Abstract
The next generation of circular high energy collider is expected to be a lepton collider, FCC-ee at CERN or CEPC in China. However, the civil engineering concepts foresee to equip these colliders with bigger detector caverns than one would need for a lepton collider, so that they can be used for a hadron collider that may be installed in the same tunnel without further civil engineering. This opens up the possibility to install extra instrumentation at the cavern walls to search for new long-lived particles at the lepton collider. We use the example of heavy neutral leptons to show that such an installation could improve the sensitivity to the squared mixing parameter by almost half an order of magnitude.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Future lepton colliders such as the FCC-ee [1] or CEPC [2] have an extremely rich physics program [3, 4]. In particular, they are outstanding intensity frontier machines that can not only study the properties of the electroweak and Higgs sector at unprecedented accuracy, but they can also search for feebly coupled hidden particles that have escaped detection at the LHC due to their low production cross section. Due to their small interaction strength hidden particles can have comparably long lifetimes. Such new long-lived particles (LLPs) appear in many extensions of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics that can address open questions in particle physics and cosmology, such as the Dark Matter (DM), neutrino masses or baryogenesis, cf. e.g. [5]. In recent years many studies have investigated the sensitivity of the LHC [6] and other experiments [7] to LLPs. The clean environment of a lepton collider would offer even better perspectives for such searches [1, 3].
LLPs are typically searched for at colliders through displaced signatures [6]. One constraint in this context is the volume of the main detectors, which limits the potential to search for particles with very long lifetimes. For the LHC, several dedicated detectors have been proposed to extend the reach to larger lifetimes, including FASER [8], MATHUSLA [9], CODEX-b [10], Al3X [11], MAPP [12], and ANUBIS [13]. While MATHUSLA would be placed at the surface, the other proposals take advantage of existing cavities that can be instrumented. At a future lepton collider the detectors will be smaller than those of the LHC, which limits the sensitivity to long lifetimes. However, the current planning for the FCC-ee and CEPC foresees to build a hadron collider in the same tunnel, namely the FCC-hh or SPPC [14, 15]. For this reason, it has been proposed and is widely accepted that the detector caverns for the FCC-ee will be much bigger than needed for a lepton collider, so that the FCC-hh and its detectors can be installed in the same tunnel without major civil engineering effort. In this Letter we point out that instrumenting this extra space could considerably increase the sensitivity of the FCC-ee (or likewise the CEPC) to LLPs at a cost of only a few million Swiss franc (CHF). We therefore propose to include such a HErmetic CAvern TrackEr (HECATE) in future FCC-ee and CEPC studies.Footnote 1
2 Possible implementation and cost estimate
A possible implementation of the HECATE detector would consist of resistive plate chambers (RPCs) or scintillator plates, constructed from extruded scintillating bars, located around the cavern walls and forming a \(4\pi \) detector. Such an hermetic detector design maximizes the fiducial volume and allows to discriminate against events originating from outside the detector cavern. The inner detector and muon chambers act as a veto able to reject SM particles from the primary vertex. In order to obtain timing information and to distinguish particles from cosmic background, the HECATE detector should have at least two layers of detector material separated by a sizable distance. For reliable tracking, at least four layers, along with a smaller size and/or optimised geometry of the detector plates, would be required. The biggest challenge of such detector is the control of the background that will originate from two sources: cosmics and neutrinos produced at collision point. The first can be handled using timing information, which permits to distinguish particles coming from within the cavern from ones coming from outside the cavern. We expect neutrinos that are produced from cosmic rays and decay within the cavern volume to be more problematic. However, this background requires a detailed Monte Carlo simulation, which lies beyond the scope of this Letter. On the other hand, the feasibility of such a rejection is studied for the MATHUSLA detector, see [16] and references therein. We expect a lower background for HECATE, as MATHUSLA would be exposed to more cosmics due to its location on the surface. More dangerous is the background from SM neutrinos produced in process such as \(e^+ e^- \mathpunct \rightarrow Z \mathpunct \rightarrow \nu {{\overline{\nu }}}\), as neutrinos may interact with the detector material resulting in detectable charged particles. These type of events can be rejected in different ways, depending on where the interaction takes place. Events originating from the beam pipe can be rejected by using the tracker as a veto and interactions within the inner detectors can be rejected using its outer layers. Additionally, in the case that the background remains too large, one could install an additional tracker layer outside the detector as a veto system, that would be able to reject SM neutrino interactions in the outer layers of the usual detector. The present Letter is a simple proof-of-principle, and we postpone a detailed investigation of such backgrounds to future work. We note in passing that the MATHUSLA collaboration, which faces similar issues, has concluded that they are under control, see [16] and references therein.
For a horizontally cylindrical cavern with a radius of 15 m and length of 50 m, plates of \(1~{\hbox {m}^2}\) surface would provide \(\sim 6000\) readout channels for the scintillating bars. The main cost of such detector would then be the cost of the scintillators. Assuming a thickness of 1 cm for a single panel the cost would amount to 3–5 MCHF with current prices. This assumes that the used scintillator is EJ-200, which has a long optical attenuation length and fast timing. The cost could be significantly reduced if a cheaper alternative is used that still matches the specifications required for such a detector design. The cost of the readout electronics can be estimated based on the Sci-Fi detector from LHCb [17]. On this basis, the readout electronics together with the clear and wave-shifting fibers needed for the scintillator would cost around 30 CHF per channel. Hence, the total cost of the detector would be below 5 MCHF per layer. This estimate assumes present day technology and one can expect that better technology can be purchased at lower prices at the time the FCC-ee will be built.
3 Sensitivity estimate
We estimate the HECATE sensitivity for right-handed neutrinos, a type of heavy neutral leptons (HNLs). The existence of these HNLs is predicted by well-motivated extensions of the SM, in particular the type-I seesaw mechanism [18,19,20,21,22,23], leptogenesis [24], and as DM candidates [25]. They have been a benchmark scenario for FCC-ee sensitivity estimates from early stages [26]. The properties of HNLs are characterised by their Majorana mass M and the mixing angles \(\theta _a\) that determine the suppression of their weak interactions relative to that of ordinary neutrinos. The implications of the heavy neutrinos’ existence strongly depend on the magnitude of M, see e.g. [27] for a review.Footnote 2 The seesaw mechanism requires at least two HNLs to explain the light neutrino oscillation data. However, for the purpose of the present study a simplified model with a single HNL denoted by N suffices,
where \(e_{La}\) and \(\nu _{La}\) are the charged and neutral SM leptons, respectively, Z and W are the weak gauge bosons with masses \(m_Z\) and \(m_W\), and h is the physical Higgs field after spontaneous breaking of the electroweak symmetry by the expectation value v.
At a lepton collider the HNLs are primarily produced from the decay of on-shell Z-bosons. The HNL production cross section in the process \(Z\rightarrow \nu N\) can be estimated as [26]Footnote 3
their decay rate is roughly \(\Gamma _N \simeq 12 U^2 M^5 G_F^2 /(96\pi ^3)\) with \(G_F\) the Fermi constant and \(U^2=\sum U_a^2\) with \(U_a^2=|{\theta _a}|^2\).Footnote 4 The number of events that can be observed in a spherical detector with an integrated luminosity L can then be estimated asFootnote 5
Here \(\lambda _N = {\beta \gamma }/{\Gamma _N}\) is the HNL decay length in the laboratory frame, \(l_0\) and \(l_1\) denote the minimal and maximal distance from the interaction point (IP) where the detector can detect an HNL decay into charged particles. If the Z-boson decays at rest we can set \(\beta \gamma =(m_Z^2 - M^2)/(2 m_Z M)\).Footnote 6 We then replaced one of the neutrinos with the HNL with a given mass. We have considered masses spanning from 1 GeV up to \(m_Z\) in steps of 1 GeV.Footnote 7
Comparison of the sensitivities for nine signal events that can be achieved at the FCC-ee with \(2.5\times 10^{12}\) Z-bosons (red) or CEPC with \(3.5\times 10^{11}\) Z-bosons (blue). The faint solid curves show the main detector sensitivity (\(l_0 = 5\, \hbox {mm}\), \(l_1 = 1.22\, \hbox {m}\)). The faint dash-dotted curve indicates the additional gain if the muon chambers are used at the FCC-ee (\(l_0 = 1.22\, \hbox {m}\), \(l_1 = 4\, \hbox {m}\)). The thick curves show the sensitivity of HECATE with \(l_0 = 4\, \hbox {m}\), \(l_1 = 15\, \hbox {m}\) (solid) and \(l_0 = 4\, \hbox {m}\), \(l_1 = 25\, \hbox {m}\) (dashed), respectively. Finally, the faint dashed red line shows the FCC-ee main detector sensitivity with \(5\times 10^{12}\) Z-bosons, corresponding to the luminosity at two IPs. For comparison we indicate the expected sensitivity of selected other experiments with the different green curves as indicated in the plot [8,9,10, 45, 48]. The gray areas in the upper part of the plot show the region excluded by past experiments [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57], the grey areas at the bottom mark the regions that are disfavoured by BBN and neutrino oscillation data in the \(\nu \)MSM (‘seesaw’)
In Fig. 1 we show the expected gain in sensitivity that can be achieved with HECATE (thick curves; red and blue encoding the FCC-ee and CEPC, respectively; solid and dashed, corresponding to \(l_1 = 15\, \hbox {m}\) or \(l_1 = 25\, \hbox {m}\)) in comparison to using only the inner detector (faint red and blue curve for FCC-ee and CEPC) with \(2.5\times 10^{12}\) and \(3.5\times 10^{11}\) Z-bosons, respectively. These numbers refer to the expected integrated luminosity during the Z-pole run at one IP. We display lines for nine detected signal events approximately corresponding to the \(5\, {\sigma }\) discovery region under the assumption of a single background event. The actual sensitivity of HECATE should lie somewhere between the two thick red curves, as the approximately cylindrical detector extents from the IP 15 m in radial direction and 25 m in beam direction. The improvement with HECATE is almost half an order of magnitude in \(U^2\) for given M. This can be understood by recalling that the region on the lower left side of the sensitivity region corresponds to decay lengths that greatly exceed the detector size. In this regime the exponentials in (3) can be expanded in \(l_1/\lambda \) and \(l_0/\lambda \). For \(l_1 \gg l_0\) the number of events is simply given by
Hence, the value of \(U^2\) that leads to a given number of events for fixed M scales as \(\mathpunct \propto 1/\sqrt{l_1}\). For the inner detector we assume a radius of 1.22 m within which displaced vertices can be detected. This corresponds to the size of the ECAL designed for the ILC [58], we use it as an estimate for the dimensions of the FCC-ee or CEPC detectors, which are to be determined.Footnote 8 Hence, one can expect relative sensitivity gains \(\mathpunct \propto \sqrt{1.22~\hbox {m}/l_1}\). Relation (4) also permits to estimate the sensitivity gain by increasing the integrated luminosity L (e.g. by extending the Z-pole run or by considering more than one IP): Increasing L by a given factor has the same effect as increasing \(l_1\) by the same factor. Hence, for given M, the value of \(U^2\) needed to achieve a given number of events scales as \(\mathpunct \propto 1/\sqrt{L}\). As an example we display the gain in sensitivity that could be achieved with the inner detector by doubling the integrated luminosity of the Z-pole run (faint dashed red curve). The scaling of all lines in the plot with increased integrated luminosity can be estimated by comparing the faint dashed red line to the faint solid red curve, and with relation (4). All HECATE lines would scale with the number of Z-bosons in the same way as the main detector line, we omit them here to keep the plot readable. We further do not show all lines for the CEPC, the omitted ones would give similar relative sensitivity gains as for FCC-ee.
Further, we estimate the potential sensitivity gain from performing a search in the muon chambers at the FCC-ee (faint dash-dotted red curve). This idea, originally proposed in [60, 61], has been applied to HNL searches at the LHC in [62, 63]. As suggested by the scaling above, the gain is considerably lower than what could be done with HECATE. Finally, one may wonder whether it is worth to dig even bigger caverns to host dedicated LLP detectors. The scaling \(\mathpunct \propto 1/\sqrt{l_1}\) of the sensitivity to \(U^2\) for given M implies that the costs for civil engineering would quickly grow. For illustrative purposes we add the sensitivity that could be achieved with the very unrealistic Totally Hyper-UNrealistic DEtectoR in a huge DOME (THUNDERDOME) concept at FCC-ee (\(l_0 = 4\, \hbox {m}\), \(l_1 = 100\, \hbox {m}\), dotted red line). However, for other LLP models with a different scaling the return of investment might be better.
It should be said that Fig. 1 is very conservative as far as the sensitivity gain with HECATE relative to the inner detector is concerned because we have assumed 100% efficiency and no backgrounds for both. For HECATE these assumptions are semi-realistic, as the inner detector can be used as a veto. In contrast, in the inner detector the reconstruction efficiency for displaced vertices rapidly decreases as a function of displacement. This dependence has been studied for the LHC [57, 64, 65] and LEP [51, 66], but a realistic estimate for the FCC-ee detectors would require detailed simulations. In the present note, which is a proof-of-principle, we therefore choose to make the same assumptions for HECATE and the inner detector and therefore underestimate the relative sensitivity gain that could be achieved with HECATE.
It is instructive to compare the HECATE sensitivity to existing constraints and to the reach of other upcoming or proposed experiments. An updated summary of relevant experimental constraints can be found in [67].Footnote 9 In Fig. 1 we display the exclusion region of several experiments under the assumption that the HNL exclusively mix with the second SM generation (\(U^2=|{\theta _\mu }|^2\)) [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Indirect searches, on the other hand, strongly depend on the properties of light neutrinos, cf. e.g. [67, 69,70,71,72,73,74] for a detailed discussion. In particular, lower bounds on the individual \(|{\theta _a}|\) from neutrino oscillation data can only be imposed under specific model assumptions, and the lower bound on their sum \(U^2\) scales as \(m_{\text {lightest}}/M\). As an indicator, we add the corresponding lower ‘seesaw’ bound in the Neutrino Minimal Standard Model (\(\nu \)MSM) [75, 76] as a gray area, assuming normal ordering of the light neutrinos. There is also a bound on the lifetime of the N from the requirement to decay before big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) in the early universe, which again depends on the flavour mixing pattern. We here display the bound from [77] under the assumption \(U^2=|{\theta _\mu }|^2\).Footnote 10
To put HECATE into the context of the future experimental program in particle physics, we indicate the sensitivity of selected other proposed or planned experiments, as indicated in the plot [8,9,10, 45, 48]. HECATE would be complementary to other proposals and help to fill the sensitivity gap between the reach of future lepton colliders limited by the volume of their detectors and fixed target experiment limited by the D-meson threshold, cf. Fig. 1.
Finally, one may compare the reach to the parameter region where leptogenesis is possible in well-motivated scenarios. The most updated parameter space scans for the \(\nu \)MSM (practically \(n=2\)) and the model with \(n=3\) can be found in [83, 84], respectively. In both cases HECATE can probe regions deep inside the leptogenesis parameter space. In the future, it would be interesting to study how well HECATE could measure the HNL properties, so that, in case any HNLs are discovered, one could address the question whether or not these particles are indeed responsible for the origin of matter in the universe. For the FCC inner detector this has been done in [85, 86].
4 Discussion and conclusions
In this Letter we point out that an instrumentation of the large detector caverns that are planned at future circular lepton colliders could considerably increase the sensitivity of searches for LLPs. The main difference between the HECATE concept and other proposals (such as surface detectors [9, 87], forward detectors [9] or installations on the cavern ceiling [87]) lies in the approximate \(4\pi \) solid angle coverage that can be achieved by covering the cavern walls with detectors. The possibility to install a far detector that is sensitive to displacements over 20 m with such large angular coverage without extra civil engineering is a unique opportunity resulting from the fact that the caverns for FCC-ee or CEPC are expected to be designed to host a hadron collider. In addition to the large caverns, there will also be large vertical shafts over the chambers for the detector installation (16 m diameter planned for the CEPC, and over 20 m for the FCC at least two IPs), which could be used to install further instrumentation (as proposed for the LHC with ANUBIS).
The proposed solution based on scintillators should be regarded as an example and proof-of-principle. There are many other detectors that will reach timing and efficiency requirements, such as RPCs. The final choice would be based on detailed study of balance between the cost and the detector performance.
Using this example, we estimate that a detector of the HECATE type could increase the FCC sensitivity to heavy neutrinos (or HNLs) with masses below \(m_Z\) by almost half an order of magnitude at a cost of the order of ten million CHF, conservatively assuming present detector technology and prices. This improvement would help to fill the sensitivity gap for HNL masses between the B-meson mass (below which fixed target experiments are highly sensitive) and the regime that can be covered by the FCC-ee or CEPC main detectors. Heavy neutrinos are only one example for LLPs, which we have chosen for illustrative purposes here. HECATE could open many other portals to dark sectors that can potentially address some of the ‘big questions’ in particle physics and cosmology, including DM, baryogenesis, cosmic inflation and neutrino masses.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The is no data generated for this manuscript, besides the points displayed in Figure 1. The figure 1 is provided in electronic form for other people to use if needed.]
Notes
In a first version of the manuscript the detector concept was called HADES. The names has been changed to HECATE to avoid confusion with the existing experiment at GSI.
The sub-dominant N production in the decay of B-mesons generated in the process \(Z \rightarrow b {{\bar{b}}}\) has e.g. been studied in [37].
Natural units with \(c = 1\) are used throughout this Letter.
The sensitivity of some experiments depend on the number n of HNL flavours, the mass of the lightest SM neutrino \(m_{\text {lightest}}\), and on the flavour mixing pattern, i.e. the relative size of the mixings \(|{\theta _a}|^2\) with individual SM generations. It is therefore difficult to make an apple-to-apple comparison. The sensitivity of direct searches for displaced searches at accelerators in good approximation only depends on the flavour mixing pattern. In contrast to that, searches that rely on lepton number violating signatures strongly depend on the HNL mass spectrum and light neutrino properties [68].
In the recent works [77, 78] it was assumed that the HNLs are in thermal equilibrium in the early universe, which is in general not true for small \(U^2\). In [79] it was, however, pointed out that smaller mixing angles are ruled out by the cosmological history between BBN and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) decoupling [80], and various other effects of HNL decays (dissociation of nuclei [79], effect the CMB anisotropies [81] heating up the intergalactic medium [82]). In the mass range considered here, the bounds from [77, 78] can therefore be regarded as ‘hard’ unless one considers \(U^2\) that are so tiny that the HNL are never produced in significant quantities.
References
FCC, FCC-ee: the lepton collider: future circular collider conceptual design report volume 2. Eur. Phys. J. ST 228(2), 261–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4. No: CERN-ACC-2018-0057
CEPC Study Group, CEPC conceptual design report: volume 1—Accelerator (2018). arXiv: 1809.00285 [physics.acc-ph]. No: IHEP-CEPC-DR-2018-01 and IHEP-AC-2018-01
CEPC Study Group, in CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2—Physics & Detector, ed. by J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al. (2018). arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex]. No: IHEP-CEPC-DR-2018-02, IHEP-EP-2018-01, and IHEP-TH-2018-01
FCC, FCC physics opportunities: future circular collider conceptual design report volume 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(6), p. 474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6904-3. No: CERN-ACC-2018-0056
D. Curtin et al., Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82.11, 116201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6. arXiv:1806.07396 [hep-ph]. No: FERMILAB-PUB-18-264-T
J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the standard model at the large hadron collider. J. Phys. G 47.9, 090501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab4574. arXiv:1903.04497 [hep-ex]
J. Beacham et al., Physics beyond colliders at CERN: beyond the standard model working group report. J. Phys. G 47.1, 010501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab4cd2. arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]. No: CERN-PBC-REPORT-2018-007
J.L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, S. Tro-janowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 97.3, 035001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035001. arXiv:1708.09389 [hep-ph]. No: UCI-TR-2017-08
J.P. Chou, D. Curtin, H. Lubatti, New detectors to explore the lifetime frontier. Phys. Lett. B 767, 29–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.043. arXiv:1606.06298 [hep-ph]
V.V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci, D.J. Robinson, Searching for long-lived particles: a compact detector for exotics at LHCb. Phys. Rev. D 97.1, 015023 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.015023. arXiv:1708.09395 [hep-ph]
V.V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, B. Nachman, M. Papucci, D.J. Robinson, Leveraging the ALICE/L3 cavern for long-lived particle searches. Phys. Rev. D 99.1, 015023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.015023. arXiv:1810.03636 [hep-ph]
MoEDAL, MoEDAL physics results and future plans. PoS CORFU 2019, 009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.376.0009
M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee, C. Ohm. ANU-BIS: proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts (2019). arXiv:1909.13022 [physics.ins-det]
M. Ahmad et al. CEPC-SPPC preliminary conceptual design report. 1. Physics and detector (2015). No: IHEP-CEPC-DR-2015-01, IHEP-TH-2015-01, and IHEP-EP-2015-0
FCC, FCC-hh: the hadron collider: future circular collider conceptual design report volume 3. Eur. Phys. J. ST 228(4), 755–1107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-900087-0. No: CERN-ACC-2018-0058
MATHUSLA, An update to the letter of intent for MATHUSLA: search for long-lived particles at the HL-LHC (2020). arXiv:2009.01693 [physics.ins-det]. No: CERN-LHCC-2020-014 and LHCC-I-031-ADD-1
LHCb, LHCb tracker upgrade technical design report. Technical report. CERN-LHCC-2014-001, LHCB-TDR-015 (2014)
P. Minkowski, \(\mu \rightarrow e\gamma \) at a rate of one out of \(10^{9}\) muon decays? Phys. Lett. B 67, 421–428 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90435-X. No: Print-77-0182 (BERN)
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, R. Slansky. Complex spinors and unified theories. Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315–321 (1979). arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]. No: PRINT-80-0576
J. Schechter, J. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) x U(1) theories. Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2227. No: SU-4217-167 and COO-3533-167
R.N. Mohapatra, G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.912. No: MDDP-TR-80- 060, MDDP-PP-80-105, and CCNY-HEP-79-10
T. Yanagida, Horizontal symmetry and masses of neutrinos. Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 1103 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.64.1103. No: TU-80- 208
J. Schechter, J. Valle, Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number. Phys. Rev. D 25, 774 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.774. No: SU-4217-203 and COO-3533-203
M. Fukugita, T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification. Phys. Lett. B 174, 45–47 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3. No: RIFP-641
S. Dodelson, L.M. Widrow, Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 17–20 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.17. arXiv:hep-ph/9303287. No: FERMILAB-PUB-93-057-A
FCC-ee study Team, Search for heavy right handed neutrinos at the FCC-ee. Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273–275, 1883–1890 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.09.304. arXiv: 1411.5230 [hep-ex]. Ed. by M. Aguilar-Benítez, J. Fuster, S. Martí-García, A. Santamaría
M. Drewes, The phenomenology of right handed neutrinos. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330019 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301313300191. arXiv:1303.6912 [hep-ph]. No: TUM-HEP-881- 13
D. Bodeker, W. Buchmuller, Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the GUT scale (2020). arXiv:2009.07294 [hep-ph]. No: DESY-20-141
B. Garbrecht, Why is there more matter than antimatter? Calculational methods for leptogenesis and electroweak baryogenesis. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 110, 103727 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103727. arXiv:1812.02651 [hep-ph]. No: TUM-HEP-1177-18
E. Chun et al., Probing leptogenesis. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33.05n06, 1842005 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X18420058. arXiv:1711.02865 [hep-ph]
M. Drewes et al., A white paper on keV sterile neutrino dark matter. JCAP 01, 025 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/025. arXiv:1602.04816 [hep-ph]. No: FERMILAB-PUB-16-068-T
A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens, O. Ruchayskiy, Sterile neutrino dark matter. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 1–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.07.004. arXiv:1807.07938 [hep-ph]
A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli, B. Zhang, The search for heavy Majorana neutrinos. JHEP 05, 030 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/030.. arXiv:0901.3589 [hep-ph]. No: FERMILAB-PUB-08-086-T, NSF-KITP-08- 54, MADPH-06-1466, DCPT-07-198, and IPPP-07-99
F.F. Deppisch, P. Bhupal Dev, A. Pilaft-sis, Neutrinos and collider physics. New J. Phys. 177, 075019075019 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075019. arXiv:1502.06541 [hep-ph]. No: MAN-HEP-2014-15
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, O. Fischer, Sterile neutrino searches at future \(e^{-} e^{+}, pp\), and \(e^{-}p\) colliders. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32.14, 1750078 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X17500786. arXiv:1612.02728 [hep-ph]
Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, R. Ruiz, Lepton number violation: seesaw models and their collider tests. Front. in Phys. 6, 40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00040. arXiv:1711.02180 [hep-ph]. No: PITT-PACC-1712, IPPP-17-74, and COEPP-MN-17-17
E.J. Chun, A. Das, S. Mandal, M. Mitra, N. Sinha, Sensitivity of lepton number violating meson decays in different experiments. Phys. Rev. D 100.9, 095022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.095022. arXiv:1908.09562 [hep-ph]. No: OU-HEP-1016 and IP/BBSR/2019-4
L.M. Johnson, D.W. McKay, T. Bolton, Extending sensitivity for low mass neutral heavy lepton searches. Phys. Rev. D 56, 2970–2981 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2970. arXiv:hep-ph/9703333
D. Gorbunov, M. Shaposhnikov, How to find neutral leptons of the \(\nu \)MSM? JHEP 10, 015 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/015. arXiv:0705.1729 [hep-ph] [Erratum in: JHEP 11, 101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2013)101]
L. Canetti, M. Drewes, T. Frossard, M. Sha-poshnikov, Dark matter, baryogenesis and neutrino oscillations from right handed neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 87, 093006 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.093006. arXiv:1208.4607 [hep-ph]. No: TTK-12-05, TUM-HEP-852-12, and CAS-KITPC-ITP-368
K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, D. Gorbunov, O. Ruchayskiy, Phenomenology of GeV-scale heavy neutral leptons. JHEP 11, 032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)032. arXiv:1805.08567 [hep-ph]
S. Pascoli, R. Ruiz, C. Weiland, Heavy neutrinos with dynamic jet vetoes: multilepton searches at \(\sqrt{s} = 14\), 27, and 100 TeV. JHEP 06, 049 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)049. arXiv:1812.08750 [hep-ph]. No: CP3-18-77, IPPP/18/111, PITT-PACC-1821, and VBSCAN-PUB-10-18
P. Coloma, E. Fernández-Martínez, M. González-López, J. Hernández-García, Z. Pavlovic, GeV-scale neutrinos: interactions with mesons and DUNE sensitivity. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(1), 78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08861-y
J. de Vries, H.K. Dreiner, J.Y. Günther, Z.S. Wang, G. Zhou, Long-lived sterile neutrinos at the LHC in effective field theory. JHEP 03, 148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)148
P. Ballett, T. Boschi, S. Pascoli, Heavy neutral leptons from low-scale seesaws at the DUNE near detector. JHEP 03, 111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)111. arXiv:1905. 00284 [hep-ph]. No: IPPP/18/76
M. Drewes, A. Giammanco, J. Hajer, M. Lu-cente, New long-lived particle searches in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 101.5, 055002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.055002. arXiv:1905.09828 [hep-ph]. No: CP3-19-26
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024. arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]. No: LU-TP-14-36, MCNET-14-22, CERN-PH-TH-2014-190, FERMILAB-PUB-14-316-CD, DESY-14-178, and SLAC-PUB-16122
SHiP, Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to heavy neutral leptons. JHEP 04, 077 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2019)077. arXiv:1811.00930 [hep-ph]
CHARM, A search for decays of heavy neutrinos in the mass range 0.5 to 2.8 GeV. Phys. Lett. B 166, 473–478 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)91601-1. No: CERN-EP-85-190
G. Bernardi et al., Further limits on heavy neutrino couplings. Phys. Lett. B 203, 332–334 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90563-1. No: CERN-EP/87-234
DELPHI, Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays. Z. Phys. C 74, 57–71 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002880050370. No: CERN-PPE-96-195 [Erratum in: Z. Phys. C 75, 580 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546181]
NuTeV, E815, Search for neutral heavy leptons in a high-energy neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4943–4946 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4943. arXiv:hep-ex/9908011. No: FERMILAB-PUB-99-223-E
E949, Search for heavy neutrinos in \(K^{+} \rightarrow \mu ^{+}\nu _{H}\) decays. Phys. Rev. D 91(5), 052001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.052001. arXiv:1411.3963 [hep-ex]. No: FERMILAB-PUB-14- 609-E
LHCb, Search for massive long-lived particles decaying semileptonically in the LHCb detector. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(4), 224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4744-6. arXiv:1612.00945 [hep-ex]. No: CERN-EP-2016-283 and LHCB-PAPER-2016-047
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, O. Fischer, Sterile neutrino searches via displaced vertices at LHCb. Phys. Lett. B 774, 114–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.057. arXiv:1706. 05990 [hep-ph]
CMS, Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with three charged leptons in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(22), 221801 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.221801. arXiv:1802.02965 [hep-ex]. No: CMS-EXO-17-012 and CERN-EP-2018-006
ATLAS, Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons produced in 13 TeV pp collisions using prompt and displaced signatures with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 10, 265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)265. arXiv:1905.09787 [hep-ex]. No: CERN-EP-2019-071
H. Abramowicz et al., in The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report—Volume 4: Detectors, ed. by T. Behnke et al. (2013). arXiv:1306.6329 [physics.ins-det]. No: ILC-REPORT-2013-040, ANL-HEP-TR-13-20, BNL-100603-2013-IR, IRFU-13-59, CERN-ATS-2013-037, COCKCROFT-13-10, CLNS-13-2085, DESY-13-062, FERMILAB-TM-2554, IHEP-AC-ILC-2013-001, INFN-13-04-LNF, JAI-2013-001, JINR-E9-2013-35, JLAB-R-2013-01, KEK-REPORT-2013-1, KNU-CHEP-ILC-2013-1, LLNL-TR-635539, SLAC-R-1004, and ILC-HIGRADE-REPORT-2013-003
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, O. Fischer, Displaced vertex searches for sterile neutrinos at future lepton colliders. JHEP 12, 007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)007. arXiv:1604.02420 [hep-ph]
S. Bobrovskyi, W. Buchmuller, J. Hajer, J. Schmidt, Quasi-stable neutralinos at the LHC. JHEP 09, 119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2011)119. arXiv:1107.0926 [hep-ph]. No: DESY-11-077
S. Bobrovskyi, J. Hajer, S. Rydbeck, Long-lived higgsinos as probes of gravitino dark matter at the LHC. JHEP 02, 133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2013)133. arXiv:1211.5584 [hep-ph]. No: DESY-12-175
I. Boiarska, K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, S. Eijima, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, I. Timiryasov, Probing baryon asymmetry of the Universe at LHC and SHiP (2019). arXiv:1902.04535 [hep-ph]
M. Drewes, J. Hajer, Heavy neutrinos in displaced vertex searches at the LHC and HL-LHC. JHEP 02, 070 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2020)070. arXiv:1903.06100 [hep-ph]. No: CP3-19-11
ATLAS, Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and missing transverse momentum in \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 97(5), 052012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.052012. arXiv:1710.04901 [hep-ex]. No: CERN-EP-2017-202
ATLAS, Performance of vertex reconstruction algorithms for detection of new long-lived particle decays within the ATLAS inner detector. Technical report. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-013 (2019)
ALEPH, Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 360, 481–506 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00138-7. No: CERN-PPE-94-170 and FSU-SCRI-95-70
M. Chrzaszcz, M. Drewes, T.E. Gonzalo, J. Harz, S. Krishnamurthy, C. Weniger, A frequentist analysis of three right-handed neutrinos with GAMBIT. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(6), 569 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8073-9. arXiv:1908.02302 [hep-ph]. No: gambit-physics-2019
M. Drewes, J. Klaric, P. Klose, On lepton number violation in heavy neutrino decays at colliders. JHEP 19, 032 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)032. arXiv:1907.13034 [hep-ph]
S. Antusch, O. Fischer, Non-unitarity of the leptonic mixing matrix: present bounds and future sensitivities. JHEP 10, 094 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)094. arXiv:1407.6607 [hep-ph]. No: MPP-2014-313
D. Gorbunov, I. Timiryasov, Testing \(\nu \)MSM with indirect searches. Phys. Lett. B 745, 29–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.060. arXiv:1412.7751 [hep-ph]. No: INR-TH-2014-035
E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Hernandez-Garcia, J. Lopez-Pavon, Global constraints on heavy neutrino mixing. JHEP 08, 033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)033. arXiv:1605.08774 [hep-ph]
P. Hernández, M. Kekic, J. López-Pavón, J. Racker, J. Salvado, Testable baryogenesis in seesaw models. JHEP 08, 157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)157. arXiv:1606.06719 [hep-ph]
M. Drewes, B. Garbrecht, Combining experimental and cosmological constraints on heavy neutrinos. Nucl. Phys. B 921, 250–315 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.05.001. arXiv:1502.00477 [hep-ph]. No: TUM-HEP-979- 15
M. Drewes, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter, J. Klaric, Testing the low scale seesaw and leptogenesis. JHEP 08, 018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)018. arXiv:1609.09069 [hep-ph]. No: TUM-HEP-1062-16
T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, M. Shaposhnikov, The \(\nu \)MSM, dark matter and neutrino masses. Phys. Lett. B 631, 151–156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.070. arXiv:hep-ph/0503065 [hep-ph]
T. Asaka, M. Shaposhnikov, The \(\nu \) MSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe. Phys. Lett. B 620, 17–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.06.020. arXiv:hep-ph/0505013
A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, V. Syvolap, Improved BBN constraints on heavy neutral leptons (2020). arXiv:2008.00749 [hep-ph]
N. Sabti, A. Magalich, A. Filimonova, An extended analysis of heavy neutral leptons during big bang nucleosynthesis . JCAP 11, 056 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/056
V. Domcke, M. Drewes, M. Hufnagel, M. Lucente, MeV-scale seesaw and leptogenesis. JHEP 01, 200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)200
A.C. Vincent, E.F. Martinez, P. Hernández, M. Lattanzi, O. Mena, Revisiting cosmological bounds on sterile neutrinos. JCAP 04, 006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/006. arXiv:1408.1956 [astro-ph.CO]. No: IFIC-14-53, FTUAM-14-32, and IFT-UAM-CSIC-14-075
V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, P.D. Serpico, Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy. JCAP 03, 043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/043. arXiv:1610.10051 [astro-ph.CO]
R. Diamanti, L. Lopez-Honorez, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz, A.C. Vincent, Constraining dark matter late-time energy injection: decays and P-wave annihilations. JCAP 02, 017 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/017. arXiv:1308.2578 [astro-ph.CO]. No: IFIC-13-54
J. Klaric, M. Shaposhnikov, I. Timiryasov, Uniting low-scale leptogeneses (2020). arXiv:2008.13771 [hep-ph]
A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke, M. Drewes, J. Klaric, M. Lucente, Low-scale leptogenesis with three heavy neutrinos. JHEP 01, 164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2019)164. arXiv:1810.12463 [hep-ph]. No: CP3-18-59, DESY 18- 174, DESY-18-174, and LPT-Orsay-18-85
A. Caputo, P. Hernandez, M. Kekic, J. López-Pavón, J. Salvado, The seesaw path to leptonic CP violation. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(4), 258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4823-8. arXiv:1611.05000 [hep-ph]. No: CERN-TH-2016-238
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, M. Drewes, O. Fischer, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter, J. Klaric, Probing leptogenesis at future colliders. JHEP 09, 124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2018)124. arXiv:1710.03744 [hep-ph]. No: TUM-1160/18 and CP3-17-48
Z.S. Wang, K. Wang, Physics with far detectors at future lepton colliders. Phys. Rev. D 101.7, 075046 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075046. arXiv:1911.06576 [hep-ph]. No: APCTP Pre2019-024
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Alain Blondel, David Curtin, Albert De Roeck, Rebeca Gonzalez Suarez, Elena Graverini, and Manqi Ruan for useful comments on this Letter. The work of M.C. is funded by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange under the Bekker program (Grant no. PPN/BEK/2018/1/ 00170). M.C. is also grateful for the funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant no. 951754.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Chrząszcz, M., Drewes, M. & Hajer, J. HECATE. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09253-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09253-y