Skip to main content
Log in

“Structural Transformation” of the Russian Economy and Economic Policy

  • MACROECONOMIC PROBLEMS
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract

The article examines structural shifts in the Russian economy caused by external sanctions restrictions and reactions of the Russian government in the period after February 2022. The specifics of changes in the allocation of resources between sectors of the economy are described in the context of the theory of structural transformation. The features of the current transformation in Russia are revealed, in particular, a general decrease in efficiency and well-being, including due to the intensification of the development of industries focused on the government demand, as well as relative changes in profitability, which determines the volume of investments in fixed assets. It notes the limited capacity of public policy to directly stimulate transformation and justifies measures that, after mitigating the initial shocks, should be aimed at facilitating the market-driven reallocation of productive resources. This requires efforts to manage state-owned companies, infrastructure policy, as well as measures to develop financial markets and the non-banking sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a special volume on structural transformation [3], it is defined as follows (p. 1): the movement of a country’s productive resources (natural resources, land, capital, labor and know-how) from low-productivity to high-productivity economic activities.

  2. Interestingly, a quarter of a century after the well-known late Soviet dichotomy “acceleration – perestroika” in modern Russia the preferential accumulation of capital was developed as one of the target indicators of the “May Decrees” of 2012, which set the task of bringing the level of investment in fixed assets to 25% GDP. But at the same time, another task aimed at creating 25 million modern jobs rather indicated the need for structural change.

  3. This is one of the obvious reasons for the emerging fiscal crisis in the Russian economy.

  4. Government resolutions of August 1 (no. 1365) and December 13 (no. 2290), 2022, give military industrial enterprises the right to increase the intensity of the use of labor force (including involving staff without their consent in overtime work, work on weekends and holidays, limit employee vacations, move labor resources from other regions, etc.).

  5. According to the methodology of the Bank of Russia, the net balance of estimates is calculated for each indicator from the survey as the difference between the shares of responses of the “greater” type (increased, improved, etc.) and responses of the “less” type (decreased, worsened, etc.) in percent to the sum of the answers. Thus, the change in the balance of responses, which is in the range between –1 and 1 (from –100 to 100 basis points), compared to the previous month, displays the direction and intensity of ongoing processes [19].

  6. The latest available Rosstat indicator refers to 2021; however, this figure has been steadily increasing in recent years.

  7. Unfortunately, data on selling prices and costs for various segments within the manufacturing industry are not publicly available.

  8. See the so-called “disorganization” effect and its striking manifestations in Russia [28, 29].

REFERENCES

  1. E. S. Nabiullina, Speech at a joint meeting of relevant committees of the State Duma dedicated to the consideration of the Annual Report of the Bank of Russia for 2021, April 18, 2022. http://cbr.ru/press/event/?id=12824.

  2. Bank of Russia. What are the trends talking about?, Bulletin of the Department of Research and Forecasting, No. 2 (54), April 2022. https://www.cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/40953/bulletin_22-02.pdf.

  3. The Oxford Handbook of Structural Transformation, Ed. by M. Célestin and J. Y. Lin, Oxford Handbooks (Oxford, Academic, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793847.00-1.0001

  4. W. A. Lewis, “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour,” Manchester School 22, 139–191 (1954).

  5. I. L. Lyubimov, “From universalism to individualism: New approaches to solving the problems of economic growth,” Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, 108–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-11-108-126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kuznets, “Growth and structural shifts,” in Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: The Postwar Experience of the Republic of China, Ed. by W. Galenson (London, Cornell University Press, 1979), pp. 15–132.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. V. Buklemishev and Yu. A. Danilov, “Economic leadership and ‘leader’s rent’,” Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, No. 10, 5–17 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report. Breaking In and Moving Up: New Industrial Challenges for the Bottom Billion and the Middle-Income Countries, 2009. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2009-02/IDR_2009_print_0.PDF.

  9. D. Rodrik, “Premature deindustrialization,” J. Econ. Growth 21, 1–33 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Stiglitz, Structural Transformation, Deep Downturns, and Government Policy, NBER Working Paper, No. 23794, 2017.

  11. A. S. Vasilenko, D. N. Chernyad’ev, and S. A. Vlasov, “Structural transformation of the Chinese economy: Success or failure?,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 7, 65–81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-65-81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. A. Mau, “Anti-crisis measures or structural reforms: The economic policy of Russia in 2015,” Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 2, 5–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-2-5-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I. N. Timofeev, “Policy of sanctions against Russia: A new stage,” Zh. Nov. Ekon. Assots. 55 (3), 198–206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Transformation of the Structure of the Economy: Mechanisms and Management, Ed. by A. A. Shirov (MAKS, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. H. Belke, M. Göcke and L. Werner, Hysteresis Effects in Economics—Different Methods for Describing Economic Path-Dependence, Ruhr Economic Paper, No. 468, January 10, 2014. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2423282. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2423282

  16. N. Anwar, J. Oehmke, J. Anderson, S. Mbaye, C. Pray, L. Nagarajan, C. Moss, and L. Post, Measuring Agricultural and Structural Transformation, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2017 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, 2017. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/agsaaea17/25-8549.htm.

  17. V. E. Gimpelson, “Labour market, employment and migration,” in The Contemporary Russian Economy: A Comprehensive Analysis, Ed. by M. Dabrowski (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2023), Ch. 17, pp. 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. A. Gnidchenko, “Trajectories of structural transformation: Experience of successful exporting countries,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 12, 48–65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-48-65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bank of Russia. Monitoring of enterprises, 2023. https://www.cbr.ru/dkp/mp/.

  20. CMASF. On the dynamics of industrial production in December 2022, 2023. http://www.forecast.ru/_ARCHIVE/Analitics/PROM/2022/PR-OTR_2023-02-01.pdf.

  21. ACRA. Sanctions and structural adjustment, June 23, 2022. https://www.acra-ratings.ru/upload/iblock/ff3/a39ry38q401g92o64r70mlp9k3rch0tp/20220623_RRFDK.pdf.

  22. Bank of Russia. The main directions of the unified state monetary policy for 2023 and the planning period of 2024 and 2025, 2022. https://www.cbr.ru/about_br/publ/ondkp/on_2023_-2025/.

  23. A. Nordström and V. Anders, Does central bank equity matter for monetary policy?, Swedish Riksbank Staff Memo, December 2022. https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/staff-memo/engelska/-2022/does-central-bank-equity-matter-for-monetary-policy.pdf.

  24. SIPRI. Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex.

  25. M. V. Ershov, “Russian economy in the context of new sanctions challenges,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 12, 5–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-12-5-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bank of Russia. Review of the monetary policy of the Bank of Russia: Plan of analytical works and measures, January 31, 2023. https://www.cbr.ru/collection/collection/file/43694/odkp_2023.pdf.

  27. Yu. Danilov, O. Buklemishev, and A. Abramov, “On the need for reform of financial markets and the non-banking financial sector,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 9, 28–50 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O. Blanchard and M. Kremer, “Disorganization,” Q. J. Econ. 112, 1091–1126 (1997).

  29. S. Avdasheva, “Structural changes in the Russian economy since 1992,” in The Contemporary Russian Economy: A Comprehensive Analysis, Ed. by M. Dabrowski (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2023), Ch. 8, pp. 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Buklemishev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buklemishev, O.V. “Structural Transformation” of the Russian Economy and Economic Policy. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 456–463 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723040044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723040044

Keywords:

Navigation