Abstract
We investigate the collision energy dependence of deuteron and antideuteron emission in the RHIC-BES low- to mid-energy range \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 4.6–200 GeV where the formation rate of antinuclei compared to nuclei is strongly suppressed. In the coalescence picture, this can be understood as bulk emission for nuclei in contrast to surface emission for antinuclei. By comparison with experimental data on the coalescence parameter \(B_2\), we are able to extract the respective source geometries. This interpretation is further supported by results from the UrQMD transport model, and establishes the following picture: At low energies, nucleons freeze out over the total fireball volume, while antinucleons are annihilated inside the nucleon-rich fireball and can only freeze out on its surface. Towards higher energies, this annihilation effect becomes less significant because of the enhanced meson production in the reaction. Thus, the nucleon and antinucleon freeze-out distributions become similar with increasing energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.]
References
R. Hagedorn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 276 (1960)
S. Butler, C. Pearson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 69 (1961)
J. Nagle, B. Kumar, D. Kusnezov, H. Sorge, R. Mattiello, Phys. Rev. C 53, 367 (1996)
J. Schaffner-Bielich, A. Gal, Phys. Rev. C 62, 034311 (2000). arXiv:nucl-th/0005060
B. Monreal et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 031901 (1999). arXiv:nucl-th/9904080
L.W. Chen, C. Ko, B.A. Li, Nucl. Phys. A 729, 809 (2003). arXiv:nucl-th/0306032
Y. Oh, C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 76, 054910 (2007). arXiv:0707.3332
L. Zhu, C.M. Ko, X. Yin, Phys. Rev. C 92, 064911 (2015). arXiv:1510.03568
J. Chen, D. Keane, Y.G. Ma, A. Tang, Z. Xu, Phys. Rept. 760, 1 (2018). arXiv:1808.09619
R. Malaney, G. Mathews, Phys. Rept. 229, 145 (1993)
M. Rufa, J. Schaffner, J. Maruhn, H. Stoecker, W. Greiner, P. Reinhard, Phys. Rev. C 42, 2469 (1990)
E. Carlson, A. Coogan, T. Linden, S. Profumo, A. Ibarra, S. Wild, Phys. Rev. D 89, 076005 (2014). arXiv:1401.2461
M. Korsmeier, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103011 (2018). arXiv:1711.08465
P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Dönigus, Nucl. Phys. A 987, 144 (2019). arXiv:1809.04681
M. Beyer, Nucl. Phys. A 560, 895 (1993). arXiv:nucl-th/9302002
S. Aid et al. (H1), Phys. Lett. B 353, 578 (1995). arXiv:hep-ex/9504008
S. Mrowczynski, P. Slon (2019). arXiv:1904.08320
S. Sombun, K. Tomuang, A. Limphirat, P. Hillmann, C. Herold, J. Steinheimer, Y. Yan, M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C 99, 014901 (2019). arXiv:1805.11509
S. Bazak, S. Mrowczynski, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850142 (2018). arXiv:1802.08212
S. Mrowczynski, Acta Phys. Polon. B 48, 707 (2017). arXiv:1607.02267
S. Mrowczynski, Phys. Lett. B 308, 216 (1993)
J. Nagle, B. Kumar, M. Bennett, S. Coe, G. Diebold, J. Pope, A. Jahns, H. Sorge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2417 (1994)
M. Bleicher, C. Spieles, A. Jahns, R. Mattiello, H. Sorge, H. Stoecker, W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B 361, 10 (1995). arXiv:nucl-th/9506009
P.E. Hodgson, Nuclear reactions and nuclear structure, vol. 426 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971)
R. Arsenescu et al., NA52 (NEWMASS). J. Phys. G 25, 225 (1999)
G. Van Buren (E864), Nucl. Phys. A 661, 391 (1999)
T. Armstrong et al. (E864), Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2685 (2000). arXiv:nucl-ex/0005001
J. Adam et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 99, 064905 (2019). arXiv:1903.11778
E.V. Shuryak, New Phases of QCD; the Tricritical Point; and Rhic as a “Nutcracker”, in 15th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics (Springer, 1999), pp. 179–188, hep-ph/9903297
S. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255 (1998). arXiv:nucl-th/9803035
M. Bleicher et al., J. Phys. G 25, 1859 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9909407
G. Graef, J. Steinheimer, F. Li, M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064909 (2014). arXiv:1409.7954
R. Maj, S. Mrowczynski, Phys. Rev. C 80, 034907 (2009). arXiv:0903.0111
V. Gaebel, M. Bonne, T. Reichert, A. Burnic, P. Hillmann, M. Bleicher (2020). arXiv:2006.12951
J. Steinheimer, A. Botvina, M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014911 (2017). arXiv:1605.03439
A. Botvina, J. Steinheimer, M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C 96, 014913 (2017). arXiv:1706.08335
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Mrówczyński for fruitful comments. This work was supported by the Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents Project (DPST)-Royal Thai Government Scholarship, Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD), the Stiftung Polytechnische Gesellschaft Frankfurt am Main, the Helmholtz International Center for FAIR (HIC for FAIR) within the LOEWE program launched by the State of Hesse, and the COST Action CA15213 (THOR). The computational resources were provided by the Center for Scientific Computing (CSC) at the Goethe-Universität Frankfurt. We would also like to express our gratitude to our colleagues in Frankfurt and at SUT for their hospitality, enthusiastic engagement in the discussions and valuable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Laura Tolos.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kittiratpattana, A., Wondrak, M.F., Hamzic, M. et al. Deuteron and antideuteron coalescence in heavy-ion collisions: energy dependence of the formation geometry. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00269-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00269-8