1 Introduction

The gravitational two-body problem has attracted much attention over the years from both physicists and mathematicians. In particular, it is highly important to explore the physics of a central black hole surrounded by an orbiting ring: it is expected that this composed two-body system may be formed as an intermediate stage in the gravitational collapse of a compact spinning star to form a black hole [13]. Likewise, the coalescence of two compact objects may produce a composed black-hole–ring system [13]. In addition to these astrophysical motivations, it is highly interesting to explore the composed black-hole–ring system in order to understand how an exterior matter configuration affects the physical properties of central black holes [15].

The general-relativistic problem of a slowly spinning black hole surrounded by a thin orbiting ring was studied perturbatively by Will [4, 5] (see also [68]). It was shown in [4] that, due to the well-known phenomenon of dragging of inertial frames by the orbiting ring, the angular velocity \(\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}\) Footnote 1 of the central black hole in the composed black-hole–ring system is no longer related to the black-hole angular momentum \(J_{\text {H}}\) by the simple Kerr-like (vacuum) relation

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})={{J_{\text {H}}}\over {2M^2R_{\text {H}}}}. \end{aligned}$$
(1)

[Here M and \(R_{\text {H}}=M+(M^2-J^2_{\text {H}}/M^2)^{1/2}\) are the mass and horizon-radius of the black hole, respectively]. In particular, Will [4] has demonstrated explicitly that, in the composed black-hole–ring system, one can have a central black hole with zero angular momentum but with a non-zero angular velocityFootnote 2

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}}=0,J_{\text {R}},R)={{2J_{\text {R}}}\over {R^3}}, \end{aligned}$$
(2)

where \(J_{\text {R}}\) and R are, respectively, the angular momentum of the orbiting ring and its proper circumferential radius. To the best of our knowledge, no exact (analytical) calculations of the frame-dragging effect have been performed for generic black-hole–ring configurations (that is, for the case of central black holes with non-negligible angular momenta).

2 The continuous (smooth) behavior of the black-hole angular velocity

The main goal of the present paper is to generalize the result (2) of [4] to the regime of composed black-hole–ring configurations in which the central black holes possess non-zero angular momenta. In particular, we shall use a simple continuity argument in order to provide a concrete analytical prediction for the angular-velocity/angular-momentum asymptotic functional relation \(\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}=\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})\) of generic (that is, with \(J_{\text {H}}\ne 0\)) central black holes in the composed black-hole–ring system.

Our approach here is based on a continuity argument for the behavior of the black-hole angular velocity in an adiabatic process in which the orbiting ring is assimilated (adiabatically lowered) into the central black hole. In order to demonstrate the idea, we shall first analyze the analytical relation (2) of [4] for the angular velocity of a zero angular momentum (\(J_{\text {H}}=0\)) central black hole.

Let us first consider a sequence of black-hole–ring configurations with adiabatically varying (decreasing) circumferential radii. Inspection of Eq. (2) reveals that, for a given value of the ring angular momentum \(J_{\text {R}}\), the central black-hole angular velocity increases as the ring approaches the black-hole horizon (that is, as R decreases). In particular, taking the near-horizon limit \(R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}}\) in (2), one findsFootnote 3

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}}=0,J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})\rightarrow {{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}} \end{aligned}$$
(3)

for the angular velocity of the central black hole just before it assimilates the ring.

Let us now calculate the new angular velocity \(\Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}})\) of the resulting Kerr (vacuum) black hole after it absorbed the ring. The adiabatic assimilation of the rotating ring by the central black hole produces the following changes in the black-hole physical parameters:

$$\begin{aligned} M\rightarrow M^{\text {new}}=M+\mathcal{E}_{\text {R}} \quad \text {and}\quad J_{\text {H}}=0\rightarrow J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}=J_{\text {R}}, \end{aligned}$$
(4)

where the energy \(\mathcal{E}_{\text {R}}\) of the rotating ring at the absorption point \(R=R_{\text {H}}\) is given by [9]Footnote 4 \(^{,}\) Footnote 5 \(^{,}\) Footnote 6

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}_{\text {R}}={{J_{\text {H}}}\over {2M^2R_{\text {H}}}}\cdot J_{\text {R}}\rightarrow 0 \quad \text {for } J_{\text {H}}=0 . \end{aligned}$$
(5)

Substituting (4) and (5) into (1), one finds (see footnote 3)

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}=J_{\text {R}})={{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}}\ \end{aligned}$$
(6)

for the angular velocity of the final (vacuum) Kerr black hole.Footnote 7

Comparing the near-horizon asymptotic (\(R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}}\)) expression (3) for the angular velocity of the central black hole in the composed black-hole–ring system just before the assimilation of the ring, with Eq. (6) for the angular velocity of the resulting Kerr (vacuum) black hole after it assimilated the ring, one concludes that the black hole is characterized by a smooth (continuous) evolution of its angular velocity during the adiabatic assimilation process. That is,

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}=J_{\text {R}})=\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}}=0,J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}}) . \end{aligned}$$
(7)

3 The angular-velocity/angular-momentum relation for generic black-hole–ring configurations

In the present section we shall analyze the angular-velocity/angular-momentum asymptotic functional relation \(\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}=\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})\) of generic (that is, with \(J_{\text {H}}\ne 0\)) central black holes in the composed black-hole–ring system. To that end, we shall use the characteristic continuity relationFootnote 8

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}= J_{\text {H}}+J_{\text {R}})=\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}}) \end{aligned}$$
(8)

for the evolution of the black-hole angular velocity during an adiabatic assimilation process of the orbiting ring by the central black hole.

We consider a composed black-hole–ring system which is characterized by the physical parameters \(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}}\), and R. The adiabatic absorption of the ring by the central black hole produces a final Kerr (vacuum) black hole with the following parameters:

$$\begin{aligned} M\rightarrow M^{\text {new}}=M+\mathcal{E}_{\text {R}} \quad \text {and}\quad J_{\text {H}}\rightarrow J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}=J_{\text {H}}+J_{\text {R}}, \end{aligned}$$
(9)

where the energy \(\mathcal{E}_{\text {R}}\) of the ring at the absorption point \(R=R_{\text {H}}\) is given by [9] (see footnote 4–6)

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{E}_{\text {R}}={{J_{\text {H}}}\over {2M^2R_{\text {H}}}}\cdot J_{\text {R}}. \end{aligned}$$
(10)

Substituting (9) and (10) into (1), one finds

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J^{\text {new}}_{\text {H}}= J_{\text {H}}+J_{\text {R}})={{J_{\text {H}}}\over {2M^2R_{\text {H}}}}+ {{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}} \end{aligned}$$
(11)

for the angular velocity of the final (vacuum) Kerr black hole (see footnote 7).

Taking cognizance of Eqs. (1) and (11), and using the continuity argument (8) for the evolution of the black-hole angular velocity during the adiabatic assimilation process of the ring into the central black hole, one finds the characteristic angular-velocity/angular-momentum asymptotic relation

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})=\Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})+{{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}} \end{aligned}$$
(12)

for a central black hole of angular momentum \(J_{\text {H}}\) in the composed black-hole–ring system [here \(\Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})\), as given by (1), is the angular velocity of a (vacuum) Kerr black hole with the same angular momentum].

4 Summary and discussion

The composed black-hole–ring system is one of the most fundamental problems in general relativity and astrophysics [13]. This two-body system is characterized by one of the most intriguing phenomena in general relativity, namely the dragging of inertial frames. In a very interesting work, Will [4, 5] studied this composed system perturbatively in the regime of slowly spinning central black holes. It was shown in [4, 5] that the effect of dragging of inertial frames by the orbiting ring yields a non-trivial angular-velocity/angular-momentum relation for the central black hole. In particular, Will [4, 5] found the non-zero angular velocity (2) for a central black hole of zero angular momentum (\(J_{\text {H}}=0\)) in the composed black-hole–ring system.

To the best of our knowledge, in the physical literature there are no available analytical results for the frame-dragging effect in generic black-hole–ring configurations (that is, for central black holes with non-negligible angular momenta).

The main goal of the present paper was to generalize the result (2) of Will [4, 5] to the regime of composed black-hole–ring configurations in which the central black holes possess non-zero angular momenta.

In particular, we have explored the angular-velocity/angular-momentum asymptotic functional relation \(\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}=\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})\) of generic black-hole–ring configurations. To that end, we have used a continuity argumentFootnote 9 for the evolution of the black-hole angular velocity during a physical process in which the orbiting ring is adiabatically lowered into the central black hole. This continuity argument [see Eqs. (7), (8)] yields the non-trivial (non-Kerr-like) angular-velocity/angular-momentum asymptotic functional relation (12) for generic (that is, with \(J_{\text {H}}\ne 0\)) central black holes in the composed black-hole–ring system.

Remarkably, our result (12) for the angular velocity of the perturbed central black hole implies the simple universal Footnote 10 relation

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}(R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})={{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}} , \end{aligned}$$
(13)

where \(\Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}(R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})\equiv \Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}},J_{\text {R}},R\rightarrow R^{+}_{\text {H}})-\Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})\) is the asymptotic deviation of the black-hole angular velocity \(\Omega ^{\text {BH-ring}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})\) in the composed black-hole–ring system from the corresponding angular velocity \(\Omega ^{\text {Kerr}}_{\text {H}}(J_{\text {H}})\) [see Eq. (1)] of the unperturbed (vacuum) Kerr black hole with the same angular momentum \(J_{\text {H}}\). It is worth emphasizing that the asymptotic relation (13) for \(\Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}\) is universal in the sense that it is independent of the black-hole angular momentum \(J_{\text {H}}\).

Finally, we would like to end this paper we a conjecture. In particular, we would like to suggest a simple (and compact) formula which generalizes the asymptotic near-horizon result (13) to generic values of the ring radius R. To that end, we note that the simplestFootnote 11 functional relation \(\Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}=\Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}(R)\), which reduces to (2) in the zero angular-momentum \(J_{\text {H}}\rightarrow 0\) limit,Footnote 12 and to (13) in the asymptotic near-horizon \(R\rightarrow R_{\text {H}}\) limit, is given byFootnote 13

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta \Omega _{\text {H}}(R)={{J_{\text {R}}}\over {4M^3}}\cdot \Big ({{R_{\text {H}}}\over {R}}\Big )^3. \end{aligned}$$
(14)

It would be highly interesting to test the validity of our conjectured relation (14) with full non-linearFootnote 14 numerical computations for generic (that is, with \(J_{\text {H}}\ne 0\)) black-hole–ring configurations.