Skip to main content
Log in

Resolving the \({}^{11}\hbox {B}{(p,\alpha _{0})}\) cross-section discrepancies between 0.5 and 3.5 MeV

  • Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the reaction \({}^{11}{\hbox {B}}(p,3\alpha )\) has been widely studied for its relevance in material science, nuclear structure, nuclear astrophysics, and fusion science, significant discrepancies exist in the data. For the channel proceeding via the ground state of \({}^{8}\hbox {Be}\), the available cross-section data shows large discrepancies of both normalization and energy scale. The present paper reports on a measurement of the \({}^{11}{\hbox {B}}(p,\alpha _{0})\) cross-section using an array of large area segmented silicon detectors and low beam current on an enriched thin target with the aim of resolving the discrepancies amongst previous measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited [Author’s comment: Tabulated cross sections given in table 1.]

Notes

  1. Eckert and Ziegler source no. 1652-45. Total uncertainty on the activity 3.1%.

References

  1. M. Kokkoris, A. Kafkarkou, V. Paneta, R. Vlastou, P. Misaelides, A. Lagoyannis, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 268, 3539 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A.M. Boesgaard, C.P. Deliyannis, A. Steinhauer, Astrophys. J. 621, 991 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Lamia, C. Spitaleri, V. Burjan, N. Carlin, S. Cherubini, V. Crucillà, M.G. Munhoz, M.G.D. Santo, M. Gulino, Z. Hons et al., J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 015106 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Moreau, Nucl. Fusion 17, 13 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.H. Sikora, H.R. Weller, J. Fusion Energy 35, 538 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O. Beckman, T. Huus, Č. Zupančič, Phys. Rev. 91, 606 (1953)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Symons, P. Treacy, Nuclear Phys. 46, 93 (1963)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. R.E. Segel, S.S. Hanna, R.G. Allas, Phys. Rev. 139, B818 (1965)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Davidson, H.L. Berg, M.M. Lowry, M.R. Dwarakanath, A.J. Sierk, P. Batay-Csorba, Nuclear Phys. Sect. A 315, 253 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Börchers, H. De Jong, J. Krug, E. Kuhlmann, Nucl. Phys. A 405, 141 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H.W. Becker, C. Rolfs, H.P. Trautvetter, Zeitschrift für Phys. A At. Nuclei 327, 341 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Otuka, E. Dupont, V. Semkova, B. Pritychenko, A.I. Blokhin, M. Aikawa, S. Babykina, M. Bossant, G. Chen, S. Dunaeva et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 272 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. F.C. Barker, Nucl. Phys. A 707, 277 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Munch, H.O. Uldall Fynbo, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 138 (2018). arXiv:1805.10924

  15. M. Chiari, L. Giuntini, P. Mandò, N. Taccetti, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 184, 309 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Hoffman, VULOM4b data sheet (2013). http://www.gsi.de/fileadmin/EE/Module/VULOM/vulom4B_3.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2017

  17. H.T. Johansson, M. Heil, B. Löher, H. Simon, H. Törnqvist, TRLO II - friendly FPGA trigger control, GSI Report 2014–1 (Darmstadt, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 2014), p. 354

    Google Scholar 

  18. O.S. Kirsebom, M. Munch, H.O.U. Fynbo, (2019) (in prep)

  19. J. Kelley, J. Purcell, C. Sheu, Nucl. Phys. A 968, 71 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Munch, J.H. Jensen, O.S. Kirsebom, simX (2018). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1320121

  21. J.F. Ziegler, M.D. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268, 1818 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M.C. Spraker, M.W. Ahmed, M. Blackston, N. Brown, R.H. France, S.S. Henshaw, B. Perdue, R.M. Prior, P.N. Seo, S. Stave et al., J. Fusion Energy 31, 357 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Folmer Lyckegaard for manufacturing the target. We also acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council under ERC starting grant LOBENA, No. 307447. OSK acknowledges support from the Villum Foundation through Project No. 10117. MM acknowledges support from the Nustar Collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Munch.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Woods

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munch, M., Kirsebom, O.S., Swartz, J.A. et al. Resolving the \({}^{11}\hbox {B}{(p,\alpha _{0})}\) cross-section discrepancies between 0.5 and 3.5 MeV. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00016-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00016-8

Navigation