.5|\le 10\) GeV.

Fig. 17
figure 17

a The Feynman diagram and b the cross-sections (in fb) as a function of centre of mass energy (\(E_{\mathrm{CM}}\)) for the benchmark points at muon collider for the process \(\mu ^+\mu ^- \rightarrow N^+N^-\). Here \(\theta \) is the polar angle with the beam axis

Table 12 The production cross-sections (in fb) of \( N^+ N^-\) for the benchmark points at muon collider for the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV

6 Simulation at the muon collider

Muon collider is proposed for the precision measurements as well as sensitive to processes involving lepton flavours. There is a recent buzz among the physicist where different BSM scenarios are explored [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. The proposed optimistic reach of muon collider is around 90 ab\(^{-1}\) with centre of mass energy of 30 TeV [45]. Lack of initial state QCD radiation and known centre of mass energy for the collision makes it a superior machine over LHC. In this section, we investigate the displaced Higgs production by observing charged tracks coming from the decays of Type-III fermions. Unlike at LHC, in a muon collider, the centre of mass energy is equal to the parton level collision energy; thus the kinematical distributions will differ from that of LHC. Below we describe the kinematical distributions before presenting the results. We follow the same isolation criteria and minimum \(p_T\) cut for the jets and the leptons as described in Sect. 4.

At the muon collider, \(N^\pm \) can be pair produced via Z boson and photon while production of \(N^\pm N^0\) is not possible, unlike at the LHC/FCC, but pair production of \(N^0\) is possible via \(N^{\pm }\) decay for relatively lower Yukawa couplings i.e. \(Y_N \le 10^{-8}\). Figure 17a presents the Feynman diagram of production of \(N^+ N^-\) and \(\theta \) represents the polar angle with the beam axis. Figure 17b present the cross-section for \(\mu ^+ \mu ^- \rightarrow N^+ N^-\) with respect to centre of mass energy for the two benchmark points. It can be seen that the off-shell cross-sections drop very quickly, which implies very high energy is not efficient to probe these heavy neutrinos, unlike at the LHC. The cross-section can always find the on-shell resonant mode due to the parton distribution function at the LHC.

The cross-sections for the benchmark points at three different energies of muon colliders are presented in Table 12. We see that the cross-sections drop by an order for each as we increase the centre of mass energy. Certainly, we need to achieve 30 ab\(^{-1}\) of integrated luminosity for the centre of mass energy of 30 TeV. In the following subsections, we study the kinematics of the hard scattering, i.e. of \(N^\pm \). As opposed to LHC, here the system is in the centre of momentum frame keeping the three momenta constant along with the energy, and the only variable is the polar angle with the beam axis, i.e. \(\theta \).

Fig. 18
figure 18

Various correlations of longitudinal (\(p^{N^\pm }_z\)) and transverse (\(p^{N^\pm }_T\)) momenta of \(N^{\pm }\) at muon collider with centre of mass energy of 3.5 TeV for BP1 for the process of \(\mu ^+ \mu ^- \rightarrow N^+ N^-\). a Describes \(p^{N^\pm }_x, p^{N^\pm }_y, p^{N^\pm }_z\), b presents the angular distribution of \(N^{\pm }\). c Describes correlation between \(p^{N^\pm }_z\) and \(p^{N^\pm }_T\) and d presents the correlation of \(|p^{N^\pm }_z|\) and \(p^{N^\pm }_T\) with respect to \(\cos {\theta }\)

Fig. 19
figure 19

The transverse (\(p^{N^\pm }_T\)) and longitudinal (\(p^{N^\pm }_z\)) momenta distribution of the \(N^{\pm }\) at the muon collider with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy 3.5 TeV

6.1 Kinematical distributions

We begin by simulating the hard process, i.e. the kinematics of the \(N^\pm \), which is summarised in Fig. 18. The components of the three momentum of \(N^\pm \), i.e. \(p^{N^\pm }_x,\, p^{N^\pm }_y,\, p^{N^\pm }_z\) are shown in Fig. 18a, where it is evident that the events are populated at larger \(p^{N^\pm }_z\) as compared to \(p^{N^\pm }_x,\, p^{N^\pm }_y\). This doesn’t come as surprise since the angular distribution of \(\mu ^+ \mu ^- \rightarrow N^+ N^-\) in the centre of mass frame as given in Fig. 18b, i.e. \(\frac{d\sigma }{d\cos {\theta }} \sim (1 + \cos ^2{\theta })\) [73], thus the probability is more for \(\cos {\theta }= \pm 1\), where \(p^{N^\pm }_z\) is large. This can also be interpreted as follows: the longitudinal momentum \(p^{N^\pm }_z=p^{N^\pm } \cos {\theta }\) and the transverse momentum \(p^{N^\pm }_T=p^{N^\pm }\sin {\theta }\) are anti-correlated, which is apparent from Fig. 18c. \(p^{N^\pm }_z\) and \(p^{N^\pm }_T\) peak at different angles , i.e. \(\theta =0, \pi \) for the former and \(\theta =\pi /2,\, 3\pi /2\) for the latter. As the total momentum is conserved and finite, the distribution of \(p^{N^\pm }_T\) forms a circular pattern with radius p, and \(p^{N^\pm }_z\) project the gradient as \(|\mathbf {p}|\) which can be seen from Fig. 18d.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Multiplicity distributions a for the charged leptons (\(n_{\mathrm{Lep}}\)) and b for the jets (\(n_{\mathrm{Jet}}\)) at the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV for \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1) and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) at the muon collider

Fig. 21
figure 21

The transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) distributions of charged leptons (1st and 2nd) at the muon collider for \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and center of mass energy 3.5 TeV. a and b represent the distributions of two leptons for pre and post jet-lepton isolation, respectively for \({\mathcal {B}}(N^{\pm } \rightarrow h e^{\pm })= 100\%\). c Describes the scenario for the isolated leptons obeying the branching ratio of BP1

However, if we plot the differential distributions with respect to \(p^{N^\pm }_z\), it boils down to

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\sigma }{dp^{N^\pm }_z}=\frac{d\sigma }{d\cos {\theta }}\frac{d\cos {\theta }}{dp^{N^\pm }_z} =\frac{1}{p^{N^\pm }}\frac{d\sigma }{d\cos {\theta }}\simeq \frac{1}{p^{N^\pm }}(1+\cos ^2{\theta }). \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Thus given a constant momentum for the \(N^\pm \), i.e. \(p^{N^\pm }= \mathrm{constant}\ne 0\), \(\frac{d\sigma }{dp^{N^\pm }_z}\) never diverges. On the contrary, the situation is quite different for transverse momentum distributions as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\sigma }{dp^{N^\pm }_T}= & {} \frac{d\sigma }{d\cos {\theta }}\frac{d\cos {\theta }}{dp^{N^\pm }_T}=\frac{1}{p^{N^\pm }}\frac{d\sigma }{d\cos {\theta }}\frac{d\cos {\theta }}{d\sin {\theta }}\nonumber \\\simeq & {} \frac{\tan {\theta }}{-p^{N^\pm }}(1+\cos ^2{\theta }). \end{aligned}$$
(19)

\(p^{N^\pm }_T\) diverges at \(\theta =\pi /2, 3\pi /2\), which is evident from Fig. 19. Thus unlike at the LHC, here at the muon collider, the transverse momentum dominates, and so transverse decay length can expected to be slightly larger compared to the LHC/FCC. These effects are then transferred to the decayed leptons and jets from \(N^\pm \). We should remember that this divergence also depends on the Lorentz structure of the matrix element, governed by the spin of the initial, finalstates and the propagator [73].

Fig. 22
figure 22

a The transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) distribution of the first three \(p_T\) ordered jets with the centre of mass energy of 3.5 TeV and b b-jet multiplicity distribution (\(n_{\mathrm{bjet}}\)) at the muon collider for the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV, with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

Fig. 23
figure 23

The transverse (\(p_T\)) and the longitudinal (\(p_z\)) momenta distributions at the muon collider for the process \(\mu ^+\,\mu ^-\rightarrow N^+\,N^{-}\), with \(M_N=1\,\mathrm{TeV}\) (BP1), \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). a and b represent the distributions for leading jet with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV and 14 TeV, respectively. c and d depict the similar distributions for isolated charged leptons

The kinematical features at the hard scattering level can decline when it comes to the finalstate decay products. Here we are focusing on \(N^\pm /N^0\) giving rise to \(h \ell ^\pm /\nu \), and thus 2b-jets and one lepton (\(e,\, \mu \)) or neutrino will be present in the finalstate. The jets and leptons are tagged via similar cuts as described in Sect. 4. Figure 20 depicts the lepton and jet multiplicity distributions for BP1 with \(Y_N=5 \times 10^{-7}\) at three different energies. Figure 20a presents the lepton multiplicity distributions which remains similar to that at the LHC. However, in Fig. 20b we have the jet multiplicity distributions, and the higher multiplicity is much lesser than at the LHC as muon collider is devoid of any initial state QCD radiations.

Figure 21 shows the lepton \(p_T\) distributions coming from \(\mu ^+ \mu ^- \rightarrow N^+ N^-\) at the centre of mass energy of 3.5 TeV for the first benchmark point (BP1), where \(M_N=1\) TeV and \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). Figure 21a presents the case, where the \(N^\pm \) is forced decayed to \(e^\pm h\) and both the electrons have similar \(p_T\) distributions. Figure 21b depicts the case after the jet-lepton isolation where the yield of the second lepton is reduced. Finally, Fig. 21c shows the distributions with the branching ratios of BP1. Here it can be noticed that the second lepton can either come from \(N^\pm \) or gauge bosons, while the first lepton mostly comes from \(N^\pm \) decays. The interesting point is the end point of the \(p_T\) distribution governed by the momentum conservation is limited to \(\frac{E_{\mathrm{CM}}}{2}\), unlike at the LHC/FCC.

Figure 22 depicts the \(p_T\) distributions of the first three \(p_T\) ordered jets for BP1 at the centre of mass energy of 3.5 TeV. The red curve representing the leading jet has two smooth peaks. The earlier one can be from the jets coming from the gauge bosons as well as from the Higgs boson decay. However, the higher peaks occur when two of these jets are merged due to the sufficient boost [71]. The second and third jets can come from gauge boson decays. Along with these jets, there could be additional jets due to finalstate radiation (FSR) as evident from the jet multiplicity distributions in Fig. 20b. Contrary to the LHC/FCC, there cannot be any QCD radiation from the initial state in this case, so ISR effects are absent.

Figure 22b presents the b-jet multiplicity distributions. In spite of having four b-jets coming from the two Higgs bosons for BP1 at the centre of mass energy of 3.5 TeV, not all are tagged as b-jets due to the b-tagging efficiency. There can be b-jets coming from the Z boson decays as well. For the Higgs mass reconstructions we require at least two b-jets to be tagged which we discuss in the Sect. 6.4.

Fig. 24
figure 24

Displaced total transverse (\(L_\perp \) in purple) and longitudinal (\(L_\parallel \) in green) decay length distributions for the \(SU(2)_L\) triplet heavy fermions \(N^{\pm }\), at the muon collider with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV (ac), 14 TeV (df) and 30 TeV (gi) for BP1 (\(M_N=1\) TeV). Yukawa coupling \(Y_N= 5\times 10^{-7},\, 1\times 10^{-8}\) are used in (a, d, g) and in (b, e, h), respectively, whereas the third column (c, f, i) depicts \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\)

6.2 Boost effects at the muon collider

Unlike at the LHC/FCC (as shown in Sect. 5.1) in muon collider, the momentum conservation restricts the boost. Again, the angular distributions govern the behaviour of \(p_T\) and \(p_z\), with the former diverging around \(|\eta |\sim 0\). The resultant of these two, leads to \(p_T\) being more dominant over \(p_z\) for both jets and leptons, as described in Fig. 23. Figure 23a, b show the \(p_T\) and \(p_z\) distributions of the leading jet for BP1 at the centre of mass energy of 3.5 and 14 TeV, respectively. We see the two-hump behaviour as before, which declines as we move from Fig. 23a to Fig. 23b due to larger boost which tends to create fat-jet like signatures [71, 74,75,76] at higher \(p_T\) values. Similar plots can be seen for the leptons in Fig. 23c to Fig. 23d where \(p_T\) remains dominant over \(p_z\). Thus the boost effect on the decay length will be more on the transverse decay length than the longitudinal ones. This is contrary to what we observe at the LHC/FCC, where the partonic system is often boosted along \(z-\) direction governed by the parton distribution function, resulting in longer displaced decay length for the longitudinal ones as compared to the transverse one. This is an artifact that at the LHC/FCC the partonic momentum is not fixed, unlike at the muon collider, where \(\theta \) is the only parameter that varies.

6.3 Displaced decays at the muon collider

Table 13 The number of events within the range 1 mm–10 m and 10 m–100 m in the transverse (\(L_\perp \)) and longitudinal (\(L_\parallel \)) direction for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV with the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 100,00 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\)

Displaced decays can also be observed at muon collider by observing charged tracks from \(N^\pm \) as they fly a certain distance before its decay. In Fig. 24, we describe the longitudinal \(L_{||}\) (in green) and transverse \(L_{\perp }\) (in purple) displaced decay length distributions for the charged \(SU(2)_L\) triplet heavy fermions \(N^{\pm }\) coming from \(\mu ^+ \mu ^- \rightarrow N^+N^-\) for the centre of mass energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV for BP1 (\(M_N=1~\mathrm{TeV}\)). Due to enhanced transverse boost contrary to LHC as mentioned before, the total transverse displaced decay lengths are relatively inflated. Column wise they describe the cases for three different Yukawa couplings \(5\times 10^{-7},\, 1\times 10^{-8}, \, 5\times 10^{-10}\). In the first column corresponds to \(Y_N= 5\times 10^{-7}\), where the maximum transverse decay length is around 7 mm (purple curve) at the centre of mass energy 3.5 TeV, which is enhanced due to the boost effect to 25 mm and 70 mm at the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV, respectively. \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}, \, 5\times 10^{-10}\) are used in the second and third columns to represent the larger reaches, where we expect two recoils, the first one due to the dominant decay mode of \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \), while the second one comes from the decay of \(N^0\) as discussed before. The total displaced decay lengths coming from both recoils are depicted in Fig. 24. The first one is for the \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \), which is \({\mathcal {O}}(1)\) cm, whereas the second one is \({\mathcal {O}}(0.1-1000)\) m depending on the Yukawa couplings, coming from \(N^0\) decay. It is evident that only for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\) (third column), the total transverse decay length falls in the range of \(\gtrsim 100\) m for all three energies, while for the rest, we observe the signatures within 10 m range.

In Table 13, we present the number of events for the longitudinal and transverse decay lengths for the benchmark points for the centre of mass energies of 3.5, 14 and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-10}\). We separate two different regions, 1mm-10 m and 10-100 m, for those event numbers. For other Yukawa couplings chosen earlier, the events lie within the 10 m range. One very interesting feature to observe is that due to larger transverse boost the event number for the transverse decay length are more unlike at the LHC/FCC (Table 5).

Table 14 Number of events for finalstate topologies containing at least two b-jets for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the muon collider with integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\), 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) (columns 3, 4) and with \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\) (columns 5, 6)

6.4 Results

In this section, we describe the event numbers for the finalstates coming from the \(N^\pm \) decay and at least one Higgs bosons which is tagged via b-jets. Thus in Table 14 (columns 3 and 4) we describe the finalstates with two and four b-jets for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energies 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the muon collider with integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\), 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). The b-tagging efficiency is taken to be maximum of 85% and dynamically set while simulating the events via secondary vertex reconstruction as explained earlier [67, 68]. The number of 4b-jets events are one order of magnitude less than that of 2b-jets events, where they are ideally coming via \(N^\pm \rightarrow h\ell ^\pm \), from both the legs. We see that the number of events for various finalstates reduce from 3.5 to 30 TeV as we go more and more off-shell for all the benchmark points. One interesting point to note is that, in case of muon collider, the most dominant final state is \(2b+2j+2\ell \), which is \(2b+4j+1\ell \) for the LHC. This is due to the fact that at muon collider, unlike LHC, there is no initial state QCD radiation, inflating the chance of more isolated leptons. All the finalstates described here are displaced ones and the event number \(\ge 3\) can be probed at 95% confidence level for the background-less signals [77, 78].

Similarly, we present the event numbers for \(Y_N=10^{-8} \) in Table 14 (columns 4 and 5) for the above mentioned finnalstates for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at an integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\), 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. The multi-lepton finalstates suffer compared to the case of \(Y_N=5 \times 10^{-7}\) due to lost charged lepton by the new decay mode of \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \), which is very similar to that of the LHC results in Table 7.

Fig. 25
figure 25

Di-b-jet (\(M_{bb}\)) invariant mass distributions for BP1 (\(M_N=1\) TeV) at the muon collider with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\) and centre of mass energy 3.5 TeV. The dominant peak around the SM Higgs boson mass (125.5 GeV) along with a small peak around the Z boson mass (91.1 GeV) are visible

Table 15 Number of events for single Higgs boson and di-Higgs boson mass peaks after the window cuts around the peak of the invariant mass distributions for the benchmark points at the muon collider with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

Subsequently, we focus on the di-b-jet invariant mass reconstruction as shown in Fig. 25 for BP1. We can see the two peaks coming from the Higgs and Z bosons distinctively. We impose the constraint of \(|M_{bb}-125.5|\le 10\) GeV, essential to reconstruct one Higgs boson mass peak. Following this approach, we tag at least one Higgs boson for the finalstate of 2b and two Higgs bosons for 4b, which are listed in Table 15 for the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for all benchmark points with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). From the event numbers we realise that only one Higgs boson reconstruction is feasible.

Fig. 26
figure 26

a Di-bjet-mono-lepton (\(M_{bb\ell }\)) invariant mass distribution with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\), b di-jet-mono-lepton (\(M_{jj\ell }\)) invariant mass distributions with \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\) for the benchmark points at the muon collider with the centre of mass energy 3.5 TeV

In Fig. 26a, we plot the \(bb\ell \) invariant mass to reconstruct the \(N^\pm \) mass for the benchmark points. We can clearly see the two peaks for the two benchmark points. The corresponding number of events are projected in Table 16 for the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosity (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\). Thus the visible mode leading to \(bb\ell \) can successfully reconstruct the Type-III fermion masses.

Table 16 The number of events in \(M_{bb\ell }\) distribution after the window cut around the mass peak for the benchmark points at the muon collider with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=5\times 10^{-7}\)

In Fig. 26b, we reconstruct the \(N^0\) invariant mass for the case of \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\), where \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) is the dominant decay mode. The \(N^0 \rightarrow W^\pm \ell ^\mp \) is first reconstructed via the di-jet invariant mass peak around \(W^\pm \) mass by demanding \(|M_{jj}-M_W|\le 10\) GeV. Later events are collected around that mass window to constitute \(M_{jj\ell }\). It is evident from Fig. 26b that \(M_{jj\ell }\) peaks around \(M_N\) for the benchmark points at the centre of mass energy of 14 TeV. The corresponding event numbers are presented in Table 17 for the benchmark points with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}\)=) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. We see similar effects of boost reducing the jet multiplicity for BP2 (see Table 10) and thus reducing the number of events for \(M_{jj\ell }\). For higher energies of 14 and 30 TeV such effects are negligible as the off-shell cross-section remain very low.

Table 17 The number of events in \(M_{jj\ell }\) distribution after the window cut around the mass peak for the benchmark points at the muon collider with the centre of mass energies of 3.5 TeV, 14 TeV and 30 TeV at the integrated luminosities of (\({\mathcal {L}}_{\text {int}}=\)) 1000 fb\(^{-1}\), 10,000 fb\(^{-1}\) and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively with \(Y_N=1\times 10^{-8}\)
Fig. 27
figure 27

Limits obtained via the inclusive measurements from \(N^0N^\pm ,\, N^+N^-\) productions for the Yukawa coupling versus Type-III fermion mass for the transverse (a, c) and the longitudinal (b, d) decay lengths for the finalstates containing at least one displaced Higgs boson with 14 (a, b), 100 (c, d) TeV centre of mass energies at the LHC/FCC with integrated luminosities of 3000 and 300 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively

7 Reach plots in Yukawa versus mass plane

In this section, we plot the regions with at least one displaced Higgs boson reconstructed from di-b-jet invariant mass using the window cut \(|M_{bb}-125.5|\le 10\,\mathrm GeV\) in Yukawa versus mass plane that can be probed at the LHC/FCC and at the muon collider. The regions are obtained from the zero background analysis with a confidence level of 95% at a given luminosity [77, 78]. Figure 27 presents the regions in a plane of Type-III Yukawa coupling versus mass at the LHC with 14 TeV and 100 TeV centre of mass energies that can be probed at an integrated luminosities of 3000 and 300 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively where QCD corrections to the cross-sections [63] are taken into account. The bounds obtained here are exclusively based on the displaced decay signature as we present them in Fig. 27 in \(Y_N - M_N\) plane.

In Fig. 27a, we see the bounds obtained from the transverse decay lengths at the CMS and ATLAS (in light green) and MATHUSLA (in brown) at the centre of mass energy of 14 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\). The corresponding longitudinal decay length bounds are presented in Fig. 27b. The maximum Type-III fermion mass of 1.75 TeV, 1.8 TeV can be probed via the transverse and the longitudinal displaced decay length at the LHC with centre of mass energy of 14 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively for the reconstruction of at least one Higgs boson mass. The bounds at 100 TeV centre of mass energy are 3.2 TeV and 3.6 TeV, respectively for the transverse and the longitudinal decay lengths at an integrated luminosity of 300 fb\(^{-1}\). At larger luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\) we can probe even higher mass range around 4.25 TeV. Though it is very small, we observe slight enhancement on the mass bounds in the longitudinal mode as compared to the transverse one. Yukawa couplings in the range of \(5\times 10^{-11}- 5 \times 10^{-7}\) can be probed if we consider the inclusive measurements of LHC/FCC and MATHUSLA. The transverse and longitudinal reaches at the MATHUSLA are quite low as compared to CMS and ATLAS. Considering both the transverse and the longitudinal decay lengths, we see that Yukawa coupling \(> 10^{-9}\) is out of the reach of MATHUSLA, however can be addressed at CMS and ATLAS.

Fig. 28
figure 28

Limits obtained for Yukawa coupling versus Type-III fermion mass via transverse (a, c) and longitudinal (b, d) decay lengths for the finalstates containing at least one displaced Higgs boson with the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV at the muon collider with integrated luminosities of 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. a, b Represent 1 mm \(\le L_{\perp , \, \parallel }\le \) 10 m and c, d depict 10 m \(\le L_{\perp , \, \parallel }\le \) 100 m regions

Fig. 29
figure 29

Limits obtained for Yukawa coupling versus Type-III fermion mass via transverse (a, c) and longitudinal (b, d) decay lengths for the finalstates containing at least 2b-jets with the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV at the muon collider with integrated luminosities of 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. a, b Represent 1 mm \(\le L_{\perp , \, \parallel }\le \) 10 m and c, d depict 10 m \(\le L_{\perp , \, \parallel }\le \) 100 m regions

In Fig. 28, we depict the region plots for obtaining at least one displaced Higgs boson at the muon collider for 14 TeV and 30 TeV centre of mass energies. In Fig. 28a, b, we present the regions that can be probed with transverse (\(L_{\perp }\)) and longitudinal (\(L_{||}\)) decay lengths of 1 mm to 10 m at the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV with integrated luminosities of 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. From Fig. 28a we see that one can probe \(M_N\) up to 6.8 and 9.9 TeV in the transverse direction for the centre of mass energies of 14, 30 TeV at the integrated luminosities of 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. The corresponding bounds from longitudinal decays can be estimated from Fig. 28b as 6.0 and 8.0 TeV, respectively for the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV. In case of muon collider, the reach is a little inflated in the transverse direction for the similar displacement length reach for longitudinal and transverse direction. Figure 28c, d present the limits obtained from the decay lengths of \(10-100\) meter probing very low Yukawa couplings \(\lesssim 10^{-8}\).

In Fig. 29, we also have presented our results in the \(Y_N\) verses \(M_N\) plane for the 2b-jet finalstate, however the reconstruction of Higgs mass is not demanded. Figure 29a, b describes the probable region in the transverse and longitudinal direction, respectively for the displaced range within 1 mm to 10 m with the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV and integrated luminosities of 10,000 and 30,000 fb\(^{-1}\), respectively. Figure 29c, d represents the same for the decay length within 10 m to 100  m at muon collider. Clearly, here the reach is higher than Fig. 28 as the Higgs boson mass reconstruction efficiency reduces the number for the latter case, which can be seen from Fig. 15. Unlike at the LHC, in muon collider the reach is restricted to the centre of mass energy, thus higher centre of mass energy would probe higher values of Type-III fermion mass.

8 Conclusion

Type-III seesaw model is motivated to explain the tiny neutrino mass scale which predicts the heavy charged and neutral leptons. They mix with SM charged and neutral leptons via the Yukawa couplings and the vev of the SM Higgs doublet at the electroweak symmetry breaking scale. Current lower limit of this SU(2) triplet fermion obtained using the prompt charged lepton finalstates is around 740 GeV [27,28,29,30] at \(2\sigma \) with possible QCD corrections [63] but LHC with higher energy and luminosity can probe even higher mass range. The same Yukawa coupling also gives direct coupling to SM Higgs boson with the charged and neutral heavy fermions. Thus Higgs bosons can be produced from the decays of such heavy fermions proportional to the square of the Yukawa couplings. In particular, we focus on the parameter space with low Yukawa, where the displaced decays of \(N^\pm \) and \(N^0\) occur.

In this article, we explored the displaced Higgs production from such decays both at the LHC/FCC and at the muon collider. The Higgs boson comes from these decays of \(N^\pm \rightarrow h \ell ^\pm \) and \(N^0 \rightarrow h \nu \), where the former leads to the complete visible displaced finalstate for \(Y_N\simeq 5\times 10^{-7}\). Different Yukawa coupling ranges are probed, which are compatible with the atmospheric and the solar neutrino mass scale as well as very light ones which can be explored by the proposed detector, MATHUSLA. However, for lower Yukawa couplings i.e. \(Y_N \le 10^{-8}\), we observe two decay recoils:first from the decay of \(N^\pm \rightarrow N^0 \pi ^\pm \) and the second one is from \(N^0\) decays to the SM particles. We also notice that the longitudinal boost at the LHC/FCC can lead to the enhancement of the displaced decay lengths (\(L_{||}\)), and thus has a better reach compared to the transverse (\(L_{\perp }\)) one. The detailed analyses at the LHC with centre of mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV are presented along with the bounds on Yukawa couplings and Type-III fermion masses. A very early data of 300fb\(^{-1}\) can probe Type-III fermion mass of \(\sim \) 3.6 TeV at the centre of mass energy of 100 TeV (FCC) can probe mass range of 4.25 TeV with the integrated luminosity of 3000 fb\(^{-1}\).

Displaced Higgs production in a supersymmetric Type-III seesaw mechanism is already looked into [33]. In general, the seesaw models with lower couplings predict displaced decays of right-handed neutrinos in case of Type-I seesaw [79, 80] but we do not expect any flying charged track in those scenarios. In case of Type-III seesaw at the LHC, \(N^\pm \) gives charged track before it decays, whereas \(N^0\) has invisible track before the decay. Models with inert SU(2) triplet scalars also predicts displaced charged track but mostly leads to very soft leptons and jets due to phase space suppression induced by \(Z_2\) symmetry [81,82,83]. In a supersymmetric extension of such triplet scalar, the fermionic partners stay nearly degenerate at the tree-level as well as couple to SM fermions via the mixing with doublet like Higgsinos and gauginos, resulting displaced charged track along with large missing energy due to R-parity [84]. Thus, a demand of one visible and another invisible charged tracks, i.e. first and second recoils along with one(two) hard lepton(s) but not so large missing energy can segregate the scenario from others. The reconstruction of the Higgs bosons in this scenario, can distinguish it from other possible BSM scenarios having long-lived particles. In the context of supersymmetry and UED, where we see long lived particles often have larger missing energy in the finalstates, thus can also be easily segregated. In R-parity violating framework the displaced decays of the Higgs boson is studied in [85] though produced promptly.

Unlike at the LHC/FCC, at the muon collider, we can only produce \(N^+ N^-\), and thus two such displaced charged tracks will be visible before the recoil. At the muon collider, the mass ranges that can be probed is identical for both the transverse and the longitudinal modes due to fixed total momentum in each collision. However, one interesting fact we observe is that the transverse momentum of the \(N^\pm \) diverges perpendicular to the beam axis, as opposed to the LHC. This leads to higher momentum for transverse compared to longitudinal one, and predicts larger number of events for the transverse decay lengths. We plot the sensitivity regions in the Yukawa versus mass plane for two different decay length regions, i.e. 1 mm–10 m and 10–100 m for the centre of mass energies of 14 and 30 TeV and it is evident that a detector with length around 10 m is sufficient in probing the larger ranges of the Yukawa coupling. Certainly, muon collider has good prospects in probing such scenarios having them in centre of mass frame and without initial state radiation.