Erratum to: Mueller–Navelet jets in next-to-leading order BFKL: theory versus experiment

1 Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:3084 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3084-z

Due to a mere transcription error, the content of Tables 7 and 8 under the columns labeled with (a) does not correspond to data points in the plots of Fig. 3, which give instead the correct results of the calculation.

The corrected Tables 7 and 8 are given below. In passing, we specified that the coefficients $C_0$, $C_1$, $C_2$ and $C_3$ given in Table 7 are measured in nb. Also the coefficients $C_{0}$ and $C_{1}$ given in Table 6 are measured in nb.

Table 7 $C_0$, $C_1$, $C_2$ and $C_3$ in the representation NLA$_1$ with the BLM method, in both variants (a) and (b)

Moreover, we observe that the lower limits in the integrations over $y_1$ and $y_2$ of Eq. (13) were reported as $y_{1,\mathrm{min}}=y_{2,\mathrm{min}}=0$, while the correct values, as used in the numerical analyses, are instead $y_{1,\mathrm{min}}=y_{2,\mathrm{min}}=-4.7$.

Table 8 $C_1/C_0$, $C_2/C_0$, $C_3/C_0$, $C_2/C_1$, $C_3/C_2$ in the representation NLA$_1$ with the BLM method, in both variants (a) and (b)