Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correspondence of multiplicity and energy distributions

  • Letter
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of the number of ways we can distribute energy among a collection of particles in a system is important in many branches of modern science. In particular, in multiparticle production processes the measurements of particle yields and kinematic distributions are essential for characterizing their global properties and to develop an understanding of the mechanism for particle production. We demonstrate that energy distributions are connected with multiplicity distributions by their generating functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The work presented here is theoretical and all the required formulas are given in the article. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.]

Notes

  1. The method of collective marks was originated by van Dantzig [1], and discussed in [2] and [3]. Recently, the collective marks method was used to find the probability generating function for first passage probabilities of Markov chains [4].

  2. For an updated bibliography on this subject, see http://tsallis.cat.cbpf.br/biblio.htm.

  3. Similarly as \(N^{th}\) derivatives of G(z) taken at \(z=0\) define multiplicity distribution P(N), the respective derivatives taken at \(z=1\) define factorial moments \({\mathcal {F}}_{N}\). Derivatives of \(\ln (G(z))\) taken at \(z=0\) and \(z=1\) define combinants \({\mathcal {C}}_{N}\) and cumulant factorial moments \({\mathcal {K}}_{N}\), respectively.

  4. Actually this is the method of generating Poisson distribution in the numerical Monte Carlo codes.

References

  1. D. Van Dantzig, Colloques internationaux du CNRS 13, 29–45 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.T. Runnenburg, On the use of collective marks in queueing theory, in Congestion theory, ed. by W.L. Smith, W.E. Wilkinson (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1965), pp. 399–438

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Kleinrock, Queueing systems, Chapter 7, vol. 1 (Wiley, New York, 1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Zhang, M. Hlynka, P.H. Brill, arXiv:1908.04370v1 [math.PR]

  5. C. Tsallis, J. Statist. Phys. 52, 479 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Tsallis, Eur. Phys. J. A 40, 257 (2009a). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10799-0. [arXiv:0812.4370 [physics.data-an]]

  7. C. Tsallis, Introduction to nonextensive statistical mechanics (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Wilk, Z. Włodarczyk, Acta Phys. Polon. B 46(6), 1103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.46.1103. [arXiv:1501.01936 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  9. C. Michael, L. Vanryckeghem, J. Phys. G 3, L151 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/3/8/002

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Michael, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2, 1 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(79)90002-4

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Arnison et al., UA1 collaboration. Phys. Lett. 118B, 167 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90623-2

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Hagedorn, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 6N10, 1 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02740917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.Y. Wong, G. Wilk, L.J.L. Cirto, C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. D 91(11), 114027 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.114027. [arXiv:1505.02022 [hep-ph]]

  14. G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12161-y. [arXiv:1203.4452 [hep-ph]]

  15. W. Feller, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol. II (Wiley, New York, 1966)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Broniowski, A. Olszewski, Phys. Rev. C 95(6), 064910 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064910. [arXiv:1704.01532 [nucl-th]]

  17. G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk, Phys. A 376, 279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.10.042

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Rybczyński.

Additional information

Communicated by Ulf Meissner.

Appendix A: Boltzmann-Gibbs energy distribution and Poissonian multiplicity distribution

Appendix A: Boltzmann-Gibbs energy distribution and Poissonian multiplicity distribution

Suppose that one has N independently produced particles with energies \(\{E_{1,\ldots ,N}\}\), distributed according to Boltzmann distribution,

$$\begin{aligned} F\left( E\right) =\frac{1}{T}\exp \left( -\frac{E}{T}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

with “temperature” parameter \(T=\langle E\rangle \). The sum of energies, \(U=\sum _{i=1}^{N}E_{i}\) is then distributed according to gamma distribution

$$\begin{aligned} F_{N}\left( U\right)&=\frac{1}{T\left( N-1\right) !}\left( \frac{U}{T}\right) ^{N-1} \exp \left( -\frac{U}{T}\right) \nonumber \\&=F_{N-1}\left( U\right) \frac{U}{N-1} \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

with cumulative distribution equal to:

$$\begin{aligned} F_{N}\left( >U\right) =1-\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{\left( i-1\right) !} \left( \frac{U}{T}\right) ^{i-1}\exp \left( -\frac{U}{T}\right) .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

Looking for such N that \(\sum _{i=0}^{N}E_{i}\le U\le \sum _{i=0}^{N+1}E_{i}\) we find its distribution. which has known Poissonian form

$$\begin{aligned} P\left( N\right)&=F_{N+1}\left(>U\right) -F_{N}\left( >U\right) \nonumber \\&=\frac{\left( U/T\right) ^{N}}{N!}\exp \left( -\frac{U}{T}\right) \nonumber \\&=\frac{\langle N\rangle ^{N}}{N!}\exp \left( -\langle N\rangle \right) \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

with \(\langle N\rangle =U/T\).

For the constrained systems (if the available energy is limited, \(U=\mathrm{const}\)), whenever we have independent variables \(\{E_{1,\ldots ,N}\}\) taken from the exponential distribution (A.1), the corresponding multiplicity N has Poissonian distribution (A.4)Footnote 4. However, if the multiplicity is limited, \(N=\mathrm{const}\), the resulting conditional probability becomes:

$$\begin{aligned} F\left( E|N\right)&=\frac{F_{1}\left( E\right) F_{N-1}\left( U-E\right) }{F_{N} \left( U\right) }\nonumber \\&=\frac{N-1}{U}\left( 1-\frac{E}{U}\right) ^{N-2} \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

the same as given by Eq. (5), and only in the limit \(N\rightarrow \infty \) the energy distribution goes to the Boltzmann distribution (A.1). For fluctuating multiplicity according to Poisson distribution, the energy distribution is given by (A.1).

In the same way, as demonstrated in Ref. [17], Tsallis energy distribution is connected with the NBD of multiplicity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rybczyński, M., Włodarczyk, Z. Correspondence of multiplicity and energy distributions. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00315-5

Navigation