Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic and Natural Factors of Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Russian Forests in the 2010s

  • CLIMATE POLICY IN RUSSIA: DECARBONIZATION WITH NATURE BASED SOLUTIONS
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing the net carbon sequestration of forests is the only way for Russia to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. In this context, along with measures to increase the area and quality of forest stands, ways to reduce carbon emissions from human activities and natural disturbances have become important. Using regression models of panel data, the article analyzes the spatial heterogeneity of carbon emissions in Russian forests in 2009–2021, measured by tools of the Global Forest Watch project, as a function of economic (logging volumes, government spending on forestry, forest protection and forest fire activities) and natural (the scale of forest fires and outbreaks of mass reproduction of insect pests) factors. Logging and forest fires are expected to have the greatest impact on carbon losses from forests, while the costs of government functions in forestry affairs have almost no response in reducing carbon emissions. Thus, in fact, the goal of forest conservation through public investment in relevant activities has not yet been achieved. The resulting set of regression models can be used to predict the dynamics of regional effects of carbon losses by forests with changes in logging volumes and various trajectories of forest fire activity dynamics. Such an analysis will be critical to formulate regional plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, taking into account the maximum use of the potential for increasing the net carbon sequestration of forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions by Sources and Removals by Greenhouse Gas Sinks Not Regulated by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020, Part 1, Moscow, 2022.

  2. If They Don’t Do It, At Least They’ll Warm, Kommersant, November 1, 2022. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5060885. Accessed November 5, 2022.

  3. Forest Monitoring, Land Use & Deforestation Trends. Global Forest Watch. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/map/?modalMeta=tree_cover_losses. Accessed November 12, 2022.

  4. National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions by Sources and Removals by Greenhouse Gas Sinks Not Regulated by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020, Part 1, Moscow, 2022.

  5. Unified Interdepartmental Information and Reference System. https://www.fedstat.ru. Accessed September 30, 2022.

  6. Wickham, H., Henry, L., Pedersen, T.L., Jake Luciani, T., Decorde, M., Lise, V. svglite: An 'SVG' Graphics Device. R package version 2.1.0. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=svglite. Accessed November 30, 2022.

  7. Hlavac, M., stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R package version 5.2.1. 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer. Accessed November 30, 2022.

REFERENCES

  1. Arellano, M. and Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Rev. Econ. Stud., 1991, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartalev, S.A. and Stytsenko, F.V., Satellite assessment of the death of forest stands from fires according to the data on the seasonal distribution of the area covered by fire, Lesovedenie, 2021, no. 2, pp. 115–122. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0024114821020029

  3. Croissant, Y. and Millo, G., Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package, J. Stat. Software, 2008, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Filipchuk, A.N., Moiseev, B.N., and Malysheva, N.V., New aspects of assessing the absorption of greenhouse gases by Russian forests in the context of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, Lesokhoz. Inf., 2017, no. 1, pp. 88–98.

  5. Filipchuk, A., Moiseev, B., Malysheva, N., et al., Russian forests: A new approach to the assessment of carbon stocks and sequestration capacity, Environ. Dev., 2018, vol. 26, pp. 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., et al., High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change, Science, 2013, vol. 342, no. 6160, pp. 850–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, N.L., Gibbs, D.A., Baccini, A., Birdsey, R.A., et al., Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes, Nat. Clim. Change, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kharuk, V.I., Ponomarev, E.I., Ivanova, G.A., et al., Wildfires in the Siberian taiga, Ambio, 2021, vol. 50, pp. 1953–1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01490-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P.E., Kurz, W.A., Phillips, O.L., et al., A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests, Science, 2011, vol. 333, no. 6045, pp. 988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Porfir’ev, B.N., Shirov, A.A., Semikashev, V.V., and Kolpakov, A.Yu., Economic risks in the context of policy development with low greenhouse gas emissions in Russia, Energ. Politika, 2020, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pyzhev, A.I., No one canceled the climate agenda: Why is it important for the Russian economy, EKO, 2022, vol. 577, no. 7, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-7-31-50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pyzhev, A.I., Gordeev, R.V., and Vaganov, E.A., Reliability and integrity of forest sector statistics – a major constraint to effective forest policy in Russia, Sustainability, 2021, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 1–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogelj, J., Geden, O., Cowie, A., and Reisinger, A., Net-zero emissions targets are vague: Three ways to fix, Nature, 2021, vol. 591, no. 7850, pp. 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romanov, A.A., Tamarovskaya, A.N., Gloor, E., et al., Reassessment of carbon emissions from fires and a new estimate of net carbon uptake in Russian forests in 2001–2021, Sci. Total Environ., 2022, vol. 846, p. 157322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Romanovskaya, A.A., Trunov, A.A., Korotkov, V.N., and Karaban’, R.T., The problem of taking into account the absorption capacity of Russian forests in the Paris Agreement, Lesovedenie, 2018, no. 5, pp. 323–334.

  16. Schepaschenko, D., Moltchanova, E., Fedorov, S., et al., Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported, Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimizu, K., Ota, T., and Mizoue, N., Accuracy assessments of local and global forest change data to estimate annual disturbances in temperate forests, Remote Sens., 2020, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 2438. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shvarts, E.A. and Ptichnikov, A.V Low-carbon development strategy and the role of forests in its implementation, Nauchn. Tr. Vol’nogo Ekon. O-va Ross., 2022, vol. 236, pp. 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shvidenko, A. and Shchepashchenko, D., Carbon budget of Russian forests, Sib. Lesn. Zh., 2014, no. 1, pp. 69–92.

  20. Tennekes, M., tmap: Thematic maps in R, J. Stat. Software, 2018, vol. 84, no. 6. pp. 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaganov, E.A., Porfiryev, B.N., Shirov, A.A., et al., Evaluation of the contribution of Russian forests to reducing the risks of climate change, Ekon. Reg., 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.17059/EKON.REG.2021-4-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., et al., Welcome to the Tidyverse, J. Stat. Software, 2019, vol. 4, no. 43, p. 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zamolodchikov, D.G., Grabovskii, V.I., and Kaganov, V.V., Ecosystem services and spatial distribution of protective forests of the Russian Federation, Lesovedenie, 2021, no. 6, pp. 581–592.

  24. Zhang, D., Wang, H., Wang, X., and Lü, Z., Accuracy assessment of the Global Forest Watch Tree Cover 2000 in China, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2020, no. 87, p. 102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.102033

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is grateful to D.G. Zamolodchikov and A.A. Romanovskaya for their attention to the study and their valuable comments in its first stage. Detailed feedback from two anonymous reviewers on the original manuscript helped to significantly improve the article. Excellent working conditions were provided by E.A. Vaganov and E.V. Zander.

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 19-77-30015). The data set used for modeling was compiled with the support of the state task of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation to Siberian Federal University (project no. FSRZ-2021-0011). Map imaging was partially supported by the state task to the Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity RAS (project no. AAAA-A18-118052400130-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Siberian Federal University, 660041, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

    A. I. Pyzhev

  2. Center for Problems of Ecology and Productivity of Forests, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997, Moscow, Russia

    A. I. Pyzhev

  3. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

    A. I. Pyzhev

Authors
  1. A. I. Pyzhev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Pyzhev.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pyzhev, A.I. Economic and Natural Factors of Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Russian Forests in the 2010s. Reg. Res. Russ. 13, 622–630 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523701010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523701010

Keywords:

Search

Navigation