Skip to main content
Log in

On avalanche-like perturbations of relaxed power-law distributions: Richardson’s law of warfare as a consequence of the relaxation to a Pareto-like distribution of wealth

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In monodimensional systems where a nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation [G.A. Casas et al., Phys. Rev. E 86, 061136 (2012)] describes relaxation to a distribution function which behaves like a power law in the tail, we show that perturbations of the relaxed distribution behave as avalanches in the sense of Self Organized Criticality [J. Nagler et al., Phys. Rev. E 60, 2706 (1999)]. We determine the power laws followed by both size and return time of these avalanches whenever the relaxed distribution is resilient against perturbation of arbitrary amplitude in the tail. We apply our results to a class of problems in econophysics [J.R. Sanchez et al., Europhys. J. 143, 241 (2007)] where the relaxed distribution of wealth is approximately described by Pareto’s principle [A. Di Vita, Europhys. J. 92, 255 (2019)]. If the destruction of wealth associated with an avalanche is identified with a war, then we retrieve Richardson’s model of arms race [L.F. Richardson, Nature 136, 1025 (1935)], prove that the largest avalanches follow Richardson’s scaling law of warfare [L.F. Richardson, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 43, 244 (1948)] and show that the probability of war outbreak per unit time follows a Poisson law [L.F. Richardson, Nature 155, 610 (1945)], in agreement with the findings of [L. Cederman, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97, 135 (2003), A. Clauset, Sci. Adv. 4 (2018), G. Martelloni et al. arXiv:1812.08071 (2018)].

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Dengler, Another derivation of generalized Langevin equations, arXiv:1506.02650 (2015)

  2. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1959)

  3. H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

  4. L. Borland, Phys. Rev E 57, 6634 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G.A. Casas, F.D. Nobre, E.M.F. Curado, Phys. Rev. E 86, 061136 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.S. Wedemann, A.R. Plastino, C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. E 94, 062105 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Tsallis, Milan J. Math. 73, 145 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Bologna, C. Tsallis, P. Grigolini, Phys. Rev. E 62, 2213 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. E.K. Lenzi, L.C. Malacarne, R.S. Mendes, I.T. Pedron, Physica A 319, 245 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.K. Lenzi, E.K. Lenzi, M.F. de Andrade, L.R. Evangelista, L.R. da Silva, inProceedings of the 2nd IFAC Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications, Porto, Portugal, July 19–21, 2006 (2006)

  12. S. Jespersen, R. Metzler, H.C. Fogedby, Phys. Rev. E 59, 2736 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Di Vita, Eur. Phys. J. B 92, 255 (2019)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M.L. Goldstein, S.A. Morris, G.G. Yen, Eur. Phys. J. B 41, 255 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Clauset, C.R. Shalizi, M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 51, 661 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Markovic, C. Gros, Phys. Rep. 536, 41 (2014)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Nagler, C. Hauert, H.G. Schuster, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2706 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Rypdal, K. Rypdal, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051127 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. O. Artime, N. Khalil, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 98, 042143 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. G.A. Casas, F.D. Nobre, E.M.F. Curado, Phys. Rev. E 91, 042139 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. J.R. Sánchez, R. Lopez-Ruiz, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 143, 241 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Gonzalez-Estevez, M.G. Cosenza, R. Lopez-Ruiz, J.R. Sanchez, Physica A 387, 4637 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Gonzalez-Estevez, M.G. Cosenza, O. Alvarez-Llamoza, R. Lopez-Ruiz, Physica A 388, 3521 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Chatterjee, B.K. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. B 60, 135 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Physica A 299, 213 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Levy, S. Solomon, Physica A 242, 90 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Grossmann, G. Mayer-Kress, Nature 337, 701 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. W.R. Caspary, Int. Stud. Quart. 11, 63 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L.F. Richardson, Nature 136, 1025 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Rapoport, Conflict Resolut. 1, 249 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L.F. Richardson, Nature 158, 135 (1946)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. G. Orwell,Nineteen Eighty Four (Secker & Warburg, London, 1949)

  33. L. Cederman, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97, 135 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.S. Levy, T.C. Morgan, J. Conflict Resolut. 28, 731 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Cirillo, N.N. Taleb, Physica A 452, 29 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. A. Clauset, Sci. Adv. 4 (2018)

  37. L.F. Richardson, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 43, 523 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. For a comprehensive review, see G. Bouthoul,Traité de polémologie (Sociologie des guerres, Paris, Payot, 1970) (in French)

  39. C. Von Clausewitz,On War 1, III (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1984)

  40. G. Martelloni, F. Di Patti, U. Bardi, Pattern Analysisof World Conflicts over the past 600 years, arXiv:1812.08071 (2018)

  41. M. Harrison, N. Wolf, Econ. History Rev. 65, 1055 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. L.F. Richardson, Nature 155, 610 (1945)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. L.F. Richardson, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 107, 242 (1944)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. J.A. Friedman, J. Conflict Resolut. 59, 1216 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. A. Clauset, M. Young, K.S. Gleditsch, J. Conflict Resolut. 51, 58 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Clauset, On the frequency and severity of interstate wars arXiv:1901.05086v1 [physics.soc-ph] (2019)

  47. C. Tsallis, D.J. Bukman, Phys. Rev. E 54, R219 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Di Vita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Vita, A. On avalanche-like perturbations of relaxed power-law distributions: Richardson’s law of warfare as a consequence of the relaxation to a Pareto-like distribution of wealth. Eur. Phys. J. B 93, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2020-100568-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2020-100568-3

Keywords

Navigation