# Tidal forces in Reissner–Nordström spacetimes

- 627 Downloads
- 3 Citations

## Abstract

We analyze the tidal forces produced in the spacetime of Reissner–Nordström black holes. We point out that the radial component of the tidal force changes sign just outside the event horizon if the charge-to-mass ratio is close to 1, unlike in Schwarzschild spacetime of uncharged black holes, and that the angular component changes sign between the outer and inner horizons. We solve the geodesic deviation equations for radially falling bodies toward the charged black hole. We find, for example, that the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector starts decreasing inside the event horizon unlike in the Schwarzschild case.

## Keywords

Black Hole Event Horizon Radial Component Tidal Force Charged Black Hole## 1 Introduction

Black holes are objects of great fascination for the scientific community as well as for the general public, especially because of their remarkable physical properties. Schwarzschild (uncharged) black holes – the simplest case – have been extensively investigated over the years. However, less attention has been given to Reissner–Nordström (electrically charged) and Kerr (rotating) black holes. The importance of studying these more complex black holes lies in the fact that they present a new set of phenomena that are not present in Schwarzschild spacetimes. Examples are the Penrose process [1], superradiance [2], and interconversion between spin 1 and 2 fields [3, 4], as well as electromagnetic helicity-reversing processes [5]. Reissner–Nordström black holes are of special interest because they allow one to analyze extreme spacetime configurations with spherical symmetry. For example, it has recently been found that extreme Reissner–Nordström black holes absorb and scatter gravitational and electromagnetic waves equally [6, 7]. This equality is a consequence of the supersymmetry that relates photons and gravitons in the extreme Reissner–Nordström spacetime [8].

In this paper we focus on Reissner–Nordström black holes, which are spherically symmetric, and which have a non-zero electric charge but no angular momentum. They are exact solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equations [9], and in the case of vanishing electric charge, they reduce to the Schwarzschild black holes.

It is well known that a body falling toward the event horizon of a static uncharged black hole experiences stretching in the radial direction and compression in the angular directions [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. However, whether a body may experience stretching or compression in either direction (radial or angular) in Reissner–Nordström spacetime depends on the charge-to-mass ratio of the black hole and where the body is located (see, e.g., Ref. [15]). At certain points of Reissner–Nordström spacetimes, the tidal forces in the radial or angular direction change their sign unlike in Schwarzschild spacetime. In this paper we describe the tidal forces in Reissner–Nordström spacetime in detail. We then solve the geodesic deviation equations to analyze the changes in size of a test body consisting of neutral dust particles in-falling radially toward the Reissner–Nordström black hole. We also point out that the tidal forces can be understood within Newtonian Mechanics if an extra force coming from General Relativity is added, while the geodesic deviation needs to be analyzed using full General Relativity. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we briefly review relevant facts about Reissner–Nordström black holes. We analyze geodesics in Reissner–Nordström spacetime in Sect. 3 and study tidal forces for charged static black holes in Sect. 4. In Sect. 5 we obtain the solutions of the geodesic deviation equations. Then we present our conclusion in Sect. 6. We use the metric signature \((+,-,-,-)\) and set the speed of light *c* and Newtonian gravitational constant *G* to 1 throughout this paper.

## 2 Reissner–Nordström black holes

*M*and

*q*are the mass and charge (in gaussian units) of the black hole, respectively.

- (i)
For \(q^2/M^2< 1\), we have a Reissner–Nordström black hole with two horizons.

- (ii)
For \(q^2/M^2 = 1\), we have an extremely charged Reissner–Nordström black hole, with the event horizon located at \(r_{+}=r_{-}=M\).

- (iii)
For \(q^2/M^2 > 1\), we have a naked singularity.

*f*(

*r*), are

## 3 Radial geodesics in Reissner–Nordström spacetimes

*b*, we obtain \(E=\sqrt{f(r=b)}\) from Eq. (6) [19].

*r*. For Reissner–Nordström spacetime this becomes

*b*is the initial position of test particle (starting from rest). The radius \(R^{\text {stop}}\) is always located inside the internal (Cauchy) horizon. In the limit \(b\rightarrow \infty \), one finds \(R^{\text {stop}} \rightarrow q^2/2M\). In the maximal analytic extension of Reissner–Nordström spacetime the particle, after bouncing back at \(R^{\text {stop}}\), would emerge in a different asymptotically flat region of the spacetime [11]. For more details as regards the physics of free-falling neutral particles in Reissner–Nordström black holes, we refer the reader to Refs. [10, 11]. We note in passing that the Cauchy horizon is known to be unstable [24]. Thus, the part of the spacetime beyond the Cauchy horizon in the maximal analytic extension of Reissner–Nordström spacetime is unphysical.

## 4 Tidal forces in Reissner–Nordström spacetime on a neutral body in radial free fall

Substituting the explicit form (2) of *f*(*r*) in Reissner–Nordström spacetime into Eqs. (14) and (15) we see that the tidal forces in this spacetime depend on the mass and charge of a black hole. We also see that the radial and angular tidal forces may vanish, in contrast to what happens in the Schwarzschild spacetime (\(q=0\)) [10, 11, 12, 13]. We note that the expressions of the tidal forces, given by Eqs. (14) and (15), are identical to the Newtonian tidal forces with the force \(-f'/2\) in the radial direction. In the remainder of this paper we study Eqs. (14) and (15) for Reissner–Nordström spacetime in detail.

### 4.1 Radial tidal force

^{1}the radial tidal force inverts its direction and becomes compressing just outside the event horizon. The radial tidal force takes a maximum value at \(R^{\text {rtf}}_{\text {max}}\) where

### 4.2 Angular tidal forces

## 5 Solutions of the geodesic deviation equations in Reissner–Nordström spacetimes

*r*. As stated in the Introduction, we are considering a test body consisting of neutral dust particles in-falling radially toward the Reissner–Nordström black hole. It is straightforward to convert Eqs. (14) and (15) to differential equations in

*r*by using \(\mathrm{d}r/\mathrm{d}\tau = - \sqrt{E^2 - f(r)}\), which results immediately from Eq. (6). Thus, we find

*q*until

*r*becomes of the same order as the horizon radius. This is as expected because for large

*r*the spacetime looks similar for all values of

*q*. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that, for IC II (figures on the right), during the infall from \(r=b\) to \(r_{+}\), the radial component always increases. If \(q \ne 0\), while the body falls from the outer horizon (\(r=r_{+}\)) to the inner horizon (\(r_{-}\)), the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector keeps increasing, reaches a maximum, and then starts decreasing until it reaches \(r_{-}\). While the body falls in the region between \(r_{-}\) and \(R^{\text {stop}}\), the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector keeps decreasing, finally shrinking to zero at \(R^{\text {stop}}\). (Recall, however, that, since the inner (Cauchy) horizon is unstable, the region between \(r=r_{-}\) and \(R^{\text {stop}}\) is unphysical.) The radial component of the geodesic deviation vector with the initial condition IC I (shown on the left of Fig. 4) behaves similarly to IC II, except that in the former case it becomes zero at some

*r*satisfying \(R^{\text {stop}} < r < r_{-}\).

^{2}

With the initial conditions IC II, it can be seen from Fig. 5 (figures on the right) that the angular components increase in the beginning but start decreasing around \(r=b/2\), reflecting the compressing nature of the angular tidal force. They then start increasing at some point before the body reaches \(r=R^{\text {stop}}\) if \(q \ne 0\) because of the change in the sign of the angular components of the tidal force. If the initial conditions are IC I, the angular components of the geodesic deviation vector decrease linearly in *r*, as shown in the figures on the left of Fig. 5. This is expected because all geodesics with no angular velocity trace out straight radial lines.

We also can see from these figures that for Schwarzschild spacetime (\(q=0\)) the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector becomes infinite at the singularity \(r=0\) whereas the angular components vanish there, as expected [13, 25].

## 6 Conclusion

In this paper we investigated tidal forces in Reissner–Nordström spacetimes, which depend on the charge-to-mass ratio of the black hole. For certain values of these parameters, the radial tidal force can change from stretching to compressing outside the event horizon. We also noted that the angular tidal forces can only be zero between the two horizons of the charged black hole.

We pointed out that the tidal forces in Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström spacetimes can be quite different close to the black hole. In Schwarzschild spacetime the tidal forces always cause stretching in the radial direction and compression in the angular directions whereas in Reissner–Nordström spacetime they may cause either stretching or compression in any direction, depending on the charge-to-mass ratio of the Reissner–Nordström black hole and the radial coordinate.

We also noted that the geodesic deviation equations about a radially free-falling geodesic can be solved analytically. In particular, we examined the behavior of the geodesic deviation vector for such a geodesic under the influence of tidal forces created by static charged black holes. We noted that the behavior of the geodesic deviation vector is qualitatively the same for both Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström black holes away from the horizon. However, its behavior is considerably different for Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström black holes inside the event horizon, as we showed in Sect. 5. For instance, for a charged black hole, at its closest approach to the singularity, the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector becomes zero for a certain initial condition though its angular components remain finite there (though this point is beyond the Cauchy horizon and, hence, in an unphysical region). In contrast, for the uncharged black hole the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector increases all the way to the singularity whereas the angular components shrink to zero at the singularity.

## Footnotes

- 1.
Since we are dealing with neutral test particles, the results presented here are valid for both negatively and positively charged black holes. That is, although we are restricting the analysis to positively charged black holes, all results presented here depend only on the magnitude of the black hole charge and apply to negatively charged black holes as well.

- 2.
For the radial component of the geodesic deviation vector with the initial condition IC I, we have \(\eta ^{\widehat{1}}(r)|_{r=R^{\text {stop}}}\simeq -10^{-6} \eta ^{\widehat{1}}(b)\) (i.e., it is zero at some value of

*r*satisfying \(R^{\text {stop}} < r < r_{-}\)), while for initial condition IC II, we have \(\eta ^{\widehat{1}}(r)|_{r=R^{\text {stop}}}=0\).

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Erberson R. Pinheiro and João V. N. de Araújo for their contributions in the early stages of this work. The authors acknowledge Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior and Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas do Pará for partial financial support. AH also acknowledges partial support from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics through Visiting Scholar/Consultant Programme. AH thanks the Universidade Federal do Pará in Belém for kind hospitality.

## References

- 1.R. Penrose, R.M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole. Nat. Phys. Sci.
**229**, 177 (1971)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 2.A.A. Starobinskii, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.
**64**, 48 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar - 3.R.A. Matzner, Low frequency limit conversion cross-sections for charged black holes. Phys. Rev. D
**14**, 3274 (1976)Google Scholar - 4.L.C.B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, E.S. Oliveira, Electromagnetic absorption cross section of Reissner–Nordström black holes revisited. Phys. Rev. D
**80**, 104026 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 5.L.C.B. Crispino, S.R. Dolan, A. Higuchi, E.S. de Oliveira, Inferring black hole charge from backscattered electromagnetic radiation. Phys. Rev. D
**90**, 064027 (2014). arXiv:1409.4803 [gr-qc] - 6.E.S. Oliveira, L.C.B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, Equality between gravitational and electromagnetic absorption cross sections of extreme Reissner–Nordström black holes. Phys. Rev. D
**84**, 084048 (2011)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 7.L.C.B. Crispino, S.R. Dolan, A. Higuchi, E.S. de Oliveira, Scattering from charged black holes and supergravity. Phys. Rev. D
**92**, 084056 (2015). arXiv:1507.03993 [gr-qc] - 8.H. Onozawa, T. Okamura, T. Mishima, H. Ishihara, Perturbing supersymmetric black hole. Phys. Rev. D
**55**, 4529 (1997). arXiv:gr-qc/9606086 - 9.S. Chandrasekhar,
*The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes*(Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983)MATHGoogle Scholar - 10.R. D’Inverno,
*Introducing Einstein’s Relativity*(Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992)MATHGoogle Scholar - 11.M.P. Hobson, G. Efstathiou, A.N. Lasenby,
*General Relativity—An Introduction for Physicists*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.B.F. Schutz,
*A First Course in General Relativity*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar - 13.C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler,
*Gravitation*(W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 1973)Google Scholar - 14.J.B. Hartle,
*Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity*(Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2002)Google Scholar - 15.M. Abdel-Megied, R.M. Gad, On the singularities of Reissner–Nordström space-time. Chaos Solitons Fractals
**23**, 313 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar - 16.R. Penrose, in
*Singularities and Time Asymmetry, in General Relativity, an Einstein Centenary Survey*, ed. by S.W. Hawking, W. Israel, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979)Google Scholar - 17.M. Visser, Area products for stationary black hole horizons. Phys. Rev. D
**88**, 044014 (2013). arXiv:1205.6814 [hep-th]CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 18.R.M. Wald,
*General Relativity*(The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.K. Martel, E. Poisson, One-parameter family of time-symmetric initial data for the radial infall of a particle into a Schwarzschild black hole. Phys. Rev. D
**66**, 084001 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 20.K.R. Symon,
*Mechanics*(Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts, 1971)MATHGoogle Scholar - 21.S.M. Mahajan, A. Qadir, P.M. Valanju, Reintroducing the concept of «force» into relativity theory. Il Nuovo Cimento
**65B**, 404–418 (1981)Google Scholar - 22.Ø. Grøn, Non-existence of the Reissner–Nordström repulsion in general relativity. Phys. Lett.
**94A**, 424 (1983)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 23.A. Qadir, Reissner–Nordström repulsion. Phys. Lett.
**99A**, 419 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - 24.M. Simpson, R. Penrose, Internal instability in a Reissner–Nordström black hole. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**7**, 183 (1973)Google Scholar - 25.R.M. Gad, Geodesics and geodesic deviation in static charged black holes. Astrophys. Space Sci.
**330**, 107–114 (2010)CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Funded by SCOAP^{3}