Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:65 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7621-7
In this Erratum we correct terms involving finite \(m_\ell \) and \(C_T\) in \(D \rightarrow \pi \ell \ell \) distributions. We further adapt the \(q^2\) integration limits corresponding to the LHCb analysis [1]. We give the modifications regarding these two points, as well as further corrections. Note, further numerics of the article are unaffected and the conclusion remains unchanged.
\(D \rightarrow \pi \ell \ell \) distributions Errors in Eqs. (7), (17), (18) and (21) involving \(C_T\) and finite \(m_\ell \)-terms have been fixed. The corrected distributions are in agreement with Ref. [2], and therefore footnote 1 has been removed. The correct expressions read
LHCb and constraints on Wilson coefficients We correct the integration limits of the full \(q^2\)–region according to [1] and add a footnote to Eq. (9). The bounds on Wilson coefficients are changed accordingly. The paragraph is changed to the following:
Using the experimental limits on the branching fraction of \(D^+\rightarrow \pi ^+\mu ^+\mu ^-\) in high and full \(q^2\)–regions at 90% CL [1]Footnote 1,
and neglecting the SM contributions, we obtain the following constraints on the BSM Wilson coefficients in the full \(q^2\)-region,
and in the high \(q^2\)–region,
Further corrections Updated values for the integrated branching fractions of \(D^+ \rightarrow \pi ^+\mu ^+\mu ^-\) are given in Table 2.
The lifetime factor \(\tau _D\) in Eq. (13) is added on the right hand side.
We correct Eq. (25).Footnote 2 It reads
The corrected version of the article is available at arXiv:1909.11108v3.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: There are no data because this is theoretical works.]
Notes
We use the full \(q^2\)–region as given in Eq. (9) in order to present the strongest upper limit on the Wilson coefficients in Eq. (10). Since an actual measurement is only performed within \(\sqrt{q^2}\in [250,525]~\mathrm{MeV}~\mathrm{and}~\sqrt{q^2}\ge 1.25~\mathrm{GeV}\) and extrapolated in [1] in between, we prefer to use the bounds from the high \(q^2\)-region given in Eq. (11).
We thank Xinshuai Yan for pointing this out.
References
R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 724, 203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.06.010. arXiv:1304.6365 [hep-ex]
S. de Boer, G. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 93(7), 074001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.074001. arXiv:1510.00311 [hep-ph]
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Bause, R., Golz, M., Hiller, G. et al. Erratum to: The new physics reach of null tests with \(D \rightarrow \pi \ell \ell \) and \(D_s \rightarrow K \ell \ell \) decays. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08998-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08998-w