Abstract
The prompt \(J/\psi \) photoproduction within the non-relativistic QCD (NRQCD) framework at the future Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) is studied, including the contributions from both direct and resolved photons. Employing different sets of long distance matrix elements, the total cross section is dominated by the color-octet channel. We present different kinematic distributions of \(J/\psi \) production and the results show there will be about 50 \(J/\psi \) events when the transverse momentum of \(J/\psi \) is up to 20 GeV. It renders that the \(J/\psi \) photoprodution at the CEPC is a well laboratory to test the NRQCD and further clarify the universality problem in NRQCD between electron positron collider and hadron collider.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The production and decay of heavy quarkonium are ideal processes to study both perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Due to the heavy quark mass , non-relativistic QCD (NRQCD) [1] was proposed to calculate its production and decay. In the NRQCD factorization formalism, the production of heavy quarkonium is factorized into a product of the short distance coefficients (SDCs) and long distance matrix elements (LDMEs), where the former are process-dependent and can be perturbatively calculated as double expansions in both the coupling constant \(\alpha _s\) and the heavy quark relative velocity v, and the latter are supposedly universal and can be determined by fitting to experimental data.
NRQCD predicts the color-octet processes and have obtained success in \(J/\psi \) production [2,3,4,5] and polarization [6,7,8,9,10] at hadron colliders. At \(e^+e^-\) colliders, heavy quarkonium have also been studied. There are advantages on both experimental and theoretical sides [11]. On the experimental side, there is less and cleaner background for signal reconstruction; On the theoretical side, the mechanism of production is simpler and the uncertainties in calculation are smaller. There are two modes of heavy quarkonium production, i.e., \(e^+e^-\) annihilation and \(\gamma \gamma \) collision. The \(J/\psi \) production through these two modes had been measured at B factories [12, 13] and CERN LEP-II [14, 15] respectively. As for the results of \(e^+e^-\) annihilation, NRQCD can not give congruous explanation. For example, the Belle result of \(J/\psi \)+\(X_{non-c\overline{c}}\) production favors the CS prediction and is overshoot by the NRQCD predictions [16, 17]. In the \(\gamma \gamma \) collision case, the leading order(LO) NRQCD calculation [18] can explain the LEP-II data but the NLO [19] fails. What is worthy to note is that the uncertainties of LEP-II measurements are very large. With an integrated luminosity of 617 \(\mathrm {pb}^{-1}\), there are only 36±7 \(J/\psi \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-\) events and only 16 thereof are in the region \(p_t > 1\mathrm {~GeV}\).
The proposed Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) is a powerful \(e^+e^-\) collider [20, 21]. It could be operated at center of mass energy of the Z pole (91.2 GeV), the WW threshold (161 GeV), the Higgs factory (240 GeV) and the peak luminosity at 240\(\mathrm {~GeV}\) is order of \(10^{34}\mathrm {cm}^{-2}\mathrm {s}^{-1}\). Consequently, enormous \(J/\psi \) events and high precision measurement are expected. Under the energy of 240\(\mathrm {~GeV}\), the \(\gamma \gamma \) collision mode is dominant. The measurement of \(J/\psi \) photoproduction at the CEPC would supply precision results of different kinematics distributions and it could hopefully clarify the current predicament. Surely, it could also deepen our understanding of the physics of heavy quarkonium.
In this work, we study the prompt \(J/\psi \) photoproduction at the \(e^+e^-\) collider CEPC, including both direct \(J/\psi \) production and feed-down contribution from heavier quarkonium. In Sect. 2, we gives the basic NRQCD framework for the calculation. Section 3 shows the numerical results. A brief summary and conclusion is presented in Sect. 4.
2 Prompt \(J/\psi \) Photoproduction in NRQCD Framework
Electron–positron bremsstrahlung is the source of photons, which can be well formulated in Weizäcker–Williams approximation(WWA) [22],
where the electromagnetic fine structure constant \(\alpha =1/137\), \(Q^2_{min} = m_e^2 x^2/(1-x)\) and \(Q^2_{max} = (E\theta _c)^2(1-x) + Q^2_{min}\) with \(x = E_\gamma /E_e\), \(\theta _c=32\mathrm {~mrad}\) the maximum scattered angular cut in order to ensure the photon to be real, and \(E=E_e=\sqrt{s}/2\), which is \(\sqrt{s}=240\mathrm {~GeV}\) at the CEPC.
In NRQCD, the SDCs stand for the production of a pair of quark-antiquark in intermediate Fock state \(n={}^{2S+1}\!L^{[c]}_{J}\), where S is total spin, L is orbital angular momentum, J is total angular momentum and \(c=1,8\) for color-singlet (CS) and color-octet (CO) state respectively. The LDMEs describe the probability of the intermediate state evolving into the meson. The colliding photons can participate in the hard interaction either directly or via their hadronic components. Under the picture of WWA and the factorization of NRQCD, the overall differential cross section of a Hadron(H) photoproduction can be obtained by the double convolution of the cross sections of parton-parton (photon–photon) and parton distribution functions.
here \(f_{i/\gamma }(x)\) denotes the the Glück-Reya–Schienbein (GRS) parton distribution functions in photon [23], \(d\sigma (ij\rightarrow c\overline{c}[n]+k)\) are the differential partonic cross sections, \(i,j=\gamma ,g,q,{\bar{q}}\) and \(k=g,q,{\bar{q}}\) with \(q=u,d,s\). \(\langle {{\mathcal {O}}}^H[n]\rangle \) are the LDMEs of H. \(c\overline{c}[n]\) are the intermediate \(c\overline{c}\) Fock states with \(n={}^3\!S_1^{(1)},{}^1\!S_0^{(8)},{}^3\!S_1^{(8)},{}^3\!P_J^{(8)}\) for \(H=J/\psi ,\psi (2S)\) and \(n={}^3\!P_J^{(1)},{}^3\!S_1^{(8)}\) for \(H=\chi _{cJ}\) where \(J=0,1,2\).
\(J/\psi \) mesons can be produced directly or via decays of heavier charmonia, such as \(\psi (2S)\) and \(\chi _{cJ}(J=0,1,2)\). These feed-down contributions to \(J/\psi \) production can be included by multiplying their direct-production cross sections with their decay branching ratios to \(J/\psi \), i.e.,
3 Numerical results
For all the physics processes, the Fortran source for numerical calculation are generated by using the FDC package [25]. In the numerical calculations of the parton–parton processes, we take the electromagnetic fine structure constant \(\alpha =1/128\) where the typical energy scale is of order \(10\mathrm {~GeV}\) in the each scattering process and one-loop running strong coupling constant \(\alpha _s(\mu _r)\). The charm-quark mass is approximately chosen as \(m_c=m_H/2\), where the relevant quarkonia masses are \(m_H=3.097,3.415,3.511,3.556,3.686\mathrm {~GeV}\) for \(H=J/\psi ,\chi _{cJ}(J=0,1,2)\) and \(\psi (2S)\), respectively. The renormalization scale(\(\mu _r\)) and factorization scale(\(\mu _f\)) are set to be \(\mu _r=\mu _f=\mu _0=\sqrt{4m_c^2+p_t^2}\) as the default choice and will vary independently from \(\mu _0/2\) to \(2\mu _0\) to estimate the uncertainties, and here \(p_t\) is the transverse momentum of H meson. The relevant branching ratios are \(Br(J/\psi \rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-)\)=0.0596, \(Br(\psi (2S)\rightarrow J/\psi )\)=0.61 and \(Br(\chi _{cJ}\rightarrow J/\psi )\)=0.014, 0.343, 0.19 for \(J=0,1,2\) [26], respectively. The integrated luminosity of CEPC is \(5.6~\mathrm {ab}^{-1}\) [21]. Additionally, a shift \(p_t^H\approx p_t^{H'}\times (M_H/M_{H'})\) is used while considering the kinematics effect from higher excited states. As a check, we have reproduced the results relevant with LEP-II in Ref. [18, 19].
The \(p_t\)(upper), cos\(\theta \)(mid), and y(lower) distribution of prompt \(J/\psi \) employing different CO LDMEs in Table 1. The y plots use same legends as \(p_t\). The light gray bands represent the theoretical uncertainties from \(\mu _r\) and \(\mu _f\) dependence, and the vertical lines in the \(p_t\) distribution plot show the statistic error estimated from our simple detector simulation. Here only the uncertainties for the CO LDMEs of Feng 2019 are shown
The CS LDMEs are estimated from the wave functions at the origin by
where the wave functions at the origin can be calculated via potential model [27], which gives \(|R_{J/\psi }(0)|^{2}\)=0.81\(\mathrm {~GeV}^3\), \(|R_{\psi (2S)}(0)|^{2}\)=0.53\(\mathrm {~GeV}^3\), and \(|R'_{\chi _c}(0)|^{2}\)=0.075\(\mathrm {~GeV}^5\).
There are several sets of CO LDMEs on the market and it is instructive to compare their predictions for the \(J/\psi \) photoproduction at \(e^+e^-\) collision. We employ six different sets of CO LDMEs listed in Table 1. Since all the LDMES are extracted at \(m_c=1.5\mathrm {~GeV}\), the scaling rules need to employ,
Figure 1 presents the \(p_t\), cos\(\theta \) and rapidity(y) distribution of prompt \(J/\psi \) photoproduction for different CO LDMEs, where \(\theta \) is the angle between \(J/\psi \) and beam. Both cos\(\theta \) and y distribution are calculated under the cut condition \(p_t\ge 0.01\mathrm {~GeV}\). We vary \(\mu _r\) and \(\mu _f\) from \(\mu _0/2\) to \(2\mu _0\) to estimate the theoretical uncertainties. When taking \(\mu _r=\mu _f\) and varying them simultaneously, we find their uncertainties cancel with each other to some degree. So we vary them independently and the largest uncertainties is obtained with an upper bound for \(\mu _r=\mu _0/2,\mu _f=2\mu _0\) and a lower bound for \(\mu _r=2\mu _0,\mu _f=\mu _0/2\), as shown by light gray bands in Fig. 1. The major uncertainties come from the variation of \(\mu _f\) in the GRS parton distribution functions of photon [23]. Figure 1 shows that different predictions for \(J/\psi \) photoproduction are given by choosing different CO LDMEs in Table 1, but are indistinguishable with each other within the theoretical uncertainties. From the curves in Fig. 1, the CO contributions are always larger than that of CS and distinguishable from CS results and hence make it easy to test the NRQCD color-octet mechanism at the CEPC. It is the main point in this work since there are only CS contribution in \(J/\psi \) production at B-factory [16, 17].
Taking the CO LDMEs of Feng2019 [10] as default choice, we show the feed-down and resolved contributions of NRQCD in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. It is clear that most of \(J/\psi \) mesons are produced directly and only 5\(\%\) of them are from decays of \(\psi (2S)\) and \(\chi _{cJ}\). The single resolved channel is also dominated. As the reference, the \(p_t\) distribution integrated from 0.1 to 10\(\mathrm {~GeV}\), the direct, single-resolved and double-resolved channels account for 1\(\%\), 96\(\%\) and 3\(\%\) of the NRQCD prediction, respectively. Fig. 4 shows the number of \(J/\psi \) events distribution as function of \(p_t\)(upper) and \(\cos \theta \)(lower) respectively for the integrated luminosity of CEPC \(5.6~\mathrm {ab}^{-1}\). We see that at the CEPC, the number of events are considerable to discriminate between CS and NRQCD even as the transverse momentum \(p_t\) is up to \(20\mathrm {~GeV}\).
The \(\cos \theta \) distributions in Fig. 1 shows that most of \(J/\psi \) are located in closed beam region. Specifically, more than 90\(\%\) of \(J/\psi \) mesons are inside \(|\cos \theta |\ge 0.98\), the angular cut for experimental detection. In fact, \(J/\psi \) mesons decay immediately after production at the colliding point. In experimental measurement \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\), for example, is used to reconstruct \(J/\psi \) meson and hence the probability of the \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair to be detected should be investigated. If both \(\mu ^+\) and \(\mu ^-\) are detected at laboratory frame, then their parent \(J/\psi \) meson is a valid event. So there is an issue of detection efficiency for \(J/\psi \). For simplicity we assume that, at the center-of-mass frame of \(J/\psi \), the \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair are isotropic in the whole \(4\pi \) solid angle. Then we can easily calculate the probability of a \(J/\psi \) meson with given 4-momentum to be a valid event. Some brief derivations are given in the Appendix. In Fig. 5 we plot the two-dimension distribution of the probability as function of magnitude of 3-momentum and \(|\cos \theta |\) of \(J/\psi \). It shows that \(J/\psi \) mesons with \(|\cos \theta |\ge 0.98\) but small \(|\mathbf {p}|\) still have the probability to be a valid event. Fig. 6 presents three kinematic distributions both before(Line-1) and after(Line-proba.) considering the detection efficiency and here only the NRQCD results are shown. The plots show that the efficiency gets larger as \(p_t\) increases and this is reasonable as expected. It is clear that the efficiency is close to 1 in most of the \(\cos \theta \) region and \(J/\psi \) mesons with smaller \(|\mathrm {y}|\) have bigger probability of being valid event. There are actually more valid events than that by directly using the experimental detecting angular cut to \(J/\psi \).
Considering the detection efficiency and the branch ratio of \(J/\psi \) decay to \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair, we also estimate the statistics uncertainties for the measurement on the \(p_t\) distributions, as the error bars shown in Fig. 1 at some \(p_t\) points. In the event counting, we take the bin width \(\Delta p_t=0.5\mathrm {~GeV}\). In small \(p_t\) region, the uncertainties are very small. Specifically, the uncertainties on the CS and NRQCD (taking CO LDMEs of Feng2019) distributions are respectively about 0.15\(\%\) and 0.6\(\%\) for \(p_t=1\mathrm {~GeV}\) and about 1.7\(\%\) and 9\(\%\) for \(p_t=5\mathrm {~GeV}\). In larger \(p_t\) region, there are less than one event of \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair in each bin for \(p_t>11\mathrm {~GeV}\) and \(p_t>21\mathrm {~GeV}\) for CS and NRQCD distributions respectively, therefore larger bin width will be applied in experimental measurement and it is difficult for us to present a estimation here.
4 Summary
In this paper, we have calculated the prompt \(J/\psi \) photoproduction in \(e^+e^-\) collider based on NRQCD at leading order, including the contributions from both direct and resolved photons. The color-octet channels dominate the total cross section. Only 5\(\%\) of the \(J/\psi \) mesons are from the decays of heavier charmonium. We present different kinematic distributions of both the cross section and the number of \(J/\psi \) events. Under simple assumptions, we also investigated the issue of detecting efficiency. It shows that sizable \(J/\psi \) photoproduction events could be collected. There are more than 50 events for \(p_t=20\mathrm {~GeV}\) at the CEPC. It renders the \(J/\psi \) photoprodution at the CEPC a well laboratory to test the color-octet mechanism in NRQCD. We suggest that \(J/\psi \) photoproduction should be measured at future CEPC. The measurement will help to clarify the universality problem in NRQCD and improve our understanding of the quarkonium production mechanism.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data included in this manuscript are available upon request by contacting with the corresponding author].
References
G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D55,5853(1997)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5853 arXiv:hep-ph/9407339 [hep-ph]
J. Campbell, F. Maltoni, F. Tramontano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 252002 (2007)
B.Gong, X.Q. Li, J.-X. Wang, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.026 Phys. Lett. B673, 197 (2009), arXiv:0805.4751 [hep-ph]
M. Butenschoen, B.A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 022003 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.022003. arXiv:1009.5662 [hep-ph]
Y.-Q. Ma, K.Wang, K.-T. Chao, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 042002 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.042002. arXiv:1009.3655 [hep-ph]
B.Gong, J.-X. Wang, H.-F. Zhang, Phys.Rev. D 83, 114021 (2011), arXiv:1009.3839 [hep-ph]https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114021
M. Butenschoen, B.A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 172002 (2012). arXiv:1201.1872 [hep-ph]
K.-T. Chao, Y.-Q. Ma, H.-S. Shao, K. Wang, Y.-J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 242004 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.242004. arXiv:1201.2675 [hep-ph]
B. Gong, L.-P. Wan, J.-X. Wang, H.-F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 042002 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.042002. arXiv:1205.6682 [hep-ph]
Y. Feng, B. Gong, C.-H. Chang, J.-X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014044 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014044. arXiv:1810.08989 [hep-ph]
Z.-G. He, B.A. Kniehl, In: Theory report on the 11th FCC-ee workshop (2019) pp. 91–98. https://inspirehep.net/literature/1737374
K. Abe et al. ( Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88,052001 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.052001. arXiv:hep-ex/0110012 [hep-ex]
B.Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87,162002 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.162002. arXiv:hep-ex/0106044 [hep-ex]
S.Todorova-Nova, In: Multiparticle dynamics. Proceedings, 31st International Symposium, ISMD 2001, Datong, China, September 1–7, 2001 (2001) pp. 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812778048_0010. arXiv:hep-ph/0112050 [hep-ph]
J.Abdallah et al. ( DELPHI), Phys. Lett. B565, 76 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00660-9. arXiv:hep-ex/0307049 [hep-ex]
Y.-Q. Ma, Y.-J. Zhang, K.-T. Chao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 162002 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.162002. arXiv:0812.5106 [hep-ph]
Z.-G. He, Y. Fan, K.-T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054036 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.054036. arXiv:0910.3636 [hep-ph]
M.Klasen, B.A. Kniehl, L.N. Mihaila, M.Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett.89,032001 (2002). ]https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.032001. arXiv:hep-ph/0112259 [hep-ph]
M. Butenschoen, B.A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. D 84, 051501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.051501. arXiv:1105.0820 [hep-ph]
(2018) arXiv:1809.00285 [physics.acc-ph]. https://inspirehep.net/literature/1692577
M.Dong et al. (CEPC Study Group), (2018) arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex]
S. Frixione, M.L. Mangano, P. Nason, G. Ridolfi, Phys. Lett. B 319, 339 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90823-Z. arXiv:hep-ph/9310350 [hep-ph]
M. Gluck, E. Reya, I. Schienbein, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054019 (1999). [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D62,019902(2000)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.054019, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.019902. arXiv:hep-ph/9903337 [hep-ph]
Z.-G. He, B.A. Kniehl, M.A. Nefedov, V.A. Saleev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 162002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.162002. arXiv:1906.08979 [hep-ph]
J.-X. Wang, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 534, 241 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.07.094. arXiv:hep-ph/0407058
M.Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001
E.J. Eichten, C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1726 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1726. arXiv:hep-ph/9503356 [hep-ph]
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant No. 11475183 and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, Grant No. Y7292610K1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
As mentioned above we make two approximations or assumptions, i.e., \(J/\psi \) mesons decays into \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair immediately after their production at the colliding point, and at the rest frame of \(J/\psi \) the momentum distribution of \(\mu ^\pm \) is isotropic. Firstly at the rest frame of \(J/\psi \), the 4-momenta of \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair in spherical coordinates are given as,
where \(\theta ^*\) and \(\phi ^*\) are respectively the elevation angle and azimuth angle of \(\mathbf {p}^*_{\mu ^+}\), and \(|\mathbf {p}_{\mu ^+}^*|=\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}m_{J/\psi }^2 - m_{\mu ^+}^2}\).
At laboratory frame, their parent \(J/\psi \) meson has momentum \(p_{J/\psi }\). We can make the Lorentz transformation of the \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\) pair from rest frame of their parent \(J/\psi \) to the laboratory frame. At laboratory frame, \(\mu ^{+(-)}\) has momentum \(p_{\mu ^{+(-)}}\) and taking the \(e^+e^-\) beam direction as z-axis, the cosine of the angle between \(\mathbf {p}_{\mu ^{+(-)}}\) and z-axis are given as,
Now we can define the probability P of a \(J/\psi \) meson to be detected,
where \(f(\cos \theta ^*,\phi ^*)=1\) for both \(|\cos \theta _{\mu ^+}|\) and \(|\cos \theta _{\mu ^-}| \ge 0.98\) and \(f=0\) for others. Using numerical integration, the value of the probability of a \(J/\psi \) meson with given momentum can be obtained.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Zhan, XJ., Wang, JX. Prompt \(J/\psi \) photoproduction within the non-relativistic QCD framework at the CEPC. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 740 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8276-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8276-0