Abstract
Two rules of choosing a name of mineral of mixed composition—according to prevalent end member or valence—are considered. Trigonal carbonate, monoclinic pyroxene, and tourmaline are given as examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. G. Bulakh, V. G. Krivovichev, and A. A. Zolotarev, General Mineralogy, 4th Ed. (Akademiya, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].
F. Hatert and E. Burke, “The IMA-CNMNC Dominant-Constituent Rule Revisited Extended,” Can. Mineral. 46(4), 717–728 (2008).
F. C. Hawthorne and D. J. Henry, “Classification of the Minerals of the Tourmaline Group,” Eur. J. Mineral. 11, 201–215 (1999).
“Finding-2008 (two photos by M. Leibov),” in World of Minerals. Mineralogical Almanac (2008), Vol. 13, 77–78 [in Russian].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.G. Bulakh, 2009, published in Zapiski RMO (Proceedings of the Russian Mineralogical Society), 2009, No. 3, pp. 108–111.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bulakh, A.G. Isomorphism and choosing the mineral name. Geol. Ore Deposits 52, 612–613 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070111
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701510070111