Skip to main content
Log in

\(J/\psi \)-p scattering length from the total and differential photoproduction cross sections

  • Regular Article – Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The \(J/\psi \)-p scattering length, \(\alpha _{J/\psi p}\), can be extracted from the \(J/\psi \) photoproduction cross section near threshold using the Vector Meson Dominance (VMD) model to relate the reaction \(\gamma p \rightarrow J/\psi p\) to \(J/\psi p \rightarrow J/\psi p\). Such estimates based on experimental data result in values for \(|\alpha _{J/\psi p}|\), which are much lower than most of the theoretical predictions. In this work, we study the relations between the different results, depending on the use of the total or the differential cross sections, and the method of extrapolating the data to threshold in the case of a low-statistics data sample, such as the near threshold \(J/\psi \) photoproduction dataset. We estimate a range for \(|\alpha _{J/\psi p}|\) of 0.003–0.025 fm as extracted from experimental data within the VMD model and discuss possible reasons for such lower values compared to the theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The data points in the figures have been published in Ref. [3]. The results from this work are shown in Table 1.]

References

  1. E. Feinberg, Sov. Phys. Usp. 23, 629 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1980v023n10ABEH005036

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. I.I. Strakovsky, D. Epifanov, L. Pentchev, Phys. Rev. C 101, 042201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.042201

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ali et al., GlueX Collaboration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 072001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.072001

  4. A.I. Titov, T. Nakano, S. Daté, Y. Ohashi, Phys. Rev. C 76, 048202 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.048202

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Brodsky, E. Chudakov, P. Hoyer, J. Laget, Phys. Lett. B 498, 23 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. U. Camerini, J. Learned, R. Prepost, C. Spencer, D. Wiser, W. Ash, R.L. Anderson, D.M. Ritson, D. Sherden, C.K. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 483 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Gryniuk, M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.074001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nefediev, I. Strakovsky, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08620-5

  9. G. Krein, T. Peixoto, Few Body Syst. 61, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-020-01581-1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Sugiura, Y. Ikeda, N. Ishii, JPS Conf. Proc. 26, 031015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.26.031015

  11. U. Skerbis, S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094505

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Yokokawa, S. Sasaki, T. Hatsuda, A. Hayashigaki, Phys. Rev. D 74, 034504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034504

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Sibirtsev, M. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 71, 076005 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.076005

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Hayashigaki, Prog. Theoret. Phys. 101, 923 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.101.923

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S.J. Brodsky, G.A. Miller, Phys. Lett. B 412, 125 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01045-9

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Shevchenko, Phys. Lett. B 392, 457 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01563-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Kaidalov, P. Volkovitsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3155 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.3155

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Boreskov, B. Ioffe, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 331, 331 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.Z. Kopeliovich, I. Schmidt, M. Siddikov, Phys. Rev. C 95, 065203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.065203

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Ryskin and Alexander Titov for useful remarks and continuous interest in the paper and Daniel Carman for valuable comments. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under Award No. DE-SC0016583 and Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lubomir Pentchev.

Additional information

Communicated by Klaus Peters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pentchev, L., Strakovsky, I.I. \(J/\psi \)-p scattering length from the total and differential photoproduction cross sections. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00364-4

Navigation