# A holographic cut-off inspired in the apparent horizon

## Abstract

In this work we consider a general function for the \(c^{2}\) term that appears in the conventional expression for the holographic dark energy in a FLRW curved spacetime. The cut-off prospective is inspired in the apparent horizon length. By exploring the slowly varying condition for the \(c^{2}\) term, we obtain a range of validity for this holographic proposal. Under these considerations can be found that this holographic cut-off is adequate to describe the late cosmic evolution. Additionally, by considering some values constrained with the use of observational data for some cosmological parameters in the context of dark energy models, such as the deceleration parameter or the parameter state, can be shown that this holographic model remains *close* to the \(\Lambda \)CDM model.

## 1 Introduction

Generally the followed path to give a description for the late cosmic evolution involves going beyond the theory of general relativity, several of the proposed models can describe an accelerated cosmic phase, however the results are not conclusive, a difficult test to pass for many of these cosmological models is to keep a small growth of the matter-density perturbations during the expansion. For an interesting review on the topic of modified theories of gravity, see for instance the Ref. [1].

In the standard framework, the current cosmic acceleration is due to an exotic component of the universe known as dark energy, this idea is not ruled out by cosmic data since a certain tendency can be observed in the value obtained for the parameter state that describes the dark energy, this value oscillates around -1 [2, 3, 4, 5, 6], it is even possible to see that some results place this value below -1. The nature of the dark energy has been discussed in the literature as quintessence matter or phantom one [7, 8, 9], but some of its fundamental properties are still an open subject.

In this paper we will approach the problem of dark energy from a holographic point of view. The concept of holography at cosmological level began to acquire interest since it could be determined that it alleviated the coincidence problem even for non-spatially flat cosmologies [10], under this description the physical quantities inside the universe can be described by quantities defined on the boundary of the universe, specifically, the density associated to the dark energy must be proportional to an infrared cut-off with a particular interest in the cosmological context. See for instance the Refs. [11, 12], where was shown that under a specific election for the horizon length of the holographic dark energy, some important consequences can be obtained at cosmological level, such as crossing of the phantom divide, unification of early time inflationary epoch and late time accelerating universe, among other. Within the holographic description is common to find interacting schemes for the dark energy with other components of the universe [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19], providing a natural framework for thermodynamics description, however, some issues at thermodynamics level for an expanding universe deserve a deeper investigation [20].

In this work we will explore the effects of the curvature parameter on the resulting cosmological quantities for a specific holographic proposal, which is inspired in the length of the apparent horizon, as we will see later, the \(c^{2}\) term appearing in the holographic dark energy is a general function of the redshift and it is written in terms of the curvature parameter. For a flat universe case the \(c^{2}\) term becomes a constant, this resembles the Li holographic model [21].

Besides, by evaluating the \(c^{2}\) term at present time it is possible to establish a range of validity for an arbitrary constant that appears in the holographic cut-off for the dark energy density, as expected, the value of this constant depends on the value of the curvature parameter and an important consequence is that such range of values, is appropriate to describe the late time cosmic evolution in this model, i.e., an expanding universe.

The curvature parameter seems to have a relevant role in the holographic scheme, in Ref. [22] can be found that for a closed universe the interacting term for the dark cosmological sector depends on this value. On the other hand, in Ref. [23] was found that only for a non-flat universe, the interacting description for the dark energy - dark matter components admits a future singularity. As far as we know, a non-flat universe is not ruled out by the observational data [2, 3] and some recent results coming from the study of the Hubble parameter for several dark energy models with spatial curvature contribution showed that the \(\Lambda \)CDM model does not discard this kind of models [24, 25].

Finally, for this holographic model it can be established that it is appropriate to describe a late cosmic evolution and according to observations, the coincidence parameter is of order 1 at present time, later, as the universe evolves to the far future, the coincidence parameter decreases.

This work is organized as follows: In Sect. 2 we describe the dynamics of the model in a FLRW curved spacetime and we provide some generalities of the apparent horizon inspired holographic cut-off used in this approach. In Sect. 3 we study the slow varying condition for the \(c^{2}\) term in this holographic proposal, we establish the stage of the cosmic evolution that this holographic model can describe. In Sect. 4 we study some consequences on the parameter state of the model, we determine some values of the cosmological parameters of the model at present time. In Sect. 5 we write the final remarks of our work.

## 2 Dynamics of the model

*r*is the coincidence parameter defined as \(r := \rho _{2}/\rho _{1}\) and \(\Omega _{k}\) is the curvature parameter given by \(\Omega _{k}(z) = - k (1/a_{0}^{2}H_{0}^{2})(1+z)^{2} = \Omega _{k}(0)(1+z)^{2}\), being \(a_{0}\) the value of the scale factor at present time (\(z=0\)), \(H_{0}\) the Hubble constant (value of the Hubble parameter for \(z=0\)), \(k = \pm 1 , 0\), represents a closed, open and flat universe, respectively and

*z*is the redshift. In this case \(\rho _{1}\) is the density for the dark energy component and as we will see in the next section we will consider a holographic cut-off inspired in the apparent horizon length to describe it and \(\rho _{2}\) the corresponding one for the dark matter component.

### 2.1 Inspired apparent horizon cut-off

*L*is the size of the current universe. From now on, we will consider the energy density for the dark energy as follows

## 3 The \(c^{2}(z)\) function

*H*, i.e., [27]

*z*we have the condition \(c^{2}(z) \gtrsim (2\beta _{1})/3\), therefore \((2\beta _{1})/3 \lesssim c^{2}(z) < 1\). However, since the condition (12) must be preserved along the cosmic evolution, we can write

On the other hand, by considering the Eq. (14) in the Eq. (15), one gets that \(z \lesssim 0\), this is a clear indication that the suggested holographic cut-off for the dark energy density is appropriate to describe the late cosmic evolution.

As can be observed in Fig. 2, the density ratio is of order one at present time, which means that both densities are of the same order of magnitude, this is known as the cosmological coincidence problem and it is an indication that we are in a special period of cosmic evolution, this fact is corroborated by observational data. However, as the universe evolves the coincidence parameter decreases, as can be seen from Eq. (19), this behavior is independent of the value of the curvature and \(\Omega _{2}(0)\) parameters, this is a clear indication that the dark energy dominance starts *now* and will keep that way, this is also a known feature of the cosmological coincidence problem [28].

## 4 The parameter state \(\omega _{1}(z)\)

*q*(

*z*) the deceleration parameter. If we evaluate at present time the constant \(\beta _{1}\) takes the form

In Ref. [4] a dark energy equation of state was found in the interval \(\omega \left( 0\right) = -\,0.95_{-0.39}^{+0.33}\), from the dark energy survey. If we take into account the Eq. (24) and the aforementioned values for the parameter state, we can find that the deceleration parameter must obey the following condition \(-1.01 \leqslant q(0) \leqslant 0.07\). It is important to point out that the interval obtained for the deceleration parameter includes the \(\Lambda \)CDM model.

In Ref. [29] can be found the interval \(-\,0.8 \leqslant q(0) \leqslant -\,0.2\) for the deceleration parameter when a generalized parametrization of this cosmological quantity is considered together with an updated compilation of the Hubble measurements obtained from the cosmic chronometer, with this interval for *q*(0) and the Eq. (24) one gets \(-1.2 \leqslant \omega _{1}(0) \leqslant -\,0.8\), then this holographic proposal for the dark energy can behave as phantom or quintessence.

## 5 Final remarks

By considering the apparent horizon length for the holographic dark energy, we explore the \(c^{2}\) term given by a general function of the redshift. Since we are taking into account the spatial curvature of the spacetime the resulting \(c^{2}\) term depends on the present time values of the curvature and coincidence parameters. For a flat spacetime at present time the \(c^{2}\) function becomes a constant.

The form obtained for the function \(c^{2}(z)\) in this holographic cut-off seems to be reasonable, by considering a slow time variation for it, or in other words, that its variation is not much faster than the scale factor, we can obtain a range of validity for this holographic proposal. At first glance the slow variation can be guaranteed in the far future and is also fulfilled in the past, therefore this holographic proposal for dark energy could be adequate to describe the cosmic evolution. The behavior of the normalized Hubble parameter in this model differs from the one obtained in the \(\Lambda \)CDM as the universe approaches the far future, in this model its value increases. Additionally, when the coincidence parameter is computed, at present time we can observe that is around one, which is in agreement with observational data.

Once that the slowly variation is considered, the parameter state for the dark energy can be obtained from the dynamics of the model. This parameter state results to be a varying function of the redshift and depends explicitly on the deceleration parameter, which is also a function of the redshift. Given that the parameter state can vary, this holographic model could mimic the \(\Lambda \)CDM model.

As a simple verification we can observe that by considering the constrained value of \(\omega \) for some dark energy models at present time, we obtain that the deceleration parameter can take values below \(-1\), i.e., beyond the cosmological constant cosmic evolution. As the value of the parameter state reaches the phantom zone, the deceleration parameter becomes more negative. This appears to be consistent. A cosmological constant evolution can be emulated in this model. Finally, if we consider the value constrained for the deceleration parameter with the use of recent data, we obtain that the parameter state of this holographic proposal can take values in the phantom or quintessence zone. In this work we are not considering gravitational interaction in the dark sector, we will discuss this elsewhere.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

M. C. acknowledges the hospitality of the Instituto de Física of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile, where part of this work was done. M.C. work is supported by S.N.I. (CONACyT-México) and PRODEP (UV-PTC-851).

## References

- 1.T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, C. Skordis, Phys. Rept.
**513**, 1 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.P.A.R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys.
**571**, A16 (2014)Google Scholar - 3.P.A.R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys.
**594**, A13 (2016)Google Scholar - 4.M.A. Troxel et al. (DES Collaboration), arXiv:1708.01538 [astro-ph.CO]
- 5.A.G. Riess et al., Supernova search team. Astron. J.
**116**, 1009 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.S. Perlmutter et al., Supernova cosmology project. Astrophys. J.
**517**, 565 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.R.R. Caldwell, Phys. Lett. B
**545**, 23 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.B. Feng, X. Wang, X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B
**607**, 35 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.S. Tsujikawa, Dark energy: investigation and modeling. Dark matter and dark energy. Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr.
**370**, 331–402 (2011). (Springer)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.D. Pavon, J. Phys. A
**40**, 6865 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Gen. Rel. Grav.
**38**, 1285 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Eur. Phys. J. C
**77**, 528 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.S. del Campo, J.C. Fabris, R. Herrera, W. Zimdahl, Phys. Rev. D
**83**, 123006 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.J.B. Jiménez, D. Rubiera-Garcia, D. Sáez-Gómez, V. Salzano, Phys. Rev. D
**94**, 123520 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.F. Arévalo, P. Cifuentes, S. Lepe, F. Peña, Astrophys. Space Sci.
**352**, 899 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.A.A. Costa, R.C.G. Landim, B. Wang, E. Abdalla, arXiv:1803.06944 [astro-ph.CO]
- 17.C. Li, Y.-F. Cai, arXiv:1804.04816 [astro-ph.CO]
- 18.E. Aydiner, Sci. Rep.
**8**, 721 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.M. Cruz, S. Lepe, F. Peña, Phys. Rev. D
**92**, 123511 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.M. Cruz, S. Lepe, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D
**98**, 083515 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.M. Li, Phys. Lett. B
**603**, 1 (2004)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.N. Cruz, S. Lepe, F. Peña, J. Saavedra, Phys. Lett. B
**669**, 271 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.M. Cruz, S. Lepe, Class. Quantum Grav.
**35**, 155013 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.O. Farooq, D. Mania, B. Ratra, Astrophys. Space Sci.
**357**, 11 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.O. Farooq, F. Madiyar, S. Crandall, B. Ratra, Astrophys. J.
**835**, 26 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.D. Bak, S.J. Rey, Class. Quantum Grav.
**17**, L83 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.N. Radicella, D. Pavón, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.
**10**, 005 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.H.E.S. Velten, R.F. vom Marttens, W. Zimdahl, Eur. Phys. J. C
**74**, 3160 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.A.A. Mamon, Mod. Phys. Lett. A
**33**, 1850056 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Funded by SCOAP^{3}.