Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Amendment Prevents Oxidation of Subsurface of Sulfidic Soil under Aerobic Conditions

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Managing the surface soil (0−10 mm) is important for microbes and benthic organisms that regulate various ecological services, e.g. regulation of soil or water chemistry, oxygenation, and temperature. In this study, the importance of soil carbon and nitrogen in the subsurface (10–80 mm) of sulfidic soil was investigated following the addition of complex and simple carbon and nitrogen sources. The purpose was to assess the effects of carbon and nitrogen on sulfidic soil chemistry (i.e. redox and pH) so as to establish alternative management strategies to prevent oxidation of the surface soil. Aerobic and anaerobic soil moisture conditions were considered as the most prevalent under any surface environment. The results showed that the presence of both carbon and nitrogen, either under aerobic or anaerobic soil condition, is important to prevent oxidation. Organic matter of plant material origin is complex and contains both carbon and nitrogen; this highly reduces the soil redox and increases the pH, even under the aerobic soil conditions. Simple metabolic substrate like glucose acidified the soil and ammonium had no significant effect on soil pH compared to compounds like urea containing both carbon and nitrogen having the opposite effects. The results of this study have implications for management of the surface soil, which is important for various surface environment chemistry and ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C. R. Ahern, A. E. McElnea, and L. A. Sullivan, Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines (Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, Indooroopilly, 2004), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. M. Aminiyan, A. A. S. Sinegani, and M. Sheklabadi, “Aggregation stability and organic carbon fraction in a soil amended with some plant residues, nanozeolite, and natural zeolite,” Int. J. Recycl. Org. Wastes Agric. 4, 11–22 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Aminiyan, H. Hosseini, and A. Heydariyan, “Microbial communities and their characteristics in a soil amended by nanozeolite and some plant residues: short time in-situ incubation,” Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 7, 9–19 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Baker, M. P. Shand, and R. W. Fitzpatrick, Recovery of Re-Flooded Acid Sulfate Soil Environments around Lakes Alexandrina and Albert, South Australia (CSIRO Land and Water Science, Adelaide, 2013). https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/files/4e25bdec-a4fa-4e3a-9d04-a27300f31320/recovery-reflooded-acid-sulfate-soil-lakes-2011-12-rep.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2020.

  5. D. S. Baldwin and M. Fraser, “Rehabilitation options for inland waterways impacted by sulfidic sediments—a synthesis,” J. Environ. Manage. 91, 311–319 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. C. Balser and M. K. Firestone, “Linking microbial community composition and soil processes in a California annual grassland and mixed-conifer forest,” Biogeochemistry 73, 395–415 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Condron, C. Stark, M. O’Callaghan, P. Clinton, and Z. Huang, “The role of microbial communities in the formation and decomposition of soil organic matter,” in Soil Microbiology and Sustainable Crop Production, Ed. by G. Dixon and E. Tilston (Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. L. Creeper, Shand, W. S. Hicks, and R. W. Fitzpatrick, “Geochemical processes following freshwater reflooding of acidified inland acid sulfate soils: an in situ mesocosm experiment,” Chem. Geol. 411, 200–214 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. D. DeLaune and C. N. Reddy, “Redox potential,” in Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Ed. by D. Hillel (Academic, London, 2005), pp. 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Dent, Acid Sulphate Soils: A Baseline for Research and Development (International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, 1986), p. 24. http:// www2.alterra.wur.nl/Internet/webdocs/ilri-publicaties/ publicaties/Pub39/pub39-h1.0.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2020.

  11. D. L. Dent and L. J. Pons, “A world perspective on acid sulphate soils,” Geoderma 67, 263–276 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. S. Fanning, “Acid sulfate soils,” in Encyclopedia of Environmental Management, Ed. by S. E. Jorgensen (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012), pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Fiedler, M. J. Vepraskas, and J. L. Richardson, “Soil redox potential: importance, field measurements, and observations,” in Advances in Agronomy, Ed. by L. S. Donald (Academic, Salt Lake City, UT, 2007), pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. W. Fitzpatrick, “Demands on soil classification and soil survey strategies: special-purpose soil classification systems for local practical use,” in Developments in Soil Classification, Land Use Planning and Policy Implication, Ed. by S. A. Shahid, F. K. Taha, and M. A. Abdelfattah (Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2013), pp. 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. W. Fitzpatrick, B. Powell, and S. Marvanek, “Atlas of Australian acid sulfate soils,” in Inland Acid Sulfate Soil Systems Across Australia, Ed. by W. R. Fitzpatrick and P. Shand (CRC LEME, Perth, 2008), pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. W. Fitzpatrick, G. Grealish, P. Shand, S. L. Simpson, R. H. Merry, and M. D. Raven, Acid Sulfate Soil Assessment in Finniss River, Currency Creek, Black Swamp, and Goolwa Channel (CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, 2009). http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/science/ 2009/sr26-09.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2020.

  17. R. W. Fitzpatrick, P. Shand, and W. Hicks, Technical Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Inland Freshwater Areas impacted by Acid Sulfate Soils (CSIRO Land and Water Science, Adelaide, 2011), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. B. Krauskopf, Introduction to Geochemistry (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Lal, “Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security,” Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Lin, K. O’Brien, G. Lancaster, L. A. Sullivan, and D. McConchie, “An improved analytical procedure for determination of total actual acidity (TAA) in acid sulfate soils,” Sci. Total Environ. 262, 57–61 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Ljung, F. Maley, A. Cook, and P. Weinstein, “Acid sulphate soils and human health—A millennium ecosystem assessment,” Environ. Int. 25, 1234–1242 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. W. Lucas, B. B. Casper, J. K. Jackson, and T. C. Balser, “Soil microbial communities and extracellular enzyme activity in the New Jersey Pinelands,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2508–2519 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. C. T. Mcdonald, J. Smith, A. F. Keene, M. Tunks, A. Kinsela, and I. White, “Impacts of runoff from sulfuric soils on sediment chemistry in an estuarine lake,” Sci. Total Environ. 329, 115–130 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. S. Michael, “Comparative analysis of the ameliorative effects of soil carbon and nitrogen amendment on surface and subsurface soil pH, Eh and sulfate content of acid sulfate soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 1181–1190 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. S. Michael, “Ecological impacts and management of acid sulphate soil: a review,” Asian J. Water Environ. Pollut. 10, 13–24 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. S. Michael, PhD Thesis (University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 2015).

  27. P. S. Michael, “Effects of live plants and dead plant matter on the stability of pH, redox potential and sulfate content of sulfuric soil neutralized by addition of alkaline sandy loam,” Malays. J. Soil Sci. 22, 1–18 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. S. Michael, “The role of surface soil carbon and nitrogen in regulating surface soil pH and redox potential of sulfidic soil of acid sulfate soils,” Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 41, 1627–1642 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. S. Michael, and J. R. Reid, “The combined effects of complex organic matter and plants on the chemistry of acid sulfate soils under aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions,” J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 18, 542–555 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. S. Michael, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and R. Reid, “The importance of soil carbon and nitrogen in amelioration of acid sulfate soils,” Soil Use Manage. 32, 97–105 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. S. Michael, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and R. Reid, “The role of organic matter in ameliorating acid sulfate soils with sulfuric horizons,” Geoderma 225, 42–49 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P. S. Michael, W. R. Fitzpatrick, and R. Reid, “Effects of live wetland plant macrophytes on acidification, redox potential and sulfate content in acid sulphate soils,” Soil Use Manage. 33, 471–481 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Nannipieri, J. Ascher, M. T. Ceccherini, L. Landi, G. Pietramellara, and G. Renella, “Microbial diversity and functions,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 54, 655–670 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Nordmyr, M. Åström, and P. Peltola, “Metal pollution of estuarine sediments caused by leaching of acid sulphate soils,” Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci. 76, 141–152 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D. K. Nordstrom, “Aqueous pyrite oxidation and consequent formation of secondary iron minerals” in Acid Sulphate Weathering, Ed. by D. M. Kral (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1982). pp. 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Österholm and M. Åström, “Quantification of current and future leaching of sulfur and metals from Boreal acid sulfate soils, western Finland,” Soil Res. 42, 547–551 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. M. Poch, B. P. Thomas, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and R. H. Merry, “Micromorphological evidence for mineral weathering pathways in a coastal acid sulphate soil sequence with Mediterranean-type climate, South Australia,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 47, 403–422 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. F. N. Ponnamperuma, “The chemistry of submerged soil,” Adv. Agron. 24, 29–96 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. L. J. Pons, “Outline of the genesis, characteristics, classifications and improvement of acid sulphate soils,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Acid Sulphate Soils, Ed. by D. Dost (International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, 1973), pp. 3–27.

  40. M. C. Rabenhorst, W. D. Hively, and B. R. James, “Measurements of soil redox potential,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73, 668–674 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. E. E. Schulte and B. G. Hopkins, “Estimation of soil organic matter by weight loss-on-ignition,” in Soil Organic Matter: Analysis and Interpretation, Ed. F. R. Magdoff, M. A. Tabatabai, and E. A. Hanlon (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1996), pp. 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Shamshuddin, S. Muhrizal, I. Fauziah, and M. H. A. Husni, “Effects of adding organic materials to an acid sulfate soil on the growth of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) seedlings,” Sci. Total Environ. 323, 33–45 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Simpson and P. Pedini, “Brackish water aquaculture in the tropics: the problem of acid sulfate soil environment,” Appl. Geochem. 19, 1837–1853 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy (United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Z. P. Wang, R. D. DeLaune, W. H. Patrick, and P. H. Masscheleyn, “Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice roil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 382–385 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the Commonwealth of Australia through an ADS scholarship and conducted under the supervision of Professors Robert J. Reid and Robert W. Fitzpatrick. As the fund for the work was provided to the author as a scholarship, there is no competing financial interest. The author is grateful to anonymous reviewers whose comments led to improvements in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Adelaide, Australia

    Patrick S. Michael

  2. Department of Agriculture, PNG University of Technology, MP 411, LAE, Papua New Guinea

    Patrick S. Michael

Authors
  1. Patrick S. Michael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick S. Michael.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patrick S. Michael Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Amendment Prevents Oxidation of Subsurface of Sulfidic Soil under Aerobic Conditions. Eurasian Soil Sc. 53, 1743–1751 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120078

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120078

Keywords:

Search

Navigation