Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detection of Residual Solvent in Solvent-Extracted Unconventional Oil Ore Gangues

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics Aims and scope

Abstract

The solvent extraction technology is a promising method for recovery of unconventional oil resources because of its high efficiency, low energy consumption, and high compatibility. Solvent selection and solvent loss are the main limitations in terms of industrialization of the technology. To evaluate the solvent, efficient detection of the residual solvent content in the extracted-oil gangue is also a problem. A solvent extraction-gas chromatography (GC) combined method is proposed for fast determination of residual organic solvent in extracted-oil ore gangues (mixed with process water). To improve the precision, a combination of the external standard method and the internal standard method (ES&IS method) was applied. This analytical method shows a relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 2%. The recovery of residual solvent was in the range of 95.4 ~ 102.0 wt% (for a spiked organic solvent content of 0.5 to 25.0 wt%). It is also found that whatever types of solvent (ethanol, tetrahydrofuran, cyclohexane, n-heptane, acetone, ethyl acetate, or toluene) are used, the method detection limit (MDL) can be less than 0.023 mg/mg. The whole procedure of this method, including the pretreatment and instrumental detection, can be finished in-situ in a relatively short time (less than 1.5 hours). On the other hand, due to the simple application of solvent extraction pretreatment and GC detection, this measurement can be a low-cost one. Therefore, it can be applied to solvent selection and solvent recovery method evaluation and propel the industrialization of the solvent extraction technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng, L., Stoyanov, S.R., and Xu, Y., Recent Advances in Nonaqueous Extraction of Bitumen from Mineable Oil Sands: A Review, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2017, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 492–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Energy, A., Alberta’s Reserves 2006 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2007-2016, EUB ST98-2007, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, X., Wang, J., He, L., Sui, H., and Yin, W., Ionic Liquid-Assisted Solvent Extraction for Unconventional Oil Recovery: Computational Simulation and Experimental Tests, Energy Fuels, 2016, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 7074–7081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sui, H., Ma, G., He, L., Zhang, Z., and Li, X., Recovery of Heavy Hydrocarbons from Indonesian Carbonate Asphalt Rocks. Part 1: Solvent Extraction, Particle Sedimentation, and Solvent Recycling, Energy Fuels, 2016, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 9242–9249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Z., Bei, H., Li, H., Li, X., and Gao, X., Understanding the Co-Pyrolysis Behavior of Indonesian Oil Sands and Corn Straw, Energy Fuels, 2017, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 2538–2547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nikakhtari, H., Pal, K., Wolf, S., Choi, P., Liu, Q., and Gray, M.R., Solvent Removal from Cyclohexane-Extracted Oil Sands Gangue, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2016, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 408–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pal, K., Nogueira Branco, L.d.P., Heintz, A., Choi, P., Liu, Q., Seidl, P.R., and Gray, M.R., Performance of Solvent Mixtures for Non-Aqueous Extraction of Alberta Oil Sands, Energy Fuels, 2015, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2261–2267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robbins, G.A., Wang, S., and Stuart, J.D., Using the Static Headspace Method to Determine Henry’s Law Constants, An. Chem., 1993, vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 3113–3118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacGillivray, B., Pawliszyn, J., Fowlie, P., and Sagara, C., Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Versus Purge and Trap for the Determination of Substituted Benzene Compounds in Water, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1994, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., and Wittmann, G., Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Gas Chromatography, TrAC Trends An. Chem., 2002, vol. 21, no. 910, pp. 637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, C.H., Feng, C.T., Lo, Y.S., Lin, T.Y., and Lo, J.G., Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Workplace Air by Multisorbent Adsorption/Thermal Desorption-GC/MS, Chemosphere, 2004, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 71–80.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavalcante, R.M., de Andrade, M.V., Marins, R.V., and Oliveira, L.D., Development of a Headspace-Gas Chromatography (HS-GC-PID-FID) Method for the Determination of VOCs in Environmental Aqueous Matrices:Optimization, Verification and Elimination of Matrix Effect and VOC Distribution on the Fortaleza Coast, Brazil, Microchem. J., 2010, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Saeid, M., Al-Wabel, M., Abdel-Nasser, G., Al-Turki, A., and Al-Ghamdi, A., One-Step Extraction of Multiresidue Pesticides in Soil by Microwave-Assisted Extraction Technique, J. Appl. Sci. (Faisalabad), 2010, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1775–1780.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Brabander, H., Noppe, H., Verheyden, K., Bussche, J.V., Wille, K., Okerman, L., Vanhaecke, L., Reybroeck,W., Ooghe, S., and Croubels, S., Residue Analysis: Future Trends from a Historical Perspective, J. Chromatogr. A, 2009, vol. 1216, no. 46, pp. 7964–7976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. James, K.J. and Stack, M.A., Rapid Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Environmentally HazardousWastewaters Using Solid PhaseMicroextraction, Fresenius J. An. Chem., 1997, vol. 358, no. 78, pp. 833–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng, S.J., Sims, N.F., Tay, E.X., and Webster, R.D., Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Water Using Mixtures of Olive Oil, Lecithin, and Vitamin E as Phase Transfer Agents, J. Water Process Eng., 2017, vol. 18, pp. 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boczkaj, G., Makos, P., and Przyjazny, A., Application of Dynamic Headspace and Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry (DHS-GC-MS) for the Determination of Oxygenated Volatile Organic Compounds in Refinery Effluents, An. Methods-UK, 2016, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 3570–3577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu, H., Li, T., Sun, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Zhong, Z., and Guo, Y., Determination of Benzene Series Compounds and Chlorobenzenes in Water Sample by Static Headspace Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection, J. Sep. Sci., 2015, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1916–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pascale, R., Bianco, G., Calace, S., Masi, S., Mancini, I.M., Mazzone, G., and Caniani, D., Method Development and Optimization for the Determination of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes in Water at Trace Levels by Static Headspace Extraction Coupled to Gas Chromatography-Barrier Ionization Discharge Detection, J. Chromatogr. A, 2018, vol. 1548, pp. 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fredes, A., Sales, C., Barreda, M., Valcarcel, M., Roselló, S., and Beltrán, J., Quantification of Prominent Volatile Compounds Responsible for Muskmelon and Watermelon Aroma by Purge and Trap Extraction Followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Determination, Food Chem., 2016, vol. 190, pp. 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zang, X., Liang, W., Chang, Q., Wu, T., Wang, C., and Wang, Z., Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Pen Inks by a Dynamic Headspace Needle Trap Device Combined with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 2017, vol. 1513, pp. 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kadam, A.A., Karbowiak, T., Voilley, A., and Debeaufort, F., Techniques to Measure Sorption and Migration between Small Molecules and Packaging. A Critical Review, J. Sci. Food. Agr., 2015, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1395–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Z., Yang, M.J., and Pawliszyn, J., Solid-Phase Microextraction. A Solvent-Free Alternative for Sample Preparation, An. Chem., 1994, vol. 66, no. 17, pp. 844A–853A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brokl, M., Bishop, L., Wright, C.G., Liu, C., McAdam, K., and Focant, J.-F., Multivariate Analysis of Mainstream Tobacco Smoke Particulate Phase by Headspace Solid-Phase Micro Extraction Coupled with Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 2014, vol. 1370, pp. 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park, Y.-S., Dutta, S., Ann, M., Raaijmakers, J.M., and Park, K., Promotion of Plant Growth by Pseudomonas Fluorescens Strain SS101 via Novel Volatile Organic Compounds, Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co., 2015, vol. 461, no. 2, pp. 361–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao, Z., Zhou, X., Niu, Y., Yu, D., Zhu, J., and Zhu, G., Optimization and Application of Headspace-Solid-Phase Micro-Extraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of Volatile Compounds in Cherry Wines, J. Chromatogr., 2015, vol. 978, pp. 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, J. and Dabros, T., Process for Solvent Extraction of Bitumen fromOil Sand, Energy Fuel., 2012, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1002–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Knoll, J.E., Estimation of the Limit of Detection in Chromatography, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1985, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 422–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Otero, R., Carrera, G., Dulsat, J.F., Fábregas, J.L., and Claramunt, J., Static Headspace Gas Chromatographic Method for Quantitative Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Drug Substances According to European Pharmacopoeia Requirements, J. Chromatogr. A, 2004, vol. 1057, no. 12, pp. 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Municipal Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (grant no. 18JCQNJC06500). This work partially was performed at Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics SB RAS with the financial support of the BSI SAS Program for 2017-2020 (project III.18.2.3, reg. no. AAA-17-117030310025-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    X. Li, Z. Jia, J. Wang, H. Sui & L. He

  2. National Engineering Research Center of Distillation Technology, Tianjin, 300072, China

    X. Li, H. Sui & L. He

  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin, 300072, China

    X. Li, Z. Jia, J. Wang, H. Sui & L. He

  4. Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Akad. Lavrent’eva 1, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

    H. Sui & O. A. Volodin

Authors
  1. X. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Z. Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. O. A. Volodin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. Wang or H. Sui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Jia, Z., Wang, J. et al. Detection of Residual Solvent in Solvent-Extracted Unconventional Oil Ore Gangues. J. Engin. Thermophys. 28, 499–506 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232819040052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1810232819040052

Search

Navigation