Skip to main content
Log in

Experience in Approbation of Societal Land Value as a Basis for Ecological and Economic Assessment of Damage from Land Degradation

  • DEGRADATION, REHABILITATION, AND CONSERVATION OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a development of the ideas of ecological and economic assessment of land degradation, the notion of societal land value is suggested as a characteristic that simplifies the consideration of the environmental factor, including, in particular, ecosystem services in the final valuation indicators. An integral part of the societal value of agricultural land is the value of the basic properties of soil associated with agricultural production. To convert soil indicators into monetary values, the cost of an analogous artificial product available on the market and related to the given soil property (e.g., vermicompost as an analogue of soil humus) is taken into account. The assessment of societal land value for Belgorod oblast attests to a high contribution (up to 62%) of soil component to it. It is proposed that the category of societal land value can be used as the basis for calculation of indicators of the ecological and economic damage from land degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The difference in the notions of land and soil in Russian literature is discussed in [24].

  2. In this paper, the terms ecosystem favors (Russian: ekosistemnye uslugi) and ecosystem services are assumed to be equivalent, though a different point of view on the use of these terms is sometimes expressed, e.g., in [38].

  3. Somewhat synonymous notions of the bulk value, ecological or environmental expenses, environmental cost, etc. can be found in literature.

REFERENCES

  1. A. Bagdasaryan, “Degradation for billions: more than 60% of Russian agricultural resources are exhausted,” Agroinvestor, No. 11, (2015).

  2. Belgorod Oblast in Numbers, 2018: Brief Handbook (Belgorodstat, Belgorod, 2018) [in Russian].

  3. A. A. Bykov, “On the methodology of economic evaluation of life of statistically average human: explanatory note,” Probl. Anal. Riska 4 (2), 178–191 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management (UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2017).

  5. G. V. Dobrovol’skii and E. D. Nikitin, Functions of Soils in the Biosphere and Ecosystems: Ecological Value of Soils (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. V. Dobrovol’sky and E. D. Nikitin, Ecology of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Report on Human Development in the Russian Federation in 2016 “The United Nations’ Goals for Sustainable Development and Russia,” Brief Handbook, Ed. by S. N. Bobylev and L. M. Grigor’ev (Analytical Center, Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. I. Karmanov and D. S. Bulgakov, “Calculation of the value of agricultural lands on the soil-ecological basis,” in The Role of Soils in the Biosphere (Moscow, 2003), No. 3, pp. 62–97 [in Russian].

  9. T. G. Kas’yanenko, G. A. Makhovikova, V. E. Esipov, and S. K. Mirzazhanov, Evaluation of Real Estate (Knorus, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Kiryushin, “Consequences of extreme economic liberalism and objectives of agrarian policy,” Innovatsii, No. 1, 4–17 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. R. Commons, Legal Foundations of Capitalism (New York, Macmillan, 1924; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2011).

  12. S. V. Lukin, Agroecological State and Productivity of Soils in Belgorod Oblast (Konstanta, Belgorod, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. S. Malyshev, General Theory of Rent (Tomsk State Univ., Tomsk, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scientific Principles of Agricultural Soil (Land) Degradation Control in Russia and Rehabilitation of Their Fertility in Adaptive Landscape Land Agriculture, Vol. 1: Theory and Practice in Prevention of Agricultural Soil (Land) Degradation (Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

  15. Letter No. 3-15/582 of the Committee of the Russian Federation on Land Resources and Land Management from March 27, 1995 “Methodological Recommendations for Identification of Degraded and Polluted Lands” (RF Ministry of Nature and Mineral Resources, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

  16. Letter No. 3-14-2/1139 of the Committee of the Russian Federation on Land Resources and Land Management from July 29, 1994 “Determination of Losses from Soil and Land Degradation” (Moscow, 1994) [in Russian].

  17. Regulation No. 14-pp of January 26, 2015 “On Approval of the Code of Responsible Land User in Belgorod Oblast” (Belgorod, 2015) [in Russian].

  18. Problems of Degradation of Agricultural Land and Restoration of Its Fertility in Russia, Ed. by A. V. Gordeev and G. A. Romanenko (Rosinformagrotekh, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Order of the Russian Federation Government No. 1225-r from August 31, 2002 “On the Ecological Doctrine of the Russian Federation” (Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

  20. Cost of human life, Rosagrotekh. https://www.rgs.ru/ pr/csr/lifecost/index.wbp. Accessed July 1, 2017.

  21. G. I. Uvarov and V. D. Solovichenko, Degradation and Protection of Soils in Belgorod Oblast (Otchii Krai, Belgorod, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. L. Shishov, D. N. Durmanov, I. I. Karmanov, and V. V. Efremov, Theory and Regulation of Soil Fertility (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. Evolution of Cost Theory, Ed. by Ya. S. Yadgarov (Infra-M, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  24. A. S. Yakovlev, E. N. Molchanov, O. A. Makarov, I. Yu. Savin, P. V. Krasilnikov, S. N. Chukov, and M. V. Evdokimova, “Regulatory and legislative aspects of the ecological evaluation and control of soil degradation in Russia on the basis of the assessment of soil ecological functions,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 991–996 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315090124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. M. Breure, G. B. De Deyn, E. Dominati, et al., “Ecosystem services: a useful concept for soil policy making!” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 4 (5), 578–585 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Cornell, J. Weier, N. Stewart, et al., Economics of Land Degradation Initiative: Report for the Private Sector. Sustainable land management—A Business Opportunity (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Bonn, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. S. De Groot, M. A. Wilson, and R. M. J. Boumans, “A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services,” Ecol. Econ. 41, 393–408 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L. Denier, S. Scherr, S. Shames, P. Chatterton, L. Hovani, and N. Stam, The Little Sustainable Landscapes Book (Global Canopy Program, Oxford, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Dominati, A. Mackay, S. Green, and M. Patterson, “A soil change-based methodology for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services from agro-ecosystems: a case study of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand,” Ecol. Econ. 100, 119–129 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Dominati, M. Patterson, and A. Mackay, “A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils,” Ecol. Econ. 69, 1858–1868 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. Greiner, A. Keller, A. Gret-Regamey, and A. Paprit, “Soil function assessment: review of methods for quantifying the contributions of soils to ecosystem services,” Land Use Policy 69, 224–237 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. D. Keestra, J. Bouma, J. Wallinga, et al., “The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,” Soil 2, 111–128 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005), Vol. 10.

  34. MODIS Land Cover, Global Land Cover Facility. http://www.landcover.org/data/lc/. Accessed July 1, 2017.

  35. R. Perman, Y. Ma, J. McGilvray, and M. Common, Natural Resource and Environmental Economics (Pearson Education, London, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. H. Tietenberg and L. Lewis, Environmental and Natural Resources Economics (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2012), Vol. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  37. United Nations General Assembly: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. https:// undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1. Accessed July 1, 2017.

  38. V. I. Vasenev, A. P. E. van Oudenhoven, O. N. Romzaikina, and R. A. Hajiaghaeva, “The ecological functions and ecosystem services of urban and technogenic soils: from theory to practice (a review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 1119–1132 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-010-00775a.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Tsvetnov.

Additional information

Translated by D. Konyushkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsvetnov, E.V., Marakhova, N.A., Makarov, O.A. et al. Experience in Approbation of Societal Land Value as a Basis for Ecological and Economic Assessment of Damage from Land Degradation. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 1298–1305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319100168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319100168

Keywords:

Navigation