Skip to main content
Log in

Isomorphism and choosing the mineral name

  • New Minerals, Nomenclature, and Classification
  • Published:
Geology of Ore Deposits Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two rules of choosing a name of mineral of mixed composition—according to prevalent end member or valence—are considered. Trigonal carbonate, monoclinic pyroxene, and tourmaline are given as examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. Bulakh, V. G. Krivovichev, and A. A. Zolotarev, General Mineralogy, 4th Ed. (Akademiya, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Hatert and E. Burke, “The IMA-CNMNC Dominant-Constituent Rule Revisited Extended,” Can. Mineral. 46(4), 717–728 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. C. Hawthorne and D. J. Henry, “Classification of the Minerals of the Tourmaline Group,” Eur. J. Mineral. 11, 201–215 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Finding-2008 (two photos by M. Leibov),” in World of Minerals. Mineralogical Almanac (2008), Vol. 13, 77–78 [in Russian].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Bulakh.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.G. Bulakh, 2009, published in Zapiski RMO (Proceedings of the Russian Mineralogical Society), 2009, No. 3, pp. 108–111.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bulakh, A.G. Isomorphism and choosing the mineral name. Geol. Ore Deposits 52, 612–613 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070111

Keywords

Navigation