Abstract
Since, in Einstein gravity, a massless scalar field with lightlike gradient behaves as a null dust, one could expect that it can act as the matter source of Vaidya geometries. We show that this is impossible because the Klein–Gordon equation forces the null geodesic congruence tangent to the scalar field gradient to have zero expansion, contradicting a basic property of Vaidya solutions. By contrast, exact plane waves travelling at light speed and sourced by a scalar field acting as a null dust are possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Null dust and Vaidya’s spacetime
The Vaidya solutions of the Einstein equations [1, 2]
(where \(R_{ab}\) is the Ricci tensor of the metric \(g_{ab}\), R is its trace, and \(T_{ab}\) is the matter energy-momentum tensor)Footnote 1 are used to study gravitational collapse, the formation and evolution of event and apparent horizons, and as toy models of evaporating black holes. Vaidya geometries are also useful in string theory and holography (e.g., [4, 5]). The source of a Vaidya geometry is a null dust, described by the stress-energy tensor
where \(\rho \) is the dust density and the four-vector \(\ell ^a\) is null and geodesic,
as follows from the conservation equation \(\nabla ^b T_{ab}=0\) (see Ref. [6] for a review on the null dust). Contrary to timelike geodesics, for which the normalization selects the proper time as the parameter along the curve, for null geodesics the null normalization of the four-tangent does not impose affine parametrization. As a consequence, in general, the covariant conservation equation \(\nabla ^b T_{ab} =0\) for the stress-energy tensor (2) gives non-affinely parametrized geodesics. Since the components \(\ell ^{\mu }\) of a null vector can be reparametrized as \( \ell ^{\mu }\rightarrow {\bar{\ell }}^{\mu } = f \ell ^{\mu }\) (where \(f>0\) is a function of the coordinates) without changing its normalization, a representation can be chosen in which \(\rho \) is unity by choosing \(f=\sqrt{\rho }\), but the corresponding null geodesics followed by the null dust are not affinely parametrized [6].
A null dust appears frequently in classical and quantum gravity, in Vaidya spacetimes [1, 2], pp-waves [6,7,8], Robinson-Trautman geometries [9], twisting solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations [9,10,11], in studies of classical and quantum gravitational collapse, horizon formation, mass inflation [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], black hole evaporation [22,23,24], and canonical Hamiltonians [4, 6, 25]. Colliding scalar field-null dust solutions were studied in [26, 27]. A null dust is interpreted as a coherent zero rest mass field that propagates at light speed in the null direction \(\ell ^a\), in the geometric optics limit. In this sense, null dust is more closely related to fundamental fields than its timelike counterpart [6], which explains its widespread use as a matter source in the investigation of fundamental questions in gravity.
An outgoing Vaidya solution [1, 2] (see also [28, 29]) is given by the line element
where u is a retarded null coordinate, m(u) is a regular mass function, and \(d\Omega _{(2)}^2 \equiv d\vartheta ^2 +\sin ^2 \vartheta \, d\varphi ^2\) is the line element on the unit 2-sphere. The only non-vanishing component of the Ricci tensor is
where a prime denotes differentiation with respect to u. The stress-energy tensor of the null dust sourcing the Vaidya geometry is
where the vector \(\ell ^a \) is null and geodesic. For the outgoing Vaidya metric, it is \(\ell _a=-\partial _a u\) [28, 29].
2 Scalar field as a null dust and the impossibility of scalar field-sourced Vaidya geometries
Scalar field theory is the simplest field theory and scalar fields are ubiquitous in particle physics, cosmology, scalar-tensor gravity, and in models of classical and quantum gravity in general [3, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. A null dust can be achieved by means of a scalar field \(\phi \) with null gradient \(\nabla ^c \phi \nabla _c \phi =0\) [6, 38]. This result follows from a specification of the dynamics. For example, a Klein-Gordon scalar field with null gradient \(\nabla _c \phi \) constitutes an imperfect fluid of type II in the Hawking-Ellis classification [39]. Imposing the (weak, or strong, or dominant) energy condition, forces a scalar potential \(V(\phi )\) that could potentially be present to vanish identically and this type II fluid becomes a null dust, as discussed in detail in Ref. [40].Footnote 2 (Indeed, the condition \(V=0\) is satisfied in the stress-energy tensor (8) below.)
It is well known [42,43,44] that a scalar field \(\phi \) with timelike gradient, \(\nabla ^c\phi \nabla _c \phi <0\), is equivalent to an irrotational perfect fluid with four-velocity
Scalar fields with spacelike gradients are less interesting and seldom considered from this point of view [45]. However, recently Ref. [40] has proposed an interesting alternative interpretation as a superposition of a left-going (or, in spherical symmetry, incoming) and a right-going (in spherical symmetry, outgoing) null dust with an additional perfect fluid. In general, a certain geometry solving the Einstein equations can be attributed to more than one source (see [41] for a discussion in the context of scalar fields).
There remains the case \(\nabla ^c\phi \nabla _c \phi =0\): the stress-energy tensor of a massless, minimally coupled, scalar field \(\phi \) is simply
The covariant conservation equation \(\nabla ^b T_{ab}^{(\phi )} =0\) for the stress-energy tensor (8) gives the Klein-Gordon equation
The structure of the scalar field stress-energy tensor (8) matches that of the \(T_{ab}\) of a null dust if \(\ell _a \equiv \nabla _a \phi \) is lightlike. Because \(\ell ^a\) is a gradient, only an irrotational dust can be reproduced this way. Now, the divergence of \(\ell ^a\) is
by virtue of the Klein–Gordon equation of motion for \(\phi \). The covariant conservation equation \(\nabla ^b T_{ab}=0\) satisfied by any dust, including the null dust with \(\rho =1\), gives
which is the non-affinely parametrized geodesic equation. However, since \(\Box \phi =0\), the right hand side vanishes and \({\bar{\ell }}^a\) must be null and tangent to
affinely-parametrized null geodesics.
As noted in the previous section, since a null vector is defined up to a multiplicative (positive) factor, one could choose a different parametrization of the null dust in which its stress-energy tensor is instead written as \(T_{ab}=\rho \, \ell _a \ell _b\) [6, 38]. For a general null dust, the covariant conservation equation \(\nabla ^b T_{ab}=0\) gives non-affinely parametrized geodesics [6].
Now consider the congruence of null geodesics tangent to the null vector \(\ell ^a\) (outgoing null geodesics for the geometry (4), or ingoing null geodesics for the geometry (15)). Let us focus on the outgoing Vaidya spacetime (4) first: by comparing the relation \(\ell _a=-\nabla _a u \) valid in Vaidya’s geometry with \(\ell _a=\nabla _a \phi \) specifying that the null dust is generated by a scalar field, we obtain (apart from an irrelevant additive integration constant) \(\phi =-u\), so the scalar field is outgoing at the speed of light. However, this result is in contradiction with the Klein–Gordon equation \(\Box \phi =0\) becauseFootnote 3
where we used the fact that
and \(\sqrt{-g}=r^2 \sin \vartheta \). Clearly, \(\Box \phi = 2/r \ne 0\) and the Klein–Gordon equation cannot be satisfied. Although a scalar field with lightlike gradient is a null dust realization, a scalar field-sourced outgoing Vaidya geometry is impossible. More generally, if one considers radial outgoing and ingoing null geodesics with tangents \(\ell ^a\) and \(n^a\) in the outgoing Vaidya geometry (4), their expansions are easily found to be
Clearly, both expansions are non-vanishing for \(r>2m\). Put in other words, the congruence of outgoing radial null geodesics that is deemed to have \(\ell ^c=\nabla ^c \phi \) as its four-tangent field is twist-free (because \(\ell ^c \) is a gradient), shear-free (because of spherical symmetry), but cannot be also expansion-free in this geometry.
The same argument, adapted to the replacement \(u \rightarrow v\), demonstrates the impossibility of ingoing Vaidya solutions of the form
(where v is the advanced null coordinate) sourced by a scalar field, that would have to be \(\phi =-v\).
It is possible to obtain analytic solutions of the Einstein equations (1) travelling at the speed of light and sourced by scalar fields acting as a null dust, provided that the expansions of the associated null rays are allowed to vanish. As an example, consider an exact plane wave sourced by a scalar field with null four-gradient. This plane wave, described in [46], is given in null coordinates by the Szekeres form [47]
where [46]
and where f(u) is an arbitrary (but regular) function of u, \(\lambda _{1,2}\) and k are constants, and [46]
In this case we have
and
using which one obtains
In this case \(\ell ^c \equiv \nabla ^c \phi \) can be a null vector without contradicting the vanishing of the divergence \(\nabla ^c \ell _c= \Box \phi = 0\) because we have planar, instead of spherical, symmetry and null geodesics with tangents \(\ell ^c\) can form a non-expanding congruence.
3 Conclusions
Vaidya geometries sourced by a massless scalar field \(\phi \) acting as a null dust cannot be solutions of the Einstein equations (1). The physical reason is that these spherically symmetric geometries must necessarily have non-vanishing expansion, which contradicts the Klein–Gordon equation \(\Box \phi =0\). In fact, an (irrotational) null dust created from a lighlike scalar field gradient \(\ell _a=\nabla _a\phi \) must necessarily have zero divergence \(\nabla ^c \ell _c=\Box \phi \), which is incompatible with the expanding (contracting) nature of the outgoing (ingoing) Vaidya geometries. By contrast, the exact plane wave (16) can be sourced by a scalar field with lightlike gradients because the requirement of zero divergence \(\nabla ^c \ell _c=0\) is allowed by the planar symmetry of this geometry.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited [Authors’ comment: This work is purely theoretical.]
Notes
We follow the notation of Ref. [3] and use units in which the speed of light and Newton’s constant are unity.
This null dust can be interpreted also as an imperfect fluid with energy density, radial pressure, and heat flux density all equal, as discussed in [40].
Greek indices now denote tensor components in a particular coordinate system.
References
P.C. Vaidya, Curr. Sci. 12, 183 (1943)
P.C. Vaidya. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.)33, 264 (1951)
R.M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984)
S. Chapman, H. Marrochio, R.C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 1806, 046 (2018)
S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 034 (2009)
J. Bic̆ák, K.V. Kuchar̆. Phys. Rev. D56, 4878 (1997)
J.B. Griffiths, Colliding Plane Waves in General Relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991)
A. Krasinski, Physics in an Inhomogeneous Universe (Copernicus Astronomical Center, Warszaw Report, 1993)
I. Robinson, A. Trautman, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 265, 463 (1962)
E. Herlt, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 12, 1 (1980)
D. Kramer, U. Hähner, Class. Quantum Gravity 12, 2287 (1995)
Y. Kuroda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 63 (1984)
I.H. Dwivedi, P.S. Joshi, Class. Quantum Gravity 6, 1599 (1989)
J.P.S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1447 (1992)
E. Poisson, W. Israel, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796 (1990)
R. Balbinot, E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 13 (1993)
W.G. Anderson, P.R. Brady, W. Israel, S.M. Morsink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1041 (1993)
W. Israel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 3, 71 (1994)
D.A. Konkowski, T.M. Helliwell, Phys. Rev. D 50, 841 (1994)
A. Wang, Y. Wu, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 31, 107 (1999)
C. Vaz, L. Witten, T.P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 65, 104016 (2002)
R. Parentani, T. Piran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2805 (1994)
O. O’Loughlin, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044020 (2015)
S. Nafooshe, M. O’Loughlin, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044035 (2016)
Z. Horvath, Z. Kovacs, L.Á. Gergely, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084034 (2006)
W.Z. Chao, J. Phys. A 15, 2429 (1982)
M. Halilsoy, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 44, 544 (1985)
H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of the Einstein Field Equations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)
E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)
M. Bojowald, Quantum Cosmology: A Fundamental Description of the Universe (Springer, New York, 2011)
A.D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology (Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, 1990)
V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)
L. Amendola, S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy, Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)
V. Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar Tensor Gravity (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2004)
T.P. Sotiriou, V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010)
A. De Felice, S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Relativ. 13, 3 (2010)
S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep. 505, 59 (2011)
V. Faraoni, J. Côté, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 318 (2019)
S.W. Hawking, G.F.R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973)
C. Gergely, Z. Keresztes, L.Á. Gergely, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024044 (2020)
J. Santos, M.J. Rebouças, A.F.F. Teixeira, J. Math. Phys. 34, 186 (1992)
G.F.R. Ellis. Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course 47: General Relativity and Cosmology, in Relativistic Cosmology, ed. by R.K. Sachs (Academic Press, New York & London, 1971), p. 104. Reprinted in Gen. Relativ. Gravit.41, 581 (2009)
M.S. Madsen, Class. Quantum Gravity 5, 627 (1988)
V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 85, 024040 (2012)
I. Semiz, Phys. Rev. D 85, 068501 (2012)
G.F. Bressange, Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 225 (1998)
P. Szekeres, J. Math. Phys. 13, 286 (1972)
Acknowledgements
We thank a referee for numerous comments improving the original version of this manuscript. This work is supported, in part, by the Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 2016-03803 to V.F.) and by Bishop’s University. The work of A.G. has been carried out in the framework of the activities of the Italian National Group for Mathematical Physics [Gruppo Nazionale per la Fisica Matematica (GNFM), Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Faraoni, V., Giusti, A. & Fahim, B.H. Vaidya geometries and scalar fields with null gradients. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09040-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09040-9