Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity of Plants in Thickets of Invasive Sorbaria sorbifolia: Differences in the Effect on Aboveground Vegetation and Seed Bank

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diversity of aboveground vegetation of the herb–dwarf shrub layer and seedlings from the soil seed bank in the thickets of invasive shrub Sorbaria sorbifolia was evaluated in urbanized forests of the city of Yekaterinburg (the Middle Urals, Russia). Geobotanical relevés and identification of seedlings from the soil seed bank were performed in different forest communities: thickets of invasive S. sorbifolia, thickets of native Rubus idaeus, and in forest communities without S. sorbifolia and R. idaeus. The effect observed in the presence of S. sorbifolia was as follows: the abundance of aboveground vegetation in the herb–dwarf shrub layer was lower by a factor of 10–20 or more; the taxonomic richness of the herb–dwarf shrub layer in the relevé (α-diversity), by a factor of 6–8; and the total number of species recorded in the community group (γ-diversity), by a factor of 3. The disappearance of species under S. sorbifolia was selective. Relatively light-loving and relatively dry-loving species disappeared first, while more shade-loving and moisture-loving species were relatively resistant. The taxonomic richness and abundance of seedlings from the soil seed bank did not change depending on the abundance of S. sorbifolia. Approximately half of the identified seedling taxa were typical forest plants, while the others were only specific for the seed bank and did not occur in the vegetative state. It is concluded that the influence of S. sorbifolia on the vegetation of subordinate layers is due primarily to the direct competitive and habitat-transforming effect of the living S. sorbifolia phytomass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Wilcove, D.S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., et al., Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States, BioScience, 1998, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W., Essl, F., et al., Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants, Nature, 2015, vol. 525, pp. 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilà, M., Espinar, J.L., Hejda, M., et al., Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: A meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 2011, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vilà, M., Rohr, R.P., Espinar, J.L., et al., Explaining the variation in impacts of non-native plants on local-scale species richness: The role of phylogenetic relatedness, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2015, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maron, J.L. and Marler, M., Effects of native species diversity and resource additions on invader impact, Am. Nat., 2008, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/588303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hejda, M., Pysek, P., and Jarosik, V., Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities, J. Ecol, 2009, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lanta, V., Hyvönen, T., and Norrdahl, K., Non-native and native shrubs have differing impacts on species diversity and composition of associated plant communities, Plant. Ecol., 2013, vol. 214, no. 12, pp. 1517–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0272-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Veselkin, D.V. and Dubrovin, D.I., Diversity of the grass layer of urbanized communities dominated by invasive Acer negundo,Russ. J. Ecol., 2019, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413619050114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, T.M., Bellard, C., and Ricciardi, A., Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2019, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine, J.M., Vilà, M., D’Antonio, C.M., et al., Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 2003, vol. 270, pp. 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, J., Plant Evolution in the Mediterranean, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Pickett, S.T.A. and McDonnell, M.J., Seed bank dynamics in temperate deciduous forest, in Ecology of Soil Seed Banks, Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T., and Simpson, R.L., Eds., San Diego, CA: Academic, 1989, pp. 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-440405-2.50013-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Fenner, M. and Thompson, K., The Ecology of Seeds, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilà, M. and Gimeno, I., Does invasion by an alien plant species affect the soil seed bank?, J. Veg. Sci., 2007, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02554.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gioria, M., Pyšek, P., and Moravcová, L., Soil seed banks in plant invasions: promoting species invasiveness and long-term impact on plant community dynamics, Preslia, 2012, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gioria, M., Jarošík, V., and Pyšek, P., Impact of invasions by alien plants on soil seed bank communities: Emerging patterns, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 2014, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 132–142. doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gooden, B. and French, K., Impacts of alien grass invasion in coastal seed banks vary amongst native growth forms and dispersal strategies, Biol. Conserv., 2014, vol. 171, pp. 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gioria, M. and Osborne, B.A., Resource competition in plant invasions: Emerging patterns and research needs, Front. Plant Sci., 2014, vol. 5, no. 501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00501

  19. Kulikov, P.V., Zolotareva, N.V., and Podgaevskaya, E.N., Endemichnye rasteniya Urala vo flore Sverdlovskoi oblasti (Endemic Plants of the Urals in the Flora of Sverdlovsk Oblast), Yekaterinburg: Goshchitskii, 2013.

  20. Storozheva, M.M., Flora i rastitel’nost' Uktusskikh gor (Srednii Ural) (The Flora and Vegetation of the Uktus Mountains, Middle Urals), Sverdlovsk: Ural. Nauch. Tsentr Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1987.

  21. Shavnin, S.A., Veselkin, D.V., Vorobeichik, E.L., et al., Factors of pine-stand transformation in the city of Yekaterinburg, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2016, no. 7, pp. 844–852.

  22. Veselkin, D.V. and Kaigorodova, S.Yu., Relationship between agrochemical soil properties in urbanized forests and ectomycorrhiza structure in Scots pine, Agrokhimiya, 2013, no. 11, pp. 63–71.

  23. Zolotareva, N.V., Podgaevskaya, E.N., and Shavnin, S.A., Changes in the structure of ground vegetation layer in pine forests under conditions of a large industrial city, Izv. Orenburg. Gos. Agrarn. Univ., 2012, no. 5 (37), pp. 218–221.

  24. Veselkin, D.V., Korzhinevskaya, A.A., and Podgayevskaya, E.N., The species composition and abundance of alien and invasive understory shrubs and trees in urban forests of Yekaterinburg, Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ.,Ser. Biol., 2018, vol. 42, pp. 102–118.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Veselkin, D.V. and Korzhinevskaya, A.A., Spatial factors of understory adventization in park forests of a large city, Izv. Akad. Nauk., Ser. Geogr., 2018, no. 4, pp. 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618040167

  26. Mazurenko, M.T. and Khokhryakov, A.P., Struktura i morfogenez kustarnikov (The Structure and Morphogenesis of Shrubs), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

  27. Serebryakov, I.G., Life forms of higher plants and their study, in Polevaya geobotanika (Field Geobotany), Moscow: Nauka, 1964, vol. 3, pp. 146–205.

  28. Firsov, G.A. and Tkachenko, K.G., On seed quality in Sorbaria sorbifolia and Sorbaria krilowii (Rosaceae) introduced in northwestern Russia, Byull. Bot. Sada-Inst., 2016, no. 16, pp. 22–28.

  29. Vinogradova, Yu.K., Maiorov, S.R., and Khorun, L.V., Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii: chuzherodnye vidy rastenii v ekosistemakh Srednei Rossii (The Black Book of the Flora of Central Russia: Alien Plant Species in Ecosystems of Central Russia), Moscow: GEOS, 2010.

  30. Panasenko, N.N., Plants-transformers: Traits and identification features, Vestn. Udmurt. Gos. Univ., Ser. 6, 2013, no. 2, pp. 17–22.

  31. Ye, X.H., Yu, F.H., and Dong, M., A trade-off between guerrilla and phalanx growth forms in Leymus secalinus under different nutrient supplies, Ann. Bot., 2006, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Davletshina, G.T. and Ulanova, N.G., Red raspberry, in Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (The Biological Flora of Moscow Oblast), no. 12, Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1996, pp. 89–112.

  33. Kulikov, P.V., Konspekt flory Chelyabinskoi oblasti (A Synopsis of the Flora of Chelyabinsk Oblast), Yekaterinburg: Geotur, 2005.

  34. Tsyganov, D.N., Fitoindikatsiya ekologicheskikh rezhimov v podzone khvoino-shirokolistvennykh lesov (Phytoindication of Ecological Regimes in the Conifer–Broadleaf Forest Subzone), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

  35. The World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP). https://wcvp.science.kew.org/ Cited May 26, 2020.

  36. Gosling, D.C.L., Ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Huron Mountains in Northern Michigan, Great Lakes Entomol., 1986, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moskvichev, A.N., Borodin, O.V., Korepov, M.V., and Korol’kov, M.A., Ptitsy goroda Ul’yanovska: vidovoi sostav, rasprostranenie, limitiruyushchie faktory i mery okhrany (Birds in the City of Ulyanovsk: Species Composition, Distribution, Limiting Factorsm and Protection Measures), Ulyanovsk, 2011.

  38. Veselkin, D.V., Kiseleva, O.A., Ekshibarov, E.D., et al., Abundance and diversity of seedlings of the soil seed bank in the monospecific stands of the invasive species Acer negundo L., Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2018, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111718020133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reinhart, K.O., Gurnee, J., Tirado, R., and Callaway, R.M., Invasion through quantitative effects: Intense shade drives native decline and invasive success, Ecol. Appl., 2006, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1821–1831. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1821:itqeis]2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bravo-Monasterio, P., Pauchard, A., and Fajardo, A., Pinus contorta invasion into treeless steppe reduces species richness and alters species traits of the local community, Biol. Invasions, 2016, vol. 18, pp. 1883–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1131-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dorning, M. and Cipollini, D., Leaf and root extracts of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, inhibit seed germination of three herbs with no autotoxic effects, Plant Ecol., 2006, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kumar, A.S. and Bais, H.P., Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion, in Plant Communication from an Ecological Perspective, Baluška, F. and Ninkovic, V., Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Callaway, R.M., Thelen, G.C., Rodriguez, A., and Holben, W.E., Soil biota and exotic plant invasion, Nature, 2004, vol. 427, pp. 731–733.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stinson, K.A., Campbell, S.A., Powell, J.R., et al., Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms, PLoS Biol., 2006, vol. 4, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140

  45. Rastitel’nye resursy Rossii: Dikorastushchie tsvetkovye rasteniya, ikh komponentnyi sostav i biologicheskaya aktivnost’ (Wild Flowering Plants, Their Component Composition and Biological Activity), vol. 2: Semeistva Actinidiaceae–Malvaceae, Euphorbiaceae–Haloragaceae (Families Actinidiaceae–Malvaceae, Euphorbiaceae–Haloragaceae), Budantsev, A.L., Ed., St. Petersburg: KMK, 2009.

  46. Qu, G.W., Wu, C.J., Gong, S.Z., et al., Leucine-derived cyanoglucosides from the aerial parts of Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Braun, Fitoterapia, 2016, vol. 111, pp. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2016.03.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The field stage of research was performed under the state assignment of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (no. AAAA-A19-119031890084-6), the experiment on seed bank germination was performed under the state assignment of the Botanical Garden–Institute, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, and the data analysis was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-54-00024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Zolotareva.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by D. Zabolotny

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veselkin, D.V., Zolotareva, N.V., Lipikhina, Y.A. et al. Diversity of Plants in Thickets of Invasive Sorbaria sorbifolia: Differences in the Effect on Aboveground Vegetation and Seed Bank. Russ J Ecol 51, 518–527 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620060090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620060090

Keywords:

Navigation