Abstract
The nuclear time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is a tool of choice for describing various dynamical phenomena in atomic nuclei. In a recent study, we reported an extension of the framework – the multiconfigurational TDDFT (MC-TDDFT) model – that takes into account quantum fluctuations in the collective space by mixing several TDDFT trajectories. In this article, we focus on technical and numerical aspects of the model. We outline the properties of the time-dependent variational principle that is employed to obtain the equation of motion for the mixing function. Furthermore, we discuss evaluation of various ingredients of the equation of motion, including the Hamiltonian kernel, norm kernel, and kernels with explicit time derivatives. We detail the numerical methods for resolving the equation of motion and outline the major assumptions underpinning the model. A technical discussion is supplemented with numerical examples that consider collective quadrupole vibrations in \(^{40}\)Ca, particularly focusing on the issues of convergence, treatment of linearly dependent bases, energy conservation, and prescriptions for the density-dependent part of an interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data generated during this study are contained in the published article.]
Notes
In [48], the model based on (1) was branded TDGCM since it represented a time-dependent extension of the Hill-Wheeler-Griffin’s GCM framework [57, 58]. The same naming convention was adopted in Refs. [50] and [55, 56]. However, over the past decade the term TDGCM became largely associated to adiabatic fission models employing time-independent generating states [38, 39]. Therefore, to avoid any confusion and underline the distinction, we use MC-TDDFT to refer to models such as the present one that mixes states which are not necessarily adiabatic.
Since we are not dealing with a genuine Hamiltonian operator but with a density-dependent effective interaction, the “Hamiltonian kernel” is somewhat of a misnomer. Consequences of this distinction were thoroughly discussed in the literature [69,70,71,72]. The main practical consequence for our calculations is that it is necessary to introduce a prescription for the density-dependent component of an effective interaction, as explained in Sect. 3.2.3.
Several numerical tests can be performed to verify the procedure. To start with, thus obtained \(\dot{{\mathcal {N}}}^{1/2}(t)\) matrix should verify Eq. (59). Moreover, it should reduce to the usual expression when all the eigenvalues are non-zero. As a third test, when plugged into Eq. (27), it should lead to a unitary time evolution. Finally, when two identical TDDFT states are mixed, the evolution of the MC-TDDFT state should reduce to the evolution of the basis state.
References
C. Simenel, B. Avez, D. Lacroix, Quantum many-body dynamics: applications to nuclear reactions (VDM Verlag, Riga, 2010)
D. Lacroix, S. Ayik, P. Chomaz, Nuclear collective vibrations in extended mean-field theory. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 497–563 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.002
C. Simenel, Nuclear quantum many-body dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12152-0
A. Bulgac, Time-dependent density functional theory and the real-time dynamics of Fermi superfluids. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 97–121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170631
T. Nakatsukasa, K. Matsuyanagi, M. Matsuo, K. Yabana, Time-dependent density-functional description of nuclear dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.045004
P. Stevenson, M. Barton, Low-energy heavy-ion reactions and the Skyrme effective interaction. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 142–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.09.002
A. Bulgac, M. Forbes, “Time-dependent density functional theory” (Chapter 4) in “Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei” (Ed. Nicolas Schunck). IOP Publishing Ltd (2019)
M. Casida, M. Huix-Rotllant, Progress in time-dependent density-functional theory. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 63, 287–323 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143803
M.A.L. Marques, N.T. Maitra, F. Nogueira, E.K.U. Gross, A. Rubio (eds.), Fundamentals of time-dependent density functional theory (Springer, Berlin, 2012)
J.-P. Blaizot, G. Ripka, Quantum theory of finite systems, vol. 3 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986)
P. Ring, P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem (Springer, Berlin, 2004)
N.N. Bogolyubov, J. Phys. (URSS) 10, 256 (1946)
H. Born, H.S. Green, A general kinetic theory of liquids I. The molecular distribution functions. Proc. R. Soc. A 188, 10–18 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1946.0093
J.G. Kirkwood, The statistical mechanical theory of transport processes I. General theory. J. Chem. Phys. 14, 180–201 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724117
M. Bonitz, Quantum kinetic theory (Springer, Berlin, 2016)
F. Lackner, I. Březinová, T. Sato, K.L. Ishikawa, J. Burgdörfer, Propagating two-particle reduced density matrices without wave functions. Phys. Rev. A 91, 023412 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.023412
F. Lackner, I. Březinová, T. Sato, K.L. Ishikawa, J. Burgdörfer, High-harmonic spectra from time-dependent two-particle reduced-density-matrix theory. Phys. Rev. A 95, 033414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.033414
K. Dietrich, J.-J. Niez, J.-F. Berger, Microscopic transport theory of nuclear processes. Nucl. Phys. A 832, 249–288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.11.004
R. Balian, M. Vénéroni, Fluctuations in a time-dependent mean-field approach. Phys. Lett. B 136, 301–306 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)92008-2
R. Balian, M. Vénéroni, Correlations and fluctuations in static and dynamic mean-field approaches. Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 216, 351–430 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(92)90181-K
C. Simenel, Particle-number fluctuations and correlations in transfer reactions obtained using the Balian–Vénéroni variational principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 112502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.112502
P.-G. Reinhard, E. Suraud, Stochastic TDHF and large fluctuations. Nucl. Phys. A 545, 59–69 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(92)90446-Q
P.-G. Reinhard, E. Suraud, Stochastic TDHF and the Boltzman–Langevin equation. Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 216, 98–121 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(52)90043-2
D. Lacroix, Stochastic mean-field dynamics for fermions in the weak-coupling limit. Phys. Rev. C 73, 044311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044311
S. Ayik, A stochastic mean-field approach for nuclear dynamics. Phys. Lett. B 658, 174–179 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.072
D. Lacroix, S. Ayik, Stochastic quantum dynamics beyond mean field. Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 95 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14095-8
O. Juillet, P. Chomaz, Exact stochastic mean-field approach to the fermionic many-body problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 142503 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.142503
D. Lacroix, Exact and approximate many-body dynamics with stochastic one-body density matrix evolution. Phys. Rev. C 71, 064322 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064322
Y. Tanimura, D. Lacroix, S. Ayik, Microscopic phase-space exploration modeling of \(^{258}{\rm Fm} \) spontaneous fission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 152501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.152501
D. Regnier, D. Lacroix, G. Scamps, Y. Hashimoto, Microscopic description of pair transfer between two superfluid Fermi systems: combining phase-space averaging and combinatorial techniques. Phys. Rev. C 97, 034627 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034627
D. Regnier, D. Lacroix, Microscopic description of pair transfer between two superfluid Fermi systems. II. Quantum mixing of time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov trajectories. Phys. Rev. C 99, 064615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064615
M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121–180 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
J.L. Egido, State-of-the-art of beyond mean field theories with nuclear density functionals. Phys. Scr. 91, 073003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/91/7/073003
L.M. Robledo, T.R. Rodríguez, R.R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, Mean field and beyond description of nuclear structure with the Gogny force: a review. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 46, 013001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aadebd
T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, Relativistic nuclear energy density functionals: mean-field and beyond. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 519–548 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.01.055
J.-F. Berger, M. Girod, D. Gogny, Microscopic analysis of collective dynamics in low energy fission. Nucl. Phys. A 428, 23–36 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90240-9
H. Goutte, P. Casoli, J.-F. Berger, Mass and kinetic energy distributions of fission fragments using the time dependent generator coordinate method. Nucl. Phys. A 734, 217–220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.01.038
W. Younes, D.M. Gogny, J.-F. Berger, A Microscopic theory of fission dynamics based on the generator coordinate method (Springer, Cham, 2019)
M. Verriere, D. Regnier, The time-dependent generator coordinate method in nuclear physics. Front. Phys. 8, 233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00233
D. Brink, A. Weiguny, The generator coordinate theory of collective motion. Nucl. Phys. A 120, 59–93 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(68)90059-6
N. Onishi, T. Une, Local gaussian approximation in the generator coordinate method. Prog. Theor. Phys. 53, 504–515 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.53.504
D. Regnier, N. Dubray, N. Schunck, M. Verrière, Fission fragment charge and mass distributions in \(^{239}\rm Pu (n, f)\) in the adiabatic nuclear energy density functional theory. Phys. Rev. C 93, 054611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054611
N. Schunck, L.M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 116301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301
M. Bender, R. Bernard, G. Bertsch, S. Chiba, J. Dobaczewski, N. Dubray, S.A. Giuliani, K. Hagino, D. Lacroix, Z. Li, P. Magierski, J. Maruhn, W. Nazarewicz, J. Pei, S. Péru, N. Pillet, J. Randrup, D. Regnier, P.-G. Reinhard, L.M. Robledo, W. Ryssens, J. Sadhukhan, G. Scamps, N. Schunck, C. Simenel, J. Skalski, I. Stetcu, P. Stevenson, S. Umar, M. Verriere, D. Vretenar, M. Warda, S. Åberg, Future of nuclear fission theory. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 113002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abab4f
J. Zhao, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, Time-dependent generator coordinate method study of fission: dissipation effects. Phys. Rev. C 105, 054604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054604
J. Zhao, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, Time-dependent generator coordinate method study of fission. II. Total kinetic energy distribution. Phys. Rev. C 106, 054609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054609
R. Bernard, H. Goutte, D. Gogny, W. Younes, Microscopic and nonadiabatic Schrödinger equation derived from the generator coordinate method based on zero- and two-quasiparticle states. Phys. Rev. C 84, 044308 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044308
P.-G. Reinhard, R.Y. Cusson, K. Goeke, Time evolution of coherent ground-state correlations and the TDHF approach. Nucl. Phys. A 398, 141–188 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(83)90653-X
P.G. Reinhard, K. Goeke, The generator coordinate method and quantised collective motion in nuclear systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 1 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/50/1/001
N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, Y. Tanimura, Time-dependent generator coordinate method for many-particle tunneling. Phys. Lett. B 808, 135693 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135693
A. Ono, Phase-space consideration on barrier transmission in a time-dependent variational approach with superposed wave packets. Phys. Lett. B 826, 136931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136931
N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, Y. Tanimura, Comment on“Phase-space consideration on barrier transmission in a time-dependent variational approach with superposed wave packets” (2022). arXiv:2202.00513
A. Ono, Reply to Comment on “Phase-space consideration on barrier transmission in a time-dependent variational approach with superposed wave packets” (2022). arXiv:2202.06454
P. Marević, D. Regnier, D. Lacroix, Quantum fluctuations induce collective multiphonons in finite Fermi liquids. Phys. Rev. C 108, 014620 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014620
B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P.W. Zhao, J. Meng, Generalized time-dependent generator coordinate method for small- and large-amplitude collective motion. Phys. Rev. C 108, 014321 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014321
B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, J. Zhao, P. W. Zhao, J. Meng, Generalized time-dependent generator coordinate method for small and large amplitude collective motion (ii): pairing correlations and fission (2023). arXiv:2309.12564
D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena. Phys. Rev. 89, 1102–1145 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1102
J.J. Griffin, J.A. Wheeler, Collective motions in nuclei by the method of generator coordinates. Phys. Rev. 108, 311–327 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.311
J.A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, P. Ring, L.M. Robledo, C. Yannouelas, Symmetry restoration in mean-field approaches. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 123001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac288a
J. Sadhukhan, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, J.A. Sheikh, A. Baran, Pairing-induced speedup of nuclear spontaneous fission. Phys. Rev. C 90, 061304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.061304
J. Zhao, B.-N. Lu, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, S.-G. Zhou, Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field study of spontaneous fission: coupling between shape and pairing degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. C 93, 044315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044315
R. Bernard, S.A. Giuliani, L.M. Robledo, Role of dynamic pairing correlations in fission dynamics. Phys. Rev. C 99, 064301 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064301
H.-D. Meyer, F. Gatti, G. A. Worth, Multidimensional quantum dynamics: MCTDH theory and applications. Wiley (2009)
X. Yuan, S. Endo, Q. Zhao, Y. Li, S.C. Benjamin, Theory of variational quantum simulation. Quantum 3, 191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191
Y. Saad, Iterative methods for sparse linear systems: second edition, SIAM (2003)
P.-O. Löwdin, Quantum theory of many-particle systems. I. Physical interpretations by means of density matrices, natural spin-orbitals, and convergence problems in the method of configurational interaction. Phys. Rev. 97, 1474–1489 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.97.1474
F. Plasser, M. Ruckenbauer, S. Mai, M. Oppel, P. Marquetand, L. González, Efficient and flexible computation of Many–Electron wave function overlaps. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 1207–1219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01148
R. Balian, E. Brezin, Nonunitary Bogoliubov transformations and extension of Wick’s theorem. Il Nuovo Cimento B 64, 37–55 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710281
M. Anguiano, J. Egido, L. Robledo, Particle number projection with effective forces. Nucl. Phys. A 696, 467–493 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01219-2
J. Dobaczewski, M.V. Stoitsov, W. Nazarewicz, P.-G. Reinhard, Particle-number projection and the density functional theory. Phys. Rev. C 76, 054315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.054315
T. Duguet, M. Bender, K. Bennaceur, D. Lacroix, T. Lesinski, Particle-number restoration within the energy density functional formalism: nonviability of terms depending on noninteger powers of the density matrices. Phys. Rev. C 79, 044320 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044320
L.M. Robledo, Remarks on the use of projected densities in the density-dependent part of Skyrme or Gogny functionals. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 37, 064020 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064020
P. Bonche, H. Flocard, P. Heenen, Self-consistent calculation of nuclear rotations: the complete yrast line of \(^{24}\)Mg. Nucl. Phys. A 467, 115–135 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90331-9
T. Duguet, P. Bonche, Density dependence of two-body interactions for beyond-mean-field calculations. Phys. Rev. C 67, 054308 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.054308
R. Bhatia, Matrix analysis (Springer, New York, 1997)
O.C. Zienkiewicz, R.L. Taylor, The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals, 7th edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, 2013)
R. Anderson, J. Andrej, A. Barker, J. Bramwell, J.-S. Camier, J.C.V. Dobrev, Y. Dudouit, A. Fisher, T. Kolev, W. Pazner, M. Stowell, V. Tomov, I. Akkerman, J. Dahm, D. Medina, S. Zampini, MFEM: a modular finite element methods library. Comput. Math. with Appl. 81, 42–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009
K.-H. Kim, T. Otsuka, P. Bonche, Three-dimensional TDHF calculations for reactions of unstable nuclei. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 23, 1267 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/23/10/014
P. Marević, N. Schunck, E. Ney, R. Navarro Pérez, M. Verriere, J. O’Neal, Axially-deformed solution of the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis (IV) HFBTHO (v4.0): A new version of the program. Comput. Phys. Commun. 276, 108367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108367
G. Scamps, D. Lacroix, Systematics of isovector and isoscalar giant quadrupole resonances in normal and superfluid spherical nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 88, 044310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044310
B. Schuetrumpf, P.G. Reinhard, P.D. Stevenson, A.S. Umar, J.A. Maruhn, The TDHF code Sky3D version 1.1. Comput. Phys. Commun. 229, 211–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.012
S. Jin, K.J. Roche, I. Stetcu, I. Abdurrahman, A. Bulgac, The LISE package: solvers for static and time-dependent superfluid local density approximation equations in three dimensions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108130
P. Chomaz, N. Frascaria, Multiple phonon excitation in nuclei: experimental results and theoretical descriptions. Phys. Rep. 252, 275–405 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00079-I
T. Aumann, P.F. Bortignon, H. Emling, Multiphonon giant resonances in nuclei. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 351–399 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.48.1.351
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by CNRS through the AIQI-IN2P3 funding. P. M. would like to express his gratitude to CEA and IJCLab for their warm hospitality during work on this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Takashi Nakatsukasa.
Appendices
Appendix A: Local transition densities
The spin expansion of the non-local transition density [Eq. (42)] for isospin \(\tau \) reads
where \(\rho _{\varvec{q}\varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r},\varvec{r'};t)\) is the non-local one-body transition particle density,
\(s_{\varvec{q}\varvec{q'}, \mu }^{(\tau )} (\varvec{r},\varvec{r'};t)\) is the \(\mu \)-th component of the non-local one-body transition spin density,
and \({\hat{\sigma }}_\mu \) are the Pauli operators. The local variants of the particle density \(\rho _{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\), spin density \(\varvec{s}_{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\), kinetic density \(\tau _{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\), current density \(\varvec{j}_{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\), spin-current pseudotensor density \(J_{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}, \mu \nu }^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\), and spin-orbit current vector density \(\mathrm{{\varvec{J}}}_{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{(\tau )}(\varvec{r};t)\) read
In the following paragraph, the explicit dependence on time and isospin is omitted for compactness.
For Slater generating states, the coordinate space representation of the non-local transition density (for either neutrons or protons) can be written as
where \(\Big [M_{\varvec{q} \varvec{q'}}^{-1}(t)\Big ]_{kl}\) are (generally complex) elements of the inverted matrix of single-particle overlaps [Eq. (37)]. Given the decomposition (33), the local transition particle density reads
with
for \(\alpha = 0, 1, 2, 3\). Similarly, the local transition kinetic density reads
with
with
and \(\mu = x, y, z\). Furthermore, the \(\mu \)-th component of the local transition current density reads
with
The components of the local transition spin density then read
with
Finally, the components of the spin-current pseudotensor density read
with
Appendix B: Coupling constants
The coupling constants appearing in the Skyrme energy density (44) read
Parameters \(t_i\), \(x_i\) (\(i = 0, 1, 2, 3\)), W, and \(\alpha \) are the standard parameters of the Skyrme pseudopotential [7, 73].
Appendix C: Variance of a one-body operator in a normalized MC-TDDFT state
To evaluate the variance of Eq. (65), we need an expectation value of the \({\hat{O}}^2\) operator in a normalized MC-TDDFT state. We start from
Again, the collective kernel of the \({\hat{O}}^2\) operator is calculated from (24) and the corresponding usual kernel follows from the generalized Wick theorem,
Here,
Furthermore, the second trace corresponds to the sum of two terms,
The first term reads
with
and
The second term reads
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Marević, P., Regnier, D. & Lacroix, D. Multiconfigurational time-dependent density functional theory for atomic nuclei: technical and numerical aspects. Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01231-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01231-8