Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Regional Differentiation of the Processes of Decarbonization of the Russian Economy

  • CRITICAL INNOVATION PROJECT OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE ON CLIMATE
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

The article discusses the conceptual foundations and methodological approaches related to regulation of the processes of decarbonization of the Russian economy in light of the implementation of the Strategy of Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2050. A conceptual scheme for a regional dimension of the development of scenarios of decarbonization of the Russian economy, including its key industries—nonenergy sectors, which is especially relevant in the context of significant spatial differentiation both in terms of indicators of socio-economic development and industry structure of individual Russian regions and in terms of location of greenhouse gas-intensive industries. The proposed approach to regionalization of greenhouse gas emissions is based on determination of the regional structure of production and its technological landscape, as well as integral estimates of prospects for decarbonization in individual regions. The results can be used in the development of scenarios of decarbonization of the Russian economy and its individual industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. F. Barca, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach To Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations (European Commission, Brussels, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Giest, “Place-based policy in climate change: Flexible and path-dependent elements,” Int. J. Public Adm. 37, 824–834 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.917100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Moore-Cherry, A. Clavin, T. Krawchenko, and J. Tomaney, Exploring Place-Based Opportunities for Policy and Practice in Transition, Research Paper no. 24, National Economic & Social Development Office NESDO, 2022.

  4. N. Balta-Ozkan, T. Watson, and E. Mocca, “Spatially uneven development and low carbon transitions: insights from urban and regional planning,” Energy Policy 85, 500–510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Hansen and L. Coenen, “The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field,” Environ. Innovation Soc. Transitions 17, 92–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bridge, “The map is not the territory: a sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 36, 11–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Garvey, J. B. Norman, M. Büchs, and J. Barrett, “A ‘spatially just’ transition? A critical review of regional equity in decarbonisation pathways,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 88, 102630 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. McCann and A. Rodríguez-Pose, “Why and when development policy should be place-based,” OECD Regional Outlook 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies (OECD , Paris, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264120983-en/

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Barca, P. McCann, and A. Rodríguez-Pose, “The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches,” J. Reg. Sci. 52, 134–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756x

  10. O. Golubchikov and K. O’Sullivan, “Energy periphery: Uneven development and the precarious geographies of low-carbon transition,” Energy Build. 211, 109818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Avila, “Environmental justice and the expanding geography of wind power conflicts,” Sustainability Sci. 13, 599–616 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0547-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. N. Bufetova, “Polarization of Russia’s spatial development: Whither goest thou?,” Mir Ekon. Upr. 22, 103–129 (2022). https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-1-103-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. M. Shatalova and E. V. Kasatkina, “Socio-economic inequality of regions in the Russian Federation: Measurement issues and long-term evaluation,” Econ. Soc. Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast 15 (4), 74–87 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.5

  14. E. S. Gubanova and V. S. Kleshch “Methodological aspects of the analysis of the level of uneven socio-economic development of regions,” Ekonomicheskie i Sotsial’nye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz 10 (1), 58–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.1.49.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spatial Development of Modern Russia: Trends, Factors, Mechanisms, Institutions, Ed. by E. A. Kolomak (Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Novosibirsk, 2020) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. A. Minakir, “Spatial heterogeneity of Russia and the tasks of regional policy,” Zh. Nov. Ekon. Assots. 10 (10), 150–153 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. M. Svetlov, R. G. Yanbykh, and D. A. Loginova, “On the heterogeneity of the effects of state support for agriculture,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 4, 59–73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-59-73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. N. Porfir’ev, “On the ‘green’ vector of the strategy of socio-economic development of Russia,” Nauchn. Tr. Vol’nogo Ekon. O-va Ross. 227 (1), 128–136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-128-136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. N. Ershov, M. V. Sigova, and I. A. Nikitina, “Reflection of the concept of energy transition in the development strategies of industries and regions of Russia,” Vestn. St. Peterb. Univ., Ekon. 39 (1), 73–101 (2023).https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2023.104

  20. National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions from Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases Not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2021 (Rosgidromet, Moscow, 2023), Pt. 1 [in Russian].

  21. I. P. Glazyrina and I. A. Zabelina, “Spatial Heterogeneity of Russia in the Light of the Concept of a Green Economy: The Social Context,” Geogr. Nat. Resour. 39, 103–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372818020026

  22. D. A. Gainanov, R.F. Gataullin, and R. G. Safiullin, “Typology of regional systems in Russia in connection with the processes of decarbonization of the economy,” Ekon. Reg. 19 (1), 29–44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. S. Tikunov and O. Yu. Chereshnya, “Pollution index and index of environmental tension in the regions of the Russian Federation,” Teor. Prikl. Ekol., No. 3, 34–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25750/1995-4301-2017-3-034-038

Download references

Funding

The study is part of research for the Critical Innovation Project of National Significance “Unified National Monitoring System for Climatically Active Substances” approved by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation no. 3240-r dated October 29, 2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. Gilmundinov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Ovchinnikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilmundinov, V.M., Pankova, Y.V. & Tagaeva, T.O. The Concept of Regional Differentiation of the Processes of Decarbonization of the Russian Economy. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 786–793 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723060059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723060059

Keywords:

Navigation