Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological Approaches to the Delimitation of the Boundaries of the Moscow Agglomeration Based on Data from Mobile Network Operators

  • URBAN GEOGRAPHY
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The article highlights the boundaries of the Moscow agglomeration and analyzes its spatial structure using approaches involving the concept of time geography. The study is based on a methodology for determining functional urban areas of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); mobile operators data on the localization of network users are applied. The analysis showed the impossibility of using the OECD methodology without adaptation to Russian conditions. This is because, according to this methodology, the entire territory of a “real city,” including the “bedroom districts” of Moscow and its satellite towns, lies in the core zone. Meanwhile, the suburban zone extends to the territory of almost all of Moscow oblast, in many directions beyond its borders. The proposed adapted variant of the delimitation methodology involves a reduction in the size of the core to the borders of the Moscow Ring Road (MKAD) with a corresponding decrease in the boundaries of the suburban zone. This is consistent with the approaches and ideas prevailing in Russian practice. Using the methodology of the spatiotemporal approach (concept of time geography), a “pulsating agglomeration” model was developed. This model is a way of studying and analyzing the dynamics of socioeconomic functioning of agglomerations, taking into account the different socioeconomic rhythms of the agglomeration. As part of the agglomeration, “static” (constant throughout the year) and “mobile” (seasonal) parts of the suburban area were distinguished. This allowed us to include in the analysis of “pulsation” not only the population of the structural elements of the agglomeration, but also its borders, depending on the seasons of the year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Three hours on the way to work: a study of the Moscow agglomeration. Strelka Institute. 2017. https://api.strelka.com/en/magazine/2017/08/17/moscow-agglomeration. Accessed: April 27, 2019.

  2. A detailed analysis of the evolution of works in the field of time geography is given by A.V. Starikova and A.I. Treivish [15].

  3. Three hours on the way to work: a study of the Moscow agglomeration. Strelka Institute. 2017. https://api.strelka.com/en/magazine/2017/08/17/moscow-agglomeration. Accessed: April 27, 2019.

  4. Functional urban areas by country. 2011. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/functionalurbanareasbycountry.htm. Accessed February 2, 2019.

  5. At the same time, in Moscow oblast there are processes to consolidate municipalities to the level of urban districts. These districts include not only cities and urban-type settlements, but also all former rural settlements of the municipal district. In the near future, this approach will become nonrepresentative and will require a transition to an exclusively kilometer grid.

  6. The authors have no data on commuting in neighboring regions of Moscow oblast.

  7. In addition, the core within such boundaries is in many respects similar to the boundaries of the core of an agglomeration based on data on the density of business life, as determined by the methodology adopted in the United Kingdom, as well as to approaches established in Russian practice [2].

  8. Almost complete compliance of this zone and the territory, which is the core of the agglomeration according to the classical OECD methodology is observed.

  9. It is important to consider that in the first delimitation variant, a significant part of the suburban zone will be located outside the two regions under consideration and may include 1.5–2 mln inhabitants of neighboring regions. https://api.strelka.com/ ru/magazine/2017/08/17/moscow-agglomeration. Accessed April 27, 2019.

REFERENCES

  1. Brade, I., Burdak, I., and Rudol’f, R., The development trends of the peripheral zones of the largest cities in Europe, in Krupnye goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii (Large Cities and Globalization Challenges), Smolensk: Oikumena, 2003, pp. 128–139.

  2. Volchkova, I.V., Osobennosti sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya gorodskikh aglomeratsii v Rossii (Specific Socioeconomic Development of Urban Agglomerations in Russia), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Arkh.-Stroit. Univ., 2013.

  3. Glushkova, V.G., Moscow agglomeration, in Moskva. Entsiklopediya (Moscow: Encyclopedia), Moscow, 1997, pp. 499–500.

  4. Lappo, G.M., Goroda na puti v budushchee (Cities Towards Future), Moscow: Mysl’, 1987.

  5. Makhrova, A.G., Kirillov, P.L., and Bochkarev, A.N., Work commuting of the population in the Moscow agglomeration: estimating commuting flows using mobile operator data, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makhrova, A.G. and Kirillov, P.L., Seasonal pulsation of settlement pattern in the Moscow agglomeration under the influence of dacha and work commuting: approaches to studies and assessment, Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Makhrova, A.G., Nefedova, T.G., and Treivish, A.I., Is Moscow a megapolis? agglomeration? or megalopolis? Demoscope Weekly, 2012, nos. 517−518. http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0517/demoscope517.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2019.

  8. Makhrova, A.G. and Pertsik, E.N., Second-order agglomerations in the Moscow metropolitan area: development, borders, and relationships, in Voprosy geografii. Vyp. 131. Moskovskii stolichnyi region (Problems of Geography, No. 131: Moscow Metropolitan Area), Moscow: Mysl’, 1988, pp. 56–63.

  9. Makhrova, A.G. and Trifonov, A.A., Urbanization in the Moscow region, in Russkii gorod (issledovaniya i materialy) (Russian Town: Studies and Materials), Moscow, 1990, no. 9, pp. 40–74.

  10. Naimark, N.I. and Zaslavsky, I.N., Dynamic typology of urban agglomerations in USSR, in Problemy izucheniya gorodskikh aglomeratsii (The Study of Urban Agglomerations), Moscow, 1988.

  11. Novoselov, A.S., Regional’naya ekonomicheskaya politika sub”ekta Federatsii: printsipy, formy i metody realizatsii (Regional Economic Policy of a Federal Subject: Principles, Types, and Implementation Methods), Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010.

  12. Pertsik, E.N., Large metropolitan areas: development and planning, in Problemy razvitiya aglomeratsii Rossii (Development of Russian Agglomerations), Moscow: Krassand, 2009, pp. 34–46.

  13. Polyan, P.M., Zaslavsky, I.N., and Naimark, N.I., Delimitation of urban agglomerations: comparison and synthesis of advanced methods, in Problemy territorial’noi organizatsii prostranstva i rasseleniya v urbanizirovannykh raionakh (Territorial Organization of a Space and Settlement Pattern in Urbanized Regions), Sverdlovsk, 1988, pp. 26–40.

  14. Popov, R.A. and Puzanov, A.S., Urban agglomeration management in modern Russia, Gorod. Al’m., 2008, no. 4, pp. 147–164.

  15. Starikova, A.V. and Treivish, A.I., Time, place, and mobility: the evolution of time geography, Reg. Issled., 2017, no. 3, pp. 13–22.

  16. Timing Space and Spacing Time, Carlstein, T., Parkes, D., and Thrift, N.J., Eds., London: Edward Arnold, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hägerstrand, T., What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc., 1970, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenntorp, B., Time-geography—at the end of its beginning, GeoJournal, 1999, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pred, A., The choreography of existence: comments on Hagerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness, Econ. Geogr., 1977, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tammaru, T., Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area, Environ. Plann. A, 2005, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1669–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., and Veneri, P., The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area. 2019. https://www. oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/THE%20EU-OECD% 20DEFINITION%20OF%20A%20FUNCTIONAL% 20URBAN%20AREA.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2019.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Department of Information Technologies of the Moscow Government for data provided on the movement of mobile subscribers.

Funding

Sections “Existing approaches to identifying and structuring agglomerations” and “Identification and Structuring of the Moscow Agglomeration” were written by A.G. Makhrova in the Institute of Geography RAS with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 19-17-00174 “Early Developed Regions under Socio-Economic Polarization and Shrinkage of the Active Space in European Russia.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. G. Makhrova or R. A. Babkin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makhrova, A.G., Babkin, R.A. Methodological Approaches to the Delimitation of the Boundaries of the Moscow Agglomeration Based on Data from Mobile Network Operators. Reg. Res. Russ. 10, 373–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520030090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520030090

Keywords:

Navigation