Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corrosion Behaviour of 17-4 PH Stainless Steels Produced by Adding Different Amounts of Alloying Element and Aged at Different Times

  • PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MATERIALS PROTECTION
  • Published:
Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study the corrosion behaviour of 17-4 PH (precipitation hardening) stainless steel alloys, produced by adding Ta different amounts with the method of powder metallurgy, and aged at different times was investigated. Four different amounts tantalum (0.15, 0.30, 0.45 and 0.60% weight) was added to the alloy. The prepared powders were produced green compacts at ∅10 × 6 mm dimensions (800 MPa) after mixing with turbule for 2 hours. Green compacts produced were sintered for 1 h at 1300°C under a vacuum of 10–6 mbar. The sintered samples were aged 1, 4 and 8 hours at 480°C after being in solution at 1050°C. Polarization measurements were performed in a corrosion cell, using three different electrode technique. In the corrosion tests, 0.1 M H2SO4 was used as the electrolyte medium. As a result of the studies, the alloy the hardness and densities were increased with increasing Ta amount. Similarly, the hardness and densities of produced samples were with increasing aging time. The corrosion tests revealed that increasing the amount of Ta added to the alloy increased the alloy’s resistance to corrosion. The alloy’s corrosion resistance decreased as aging time increased. The active corrosion mechanism was seen to be pitting corrosion in all alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mirzadeh, H. and Najafizadeh, A., Mater. Chem. Phys., 2009, vol. 116, no. 1, p. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.02.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirzadeh, H., Najafizadeh, A., and Moazeny, M., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40, no. 12, p. 2950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0029-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kochmanski, P. and Nowacki, J., Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, vol. 202, no. 19, p. 4834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Murayama, M., Hono, K., and Katayama, Y., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1999, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-999-0323-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nalçacıoğlu, E., Ozyurek, D., and Çetinkaya, K., Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2019, vol. 72, no. 12, p. 3081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01774-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozyurek, D., Nalcacioglu, E., and Cetinkaya, K., Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., 2020, vol. 59, no. 7, p. 386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-020-00172-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bühler, H.E., Gerlach, L., Greven, O., and Bleck, W., Corros. Sci., 2003, vol. 45, no. 10, p. 2325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00062-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, M., Li, F., Xie, H., and Wang, Y., Mater. Des., 2012, vol. 34, p. 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gülsoy, H.Ö., Wear, 2007, vol. 262, nos. 3–4, p. 491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.05.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsiao, C.N., Chiou, C.S., and Yang, J.R., Mater. Chem. Phys., 2002, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00460-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Y., German, R.M., Blaine, D., Marx, B., and Schlaefer, C., J. Mater. Sci., 2002, vol. 37, no. 17, p. 3573. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016532418920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kazior, J., Szewczyk-Nykiel, A., Pieczonka, T., Hebda, M., and Nykiel, M., Adv. Mater. Res., 2013, vol. 811, p. 87. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.811.87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao, X., Liu, G., Hu, B., Wang, J., and Ma, W., J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2015, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J., Zou, H., Li, C., Qiu, S.Y., and Shen, B.L., Mater. Charact., 2006, vol. 57, nos. 4–5, p. 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2006.02.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gholipour, A., Shamanian, M., and Ashrafizadeh, F., J. Alloys Compd., 2011, vol. 509, no. 14, p. 4905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, J., Zou, H., Li, C., Peng, Y., Qiu, S., and Shen, B., Nucl. Eng. Des., 2006, vol. 236, no. 24, p. 2531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.03.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Simsek, I. and Ozyurek, D., Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 2019, vol. 94, p. 357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.09.047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Özyürek, D., Şimşek, İ., Dincel, Ö., and Şimşek, D., Nevşehir J. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 8, p. 98. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.633780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Şimşek, D., J. Balıkesir Univ. Inst. Sci. Technol., 2022, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 289. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.997536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin, C., Zhang, W., Nakata, H., Kimura, H., Asami, K., and Inoue, A., Mater. Trans., 2005, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 858. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.46.858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karaminezhaad, M., Sharafi, S., and Dalili, K., J. Mater. Sci., 2006, vol. 41, no. 11, p. 3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-5416-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karabük University, Technology Faculty, Manufacturing Eng., 78100, Karabük, Türkiye

    Salih Çağatay Koçak

  2. National Defence University, Land Forces NCO Voc. Sch., Department of Automotive Technology, 10100, Balıkesir, Türkiye

    Doğan Şimşek

  3. National Defence University, Land Forces NCO Voc. Sch., Department of Mechatronics, 10100, Balıkesir, Türkiye

    İjlal Şimşek

  4. Karabük University, Technology Faculty, Manufacturing Eng., 78100, Karabük, Türkiye

    Dursun Özyürek

Authors
  1. Salih Çağatay Koçak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doğan Şimşek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. İjlal Şimşek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dursun Özyürek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Salih Çağatay Koçak or Dursun Özyürek.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçak, S.Ç., Şimşek, D., Şimşek, İ. et al. Corrosion Behaviour of 17-4 PH Stainless Steels Produced by Adding Different Amounts of Alloying Element and Aged at Different Times. Prot Met Phys Chem Surf 59, 1298–1305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205123701174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205123701174

Keywords:

Search

Navigation