Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the Hamming weight of the difference of two random variables on the probability of its preservation after addition and subtraction

  • Published:
Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study how does the Hamming weight of the difference between two values influence the probability of this difference preservation after modulo addition and subtraction. By the difference between two random variables we mean the operation XOR which is standard for cryptanalysis. We prove that if the most significant bit of the difference is equal to 0 (is equal to 1) then the probability of the difference preservation is equal to 2−h (equal to 2−(h−1)), where h is the Hamming weight of the difference. The theoretical results are confirmed experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. P. Agibalov, “Some Theoretical Aspects of Differential Cryptanalysis of Iterated Block Ciphers with an Additive Round Key,” Prikl. Diskretn.Mat. No. 1, 34–42 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. I. Pestunov, “Differential Cryptanalysis of Block Cipher CAST-256,” Bezopasnost’ Inform. Tekhnol. No. 4, 57–62 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Pestunov, “Differential Cryptanalysis of the Block Cipher MARS,” Prikl. Diskretn. Mat. No. 4, 56–63 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Pestunov, “On the Probability of the Propagation of the One-Bit Difference Through Modulo Addition and Subtraction,” Prikl. Diskretn.Mat. No. 4, 53–60 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Biham, A. Biryukov, and A. Shamir, “Cryptanalysis of Skipjack Reduced to 31 Round Using Impossible Differentials,” in Proceedings of Eurocrypt-99 (Springer, Berlin, 1999), pp. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Bihamand A. Shamir, “Differential Cryptanalysis of DES-Like Cryptosystem,” J. Cryptology, No. 4, 3–72 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Biryukov and E. Kushilevitz, “Improved Cryptanalysis of RC5,” in Proceedings of Eurocrypt-98 (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 85–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kelsey, T. Kohno, and B. Schneier, “Amplified Boomerang Attacks against Reduced-Round MARS and Serpent,” in Proceedings of FSE-00 (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. X. Lai and J. Massey, “Markov Ciphers and Differential Cryptanalysis,” in Proceedings of Eurocrypt-91 (Berlin, Springer, 1991), pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Nyberg and L. Knudsen, “Provable Security against a Differential Attack,” J. Cryptology, No. 8, 27–37 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Vaudenay, “Decorrelation: A Theory for Block Cipher Security,” J. Cryptology, No. 16, 249–286 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Wagner, “The Boomerang Attack,” in Proceedings of FSE-99 (Springer, Berlin, 1999), pp. 156–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Pestunov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.I. Pestunov, 2013, published in Diskretnyi Analiz i Issledovanie Operatsii, 2013, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 58–65.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pestunov, A.I. Impact of the Hamming weight of the difference of two random variables on the probability of its preservation after addition and subtraction. J. Appl. Ind. Math. 8, 92–96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990478914010104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990478914010104

Keywords

Navigation